NO. 154: SOME THOUGHTS FOR THE MEMORIAL

No.  154

My dear Brethren: Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

Comes once more the Memorial of our Lord’s death, which may be held this year any time after 6 p.m. April 10. Our method for reaching this date is as follows: The March moon news this year at 1 a.m., March 29 at the 30th Meridian East (the Meridian nearest the City of Jerusalem), thus starting that day at 6 p.m. March 28, the same being also Nisan 1. Counting to Nisan 14, as required in Exodus 12, brings us to 6 p.m. April 10, consequently, any time that evening would be appropriate for the observance – for partaking of the bread and the wine as established by Jesus “on the night in which He was betrayed.” This year, as in all years past, it is quite likely that many of the Lord’s Household will disagree with the date we have herein named; but this is not sufficient cause for disfellowshiping any one. Such dis­senters should still be regarded as brethren so long as they “keep the feast in sin­cerity and in Truth.” We would remark, however, that, as Truth people, we should endeavor to keep the sacrament at the right day and hour insofar as we are able to do so.

It is well to call to mind once more that Christendom in general is influenced not at all by the date of Nisan 14; it has been completely ignored for centuries. The Council of Nice (325AD) arbitrarily determined that the memorial of the cruci­fixion should always recur on a Friday – the first Friday after the first full moon after the Vernal Equinox. While it is true that this year 1968 that method will fix “Good Friday” and Nisan 14 relatively near each other, yet there are some years in which the two dates are almost a full month apart. But considering now the var­ious groups that do have regard for Nisan 14, there is much divergence of opinion among them, some using the Meridian nearest Jerusalem (as we ourselves now do), some using the Meridian at Greenwich, England, some using the Meridian nearest Philadel­phia, Pa., USA, etc. And with those, some determine Nisan 1 as beginning at 6 p.m. the evening before the moon comes new (as we do), with others using the evening be­ginning at 6 p.m. after the moon comes new. It will become readily apparent that there must be at least one day’s difference in the date, even with many of those who attempt to use Nisan 14.

Our own reason for our calculation is this: At the time the Passover was insti­tuted – and at the time the Memorial of the antitype was given on Thursday evening by our Lord – the Greenwich Meridian, and others now used, had not even been heard of at all. Thus, the Jews had no other choice than the Jerusalem time. Also, most of the Bible was written in Palestine, so why look some other place for any of its time settings? The trek of civilization westward is no excuse at all for changing what was standard practice when the Bible was written – and when our Lord was on earth. Or, so we view it anyway – with malice toward none, but with charity for all who have a different method of reckoning.

“WHAT MANNER OF PERSONS OUGHT YE TO BE”

The question properly arises, Who should partake and whom should we welcome in our midst for the solemn service? Our answer would be – All those who profess to keep it “in sincerity and in Truth” – unless their acts openly belie their profes­sions. There are only two reasons for denying any one welcome that night – they are gross immorality or gross doctrinal deflection. But of those properly admit­ted it should not require great elaboration to determine that there will be varying degrees of zeal and good character attainment – based largely upon the number of years and the amount of effort expended in obtaining “the knowledge of our Lord Jesus,” and the wise use made of that knowledge. Thus, St. Paul states, “Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honor, especially those who labor (carry the heavier load of the ministry) in word and doctrine (preaching and teach­ing).” (1 Tim. 5:17) And of the lesser brethren some will have improved their op­portunities more than others; but this does not imply that the younger or the weaker should not have generous reception at the gathering.

It is a sage observation that Virtue is its own reward; and those who do “all things heartily as unto the Lord, and not unto men” have a certain compensation unto themselves alone, which is sufficient in itself – regardless of what others may con­sider. In fact, the entire Gospel Age is replete with examples of brethren with “good and honest hearts” who have been “cast out” by their less faithful brethren, but whose record convinces us that they were not without compensation from the Lord. This has been true of almost all the Star Members, as well as of many of those who were co-laborers with them and partakers with them in like manner of their afflic­tions. This is beautifully stated by Jesus in Mark 10:28-30 (Dia.): “Peter began to say to Him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee. Jesus said, In­deed I say to you, There is no one who has left house, or brothers or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, on My account, and on account of the glad tidings, who will not receive a hundredfold now, in this time.... with per­secutions; and in the Age to come aionian life.” Clearly enough, then, the better characters have a superior reward now in this life to those who have been less zeal­ous in improving their opportunities. A quotation from E-14:70 is thus appropriate:

“This does not mean that the same amount of reward would be given in this life; for the more one sacrifices in the Lord’s spirit, the larger are the blessings of the hundredfold in this life; and the less one sacrifices in the Lord’s spirit, the less is his hundredfold; for the true sacrificers receive the hundred­fold of the sacrifices, which in some are larger, in others are smaller.”

It is well stated that “We whip the horse that pulls the hardest”; and this was outstandingly true of the One whose memory we now discuss. “He hath poured out His soul unto death, and He was numbered with the transgressors” (Isa. 53:12); for “Reproach hath broken my heart.” (Psa. 69:20) And, while “He set us an example that we should follow in His steps,” there was never any suggestion by Him of asceti­cism or purposeless suffering. Always He expended Himself in “the spirit of a sound mind.” But, as one writer has stated: “All creators are hard, but first of all to themselves.” Thus, Jesus never asked His followers to do anything He himself had not already done. “When He putteth forth His own sheep, He goeth before them” (as Teacher and Leader and Example). Not with silver or gold have we been brought to know the love of God, nor have we been able to purchase with filthy lucre “the peace of God which passeth understanding.” Rather, these things come by keeping “the feast in sincerity and in Truth.” And, so long as we see others doing this, we should not write them down because of any minor differences, such as the correct date for keeping the feast. Let us do things as nearly right as we know how, but make liberal allowance for others who seem to be walking in the same path as we ­even though their knowledge on all things may not be as complete and secure as our own. St. Paul’s counsel is most timely here: “A servant of the Lord must not be conten­tious, but be gentle towards all, apt to teach, patient under evil; in meekness correcting the opposers; perhaps God may give them a change of mind in order to a knowledge of the Truth” (2 Tim. 2:25, 26—Dia.), keeping in mind that some one, at some time, followed Paul’s advice toward us; and it has resulted in “that Grace wherein we now stand.”

TIMELY WARNINGS

Every antitype is greater than its type. This is markedly shown in the typical lamb which Israel slew that Passover night as they were preparing to leave Egypt. That lamb was so inferior to “the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world” (“Christ our Passover, which is sacrificed for us”) that no argument whatever is needed to prove the point. However, lest the foregoing counsel to moderation be misunderstood, and carried to such an extreme that evil result, it is well we con­sider some of the events leading up to the typical Passover. In Exodus 5 Moses and Aaron were entreating Pharaoh to “Let us go.... and sacrifice unto the Lord our God; lest He fall upon us with pestilence, or with the sword.” (v. 3) Especially has this been applicable since 1874, when the full truth on the Passover – typical and antitypical – became so very clear. The attendant “sacrifice” was also much stressed since that time, with many not heeding the various warnings, thus succumb­ing to “the pestilence that walketh in darkness.” “They admitted not the love of the Truth in order that they might be saved. And on this account God will send to them an energy of delusion, to their believing the falsehood.” (2 Thes. 2:10,11, Dia.)

Human frailty has ever been prone to point the accusing finger at the man across the road, quoting Scripture that applies directly to the accuser. This was tragically true of the Jews at the first Advent; and their course was typical of nominal spiri­tual Israel here in the end of the Age. And, since “Judgment must begin at the House of God,” the various Harvest siftings (pestilence) took their toll also from among many who claimed to be in “Present Truth.” Many of them have received “an energy of delusion,” in accordance with That Servant’s prediction along that line: “Great delu­sions are just before us, and some of them may come closest upon those possessing the most light of Present Truth” (See Berean Comment 2 Thes. 2:11). And, because of this, it was the sad duty of those not tainted by such “pestilence” to wield the “sword” (con­troversial Truth refuting the errors of the wayward) against some who had walked arm in arm with them in the Harvest reaping work. But to those who remained faithful to their “covenant by sacrifice” the promise was sure, “There shall no plague (no pesti­lential sifting error) come nigh thy dwelling!” Thus, the words of the poet are appropriate here:

Serene, I fold my hands and wait,

Nor care for wind, nor tide, nor sea;

I rave no more ‘gainst time or fate,

For lo! my own shall come to me.

I stay my haste, I make delays

For what avails this eager pace?

I stand amid the eternal ways

And what is mine shall know my face.

What matter if I stand alone?

I wait with joy the coming years;

My heart shall reap where it has sown,

And garner up its fruit of tears.

The stars come nightly to the sky;

The tidal wave unto the sea;

Nor time, nor space, nor deep, nor high,

Can keep my own away from me.

Perhaps some of the above was prompted by St. Paul’s own words in similar strain: “I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the Love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Rom. 8:38, 39)

Nor need our human limitations concern us. The Lord’s judgments are not, like human judgment, based solely, or mainly, on outward appearance, such as great know­ledge and talent, but mainly on heart characteristics. “Man looketh on the out­ward appearance (physical, financial, intellectual attainments), but the Lord looketh on the heart” (true character qualities). On the other hand, the Lord does not despise great knowledge and talent, as many among the “unstable and the unlearned” seem to think – but, if used in harmony with His “good will,” are sancti­fied to the advantage of His cause, and for the good of His people – but in all cases the main emphasis is upon the characteristics of the heart – “a good and honest heart.”

SUNDRY OBSERVATIONS

The instructions to Moses relative to keeping the original Passover in Egypt were very meticulous – as is true of all the ordinances of God. These are detailed in Exodus 12, and are very adequately treated in Parousia Volume 6. We strongly urge our readers to read the chapter on the subject in that book, this present article be­ing intended only as a supplement to that. The command to the Israelites was also very rigid that they “shall keep the Passover a feast to the Lord throughout your gener­ations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance forever.” (Ex. 12:14) And our Lord’s injunction to the Gospel-Age Church is equally compelling respecting observance of the memory of the antitype: “This do in remembrance (as a Memorial) of Me.”

All of this was further emphasized in Numbers 9, one year after the original Passover in Egypt - “Let the children of Israel also keep the Passover at his appointed season” – the Spring season, after the Vernal Equinox. This charge was given in “the wilderness of Sinai” – typical of the Church’s Gospel-Age experience in its wilder­ness condition. (See Rev. 12:6) Furthermore, the entire Gospel Age is the antitype of the night of the first Passover in Egypt; and all of us are witness that the per­iod between the first and second Advents was indeed a trialsome and long-drawn-out night time. Jesus had promised that He would come again, and the opinion was prev­alent that He would do this within the lives of those then living. Had the truth been disclosed that His absence would be for more than eighteen hundred years, there is little doubt that those who would then have become His followers would be very few indeed. This conclusion could also probably be given concerning Abraham and God’s promise to him that he was to have goodly Canaan land as his everlasting in­heritance. Little did he realize that more than three thousand years would pass be­fore the promise would finally be realized. This may even have been true of the Par­ousia Church under That Servant. The promise of 1914 was a mighty incentive to good works and the keeping of the “sacrifice.” Similarly also was the date 1954. Many would have become weary with the “burden and heat of the day” had they reckoned how long the realization of their hopes would be delayed.

Hope deferred maketh the heart sick; and, when the delay is accompanied by trialsome privations and physical and mental abuses, the heaviness of heart becomes the more onerous. Thus, the precious promises are abundant to those who have under­taken the wilderness journey. “In the world ye shall have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world.” And the close relationship between Jesus and His faithful Church is clearly shown in a critical translation of Luke 22:20: “This cup (that which is being poured out for you) is by My blood the New Covenant “that is, as each one drank of it “the same night in which He was betrayed,” the indi­cation was clearly present that they were participants in that same cup with Him. And the same has been true ever since of all who have “kept the feast in sincerity and in Truth.” But none would have been able to do this without the “exceeding great and precious promises” – the antitypical shewbread in the Holy, the Sarah features of the Abrahamic Covenant.

But of those who have promised to “keep the feast,” and then failed to do so, the threat of death is the penalty for such. This is clearly revealed in Num. 9:13: “The man that is clean (that is, one who has been reckoned clean – justified by faith ­through the merit of the atoning blood).... and forbeareth to keep the Passover, even the same soul shall be cut off from among his people.” Although all should partake of the bread and the wine if at all possible, it is not failure to partake of the emblems that would destroy one, but rather failure to carry out faithfully the covenant implied in them – the failure to purge out the old leaven of sin, error, selfishness and worldli­ness from his character. Thus, it has been properly stated that new creatures that die impenitent go into the second death.

Despite the tremendous amount of error that crept into !he Church after the Apostles passed away, the Truth as due, and the spirit of the Truth, has always been with God’s faithful people. And while it is probably true that few attained the reward of the High Calling in the interim between the Harvests, we may be cure some did! This then forces the conclusion that they had sufficient for their needs, meager though it may now seem to us who have been blessed with so much “Present Truth” here in the end of the Age. All this is clearly portrayed by the cloudy fiery pillar rest­ing “on the tabernacle” during Israel’s march from Egypt to Canaan. The Tabernacle typed the true Church, and the pillar typed the Truth as due, the picture thus clearly revealing that the true Church always had Truth sufficient for its needs during the wilderness journey of the Gospel Age. And from this we may be equally positive that the due Truth and the spirit of the Truth will continue to prevail until the last of the Elect have finished their course with joy.

But, side by side with this, we may be also equally positive that the unfaith­ful, or the measurably faithful – those who stray from the enlightening influence of that Pillar – will experience measurable darkness, depending on the distance they stray from the light of that Pillar. This is also strikingly displayed in the type: The true priests, who ministered to the Tabernacle itself, would receive full light from the Pillar; the Levites – farther away – would have less light; the Israelites in the Camp nearest to the Tabernacle would have more of that light than those on the outskirts of the Camp. This is very evident to those about us today. The believing and repentant throughout Christendom have a measure of light from the Gospel. Thus, those countries which have enjoyed most religious freedom are the most enlightened. Most of the great inventions, and the major part of the fine art and literature, have come from those countries. Truly, “the entrance of thy word giveth light”!

At times in the type the Pillar seemed to tarry long – so long that the Israel­ites became restive, became involved in various improprieties to the extent that many of them were slain by the resultant plagues that the Lord allowed to come upon them. The same principle has been manifest in the Gospel Age. As the Lord seemed to delay His coming, the Church became impatient, concluded that He intended for them to take things into their own hands, and became condemned according to the words of Isa. 30: 1-3: “Woe to the rebellious children, saith the Lord, that take counsel together, but not of Me.... that go down into Egypt.... to trust in the shadow of Egypt (the re­treats, resources and ways of this present evil world).... Therefore, the trust in the shadow of Egypt shall be your confusion.” The boy asked his father, What is a finan­cier? The father’s answer: He’s a man who can get experience without paying for it! Having seen the many mistakes of God’s people over the years, it would seem we should profit by them without receiving the reproof of the ‘plagues” which have plagued many of them. Thus, if the Word seems slow in unfolding, if the “vision” seems to tarry, if the Lord seems to delay, let us not try to take matters into our own hands - as many have done. Those who run ahead of the Lord have always come to grief, as witness the many instances of it here in this Epiphany night. The outstanding example is, of course, “that evil servant, who said in his heart, My Lord delayeth.’’ (Matt. 24:48)

Thus, especially at this particular season it is expedient that each resolve to “wait on the Lord,” knowing that “in quietness and confidence shall be your strength.” Let us be content to advance when the Pillar advances, and equally content when it seems to tarry long.

To all who faithfully “wait on the Lord,” advancing only when they know what to do, how to do it, and with the providential circumstances to see the thing through to the finish, to such the Lord has promised certain victory. Spiritual Israel is yet fighting a “good fight” – for the Lord, the Truth and the brethren; and for all who do so from “a good and honest heart” there is the strong assurance of victory over sin, error, selfishness and worldliness, and a full inheritance in goodly Canaan land - both now and in the life to come. We herewith send to all our readers the prayer for the Lord’s special blessing in the preparation for, and participation in this year’s “remembrance”; and we would conclude with just a few lines from Reprints, page 4836:

‘‘At the Memorial season all of the consecrated should manifest their love, loyalty, obedience, faithfulness, by symbolizing the Redeemer’s death.... and to remember that none can enter instantaneous perfection in the resurrection until his trial be finished successfully in the present life, and by passing into death.”

“Now the God of peace, that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant, make you perfect in every good work to do His will, working in you that which is well pleas­ing in His sight, through Jesus Christ.” (Heb. 13:20,21)

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

...........................................................................

QUESTION OF GENERAL INTEREST

QUESTION: – St. Paul admonishes us to “consider Him who endured such contradiction of sinners against Himself.” (Heb. 12:3) Who are “the sinners” of this text?

ANSWER: – The Bible often furnishes hints or helps that enable us to deduct proper interpretations of difficult texts; and we believe we find in James 5:19, 20 (Dia.) what enables us to define properly the sinners mentioned in the ques­tion. “If any one among you wander from the Truth, and some one turn him back; know you that he who turns back a sinner from his path of error, will save his soul from death.” Here is a clear statement by the Apostle that those who “wander from the Truth” are sinners. This was certainly true of those Scribes and Pharisees, and others in respected position who opposed Jesus. St. Paul says that those were the people who had the “oracles of God committed unto them” (Rom. 3:2); and it is a mat­ter of record that those who were entrusted with the care and preservation of the in­spired writings of the Old Testament were so imbued with their responsibility that they would have defended them with their lives if necessary.

In a broad sense “the whole world lieth in wickedness” (1 John 5:19), but the gen­eral sort of evil men everywhere apparent have not only not been given to abuse of true believers, but they often find in them certain admirable qualities which they give lim­ited respect. One such outstanding example is Pilate, who eventually sentenced Jesus to the cross. Yet, in the dialogue that is recorded for that night Pilate asked the question, “Am I a Jew?” (John 18:35) After more questions and answers, Pilate “went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find in Him no fault at all.” (v. 38) Clearly enough, Pilate was not one of the “sinners” who was contradicting Jesus. Rather, he viewed Him with a detached appraisal that saw in Him much to be admired, and which brought from Pilate the exclamation, “Behold the man!” (John 19:5) Compared with this man, Pilate rated His accusers (the “sinners”) and their “contradiction” as just so much refuse, and they aroused his contempt. But it could certainly not truth­fully be said of Pilate that he had “wandered from the Truth,” because he had never been “in the Truth.”

‘The Lord’s faithful followers today have much the same experiences as He did. “The Lord your God proveth you.” (Deu. 13:2) In proportion as we are able to take our Lord’s viewpoint in our experiences in life, we may be calm. If the Father per­mits trying experiences for our testing, or for the testing or proving of others – in ways we may not understand – it is for us to rejoice to have His will be done - endur­ing the same “contradiction of sinners” as did He. If we faithfully endure to the end, the reward will be ours. If we prove our loyalty and keep our faith that God is supervising our affairs (“I know that Thou hearest Me always,” said Jesus), and that no good thing will be withheld from those who are walking uprightly, we shall some day hear His “Well done.”

Our English word ‘contradiction’ properly translates the original, implying ver­bal contradiction of His words. As we consider our Lord’s case, we see that the people opposed Him, not physically (until that last night and day), but in His words, His teachings. And when such “sinners” ‘contradict’ the Lord’s faithful people, St. Paul counsels that we be not wearied or faint of mind. Such steadfast continuance can but increase our reputation in the Lord’s sight – if we endure faithfully, joy­fully, “in His steps.” Such “sinners” can do us no real or lasting harm – though they may instigate siftings of tares from the wheat, for which they usually blame others than themselves.

And, while the foregoing is primarily applicable to crown-losers, it has also a limited application to Youthful Worthies who “wander from the Truth.” Birds of a feather flock together; so we should properly expect the same class of characters doing the same class of ‘contradicting,’ and encouraging each other in their “contra­dictions.” It is well to emphasize here, however, that all crown-losers - as indivi­duals and as a class - are styled “sinners” in the Bible; but this is definitely not true of all Youthful Worthies. The latter as a class are reckoned as a faithful class, along with the Ancient Worthies and the Little Flock; it is only certain individuals among them who should be viewed in the same light as the “sinners” (in partnership with the crown-losers).

St. James exhorts the faithful Church, “Take, my brethren, the prophets, who have spoken in the name of the Lord, for an example of suffering affliction, and of patience.” Those to whom the Apostle wrote his letter already knew of the sufferings of Jesus; they already knew of the faithfulness of the Apostles; and of St. Stephen and of others who had “spoken in the name of the Lord.” Yet, he is now urging, Look back into the past and see what patient endurance has been displayed by all who had lived holy lives. Such examples should be lessons of encouragement to us, in addition to those we have in the living present. In fact, in Hebrews 12, St. Paul first mentions the “great cloud of witnesses” (the Ancient Worthies – a faithful class) before directing our attention to “Him that endured such contradiction of sinners against Himself.” In like manner we would urge all faithful Youthful Worthy brethren today also to be an “example of suffering affliction, and of patience,” which gives the assurance of cer­tain victory in “the good fight,” and to be partners with the Ancient Worthies in re­ward and service. (See Epiphany Vol. 4, p. 337)

Back in the Parousia days it was logical to look for the antitypical Scribes and Pharisees – the contradicting “sinners” – in Big Babylon, in spiritual Israel – just as Jesus found their types in fleshly Israel, those to whom He came, but who received Him not. They were those who had “wandered from the Truth.” And now especially we find a class in Little Babylon who also have “wandered from the Truth” ­the “sinners” astray on their “path of error”; so we should “think it not strange” if they also are lusty and vociferous in their “contradiction” of the Truth, and of those who faithfully present that Truth. We believe this explanation will commend itself to all who have not “wandered from the Truth.”

...........................................................................

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Brother Hoefle: Greetings in our dear Redeemer’s Name!

Your good letter received, and as always the contents are so helpful and encouraging, which means so much to us as we strive daily to serve our dear Master. We want you to know that we held a service commemorating the death of our dear Pastor Russell and dear Brother Johnson. We enjoyed our service and felt that our dear Lord’s presence was with us.

Thank you, Brother, for the reports sent to us. How sad to note such little thought given to our dear Brothers Russell and Johnson – two great servants.

Speaking of the times in which we are living, they do not look good - but soon we know Christ’s Kingdom will be established..... Enclosed is a check for $ for the Truth fund – and may our dear Heavenly Father continue to bless you as only He can bless – and strengthen you in your every effort to serve the dear brethren. Sister joins in sending you and dear Sister Hoefle our warmest Christian love and greetings – also to all the dear ones in Mount Dora.

Your brother and sister by His Grace ------- (NEW JERSEY)

...........................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Greetings through our Lord’s Name! I will now answer your good  and interesting letter of the 9th – and am happy to hear about all the good meetings you had with the friends. I was sick for about five weeks – had a cold. A lot of people here are sick.

Will you please send me some more tracts. I gave all the tracts out. Some­one laid one down, so I left it for the minister. I am studying Volumes 9 and 14, and do I find some wonderful things in them! I had a lot of time to study when I was sick.

My prayer is that the good Lord’s rich blessings be with you and all with you.

Your sister in the Truth ------- (PENNSYLVANIA)

...........................................................................

Epiphany Bible Students Ass’n

Dear Sirs! I was very much interested in The Herald of the Epiphany that you sent me. Could I please have another copy for a friend – also one of Where are the Dead.

Sincerely yours, ------- (CONNECTICUT)

...........................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace from our Lord and Shepherd!

I sent 5 lbs. to Brother ------- air mail. Dear Brother, read page 13 in The Day of Vengeance .... The New Covenant, His Kingdom will be with the Jews. They will go up to the God of Jacob to learn of His ways. The Ancient Worthies as the princes – the earthly representatives, ........ Must go to work now. Your brother by His Grace ------ (ENGLAND) Psa. 23; Hymn 23, 114 and 109

NO. 153: WEAPONS AND METHODS OF ANTICHRIST

No. 153

It is a sad commentary upon human history that, while religious truth brings out the best in the faithful few, it almost invariably brings out the worst in the unfaithful many. Or perhaps it would be better stated that the evil qualities of the unfaithful are forced to the surface, and their true characters revealed by the Truth wielded against them. This was so strongly impressed upon That Servant’s mind – especially toward the end of his life – that we find many of the Towers largely occupied with warnings to the faithful not to be overcome by the spirit and inclinations of the Great Company. When the expectations of some were not fully realized in 1914, they once again cast longing eyes toward antitypical Egypt – just as did some of the Jews in 607 BC, after Jerusalem had fallen to the Chaldeans. And to those Jews who would “go down to Egypt for help” Jeremiah had prophesied, “Now know therefore certainly that ye shall die by the sword, by the famine and by the pestilence, in the place whither ye desire to go and to so­journ.” (Jer. 42:22)

The antitype of the foregoing is explained in considerable detail in E-14, pp. 439-442: “The Great Company would die by the sword (controversy), the lack of Truth as food (famine), and crazing sifting errors (pestilence).... They have been refuted by the Truth in controversy (sword), lacked the advancing Truth and lost much of the Parousia Truth (famine), and have been spiritually crazed by sift­ing errors (pestilence).... He (God) would cause Azazel, the ruler of confusion.... to establish his authority over these truths as they would be used by the Great Company in their uncleanness.... and by them establish a false church as a part of the visible phase of his kingdom (as the Jehovah’s Witnesses have been busily do­ing now for some years—JJH).... would cause them to be refuted in controversy, by giving them error to defend which Truth teachers would refute (as instance the Lay­men’s Home Missionary Movement with their Campers Consecrated, Justification in the Camp outside the linen curtain of Christ’s righteousness, attempting to find Seven Classes of saved human beings in Isa. 41:19—JJH).

And concerning such the Lord Himself had given us proper warning in Matt. 10: 16-21: “Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves.... Beware of men, for they shall deliver you up to the councils (By introducing motions of disfellow­shipment in General Conventions, as antitypical Jezebel has done, as the LHMM is now doing, and as the J. W.’s are also doing in their local ‘councils’), and they will scourge you in their synagogues (by making false accusations and insinuations in a futile effort to ‘make excuse’ for their “strange fire” – false doctrines ­such as Campers Consecrated, etc.).... and brother shall deliver up brother to death (by killing their good influence among the brethren, as was done after Brother Rus­sell’s death throughout the Truth movement, and as has since been done after Brother Johnson’s demise).... but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.” “Whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service”! (John 16:2)

LHMM NOW USES “SAME WEAPONS” USED BY THE SOCIETY

Excommunication, boycotting, slander, “whispering campaigns,” warnings, etc. ­all these “weapons” were used by JFR against the Epiphany Messenger and his asso­ciates. RGJ has also used these “same weapons” against us and our associates. JFR accused Brother Johnson of being a sifter, a second-deather, etc.; RGJ has ac­cused us of being a sifter, dead as respects our class standing, etc. JFR warned his adherents not to go near the Epiphany Messenger, not to read his papers, etc.; RGJ warns his adherents not to speak to us, not to read our papers, etc.

We now produce a letter written by RGJ in 1924 to Brother Johnson when he himself received much the same treatment from the Society that he is now using against us. But he had the Truth on his side in those days, and he could then use the same methods toward them that we are using today against him:

“Dear Brother Johnson:

“I feel that I should report conditions as I find them here in Cleveland, Ohio, where I had the privilege of serving the friends in two meetings today, numbering in attendance 15 and 26 respectively. The brethren had mailed announcements of our meetings to some of the Society friends, whose addresses they had, and were wishing they could get word to the rest, when the Society Elders came to the rescue, mimeographing and mailing the following letter to their adherents in general:

“April 22, 1924

“Dear Brother or Sister: – The Apostle says, ‘In the last days grievous wolves shall enter in, not sparing the flock,’ and to protect the Lord’s sheep against such that the following be brought to your attention: There has been a meeting advertised for next Friday afternoon and evening, at the Labor Temple, the speaker to be ‘Pilgrim Brother Jolly.’ He is working against the Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society, and this meeting is not be­ing held under the auspices of the Cleveland Ecclesia of the I.B.S.A. For your guidance in the future, all notices of meetings will be signed by the Secretary, C. T. Gilchrist, or announced from the platform at the B. of L.E. Furthermore, in regard to literature, please note that all our reading matter bears the name of the International Bible Students Association, or The Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society.

With Christian love, your brethren,

BOARD OF ELDERS, CLEVELAND ECCLESIA.”

“By means of this letter, in which the Adversary overstepped himself, at least three Society friends came to our meeting; one saying that she proposed to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ had set her free, another speaking of the Catholic-like actions of the elders in the Society Class, and another say­ing that when he got the elders’ letter telling him not to come, he thought that was just the reason why he should come and see what it is that the Society friends are so afraid of. He rejoiced in the ‘pure truth’ he heard, and from which others had been trying to turn him, and handed me $5.00 for the Lord’s work, also promis­ing carefully to study any TRUTHS we might send him.  The others also expressed deep interest. But what astounded me the most, dear Brother, was the truly Papal spirit, which like its pattern – the Catholic Channel – this Little Catholic Chan­nel is more and more showing. They capped the climax by posting ‘spies’ at our door to warn friends not to come into our meetings, and to spot those who did so. Different ones came in reporting how these Society deacons (one in the afternoon and two in the evening) had tried to persuade them not to attend our meeting. I sent a brother out to invite them to come in. The one in the afternoon railed against us, calling the brother a Judas and adding that he was there to warn friends against us, and that he did not think we would have much of a crowd. No doubt they succeeded in scaring some away. But some who recognized that ‘the spirit of fear’ is not the spirit that the Lord hath given us, but comes from Satan and is one of his best tools (used in spirit by the Society today, as by the Catholics in the Dark Ages) to keep others in subjection to bondage, broke through the Society guards and later testified that the Lord had blessed them with truth as a result. It almost seems impossible, dear Brother, that Truth friends could fall so low as to resort to the spirit of fear and intimidation and to such methods of the Dark Ages, in an effort to hold their flock. (We echo the same sentiments of RGJ in his “path of error” today: It almost seems impossible!—JJH) Surely the darkness hates the light. Not being able to refute the truth, they fear it. They have good reason to fear it, and to fear a loss of their members who might investigate it, and see how it puts to flight their many errors. But how can they so fall from grace as to use the same methods and tactics that Satan has always used, and which methods the Lord never used nor instructed His people to use? Alas! How are the mighty fallen!

Your brother  in  His  love  and  service,

R. G. Jolly”

Be it noted that the very intolerance which is decried in the foregoing letter is the very same intolerance – identically the same – now being practiced by the present leader of the LHMM (R. G. Jolly himself, the writer of the above letter!). His watchdogs even go so far as to come out onto the public sidewalk to interrupt our conversations, to draw aside those with whom we are speaking, and warn them against even so much as a few minutes’ conversation with us. Yet, in 1924 (before RGJ was manifested as a crown-loser), when he was wielding the Truth – under the benign influence of the Epiphany Messenger – he condemned such action as “Catholic-like actions,” the “truly Papal spirit,” “by the Catholics of the Dark Ages,” “the spirit of fear and intimidation.” (Be it remembered that Brother Johnson has often observed that these crown-losers did much better before they were manifested as such than they did afterward – and verily has this been true of RGJ!) This is indeed the spirit of error – not the spirit of Truth; so it should not require further argument from us for each unprejudiced mind to determine who is going into error, and who is retaining and upholding the Truth. RGJ admits he is a part of the “unprofitable servant” of Matt. 25:30 (the Great Company Class – See Berean Comment), the one who is cast “into outer darkness” (error). Surely, the Scriptures apply here with pointed excellence: “Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee.” (Luke 19:22), and “Thou art snared with the words of thy mouth, then art thou taken with the words of thy mouth.” (Prov. 6:2)

The tactics of the Society leaders in 1924 – and now the tactics of the LHMM leaders – are indeed “the truly Papal spirit,” the tools of Antichrist; and any one who picks up such tools openly admits that he is part and parcel of Antichrist in spirit, at least. Let us consider that such tools have depraved and kept in ignorance the people in all countries where they have had full sway – Italy, Spain, Mexico, the South American and Latin American countries. All those countries lack even the progress of the Heathen Japanese; and should be a strong warning to all to avoid such methods as coming directly from the Evil One. It is a fact not to be disputed that the Protestant countries are the most progressive, the most en­lightened. These pretty well dominate the world today, although they constitute about one-sixth of earth’s population. It is in these countries that freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, prevail. “The entrance of thy word giveth light”; and it is a correct observation that those who have most of that “light” are most willing to have their teachings examined in detail. That Servant always counseled his readers to prove what he presented to them; told them never to distribute any of his literature until they had first read it themselves, and had convinced themselves of its veracity. The Epiphany Messenger did the same thing. We advise the same thing to all our readers. Nor do any need feel they should make any apology to us for reading the presentations of others. Rather, we encourage all to “Stand  fast  therefore  in  the  liberty  wherewith Christ and to look with suspicion upon any who teach otherwise.

It is quite in keeping with the foregoing to remind our readers of a little experience told about himself on numerous occasions when RGJ was doing colporteur work under the superb supervision of the Star Members: He was then working a small town in the South, when the preacher of the prominent church there upbraided him for distributing such ‘heresy’ and saying he would thoroughly expose it in his next Sunday service. At the hour of service RGJ walked boldly down the middle aisle, took one of the front seats, and sat there looking the preacher squarely in the eye – much the same as we do with him at his Conventions. If the latter had really intended to orate against the ‘subversive’ literature, he changed course – said not a word about it. Now let us consider that the Executive Trus­tee (RGJ) had contributed not one penny to build or maintain that church which he so openly occupied that Sunday morning – quite a different position for him than the one we now occupy in attending LHMM meetings. Neither he, nor any of his staunch supporters have individually contributed one-half financially toward con­struction of the LHMM under Brother Johnson than we have done. Yet he has the temerity to decry our presence – “we should know better than to attend his meet­ings,” he says! Since we are told we are not welcome we should not go there! He wasn’t welcome at the church above described – not even a former member – yet he hesitated not (and properly so) to attend the meeting.

Just a little reflection should convince any one that he is now decidedly a different person than he was back there; and we need not look far for the answer: Back there he was armed with the Truth and the strong conviction of his cause. To­day he is floundering in error – his hybrid Campers Consecrated, his elimination of all saints from the earth, his rejection of the Truth that Youthful Worthies would continue to be won until after Armageddon (See E-10:672; E-4:337, 342), Tentative Justification in the Camp where there is no laver – all these he has been teaching since his abandonment to Azazel in 1950. Therefore, his own condition today is probably much the same – if not worse – as was true of that Pastor whom he defied so courageously when he had the Truth, and the conviction that always goes with the Truth. Error often makes good runners of so-called Christians; but it never makes a “good soldier” of any of them. But, regardless of that Pastor’s condition, it is accepted teaching by Epiphany-enlightened brethren that the Society leaders in 1924 were definitely in Azazel’s hands; and RGJ now treading the exact footsteps of those crown-losers back there places no strain upon the imagination for us to con­clude that he now also has the same teacher as they did then – AZAZEL!

“How excellent is thy lovingkindness, 0 God! therefore the children of men put their trust under the shadow of thy wings. 0 continue thy lovingkindness unto them that know thee; and thy righteousness to the upright in heart.”(Psa. 36:7,10)

Sincerely  your brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

...........................................................................

QUESTION OF GENERAL INTEREST

QUESTION: – What is your opinion of the new set of Pyramid figures now offered by Brother Jolly in his Jan-Feb. Present Truth, to prove the last saint was glorified in 1950?

ANSWER: – Our opinion of his present figures is the same as our opinion of his Previous figures in the January 1947 Present Truth, p. 7 (upon which we have commented many times in past papers).  In that 1947 PT, under the head­ing “Some Pyramid Corroborations of Epiphany Dates,” there is set forth some six pages plus (the same number of pages as now appear 21 years later in this January 1968 PT), and 27 intricate mathematical calculations to ‘prove’ 1956 as the date for the glorification of the last saint. In this 1968 January paper RGJ numbers only 25 paragraphs of calculations, leaving the last two unnumbered. Had he numbered those two, then there would now be exactly 27 deductions to refute those previous 27 calculations back in 1947. And all of this he does from the same Pyramid.

The foregoing should be more than enough to establish our opinion of this present set of figures, but we offer some more detail – to leave no doubt in our readers’ minds. The 1947 calculations were prophetic because they presented future events; and all of us know that time itself completely and indisputably proved all 27 of those computations to be nothing but effervescent nonsense. When Brother Johnson died in 1950, it left no doubt whatever about the fallacy of RGJ’s figures for 1956; and it would seem that one such lesson should have been more than enough for him to leave the Pyramid alone. But the Lord referred to some virgins as “foolish” because they are “foolish”; the Lord never makes mistakes. But that is no reason at all why the rest of us need also to be “fool­ish.” When he presents 27 paragraphs now to disprove completely, and without any doubt, that his 27 paragraphs 21 years ago were all just “sinking sand,” we should evaluate his present views with the same measuring stick in both instances.

As all of us know, many sad mistakes have been made by tampering with the Pyramid – mistakes prompted by wishful thinking, or instigated by influence from brethren pressured by sentiment, or what not. Brother Morton Edgar was even per­suaded to find corroboration in the Pyramid for the colossal hoax of “Millions Now Living Will Never Die,” but later came to see – to his sorrow – that time itself also made him appear very foolish. We cannot know if this dear brother was one of the saints or not – although this mistake was not a revolutionism against any Truth that he had previously received. All of us make mistakes, and this de­ters us from excessive criticism of others who also make mistakes. However, when RGJ openly admits that he has lost his crown, this automatically manifests him as a part of antitypical “leprous” Miriam. And the same thing is proven in that he has revolutionized against one truth after another that he at one time accepted and presented with emphasis. Thus we believe we are not unduly harsh when we use a more critical appraisal of his mistakes than we would of others who have not grossly and persistently revolutionized against the truth which once sanc­tified them.

In all of the six pages in this 1968 January PT RGJ is attempting to ‘prove’ 1950 as the date when the last saint left this earth. Yet on page 4, col. 1, par. 2 he says this: “It should be remembered that we do not use the Pyramid as a source and rule of our faith, but simply as a symbolic corroboration of that Truth previously derived from the Bible.” If he really means that, why does he not show us where 1950 is pointed out in the  Bible; the same for 1954; the same for 1956. When Brother Johnson was refuting a “foolish” virgin on his 1943 date as the time for the complete glorification of the Church, he was very emphatic that the Pyramid is only a “witness” (which indeed is all that it is), that the year 1943 is nowhere pointed out in the Bible. Thus, the one he was refuting had reversed the order of things: Instead of proving the Pyramid by the Bible, he was attempting to prove the Bible by the Pyramid. This is exactly what RGJ is now also doing.

Concerning dates, the Bible clearly reveals 1874; it clearly reveals 1914, and other important dates. (See Parousia Volumes 2 and 3) But the only reason we have for accepting 1954 and 1956 is the parallel which Brother Johnson thought would occur, but which time itself has clearly proven to be wrong; and we are persuaded that Brother Johnson himself would have been the first to declare it wrong – even as Brother Russell was probably the first to declare his own mis­taken expectations for 1914, which he did some years before 1914 (and we believe this would have been true of Brother Johnson had he lived a few years longer: he would have seen that 1954-56 would not witness Armageddon, much less Anarchy) ­also some of Brother Russell’s mistaken expectations for the complete glorifica­tion of the Church. But even in Brother Johnson’s mistakes regarding the paral­lel, he himself did not make the mistake of the 1950 date being the time for the last saint to be glorified – never tried to prove that date from the Pyramid or the Bible. But leave it to one now abandoned to Azazel to do that, although it seems he has learned at least a little something from his 1947 fiasco; he now waits un­til the date is past before finding it in the pyramid, instead of attempting to tell us things future from that Great Stone Witness.

It is well in order here to consider the following from Epiphany Vol. 4, p.   132: “It is revolutionism or its partisan support against the Truth and its arrangements, and only revolutionism (emphasis by Brother Johnson him­self) or its partisan support against the Truth and its arrangements, that mani­fests crown-losers as such. The great touchstone of manifesting Leviteship is revolutionism or its partisan support, and nothing else.” And further from E-9, p. 140:

“In all cases antitypical Miriam’s leprosy has manifested itself in per­sistent revolutionism against either the Lord’s teachings or arrangements, or against both.” Now RGJ is telling us that is all wrong; the death of a man, says he, is the touchstone by which we may recognize crown-losers. But we say: Here is just one more time he is revolutionizing against that Truth he once accep­ted and taught; and all who support him either are sadly mistaken, or are his partisan supporters in this revolutionism. Thus, his “first advancing truth”(?) that he presented on October 27, 1950 – the day the last Star Member’s last re­mains were removed from the Epiphany Tabernacle – was not only not “advancing truth,” but was a clear revolutionism against Epiphany Truth.

In 2 Tim. 2:18, Dia., St. Paul tells us about Hymenius and Philetus “who missed the mark (were crown-losers) with respect to the Truth, saying that the resurrection has already happened; and they are perverting (Azazel means Per­verter) the faith of some.” And now another crown-loser – R. G. Jolly – is also “perverting the faith of some” by declaring that the first resurrection has al­ready happened. Nor should this surprise us, because the siftings of the Jewish Harvest are paralleled here in the Gospel-Age Harvest, so we should expect to find the same technique if we will just look for it.

Let us note specifically from 1 Tim. 1:20, Dia., that St. Paul had “deliv­ered up Hymenius to the Adversary (had abandoned him to Azazel, sent him off into the wilderness at the hands of the fit man—Lev. 16:21), that he may be taught not to blaspheme (not to revolutionize against the Truth).”

Let us remember that immediately after Brother Johnson’s funeral RGJ had one million leaflets printed to declare his great “advancing truth” (that came to him in a ‘sudden flash’ at 4:00 o’clock in the morning the day after the Epiphany Messenger’s demise). And what do we find to be the result? Why, there are fewer people believing it now than believed it when he first declared the last saint had departed from our midst. And many to whom those leaflets were given did not know even that there had been a Harvest, or that there is a difference between the Elect and the non-elect; did not even know the meaning of ‘saint.’ It was just another “foolish” virgin gesture – “words to no purpose.” Even of those Truth groups who claim to know Harvest Truth, have any of these groups yet accepted his “advancing truth” (?) and now declare themselves crown-losers – now EIGHTEEN years later? There is no doubt at all in our mind that some who accepted the ‘edict’ were in fact crown-losers; their subsequent gross and persistent revolutionisms have clearly attested to that. But we believe it to be equally true that not all who then inclined to believe him are no longer in the Body, just because they were tempor­arily “overtaken in a fault.” We know of a number who have since disavowed that belief into which they were more or less cudgeled at the time under stress of the great loss that had befallen us. RGJ places great stress upon Rev. 19:6,7, Dia.: “I heard as it were a voice of a great crowd (the Great Company of crown-losers), and as the sound of many waters (especially the various Truth Groups), and as a noise of mighty thunders (something that would be heard very pronouncedly), say­ing, ‘Hallelujah, Because our Lord God the Omnipotent reigned.’ We may rejoice and exult.” Do we find anything approximating this proclamation, even Eighteen Years after 1950? Of course not! None of the Truth groups have joined with him; none not one – have lamented, “The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved.” (Jer. 8:20) But – there is none so blind as he who will not see!

...........................................................................

ANNOUNCEMENT OF GENERAL INTEREST

Our Memorial date for this year is April 10 – and we suggest for our Special Effort in Antitypical Gideon’s Second Battle Sunday, March 31 through Sunday April 21 for our volunteer and sharpshooting in the slaying of these two King Errors ­Zebah (Eternal Torment), and Zalmunna (Consciousness of the Dead). This can be done individually as opportunity permits, or serving at church doors or other religious services. Our tracts – No. 1, Where are the Dead, No. 2, What is the Soul, and No. 3, The Resurrection of the Dead are especially designed for this “good work”; and we suggest the pertinent literature be ordered in time to par­ticipate in this Battle. All literature will be sent free and postage paid. We believe all our faithful brethren will want to join with us in this Epiphany Arrangement to the extent of their abilities and circumstances.

...........................................................................

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Brother: Christian greetings!

By this letter you will know I am still trust­ing in the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ – in His Goodness and Mercy. I must say it is truly wonderful what our Lord had done. Glory to His name! As it is written in John 12:32, “And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me,” you can boast that you have drawn me (into the Truth) – and I in turn am trying to draw others. I feel your prayers at times. I am not prosperous in wealth, but in health and Grace. It is said they that love thee shall prosper.

I wish you more strength and grace, and a prosperous New Year. May the Almighty give you Grace and Strength to carry out the task that lies before you.

With Christian love, Brother ------- (TRINIDAD)

Dear Brother Hoefle: A HUGE THANK-YOU for recent paper. I read it several times ­also made some notes. Then I mailed it to a Labor Leader in -------.

We have been close friends for a number of years. In fact, I took the Truth to his precious mother – had a weekly study with her for several years. He was most gener­ous with cash when we were building ‘THE BALL’...... Enough said! At her death son Samuel requested I take full charge of her funeral. She had a host of friends and relatives – some from California and several from Canada....

You have mentioned Rev. 7.... Psalms 45 supports this.... that meaning shook me considerably.  But we were taught the Watch Tower was God’s Channel. I do believe it was for The Household of Faith under That Faithful and Wise Servant. The ‘Servant’ is singular and not plural! Over 20 years ago at St. Louis, The Children of the King were born. All young children sat near the front rows. Later they stood, raised their hand, as they promised to be good children, obedient to parents, etc., etc. I wondered IF children could be brought forth BEFORE the marriage was completely ful­filled.

It has been their contention that our Lord would use the Watch Tower throughout the 1,000-year-reign – to print books, etc. (New World Publishers). What would they do with the 70 Prophets and Judges – and what would they be doing (the Princes in all the earth!!)? The Watch Tower rejects God’s Oathbound Promise to give Abraham and his seed after him the possession of Palestine, etc. J. F. Rutherford wrote “Comfort for The Jews” – then later repudiated it. Wonder why?

Blessed are the meek – for they shall inherit the earth! Truly God is loving unto every man – and His Mercy is over all His works. As the anthem sings, “O! my God, How great Thou art!” My heart rejoices always! Thank you for your patience.

Christian greetings for a blessed New Years From Sister -------- (MICHIGAN)

...........................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and Peace in Jesus dear Name!

Thanks to you and Sister Hoefle for the Christmas good message. Brother, thank you so much for your good letter.... It is helpful and comforting to me. I received the January paper and enjoyed reading it. I was thinking I may send the part on Tentative Justification to Sister ------. We have talked on this subject and others. She goes to the LHMM classes. I don’t believe she really understands ­but is a very earnest and kind and friendly person.... I noted what you said about the minister quoting from What is the Soul. I am sure all of us have sent tracts to the various ministers from time to time. Got a good feeling that I may have sent this one.

Thank you again for all your good helps to me – and with good wishes for you, Sister Hoefle, Sister Dunnagan and Sister Moynelo for a blessed New Year.  With Christian love to all.

Your sister by faith -------- (CALIFORNIA)

...........................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Christian greetings to you and Sister Hoefle!

Your most welcome letter of December 28 so much enjoyed – also “Retrospect and Prospect” – the Jan. 1, 1968 No. 151. It arrived at the most welcome time, as I had time to think of the deep reports of past Truth of God’s word and to be very happy I had the blessing of God’s teaching.... of His precious son’s sacrifice for our sins for 33 years. I’m so thankful I met and was acquainted with dear Brother Johnson. I was baptized during his visit in Los Angeles – October 4, 1947 (his natal day anniversary)........ I was surely blessed with the event, but to sadness some short years later. After his death the disfellowshipment for R. G. Jolly and the split with others. I am always thankful for the Truth and Proof of God’s Plan. God bless each and every one of your household! Sr. ------- (CALIFORNIA)

NO. 152: THE ANTICHRIST

No. 152

My dear Brethren: Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

When “the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us” He provided the foundation for two religions – the Christian and the Antichristian. The first of these set forth the highest of ideals for His followers, to perfect them in every good word and work; the second did pretty much the exact opposite, often arousing the basest of human inclina­tions toward heinous crime. The ideal of the true Christian is to attain equality in character and vision with their Leader, an ambition which none of the human race has ever achieved. Had any of them ever been able to do this, the ideal would then be largely dissipated – no more hills to climb, no more conquests to accomplish. Thus, throughout the writings of the Apostles the ideal of “Christ and Him crucified” (1 Cor. 2:2) is ever prominently in their writings, “Christ” being the ransom price for our justifi­cation, and “Him crucified” being the narrow way in which “He set us an example that we should follow in His steps.” All of this is summarized in perfect love for the Lord, the Truth and the brethren, which, when properly comprehended and practiced, delights in doing good unto all men as we have opportunity, but especially to them which are of the Household of Faith.

Thus, St. Paul counsels “Husbands, love your wives, even as the Anointed One loved the congregation, and delivered Himself up on her behalf.” (Eph. 5:25, Dia.) And among the last of the Lord’s thoughts on the night before His death was toward those who would cleave to Him in spirit and in truth – “That they all may be one... that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that Thou hast loved them as Thou hast loved Me.” (John 17:21-23) All who know anything at all about Christianity admit that its fundamental precepts are good; but, they say, no one lives up to it. And, while it is true that the vast majority of those calling themselves Christians deserve such criticism, yet it is equally true that there have been some outstanding “examples of the believers” throughout the Age. Aside from the twelve Apostles, mention may be made of John Wesley, founder of what is now the Methodist Church. The focal point of all his teaching was that disinterested good will toward all men is the ideal for Christians; and there is little doubt that he practiced what he preached. Much the same may be said for George Fox, founder of what is now the Quaker Church. Similar appraisal may be made of Balthasar Hubmaier, founder of the Baptist Church. And the preaching of these three men, along with others throughout the Age, was potent and magnetic enough to cause many of their adherents to exemplify true Christian principles in their daily lives.

But alongside the few throughout the Age there have been great multitudes who did other­wise, many of the latter with such wealth, education and mental brilliance that they have almost completely eclipsed those faithful few who held “the testimony of Jesus, and the spirit of His Prophecy.” (Rev. 19:10, Dia.) This deplorable situation was already making its first glimmering appearance in the early Church, so that St. Paul was prompted to write: “The secret of lawlessness is already working.... then will be revealed the law­less one... whose coming is according to the energy of the Adversary, with all power, and signs, and wonders because they admitted not the love of the Truth (true Christian­ity) in order that they might be saved.” (2 Thes. 2:7, Dia.)

Here is an excellent description of the Antichrist that would appear after the Apos­tles had left this earth; and, while we stated in the first sentence of this treatise that our Lord had laid the foundation for this monstrous apostasy, it should be kept in mind that such was not His design; it was merely that He provided the opportunity for “evil men and seducers” to join a good cause for their own selfish purposes – much the same as the Bible itself has also provided a very convenient conveyance for those to en­hance and enthrone themselves who in fact were really motivated by most selfish and un­holy ambitions.

It is well for us to keep in mind here that Antichrist not only means opponent, but it also means “in the place of” Christ. St. Paul had warned in 2 Thes. 2:3-5 that Jesus would not come again until “there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be re­vealed, the son of perdition; who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God... so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.” The attempts to interpret St. Paul’s words here are legion, quite a few would-be interpre­ters – being very emphatic that this refers to an individual. During the 1914-1918 war there was quite some agitation to the effect that St. Paul’s words were just another de­scription of the “Beast” of Rev. 13:2-5: “The beast which I saw was like a leopard, and his feet as a bear’s, and his mouth as lion’s mouth... and they worshipped the beast. saying Who is like the beast, and who is able to make war with him? And there was given to him a mouth speaking great and blasphemous things (note the close similarity to St. Paul’s words); and authority was given him to act forty–two months.” The theory gained quite some followers back there that this was a prophecy of the German Kaiser, which meant that the war would end in forty–two months. But when the war went on for nine months more than the forty–two, and the Kaiser suffered complete defeat, was forced to abdicate and flee to Holland, that theory died as quickly as it had been born. Their mis­take, of course, lay in their failure rightly to comprehend one of the basic rules for the understanding of The Revelation; namely, that the numerals in that book are literal, but almost all the common nouns are symbolic. Those months are 30-day months, making a total of 1260 days, as can be readily seen from Rev. 11:2,3: but, applying the principle of “a day for a year” (Num. 14:34; Ezek. 4:6), the period of time then involved would be 1260 literal years.

THE PAPACY

That the foregoing Scriptures could not possibly refer to an individual will, we be­lieve, be apparent from certain considerations, one of which is that no individual has ever survived for 1260 years. Also, the Antichrist, the Man of Sin, The Beast, all sim­ply portray different characteristics of the same thing: Antichrist being “in the place of” Christ – Man of Sin (in place of “Son of Man” – Mark 2:10), the degrading disposition and influence – The Beast, the vicious destructive and inhuman qualities. The beast “was like unto a leopard.” A leopard is black and white spotted, indicating that in some places the beast would be black as night, but in others appearing lily white in hypocriti­cal manner – professedly Christian! This latter has been outstandingly true of the Papacy; e.g., Spain, Mexico, Italy, tolerance has been foreign to their teachings. Not long back they tried to chase the YMCA out of Italy – revealing the black spots of the leopard. But in America, where they are much in the minority, they are very outspoken for tolerance – for them, that is – ­manifesting the white spots of the leopard.

In 2 Thes. 2:1–5 St. Paul states that the Lord would not return to earth again “ex­cept there come a falling away first.” Certainly, this would not mean just one indivi­dual; the very construction of Paul’s expression shows he was meaning many individuals ­a great apostasy – that would be influenced, deceived, and overawed by “the man of sin” – “the son of perdition” (destruction) – yet professedly Christian. The only entity in Gospel-Age history that properly fits this description is the Papacy; it meets all the requirements perfectly – its own record is enough – we need not go to its opponents or critics for argument to sustain this conclusion. But, in coming to this conclusion we do not wish to convey the impression that every Roman Catholic is included in this opin­ion – any more than every Protestant should be held accountable for the vagaries of the various protesting systems. There have been, and still are, many noble and magnanimous individuals among Protestant and Catholic churches, who for various reasons have failed to recognize the true situation; but this does not alter the fact that the Lord Him­self referred to certain features of the Roman Church as “the abomination of desolation.” (Matt. 24:15)

Giant oaks from little acorns grow; so also the Roman Church came to its present prominence from a very small beginning – at first meekly bowing to the powers that be, but gradually, very subtly, telling them what to do, until from 799 to 1799, the Papacy “as God sitteth in the temple of God (“Ye – the true church – are the temple of God” – ­1 Cor. 3:16), showing himself that he is God.” Said Pope Innocent III: “The pope holds the place of the true God.” Innocent and Jacobatius state “the pope can do nearly all that God can do – none dare say to him any more than to God, Lord, what doest thou?” We here present a mere fragment of what has been written about this subject – enough, we hope, to establish a firm base for our position.

MARTIN LUTHER

In our paper No. 145 we offered quite some detail about Luther’s problems and wars with papal error and intrigue – a member of antitypical Elijah against antitypical Jez­ebel; and we now offer some of his statements about Antichrist as taken from the book of Roland H. Bainton, first published in 1955:

“The faith and the Church are at stake, I rejoice to suffer in so noble a cause. I am not worthy of so holy a trial. I feel much freer now that I am certain the pope is Antichrist.” (p. 124) “If he is inviting me to my death, then I will come. I hope none but the papists will stain their hands in my blood. Antichrist reigns. The Lord’s will be done.” (p. 139) “I was wrong. I retract the statement that certain articles of John Huss are evangelical. I say now, ‘Not some, but all the articles of John Huss were condemned by Antichrist and his apostles in the synagogue of Satan. I say freely that all the condemned articles of John Huss are evangelical and Christian, and yours are downright impious and diabolical.” (p. 128) And on page 120 is a print showing “On the left Christ is washing the disciples’ feet. On the right Antichrist, the pope, is having his toes kissed by monarchs.”

In their efforts now to embrace Martin Luther, to praise his teachings and work, are the Roman Catholics also accepting what he taught about the pope being Antichrist, sitting in the synagogue of Satan? Let us not forget that the very book from which we quote aforegoing was banned by Catholics shortly after it appeared just twelve years ago (written in 1968 – now in 1979 23 years ago), and many stores were intimidated from further sale of it. And those who continue to pay homage and worship at the feet of Antichrist are in truth also “sitting in the synagogue of Satan” so long as they assemble in the same company with Antichrist. No sane human being would logically do this, of course; but the eyes of many are being opened, and they forsake such company. And we have the “sure word of prophecy” that many others will shortly do likewise. Thus, this writing is no indictment of Roman Catholics as individuals; and we urge all our readers to follow St. Paul’s counsel: “A servant of the Lord must not be contentious, but be gentle towards all, fit to teach, patient under evil; in meekness correcting the oppos­ers; perhaps God may give them a change of mind in order to a knowledge of the Truth; and that they may be recovered from the snare of the enemy, who have been entrapped by him for his pleasure.” (2 Tim. 2:24-26, Dia.)

PSALMS 75:6–7

Psalms 75 carries fitting application to our subject matter – the true Christ and to Antichrist. Verses 6 and 7: “Promotion cometh neither from the east, nor from the west, nor from the south. But God is the judge; He putteth down one, and setteth up another.” Here is veiled reference to Baal, the sun God of the nations round about Is­rael. The sun rises in the east, swings to the south, and sets in the west. And the Psalmist is telling us that those who “bow the knee to Baal” (1 Kgs. 19:18) need expect no recognition from the true God of Israel.

Almost from the beginning of Israel’s conquest of Palestine, after their deliver­ance from Egypt, there was constant conflict between the Lord God of Israel and the false Baal of the Heathen round about. In our paper on The Great Reformer we gave some detail of Elijah’s engagement with the Prophets of Baal, who received equal recognition in Is­rael because of Queen Jezebel, the wife of Ahab; and Elijah’s complete victory over them forecast the complete victory during this Gospel Age of antitypical Elijah (the true Church attempting to reform this “present evil world”), over antitypical Jezebel (the Ro­man Church) before this Age comes to a close.

The Heathen Baal was typical of power-graspers in the Christian Church during this Age; and those who “bow the knee to Baal” refers to all who do obeisance to that Anti­christian system. Thus, an identical conflict has transpired during this Age to the one that raged in Israel in the centuries preceding the Christian era. And those on the side of Baal have received no “promotion” – no lasting recognition – from the God of Heaven. In fact, in almost every instance when the Pope asks special blessing upon some event or locality or populace, the very reverse occurs: Great calamity is often the result. We instance just one example: We detailed in The Great Reformer how King Philip II of Spain is said to have laughed for the first time in his life over the horrible massacre in France on St. Bartholomew’s Day. It was this same King Philip who a few years later prepared the Invincible Armada to annihilate Protestant England for rejecting the papal domination. And that Armada received the very special blessing of the Pope for its mission – a mission which culminated in complete failure and the destruc­tion of a major part of the ships and men in that expedition.

Thus, the warning is given in Psa. 75:5: “Lift not up your horn on high; speak not with a stiff neck.” The “horn” in the Bible is often used to symbolize power (see Psa. 18:2): “The Lord... the horn – power – of my salvation”; also Mic. 4:13, “I will make thine horn (power) iron.” This exhortation is companion to St. Peter’s words: “God resisteth the proud” (1 Pet. 5:5); and then the Psalmist warns: “for promotion com­eth neither from the east, nor from the west” nor from following the course of Baal and his devotees; but God will exalt whom He will exalt – those who resist the power-grasp­ing system of Baal.

Inasmuch as the Psalmist is here contrasting “the horns (powers) of the wicked” and the “horns (powers) of the righteous” (v. 10), it is certainly no strain on the imagina­tion to conclude the “promotions” of the righteous must come from the north, since they do not come from the east, west or south. This is quite clearly confirmed in Isa. 14:12-­14, where the power-grasping course of Lucifer is described – identical twin to the course of the Papacy. Note the very similar language of v. 14: “I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the Most High,” to that of 2 Thes. 2:4: “Who (the Papacy) exalteth himself above all that is called God... he as God sitteth in the temple (con­gregation) of God (“ye are the temple of God” – l Cor. 3:16,17), showing himself that he is God.” And Lucifer would make his attempts “upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north” (his abode would rival that of the Most High).

THE DARKNESS HATETH THE LIGHT

It needs little argument that throughout the Age true Christians have been much in the minority.   The Lord had promised, “If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the Truth” (John 8:31, 32); but this promise “to know the Truth” would not apply to the vast majority who did not “continue” to keep it. To such came the “strong delusions” – also promised to those who “received not the love of the Truth.” (2 Thes. 2:10) But it is a sad commentary concerning the many that they were not content to lose the truth, they must also persecute those who did faithfully retain it. Thus developed the monstrous crimes, the heinous tortures by the Antichrist against those who “protested” against their errors. Some of this was given in our No. 145, so we need not repeat it here. However, the Antichrist was not the only system that re­sorted to the persecution of those who retained Present Truth; and we now catalog some of these:

Michael Servetus was one of those true Christians who accepted, and defended the truth that there is but one God. This aroused the ire of John Calvin (strong advo­cate of, and chief organizer of, the Presbyterian Church), so he tricked Servetus into Geneva, had him arrested for ‘heresy.’ The trial lasted about 2½ months, with Servetus thoroughly defeating Calvin on the Truth that there is but one God. But the judges, being also in error as was Calvin, found Servetus guilty, sentenced him to be burned at the stake. The next day, October 27, 1553, Servetus was taken from the city, made to sit on a block. Instead of using dry wood, green timber was used, placed some distance from him, which subjected him to a slow roasting of over a half hour duration. Also, in mock­ery – like the crown of thorns that was placed on the brow of Jesus at His crucifixion by the errorists of His day – a chaplet of straw and green twigs, besprinkled with brim­stone, was made to encircle his head. This ‘crown’ was ignited first, and produced such a cry of anguish that it struck terror into the hearts of the spectators. That was his only expression of pain.

Perhaps the saddest part of the above recital is that John Calvin himself had strong­ly denounced the persecuting spirit of Antichrist in France; had addressed a noble publi­cation to the King of France in defense of religious tolerance – tolerance for him, that is. But he readily forgot all about tolerance when he could not meet the Truth that came from Servetus, and blackened his memory with one of the worst examples of cruel intoler­ance ever to be recorded. This is indeed a sad record against Calvin, who was considered one of the most brilliant religious minds of the entire Gospel Age, and a zealous cham­pion of his idea of Christianity.

“Now the brother shall betray the brother to death, and the father the son; and children shall rise up against their parents. and shall cause them to be put to death. And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake; but he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.” (Mark 13:12-13)  And, “Who is sufficient for these things?” (2 Cor. 2:16) “He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart; who hath not lifted up his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully.” (Psa. 24:4)

Coming a little further along in history, there is the case of the pilgrim fathers who left England because of religious persecution; but, hardly had they landed in New England in 1620, than they began to heap much the same abuses upon those who disagreed with them. But let us keep in mind that, while Wesley and his adherents were sorely per­secuted in England, he himself and those who fully embraced his teachings, never perse­cuted, or recommended persecution of those who disagreed with them. The same could be said of George Fox and the Quakers; the same for Balthasar Hubmaier and the Baptists. And this is definitely our own position now.

By the time the Parousia had arrived the physical manhandling of dissenters had pretty much become out of date, but those who embraced the Harvest Truth were subjected to considerable verbal abuse and vilification, with considerable vicious slander heaped upon That Servant. This increased in severity as the 1914 war began, during which time some of the Truth people did incur actual physical violence, with even a few of them dy­ing from that abuse. During that time those in “present truth” were a unit in advocat­ing religious tolerance; and it would seem the lessons of the past, plus their own un­toward experiences, should have taught them thoroughly the quality of tolerance. But, sad to say, hardly had That Servant died than quite a few of them took up the very unchris­tian weapons against their former brethren that had been previously used against them. Were we not personally witness to this, it would be difficult to believe.

And from 1916 on those brethren who were being defamed by the Society also were loud in their acclaim of tolerance, the Executive Trustee of the LHMM being one of the fore­most in denouncing intolerance; and he did an excellent job of declaring the evils of intolerance. It was easy enough for him to do that, too, because he had the Truth as his ‘shield and buckler’: and it was no problem to prove that it was once more error perse­cuting truth. But scarcely had the Epiphany Messenger left us until the Executive Trustee began to cudgel his opponents with the same weapons that had formerly been used against him and others – with the situation now reversed: The former champion of the Truth on tolerance was now forced to intolerance by the Truth which appeared against his error – just as was true of those intolerant ones in the Society after 1917. Here is a sad illustration indeed of human frailty – the accumulated experience of the Age, coupled with extreme brilliance of Harvest Truth, availed them little as those who still retained Parousia Truth began to expose their decline into error. The formerly excommunicated became the excommunicators in very pronounced fashion: “Hear the word of the Lord, ye that tremble at his word; Your brethren that hated you, that cast you out for my name’s sake, said, Let the Lord be glorified: but he shall appear to your joy, and they shall be ashamed.” (Isa. 66:5)

In so many instances the founders of present-day religious organizations – John Wesley, Martin Luther, William Miller, Thomas Cranmer, Robert Brown, George Fox, Bal­thazar Hubmaier, Michael Servetus, Zwingli, Charles T. Russell, et al – were mercilessly opposed because of the truth they presented; a number of them were actually burned at the stake. Yet, quite often those who were outraged witnesses to such abuses, adopted the tools of the persecutors when the situation became reversed. However, the underly­ing cause of such conduct was largely due to the fact that they themselves had departed ­in whole or in part – from the teachings of those they claimed to follow. All during the Age it seems it never took long until the examples of the respective reformers were for­gotten, and much of the truth they presented was perverted or lost completely; and, as the truth was lost, so also was lost the spirit of true Christianity which had actuated their leaders. “Strong delusion” (2 Thes. 2:11) regarding the truth usually inculcates “strong delusion” in conduct also, which in turn develops fanaticism in those who fall prey to it. It is certainly sound appraisal that religious fanaticism is the deepest, wickedest and most conscienceless of hatreds.

THE TOWER OF BABEL

Some years after the deluge, when the population had begun to increase, men said, “Let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto Heaven” (Gen. 11:4). They would have insurance against another flood (in spite of the promise that another flood would never be – Gen. 9:15); they would build Babyl (Gateway to God). As retribution for this affront, the Lord confused their tongues; they could no longer understand each other. Thus, the effort became known as Babyl, meaning confusion, the same being typi­cal of the Roman Church’s effort also to build a “Gateway to God”; that is, We are the one true church – no salvation outside of us – no other access to God – their popes are now the successors to St. Peter (despite the fact there is no evidence whatever that St. Peter ever once visited Rome). But their shibboleth over the centuries has been, “Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church.” (Matt. 16:18)

In further explanation, we quote this text from the Emphatic Diaglott: “I also say to thee, Thou art a rock, and on this rock I will build my Church.” Reference to Peter as ‘a rock’ is from the Greek Petros; and ‘this rock’ as the foundation for the Church is from the Greek Petra – the difference in meaning being Petros is a small stone, with Petra as a huge boulder. Once this is clearly understood, it is easily comprehended that Jesus was not referring at all to Peter as the rock upon which He would build His Church, but to the great indisputable Truth that Peter had just spoken: “Thou art the Christ, the son of the living God.” Indeed, in the words of the hymn, “My hope is built on nothing less, Than Jesus’ blood and righteousness.” He is truly the Christ; and “other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.” (1 Cor. 3:11) He is the Petra, the unlovable rock, upon which the Church has been built. “There is none other name (neither Peter, nor any other) under Heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12) But the Roman interpretation is TRULY ANTICHRIST – “in place of” Christ. And to them also God sent confusion of tongues – a “Babyl”; their teachings today are completely foreign to the truth given us by the Lord through St. Peter.

In identical manner, the Jehovah’s Witnesses have made similar pattern; they claim also to be the “Channel for present truth’“ no salvation apart from them – they, too, would build “Bab-El.” And to them also has come retribution: a confusion of teachings so far removed from that presented by their founder that there is almost no similarity now to their beliefs of fifty years ago. And they also – in true Roman spirit – would suppress the truth presented by us; they have actually seized our papers from the hands of their dedicated deluded devotees and trampled them in the street. Yet they still boast of their founder, just as the Catholics boast of St. Peter. Was such conduct ever in evidence by the Master, Apostles, or by those true reformers mentioned aforegoing? Indeed, “By their fruits ye shall know them.” (Matt. 7:20) The spirit of Antichrist readily reveals itself to all unbiased observers. The following excerpt from Reprints 5172 (Feb. 1, 1913) is most appropriate here:

“All down the Gospel Age, those who have been faithful to the truth of God have been put ‘out of the synagogue.’ The creeds of men have been barriers to keep out those who understood the word of God.”

And there is sound logic in explanation: The Truth always brings out the best in the faithful, but it often brings out the worst in the unfaithful or measurably faithful. “We (the faithful) are unto God a sweet savour of Christ in them that are saved, and in them that perish: To the one we are the savour of death unto death (as they go deeper and deeper into error); and to the other the savour of life unto life (as the Truth per­fects them in every good word and work).” (2 Cor. 2:14,15) “The light (Truth) shineth in darkness (amid error); and the darkness (error) comprehended it not.” (John 1:5) It is an evidence of human frailty that physical force is usually applied when the intellect is not sufficient. Thus, for a thousand years the Antichrist resorted to the rack, boil­ing oil, hot lead in the ears, etc., against the ‘heretics’ whose truth they could not gainsay or resist. But there is no record of the fully faithful ever using such weapons against Antichrist. St. Paul also had counseled “Resist not evil with evil” – “the wea­pons of our warfare are not carnal.” He also wrote in 2 Cor. 3:17: “Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty (tolerance).” Con­versely speaking, we may draw the ready conclusion that without liberty there is none of the Spirit of the Lord. And from such we are advised to turn away! Woe unto those who fall prey to the spirit of Antichrist!

“For we are not like the many, trafficking the word of God; but really from sincer­ity, and as from God, in the presence of God, we speak concerning Christ.” (2 Cor. 2:17, Dia.)

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

======================

Supplement to No. 152

QUESTION OF GENERAL INTEREST

QUESTION: – In your January paper you say “It is God that justifies.” Will this also be true in the next dispensation?

ANSWER: – No. While this Gospel Age is a faith dispensation, and the next will be a works arrangement, there is another dominant feature that is the de­termining factor – namely, the Mediator (the Christ) will then be officiating. A Mediator serves between two parties at variance with each other, and the Mediator’s purpose will be to effect reconciliation between God and man, both of whom are at variance with each other. Once this arrangement is clearly seen, it is then no problem to understand that God will have nothing to do with the human race by way of giving them a reckoned (faith) justification, because the Mediator will operate to bring them gradually to perfection of physique and character, which, when it is accomplished, will enable each individual to stand in his own justification – just as was true of Adam in his perfection. He needed no intercessor with God, needed no other merit than his own inherent capacities to have direct fellowship with his creator.

This being the case, it logically follows that any attempt to teach a tentative (faith) justification in the next dispensation is simply some more Levitical nonsense of the worst order. To declare that both Messengers were in error when they taught opportunity for new Youthful Worthies until restitution sets in is a revolutionism of both the Truth and its Arrangements, and clearly manifests such would-be teachers as revolutionists, perverters and repudiators of the “faith once delivered unto the saints.” They have failed to “continue in His Word,” thereby measurably losing the Spirit of the Truth and the Spirit of understanding. (See 2 Thes. 2:10,11; also Berean Comment: “All, in the end of the Gospel Age, who, having been favored with the Word of God, have failed to appreciate and use it.... Strong delusion... That which, from certain standpoints, has the appearance of truth.”)

This is further emphasized in Rom. 3:26: “To declare at this time God’s right­eousness: that He might be just, and the Justifier of him who Believeth on Jesus.” In previous verses St. Paul also states that it is “by the faith of Jesus” (the faith­fulness that He manifested, and by the faith we have in His redemptive purposes toward us) that we now have “this Grace wherein we stand.” While this teaching is “Present Truth” now, it will have no bearing whatever in the next dispensation; and quoting it then, as applying then, would be just as much out of order as it would how be for us to preach Noah’s message of an impending flood.

Here is something from Reprints 5164, col. 2, par. 2, that is directly to the point:

“During the Millennium God will not recognize the people, because of their im­perfection, their weakness; but all of their dealings will be through the Medi­ator. until they shall have been brought up to perfection. At the end of the thous­and years they will be delivered up to the Father, unblamable before Him.(l Cor. 15: 24) God will then receive them as sons, heirs of the earthly blessings which He has provided for mankind – the things given to Adam. The very moment when the merit of Christ is applied for the world is the same moment when they will be turned over to the Mediator. (Is the world now turned over to the Mediator?—JJH) Then they will be in covenant relationship with God, but only through the Mediator, until they have reached human perfection and shall enter into his relationship directly with the Father.”

In this connection, we recall R. G. Jolly’s parrot-like quotation from E-4:346 – ­“The doctrine of Tentative Justification operating from the time of Abel, Enoch and Noah until Restitution begins.” This he presented as ‘proof’ that Tentative Justification is now operating in the Camp – since 1954. But when we quoted from that very same section of Volume 4, pages 337/347, showing Brother Johnson’s emphasis that Tentative Justification would be available UNTIL RESTITUTION BEGINS for the very purpose of winning new Youthful Worthies, as companions in honor and service with the Ancient Worthies, he was then forced to other errors to support his “strange fire” (false doctrine) of Campers Consecrated, claiming that they receive Tentative Justification in the Camp. As Brother Johnson has said, when such error­ists are forced from their original erroneous position by the Truth against them, they then resort to more and more error, as RGJ is now doing with his claim that Tentative (faith) Justification will continue throughout the Millennium. And it should be noted, too, that he no longer quotes the Truth (on Tentative Justifica­tion operating until restitution sets in) from Volume E-4. He is afraid to do this because even his sleepy adherents might just awake to the real situation.

In this entire treatise in Epiphany Volume 4 of the Youthful Worthies and Tenta­tive Justification, Brother Johnson was proving that the two are inseparably linked here in the end of the Age – until Restitution begins - Tentative Justification for Youthful Worthies, and Youthful Worthies for Tentative Justification. This faith justification is for the very purpose of winning a faith class – an Elect class; and is merely added structure to what Brother Russell has already taught. It dis­putes nothing that That Servant taught – merely elaborates and clarifies that teach­ing. Yet RGJ is now telling us that the teaching in Volume 4 is all wrong; he has found ‘new Light’ (?) on the subject – the same kind of ‘new light’ that JFR found when he decided to eliminate Tentative Justification altogether from the Bible and from That Servant’s declaration of the subject, to make room for his non-existent class – impudently claiming that the Bible and That Servant supported his error; even as RGJ also impudently claims the same support from That Servant and the Bible for his present error, now ignoring the Epiphany Messenger’s teaching altogether. And the same kind of people will now be led astray by RGJ as were led astray by JFR!

Following is some more from E-4:342, top: “If our dear readers will keep in mind that The Tower’s denial of Tentative Justification during this Age is the founda­tion of its rejecting the Scriptural doctrine that those faithful consecrators from 1881 until Restitution sets in (Has Restitution set in?—JJH).... will be the Millen­nial Associates of the Ancient Worthies in reward and service, they will be able by Scriptural, reasonable and factual thinking completely to overthrow every argument that the article under review presents to defend its thesis.”

And substantially the same may be said now for RGJ’s perversion of Tentative Justification, as he desperately attempts to avoid exposure of his present error. We have indeed been able by “Scriptural, reasonable and factual thinking completely to overthrow every argument” that he has presented to defend his erroneous contentions.

Even though we cannot judge the heart, God can — and when we see brethren depart­ing from the Truth that once sanctified them, revolutionizing, perverting and repu­diating certain vital doctrines and arrangements to justify their “path of error,” we know there is something wrong with the heart – otherwise the Lord would not per­mit them to go into such errors. It is those who have received the Truth and not appreciated it, and departed from it, who pose as “angels of light.” They are far more dangerous than those who have departed completely and become moral renegades. The latter class can’t exert much influence upon the upright, but the former often do wield much influence over the Lord’s people who fail to heed the warnings of That Servant and the Epiphany Messenger. All of this, of course, if for “the trial of your faith.”

----------------------------------------------------------

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

To WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: – I have read The Herald of the Epiphany Edition No. 7, which was given me last Sunday at the ------- Civic Center showing of Martin Luther... This reading of The Herald of the Epiphany is so good that I am keeping for re-reading and I want you to please send me the other six, No. 1 – Where are the Dead, No. 2 – What is the Soul, No. 3 – The Resurrection of the Dead, No. 4 – The Three Babylons, No. 5 – Two Distinct Salvations, No. 6 – God’s Great Sabbath Day.

Thank you very kindly, Mrs. ------- (FLORIDA)

.............................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace be yours through our blessed Lord & Master!

We have been enjoying your well written articles in defense of the Truth. The Lord knoweth them that are His, and provides bountifully for all their needs. I have been unable to write you – also Sr. Hoefle who wrote such lov­ing and helpful letters. This year, as it draws to a close, finds us still with you in Spirit. We rejoice also with the others who are always on the look-out for your monthly Truth articles. The Truth is precious indeed!

I appreciate your prayers – also dear Sr. Hoefle’s. I remember you and the brethren in prayer. Enclosed is a small contribution. lt’s not much, but the best I can do. Much love in the Lord to all with you.

By His Grace ------- (OHIO)

..................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle:

I sit thinking of the many things I would like to tell you. Then it occurs to me to do some typing – get if off my chest! You surely must be busy. Don’t feel under obligation to answer. I shall watch in your papers (No. 148 was marvelous!). Hope ------- got one.

It certainly surprises me Mr. Jolly taking the attitude against you as he does. Never dreamed he had gone SO FAR as to disfellowship you!....... I noted my letter also printed recently...... I don’t mind if you give my address to the brother who wondered about the Sister from Michigan. I do not use the English Language as well as you do. You are a Master at it!

Joe ------- wrote me a letter some years ago – rather kindly though – suggesting I transfer to another unit. At that time he had a thousand-dollar loan from my hus­band. I called them – in class – over every error in the Watch Tower. And so they wanted to get rid of me! But they all KNEW MY STANDING BEFORE MY LORD. Of course, I returned his letter with notations added to it. My husband signed, too. His wife told a friend Joe was furious (the friend repeated it to me).

I look back many years – amazed to think many of them thought they were for the High Calling! It staggers my imagination that we could ever dare hope to see our Saviour as He is – to be LIKE HIM – live and reign with Him 1,000 years! I shall leave my Judgment to my Saviour. He died for me! ....

So many times I long to serve my Maker. But as I review over the 40 years gone by, we did our best, with the help of Jesus Christ – the Beloved of God. How very earnestly I pray nightly for my Lord to NEVER TAKE AWAY THE DEEP LOVE I have for Him – for the Truth, for the thankful Heart I enjoy – to comfort me.

At times my whole frame trembles with joy and appreciation. The Watch Tower does not even tell the people – at this time of the year – what that super birth of Jesus, by the Virgin Mary, means for mankind...... The enclosed for postage help.....

Concluding with Christian love from ------- (MICH.)

..................................................................

My dear Brother Hoefle: Greetings of Christian love!

The Christmas season is approaching, and we wish you, Sister Hoefle and all the dear ones with you, a happy Holiday – and endeavoring to continue faithful in the days ahead.

We both thank you for your letters and prayers. Daily do we remember you, Sr. Hoefle and the supporting brethren in our prayers.

Quite a number of people have appreciated the No! 7 tract – and we believe it will bear fruit in due course. We have posted it to relatives and friends in various parts of the country, too, and to Protestant ministers. A few Gideon Extras have been distributed, but we find an apathetic spirit abroad. Church workers are so busy trying to amalgamate. Some of our neighbours, who have had the tracts (and who realize we know somewhat of the Bible), appreciate the message to some extent –invited us to a ‘bring and buy sale’ at their home, in aid of the Roman Catholic Church, The Church of England, The Methodist Church, The Congregation Church and The Pentecostal Church. Brother pointed out we could not uphold anything we know the Lord was not desiring.... Since our refusal to go, they have treated us as usual ­not like the Society, the LHMM, who, to say the least, treat us as if they never knew us. God bless you all! Sister joins me.

Your brother by His Grace, ------- (ENGLAND)

..................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Greetings in the Master’s Name!

Sir! I want to thank you for sending me the literature which you have done...... Are you acquainted with Brother Goodrich and his works there at Fort Lauderdale?...... I had never heard of the term Youthful Worthies until I read your literature! I don’t remember whether Brother Jolly uses that term or not. Also, am I to understand that you don’t approve of the ....Group?..... Now this term – or name – Azazel? In all the twenty some years I’ve been reading so-called Truth literature, that’s a stumper to me! We are not really associated, or belong, to any of the so-called Truth groups. But I do get and subscribe to a number of them.

I will admit that I first came in contact with the Truth through the Jehovah’s Witnesses – and Oh! I thought I had found the way – only to be very abruptly dis­allusioned about five or six years later. Then I had and kept my eyes and ears open to the things that happened about us – and our so-called brothers’ attitude. We gradually dropped out..... I must admit that you are very nearly right when you call them Little Babylon, which is also a term I hadn’t heard before. My husband and I and our 15-year-old son have our own Bible Studies in our own home..... I am trying to give my son a firm foundation to fall back on as he grows and enters into life..... It’s like Jesus said in His prayer to the Father that last time: We are in the world, but are not a part of it....

You sent me a copy of Where are the Dead. I read it and sent it to an Aunt of mine who believes in Spiritism. It was such a good paper! I would like to have a few more to give to people... It is my desire and hope to be of service to the Lord..... A Sister in the Lord, ------- (NEBRASKA)

.............................................................

My dear Brother Hoefle: Fond Christian love and Greetings!

The year is at its close, and as a little encouragement I want to tell you how much I have enjoyed your articles. Not in the sense of “rejoicing in iniquity,” however – nor in the perversions of the Leaders you have exposed – but in the pure unperverted Truths you have brought out in your refutations. Any true and honest heart – who compares your writings with the Star Members’ writings – must agree they correspond, and help in character development.

I was young and unconsecrated during the JFR sifting, but I paid great heed to it because of my love for God and His Plan. I counted the cost before I entered His vineyard – and that is why I thank God for you. We all need a pointer where we can seek after His Word..... He will not leave Himself without a witness, so it is for us to make the effort to find out His true witness...

I saw the letter from the Brother in Trinidad. I pity the poor Brother, making himself a ledling – blindly following another without proving who is right and who is wrong. See Manna Comments August 18 and December 20.

Warm Christian love.... Yours by His Grace, ------- (JAMAICA)

NO. 151: RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT

No. 151

My dear Brethren: Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

Another year gone – but not easily forgotten. The year’s turmoil has kept pace with – has probably exceeded – the advances in science, and the deterioration in the financial structure. The scientific accomplishments have indeed been astounding in several directions. In Michigan some artisans have perfected a blueberry-picking machine that will do the work of 300 laborers; and this machine seems to be as sensitive as the human touch and the human eye, since it picks only the ripe berries, while leaving the green ones on the vines.

Also, the various electronic and computing devices are in some instances so sensitive that they must be kept in air-conditioned surroundings, keeping the temperature constant in order to secure proper action. A telephone technician recently told us that such machines now in use by the telephone company are so sensitive that no one is allowed to smoke in that room. He further informed us that those machines will notify them within thirty seconds if any one has tapped a telephone line anywhere in the city – that it will advise whether the tap has been made on the line from the telephone pole to the building, or if it has been done inside the building where the phone is located. “In the time of the end knowledge shall be increased.” In this connection, Brother Johnson gave us the following statement in Epiphany Vol. 9, p. 407 (50):

“Our Pastor sketched in various details of progress (of Dan. 12:4) the vehicles – steamboats, submarines, railroad trains, trolleys, autos, buses, airships, airplanes, etc.”

Volume 9 was published in 1938; and, while those things mentioned in that book are truly amazing, the past thirty years have phenomenally pyramided the intricacies of scientific invention.

Nor has Israel been without profit from the scientific skills of this grand and awful time. A recent radio report stated they had increased the rainfall there during 1966 by 17% – through scientific manipulation – quite a welcome draught to a desert land. And they are hopeful for further increase. However, another more certain means of water is to come to that country through the construction of three gigantic filter plants that will eliminate the salt from the sea water, through providing certain irrigation for all of the land – at a cost of two billion dollars. In detailing how a combination of nickel and copper will enter essentially into this performance, our informant then exclaimed, Then you’ll see the desert blossom as the rose!

IN FINANCE

The financial structure has kept apace – in decay – with the advance in science. It is estimated that the overall debt in the United States at this time – Federal, State, Local and private – now is more than 1½ trillion dollars. Such a figure is beyond human understanding. And, while not so much is publicized about this enormous financial load, it comes to us from private sources that the more astute among the financiers are at least attempting to protect themselves against the collapse of this gigantic paper house. In 1966, for instance, all newly-mined gold has disappeared – plus forty million more. The newly-mined gold in the “free” world was worth more than one billion dollars. Then, in the first quarter of 1967 all the new gold disappeared, plus seventy million more – for that one quarter alone. Not all of this went into private hoarding, of course, as much of it was used in jewelry, in manufacture, etc. At the end of March of this year the total financial gold for the entire world was slightly more than 43 billion, which, if placed in one pile, would make a cube about 50 x 50 x 50 feet.

As usual, the politicians want no talk concerning the relationship of gold to the paper they have printed. Their by-word has been “Instant Money” – by the printing press. Inasmuch as the United States now holds less than 13 billions in gold – against which there are more than 30 billions of foreign demands payable in gold – our financial manipulators have been forced to raise interest rates, forcing other countries to do the same. At 5% the interest on 30 billions is 1½ billions each year – the ‘blackmail money’ they must now pay each year to pre­vent our foreign creditors from demanding payment in hard money – gold.

This great increase in paper money has led to what is styled “creeping inflation” – as against what is termed “galloping inflation.” To illustrate the former: A mechanic was recently engaged in wrecking a building, and he casually remarked that he had helped to construct that same building forty years ago at forty cents per hour; now he was helping tear it down at four dollars per hour. Over the years this great increase has been gradual – creeping inflation ­not distressingly noticeable to the average person, but decidedly real nonetheless.

On the other hand, some other countries have already experienced galloping inflation, a classic example being Germany after Hitler decided to eliminate the internal debt by destroying the value of the Mark. We are well acquainted with one man who was in the midst of that financial debacle; and he related that it had become so bad that, when they received their pay on Saturday noon, they did not walk, they all ran to the Belgian border about two blocks away to convert those marks into foreign currency before it shrank even lower. And there is much concern that a similar condition might soon develop in the United States.

Coming events cast their shadows before; and one such ‘shadow’ is the 1967 contract made by labor with the automobile plants. The increases they received are so great that it must eventually lead to one of two things – either galloping inflation, or a drastic depression brought on by pricing ourselves out of the world markets. It is our opinion that it will be the latter.

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY SEMINAR: This gathering was held in New York City Nov­ember 3,4-5 – perhaps the first of its kind ever to be organized – and it was our special privilege to attend, through the invitation of one of the principal speakers. Theme of this Seminar was “The Value of Money, Today and Tomorrow”; and the program included outstanding men from England, from South Africa, from Japan, from Canada, from Switzerland, from France, from Germany, from Mexico, from the United States – ‘brilliant men, qualified to speak on money and free markets.” Attendance was by invitation only, so we considered ourself much favored to be there; the general public did not even know the conference was in progress. An outstanding remark from one of the speakers was this: We are now in the 54th year of monetary disorder (since 1914).

It was also stated that the debt-increasing-money-supply system resulted in an increase of 95.1 billion in US public and private debt in 1966, and unoffi­cial estimates indicate it will be even larger in 1967. This latter conclusion is based somewhat on the fact that the debt increased 80.5 billion in 1963, 85.7 in 1964, and 93.2 in 1965. Concerning this appalling situation, the speaker quoted another writer as follows:

“You have to be richer than Croesus, wiser than Socrates, and have the callousness of an ox to attempt to break the monopoly which the aggressive but fundamentally ignorant so-called New Economists of today try to create for them­selves and us.”

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND: This year 1967 the meeting of this group was held in Rio de Janeiro; and we are informed the schism was so great among them that the French representative actually walked out of the gathering a day before it was over. The sharp differences were regarding high interest rates (on worthless paper) and international liquidity. Of course, it is very difficult for the outsider to determine if those advocates of high interest and printing-press money really don’t know any better, or whether they are actuated from grossly selfish motives. In our own IMF office in Washington there are 850 well-paid international civil servants – 100 more than two years ago. Their head­quarters are so luxurious that they include marble-walled elevator cars, a new three-­story palatial entertainment hall with a splashing fountain and glittering chande­liers. This year the IMF governors and members of their staff attended the Rio de Janeiro meeting; and, according to one financial publication, the US delegation “was buttressed by a whole Air Force plane-load of about 45 officials, plus wives and secretarial help.” One does not need to be overly observant to understand why such people are loud in their clamor for the present system. Why should they want to be rid of such an elegant setup as that – it should go on forever. Much the same as one prominent oil magnate, when asked in Court what were his chief duties as Director of his company, replied, “To clamor for dividends.” The words of St. Paul come strik­ingly to mind: “They all shall wax old as doth a garment; and as a vesture shalt thou fold them up, and they shall be changed.” (Heb. 1:11,12)

IN POLITICS

The political fabric also “waxes old as doth a garment.” As one financial writer has stated, If you expect to have a good year ahead, one of the primary con­clusions you must reach is not to believe any of the promises your Government may make. When men must compromise their moral standards for the votes of people who cannot even sign their own names in the voting booth, it is not difficult to under­stand the kind of men who eventually gain office. Last summer we were in Detroit during that disastrous riot there. We looked out of our window on the fifth floor of a building, saw the mobs smashing windows and looting at will, with a large part of the city in flames, while the politicians ordered the police not to use force in intervention – a vivid modern example of Nero fiddling while Rome burned. One financial expert remarked to us that the politicians were allowing the civil moral fibre to corrode in like manner as the financiers were doing with the financial structure. There is violent crime in the streets of Detroit – in broad daylight in the business center of the city. “They have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.” (Hos. 8:11) This now applies with equal force to finance and politics. Much could be said about it; but we may later treat of this situation from the prophetic standpoint, giving in much more detail the happenings in Detroit last summer – the same being a harbinger of yet more and worse to come.

Nor can any one be justly accused of prejudice for blaming the politicians for much of the trouble in the world today. The dividing of Berlin – half to the Com­munists and half to the western part of Germany – could be nothing more than bung­ling politics. It was an ideal arrangement to “make” trouble. The same must be said for Jerusalem – half to the Jews and half to the Arabs – both enemies from the twilight of history. Concerning Ishmael – progenitor of the Arabs – it was prophetically written: “He will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him.” (Gen. 16:12) Could Anything but trouble come from dividing Jerusalem between two such antagonists? In the 1914-18 conflict the Lord miraculously saved the city from crossfire between the Turks and the English (See our paper No. 30 of Jan. 1, 1958). Once more it was saved last summer in the conflict between the Arabs and the Jews; but the question is cer­tainly properly in order, How many times will the Lord allow Himself to be tempted in such fashion?

The River Jordan is a type of the curse upon the human race, the river ever going lower and lower, until it is about 1,300 feet below sea level when it reaches the Dead Sea. And Joshua 3:15 tells us that “Jordan overfloweth all his banks all the time of the harvest.” “The Harvest is the end of the Age,” said Jesus (Matt. 13:39, Dia.); and, having come to the end, we may expect the evidences of the curse to be more glaringly apparent in every place, but especially so in Christendom, where privileges are being abused, graft and corruption of politi­cians is rampant, and “the love of money” is debasing men in high positions. There can be little argument but that “civil rights” of the downtrodden (white or black) in America should have been sponsored years ago; but civil rights have been speedily corrupted into “civil wrongs” – much the same as when parents, wanting to be kind and generous to their children, “spare the rod, and spoil the child.” This is exactly what has happened in those cities where the illiterate, the immoral, the irresponsible, the criminally-inclined have been given more of “civil rights” than they can properly handle. It is a sage observation that few people can stand extreme adversity, but fewer still can stand great prosperity. The back-breaking toil and long hours of labor in the past were undoubtedly unjust; but that very evil had a certain restraining influence for good – it gave men neither the money nor the time to get into trouble. But the present reform measures have given the “sea” (the restless and lawless masses of humanity) more of liberty and leisure than they can properly bear.

IN RELIGION

The walls of many religious systems are also deteriorating. The creeds, the strict scruples of the past, are crumbling toward combinationism – the flimsy ideal that it matters not what one believes so long as he is sincere in that belief. This is in violent contrast to St. Paul’s version that there is but “one Lord, one faith (belief), one baptism” (Eph. 4:5), and to St. Peter’s contention that “there is none other name under Heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12) In flouting these inspired statements, the Archbishop of Canterbury paid a visit to Pope Paul VI. He is 100th in succession to St. Augustine, Canter­bury’s first archbishop in 597. He believes that the Church of Rome and the Church of England should work together as allies rather than rivals. Apparently he has forgotten what caused the cleavage in the first instance – when King Henry the Eighth divorced the Roman Church by adhering to the Biblical teaching of Thomas Cranmer that the Church is subject to the State in civil matters. To this the Church of Rome is diametrically opposed; the two positions are so inimical to each other that it is much the same as encouraging a friendly alliance between God and the Adversary.

THE JEWS: Among those who were once “in full harmony” with That Servant there is now pronounced difference on Israel and Palestine. The Jehovah’s Wit­nesses – who still claim to be “THE Channel” for Truth and salvation (no salva­tion for those now living who do not now join them) – have consigned the Jews in Palestine to annihilation. Thus they offer “Comfort to the Arabs”; whereas, they were one time emphatic in their message “Comfort For The Jews.” On the other hand, other divisions of the Harvest Movement are now stressing “Comfort For The Jews,” especially so, since their astounding victory over their neighbors in the war last summer. However, viewing matters with worldly wisdom, it would seem that the Jews are needing very little “Comfort”; the decisive defeat of their enemies is certainly comfort sufficient for present needs. In this conclusion, however, let none decide that we are forgetting Zech. 14:1-3 and the final stroke of Jacob’s Trouble at the extreme end of this “present evil world” – at which time the Israelites indeed will realize the promise, “Then shall the Lord go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fought in the Day of Battle.”

THE TRUTH GROUPS: In discussing this matter, we shall resort largely to what That Servant wrote on “The Rewards of Sacrifice” in the June 15, 1911 Tower (Reprint 4835), as it is a direct contradiction to the claims of many now claiming “full harmony” with him. Here is a small quote from that article:

“Quite likely, therefore, there will be some in the end of this Age who, although faithful unto death, will not have been begotten of the Holy Spirit and not attain the spirit plane of being in the Resurrection, but who will come forth members of the same class as the Ancient Worthies, who were developed before this Age began.”

All of us know that the Jehovah’s Witnesses, who claim to be “The Channel” in like manner as was That Servant during the Harvest reaping work, long ago denied such a class; and have substituted for them their Jonadabs, or now called the “Large Multitude.” To produce such a class they have had to deny That Servant’s inter­pretation of Rev. 7:9-17, along with many other Scriptures.

Also, at Memorial they deny this Large Multitude the privilege of the bread and the wine, another feature also directly contradicted by That Servant:

“At the Memorial season all of the consecrated should manifest their love, loyalty, obedience, faithfulness, by symbolizing the Redeemer’s death and symbol­izing their own desire to share in the sufferings of Christ as parts of the ‘broken loaf’ and as participators in the cup of His sufferings.”

Also, THE DAWNS claim “full harmony” with That Servant, but find themselves hard pressed to reconcile their present course with parts of this same article:

“But suppose that some should present themselves after the close of the acceptable time; what would be their status, and God’s dealing with them? .... We cannot now assure them (at June 15, 1911) that, after presenting themselves as sacrifices, God will accept them as such and grant them spirit-begetting to a new nature; but we can assure them that it will be their reasonable service and that God always gives large rewards to those who manifest their faith and loyalty towards Him and their cause. We can tell them, too, that, to our understanding, the Scriptures teach that the Ancient Worthy class (of which they may be a part if they fail to be accepted to the new nature) will be highly honored of God..... made ‘princes in all the earth.’“

We here stress that this article was written more than 56 years ago, at which time That Servant would not even then assure any one of a place in the High Calling. Yet the Dawns are now preaching such assurance, even as they ‘profess’ “full harmony” with the writer of that article.

The Laymen’s Home Missionary Movement in like manner vitiates the article under discussion, while also making loud claim to “full harmony” with That Ser­vant:

“We can assure them that, to our understanding, these princes will have a glorious precedence over the remainder of mankind as the special representatives of the invisible Messiah class for a thousand years. We can assure them that, to our understanding, after participating in that glorious work these princes will be uplifted at the close of the Millennium to the spirit plane of being ­as part of the antitypical Levites.”

It is indeed tragic to record that all Truth groups but one reject the above teaching by That Servant; whereas, the Epiphany Messenger accepted it in toto, and elaborated and clarified it by producing numerous prophetic texts in clear proof of the teaching. Yet those Truth groups who are one in rejecting That Servant’s teachings are also almost all in complete agreement in their rejection of the Messenger who has faithfully upheld That Servant’s teachings. And, even of the one group (the LHMM) who claims “full harmony” with That Servant – and also the Epiphany Messenger – they by their present teachings belie their claim, as they have now ruled out the possibility of any attaining membership in that elect class now – in full rejection of both Messengers’ teachings that such opportunity would be available until Restitution sets in. (See Epiphany Vol. 4, pp. 337, 342) At present the LHMM does not teach such opportunity to newcomers, as they also have a newly invented class of their own making. Whereas, the Dawns still promise newcomers a superior position to the Ancient Worthies (the High Calling), the LHMM now offers them an inferior position, offering them nothing more for present self-­denials than will come to the entire race – perfection on the human plane. Note now a little more from the article: “Nowhere in the Scriptures are we commanded by the Lord to sacrifice our earthly rights and privileges. The Divine commands end at the line of justice.... All sacrificing is a privilege, not a duty, not a command. In harmony with this St. Paul writes, not commandingly, but entreatingly ‘I beseech you, brethren.... present your bodies living sacrifices.’ He did not command this.....Whatever is commanded of God is obligation and not sacrifice.”

Their perversion of this article has forced them to invent a new class here in the end of the Age – just as the Witnesses have done – the difference being only in the name of Consecrated Epiphany Campers (also an invention). And, while the Witnesses have eliminated the real Great Multitude to make way for their non­existent class, the LHMM has now estopped entrance into that class described in the article as being eligible to membership with the Ancient Worthies (since 1954, almost fourteen years ago); and are also declaring no more saints on earth since 1950. We shall have more to say about this in a later writing.

THE GREAT REFORMER: The response to this No. 7 tract has been most gratifying. When preparing it, little did we anticipate the generous reception it would receive from ministers, from evangelists and from editors of religious magazines – quite a few of them asking to be placed on our regular mail­ing list, and offering to pay for the service. The tract has had distribution in more than 21 foreign countries, such as England, France, Scotland, Germany, Canada, Jamaica, Trinidad, Japan, Argentina, Mozambique, Taiwan, Costa Rica, Hawaii, the Philippines, Chile, and numerous other countries – although we do not wish to convey the impression that it was extensive in all of them; in fact, in many of them it was a token circulation to specific individuals. However, in all this effort only one criticism came to us, and that came from Japan. None at all from the United States or England, Scotland, France, Trinidad, Jamaica and other places where there was greater distribution. With the help of a number of the friends, this was made possible, we have made extensive distribution in many of the larger cities – such as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Detroit, Los Angeles, Memphis, Etc., as well as in many of the smaller communities, and practically all the larger cities of North Carolina. Also, a considerable number of churches were served with it on Sundays – receiving a very generous reception there, too. During all this, however, the Special Effort with the Gideon tracts was pursued vigor­ously by a number of zealous brethren. But we emphasize, it is not our thought to give preference to the No. 7 tract, as we still consider the chief work toward the public to be what the Epiphany Messenger stressed; namely, anti­typical Gideon’s Second Battle with Where Are the Dead and What Is the Soul, etc. However, the Reformer tract has proven an excellent complement to the Gideon tracts, having brought many requests for those tracts from those who have received them.

In this connection we are most happy to relate that The Reformer tract is not the only paper that has accomplished impressive results. A few months back we were listening to one minister on radio, one who offers frequent orations over extensive radio network; and we were decidedly surprised to hear him say that he was not above accepting the truth, even if it did violence to his previously-held ideas. Then he proceeded to discourse on What Is the Soul; and he gave almost word for word a large part of what is contained in that tract. In fact, the major part of his sermon on his half-hour program was devoted to that topic. In his talk he stressed repeatedly that MAN IS MORTAL! Unwittingly he was participating with us in the Special Effort in antitypical Gideon’s Second Battle. Such response and results should encourage all of us to continue in the Truth and its Arrangements, as we zealously seek to study, practice and spread the truth.

A TIMELY WARNING

On p. 74, col. 2, of the May 1944 Present Truth the Epiphany Messenger offers excellent warning and counsel under the heading, “The Enemies of Obedience,” from which we offer the following excerpts:

“There are opponents to our rendering obedience to the Lord. Our great adversary is constantly plotting to make us disobedient to the Lord. He has a thousand and one reasons to offer to secure our obedience to himself and our dis­obedience to the Lord, well knowing that if he can gain it, he has defeated us in a fight, and if he can make us habitually disobedient, he knows that he has defeated us in the entire warfare. Hence we should give no room to the devil by yielding to his temptations to disobedience; and if he finds it impossible to lure us into disobedience, he will let us alone on that subject and try to overthrow us on some other point of character. The World is also an opponent of our obedience. It tries at times through our families to make us rebellious against the Lord. In our friends it frequently seeks to do this. Sometimes in our business or co-worker associates it tries to make us unfaithful. Not seldom has it, working through the civil powers, sought this end. Especially in the nominal church has it sought to do this.

“Through the fleshly minds of our brethren, which are really a part of the world, has the world sought to make us disobedient. This has been true all through the Gospel Age; for the world opponents of the faithful have, in the main, been the fleshly minds of crown-losers, particularly the crown-lost leaders of the nominal church. The Levite leaders among the various groups of Truth people, by their fleshly minds, have misled many crown-lost brethren into dis­obedience to the Lord’s Word and Arrangements, and have constantly sought to mislead the faithful into such insubordination. And our flesh, in a thousand and one ways through our selfish and worldly affections, is constantly seeking to oppose us and make us self-willed and obdurate as to the Lord, His Word and Spirit.

“Balaam was inveigled into the wrong of disobedience by his love of money and honor, typical of false teachers during the Gospel Age (Num. 22-26). Saul was in­volved into disobedience through his love of spoils and popularity, typical of crown-lost leaders (1 Sam. 13:13; 15:3,9) David disobeyed the Lord in connec­tion with Bath-sheba and Uriah (2 Sam. 12). Solomon became disobedient in idolatry, typical of the papacy (I Kings 11:7-10). Ahab disobeyed God in sparing Ben-hadad, typical of the civil powers sparing the radicals (1 Kings 20-22). The people of Judah disobeyed the Lord in not remaining in Judea, but in going to Egypt, typical of Americans not retaining as much of truth and righteousness as they had and in entering into all sorts of worldliness (Jer. 43:7; 44:12-14). All of these – the types and antitypes, as well as others, tasted the bitter fruits of disobedience; for disobedience always brings evils upon its doers. All of us by information, observation and experience know this to be true, which, as well as the foregoing considerations, should make us guard ourselves with all diligence against the opponents of obedience and the inciters to disobedience.”

In conclusion we would heartily reciprocate the many Holiday greetings that have come to us, and we extend cordial good wishes to God’s people everywhere ­to all who call upon the name of the Lord in sincerity and in Truth. May the year ahead see increased growth in Grace and in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus. ‘‘And thanks to that God, who gives us the victory, through our Lord Jesus Christ. Wherefore, my beloved brethren, be you settled, unmoved, abounding in the work of the Lord at all times, knowing that your labor is not in vain in the Lord.” (1 Cor. 15:57,58—Diaglott)

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

------------------------------------------------------------------

­QUESTION OF GENERAL INTEREST

QUESTION: – Gen. 1:2 says, “The earth was without form and void.” Can this statement be the truth? Could earth possibly exist without having some ‘form’?

ANSWER: – As given in the King James version, the statement is misleading, as a little reflection will disclose that all matter must have some form to it. A handful of soft clay squeezed through the fingers would have no form that could be clearly defined, since it would be neither square, round, oblong, rec­tangle, etc.; but it still would have some form. The same would be true of the earth – even when it was nothing more than pristine mud or Paleozoic slime; it would self-evidently have some sort of form.

The misunderstanding prompted by the question is to be found in the faulty translation of the King James version. Verse 1 begins, “In the beginning.” It should be properly stated, “In a beginning,” since this earth was not the very first object of creation. (See John 1:1-3) Likewise verse 2 of the cosmogonic record would more correctly state the matter, “The earth was waste and empty” –probably encased completely in water, heavy steam, or a soupy combination of water, steam and solid materials. And, as such, it would truly be ‘‘waste and empty’’ ­without vegetation and without animal life of any kind, as many other planets now seem to be. The word ‘form’ is from the Hebrew ‘tohu,’ meaning literally ‘a ruin,’ or waste; and ‘void’ is from the Hebrew ‘bohu,’ meaning ‘emptiness.’

------------------------------------------------------------------

Supplement to No. 151 - Jan. 1968

CONCERNING TENTATIVE JUSTIFICATION

Since Brother Russell's death there has arisen much controversy concerning this subject. J. F. Rutherford and others have been emphatic in their denial of the doctrine completely, claiming that Brother Russell also “changed his view” on tentative justification in the latter part of his ministry. This put Brother Johnson to much toil to refute their claims, and to prove from the Scriptures that it is a sound Bible doctrine. We also went into quite some detail on the subject in our paper No. 120, which we had concluded would be sufficient to silence all the gainsayers.

But now comes another perversion of the doctrine. This time by R. G. Jolly, who stressed from the platform at the Chicago Convention in October that tentative justification would continue throughout the Millennium: and claimed that Brother Russell taught such perversion. Here once more we have the extreme of two errors ­one crown-loser denying the doctrine completely; the other crown-loser contending tentative justification will go on forever (i.e., until the end of the Millennium). Brother Johnson stressed that it is the error on tentative justification that gives rise to other errors – such as the non-existent class of Jonadabs (now styled by the Witnesses, the Large Multitude); and now another non-existent class – Campers Conse­crated – invented by RGJ. It should be evident that both of these crown-lost leaders had to have the same teacher – AZAZEL – and, Azazel means Perverter.

To continue his listeners in their uninterrupted sleep, RGJ had to by-pass the Epiphany Messenger completely in what he taught about tentative justification, so we now quote just a little from E-15:261:

“Let us see the conditions of justification that will prevail during the Millennial Age. During that Age there will be neither a tentative nor a vitalized justification, since both of these kinds of justifica­tion operate on the basis of the imputed ransom merit, as distinct from the applied ransom merit; and the Millennium will have no imputed, but an applied ransom merit operating.”

From the foregoing, there can be no question about what Brother Johnson believed, so we now ask if RGJ is trying to tell us that the Epiphany Messenger did not under­stand this doctrine? And is he also now telling us that the Epiphany Messenger (a Star Member) revolutionized against this fundamental doctrine? And that he thus lost his standing as a Star Member? This second conclusion would properly follow the first if RGJ is now right in his contentions. We emphasize this situation be­cause it was Brother Johnson himself who stressed the doctrine as vital to our retaining the Truth on the Gospel-Age and Epiphany Tabernacles. Brother Johnson also repeatedly emphasized the Truth that revolutionism against a doctrine once received, and that persisted in, would manifest that person as a crown-loser. It was JFR's denial of tentative justification that forced him to reject the entire book of Taber­nacle Shadows, a book which was the foundation rock of the Six Volumes of Studies in the Scriptures. And, while RGJ has not yet completely rejected the Tabernacle Shadows, his perversion of tentative justification forces him to pervert the teachings of that book – and that very grossly. He must now teach tentative justification in the Camp – outside the linen curtain – outside the righteousness of Christ. Of course, the errors in the case of both these crown-lost leaders have been a direct result of their “gazing.”

Let us keep clearly in mind that tentative justification in this Age is a faith justification; whereas, the justification of the Millennium will be a works justifi­cation; therefore, when Brother Johnson says in E-11:169, “There will be no more faith Justification working during the Millennium,” he was simply repeating what we have already quoted from E-15 that faith justification (tentative justification) will be a thing of the past once this Faith Age ends. A faith justification is specifically for elective purposes, despite the fact that the majority of its recipients have failed to use it for the purpose intended. Thus, he clearly states in another place, “Tentative justification ceases to operate when the Gospel Age ends.” And with this we are in full agreement.

In corroboration of the foregoing, here is something from Brother Russell himself in Reprints p. 5776 (Oct. 1, 1915):

“The difference between the justifica­tion to which the world will attain and that of the Church now, is that with the Church it is a justification by faith, a reckoned justification, attained instantly, by the imputation of the merit of Christ; while the justification of the world will be by works – it will be a making right actually, an actual perfection.... Theirs will be a work of gradually coming to a condition of justification, of perfection of mind and body, under the cover of the New Covenant, sealed with the blood of Christ. They will be coming nearer to this perfection day by day and year by year, rising toward perfection.” (As Brother Johnson thought, this teaching we believed elemental to all faithful to the Parousia Truth, and surely would be elemental – although most fundamental – to all those who have received both Parousia and Epiphany Truth—JJH)

It will be noted from these quotations that RGJ now has THAT SERVANT contradict­ing himself; and he has the Epiphany Messenger contradicting That Servant ­a spiritual bedlam that could come only from a Levite sorely enmeshed in the clutches of Azazel – confusion, and more confusion. This would be unbelievable were we not witness to it; and it is even more astounding to observe large numbers of brethren, who were schooled in the sober teachings of the two Messengers, now being led astray on this fundamental doctrine. Confusion? Yes! A Little Babylon – and in some respects more reprehensible than Big Babylon, because of the greater light that has been theirs. But, if there be any among them who do not succumb to the error, yet tacitly agree by their silence, we are forced then to conclude that they now become a partaker of RGJ's sins. For this we quote from the Manna comments of February 4:

“Those who remain after seeing Babylon and her blasphemous doctrines in the light now shining are reckoned as endorsing the blasphemies and deserving the ‘plagues' (the pestilence that walketh in darkness—JJH) more thoroughly – as much or even more than the ‘tare’ class of Babylonians, because they have greater light.-

“The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?” (Jer. 5:31)

But even of those young in the Truth, there should be little difficulty in understanding this matter if we keep in mind that “It is God that justifies” (Rom. 3:30; 8:33); and His actions are never without definite purpose. The justification of this faith Age does not actually make one right; it reckons him right. And this reckoned righteousness is given for a specific purpose; namely, to enable such to come through Jesus to gain the elective salvation that now prevails. But none of this process will operate in the next Age; the “day” of sacrifice will then be past; and the justification of that Age will be the direct result of the sacrifice of this Age – the two inseparably linked, but with decidedly different purposes in the final accounting. Thus, it is as much spiritual bedlam to teach a tentative (faith) justification for the Millennium as it would be now to teach an actual physical “works” justification for this faith Age.

Of course, we should not overlook the fact that for some years after Brother Johnson's death RGJ was often quoting from Volume E-4 that tentative justifica­tion continues from Abel until restitution begins. This he did to justify tenta­tive justification for his Campers, because, said he, the gate to the Court was closed at 1954; but, if tentative justification is to continue until restitu­tion begins, then it must self-evidently be in the Camp. But our clear refuta­tion of his errors has now forced him to abandon that position; thus, he is now teaching tentative justification throughout the Millennium. Therefore, with him, it is not now tentative justification from Abel until restitution begins, but until restitution ends – or at the beginning of the Little Season. Of course, all this confusion is the direct result of his “strange fire” (false doctrine of Campers Consecrated) – “gazing.” We presume he does have tentative justifica­tion “lapsing” in the Little Season!

The last two Messengers were brilliant and faithful, but they were not infallible – they did make some mistakes – “for the trial of your faith.” This we do not say flippantly or disrespectfully. But it borders on the paradoxical that of the few mistakes they did make in the great system of intricate Truth they gave us, these two crown-lost leaders (JFR and RGJ) should fasten upon the few mistakes they made to build up their system of error. Brother Russell mis­takenly expected the beginning of total turmoil in 1914, with the establishment of the Kingdom perhaps by 1915. Of course, this did not occur; but JFR pro­ceeded just as though it did, and declared the New Covenant in operation by 1918. This he did to make way for his non-existent Jonadabs – children of the New Cove­nant. We believe it requires little argument that the Plowman did overtake the Reaper in 1914 – the night came wherein no man could work – it brought the end to the reaping feature of the Harvest work in each country as the world war involved that country. Thus, Brother Russell had much of Truth intermingled with his mis­take about 1914, but JFR mostly ignored the Truth, grasping at the mistake to sup­port his “gazing.”

In this respect he has been more than outdone by crown-loser RGJ on his 1954 errors. Brother Johnson's mistake on 1954 was only on the time setting; not on his teachings, which were in complete harmony with Parousia Truth. At 1954-56 the total turmoil had not even begun – the Treader of Grapes did not overtake him that soweth seed; Rev. 22:11 did not see fulfillment on that date. Yet RGJ proceeds just as though it did – blindly ignoring the self-evident mistake in the time setting in order to produce his non-existent class of Campers Consecrated – just as the Witnesses continue with the error of JFR on their Large Multitude (Jonadabs). Be it remembered that Brother Johnson expected total turmoil by 1954-56; and it was on this that he based his fulfillment of Rev. 22:11. But time itself clearly declares that his expectations were wrong – that those expec­tations have not yet materialized some fourteen years later; yet RGJ proceeds just as though they had – just as did JFR in 1918 with his New Covenant. And in the face of this he repeatedly cites page 114 of Volume 10 as his “proof,” stressing this again at the Chicago Convention. That page clearly states that, when Rev. 22:11 would apply, “no more persons will enter the tentatively-justified state.” But RGJ offers this reference to “prove” his teaching (his error). Therefore, we quote once more Brother Johnson's expression concerning such “doubleminded” would-be “mouthpieces” of the Lord:

“Why do they so often quote passages to prove points positively disproven by those very passages? Is it not because they are in Azazel’s hands (as we have repeatedly declared respecting RGJ—JJH), and are thus blinded by him, and at his direction palm off his errors on the dear unsus­pecting sheep of God's flock?”

In conclusion, we propound a few questions: (1) Does RGJ now claim that Brother Johnson was unclear and confused on tentative justification – that he perverted Brother Russell's teachings thereon by positively declaring there would be no tentative justification after the Gospel Age ends? (2) Does he thus discount all the Epiphany Messenger produced on tentative justification, and his successful refutation of JFR's errors thereon – and his non-existent class? (3) Is RGJ now contending that he himself is the one who is faithful to the teachings of That Servant, and that Brother Johnson was the one who revolutionized against those teachings? If he (RGJ) continues to teach what he stressed on tentative justification in Chicago, then his answer must self-evidently be Yes; and all who agree with him must be forced to the conclusion that Brother Johnson was not what he claimed – was not the Epiphany Messenger, and was not the last Star Member: Instead of clarifying and elaborating on the Parousia Truths, he perverted them – as all crown-losers during the Age have done with the truths entrusted to them.

...........................................................................

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Epiphany Bible Students Ass'n

Dear Sirs: I got a copy of your paper the other day and was very much impressed with your article about Martin Luther. I am the Editor of a denomina­tional magazine. I would like very much to get on your mailing list. Is there a charge?

Sincerely -------- State Evangelist (NORTH CAR.)

...........................................................................

My dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace be multiplied!

This is to let you know we went to fellowship with Sister ------- and found her quite bright – walking about the house.....

We kept Brothers Russell and Johnson's memorial with her and we were greatly blessed. I gave her your letter and she asked me to relay to you her great appreciation ­that your letter brought much encouragement and happiness. She is determined to allow nothing to slacken her journey in the narrow way ....

The brethren here are all amid their various experiences in keeping up the “good fight.” Brother..... is somewhat better. He was able to be with us on Sunday. Warm Christian love to you and all the dear ones.

Yours by His Grace --------- (JAMAICA)

...........................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Greeting in the dear Master's Name! Hymn #228. Rejoice, and again I say Rejoice! Ardent Christian love unto the brethren. May I again ask you to forward tracts... My supply is very low... I have distributed The Great Reformer to members of the Lutheran Church. I have some of them left, but will need some of all the other tracts. Thank you!

And now with hearty Christian love.... Sincerely, Brother -------- (NEW JERSEY)

...........................................................................

Dear Sirs: Would you please forward to me the entire set of “The Wonderful Bible Keys.” Please mail to..........

This is an overseas address, so if there is any extra charge for postage, please bill me.

Thank you! -------- (CALIFORNIA)

NO. 150: THE PHILADELPHIA CONVENTION

No. 150

My dear Brethren: Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

At the Labor Day Convention there was presented a number of perversions – a tragic revelation of the true heart condition of so many now loudly claiming “full harmony” with Parousia and Epiphany Truth. One of the speakers, in his hour discourse on Baptism, emphasized that those who required John’s Baptism never received the Holy Spirit before they had been immersed – with which we are in agree­ment. Then he cited the case of Cornelius in Acts 10:44-48 to “prove’’ that those who received the Christian Baptism always received the Holy Spirit before immersion. The speaker stood before the Convention as an Auxiliary Pilgrim (by RGJ’s appoint­ment, of course); but it would seem that a mere babe in Present Truth should have known better. The Originator of Christian Baptism, our Lord Himself, was baptized by John at Jordon before He received the Holy Spirit; and the same was true of those twelve in Acts 19:1-7. This is just one sad example of the perverted teach­ings that have become increasingly prevalent since Brother Johnson’s demise – and a revelation of the shallow thinking of those who would be teachers.

Of course, such things as the foregoing are the direct result of the “outer darkness” (Matt. 25:30 – see Berean Comment) into which RGJ has been cast since his abandonment to Azazel in 1950; and his own discourse at the Convention on the New Covenant gave ample evidence of this. In his attempt to explain Exodus 19, wherein is explained the typical Law Covenant, he placed much stress upon Ex. l9:12: “Whosoever toucheth the mount shall be surely put to death.” Then he proceeded to declare that this was finding fulfillment now in those Youthful Worthies who oppose him – that they would surely “be put to death,” lose their Class standing.

Had he first read the true interpretation of the matter in Epiphany Vol. 9, pp. 87 to 157, it is just possible he might have been sufficiently sobered and enlightened to shy away from discussing a subject that points directly at his own evils and limitations. In this citation is found a discussion of Miriam’s afflic­tion with leprosy, the same being a type of Great Company uncleanness; and it is well that we keep in mind that RGJ readily admits he is a part of antitypical Miriam; and his letter in the Nov. 15, 1910, Reprints p. 4716, is ample proof of it, too. Here he admits that he had wasted a year in not keeping close to the Lord and His Word – yet just recently he has stated that he has “always lived very close to the lord” in his oral statements as well as in the Present Truth. Truly, “A double­minded man is unstable in all his ways”! On. p. 125 of E-9 it is stated:

“Not only is goodness of heart needed to get the Truth initially, but it is also necessary to get it progressively, and it is the one needed to retain the Truth received. The reason why people who once had the Truth lose it is that they have lost these heart qualities.” Further, on p. 134 there is this: “It will be noted that while God has given the non-star-membered teachers of the General Church..... visions and dreams, He has never given them to see a thing new a doctrine. This privilege is limited exclusively to our lord acting in the star members. Any attempt on the part of non-star-membered teacher or of a non-teacher to work out a doctrine (such as Campers Consecrated—JJH) would be speculation, and would, therefore, not result in uncovering a new truth, but would result in error.”

Although RGJ’s speculations under Brother Russell was doubtless a contributing cause toward losing his crown, it seems it taught him just nothing in a fundamental way, or he would not have attempted to foist his new doctrine of Campers Conse­crated upon the Church shortly after 1950. In so doing he has produced a class of spiritual hybrids in exact keeping with the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ “Jonodabs,” or pseudo “Great Multitude.” Nowhere in their writings do the Parousia and Epiphany Messengers even hint at a class in the end of this Age who would receive Tentative Justification outside the linen curtain of Christ’s righteousness (although they did teach an unbegotten class – Youthful Worthies – for the period after the High Call­ing until Restitution begins). Only a speculating Levite would attempt such a thing! Not only have the Messengers not taught such a thing, but their teachings clearly contradict such a doctrine. See Epiphany Volume 4, pp. 337, 342. And there is a clear contradiction to it in the January 1950 Present Truth, p. 3, col. 1:

“This represents the sacrifice of the Christ, Head and Body, as viewed by those who are justified in the court. The laver in its foundation and shaft repre­sents the Old Testament; and its bowl wherein the water was found represents the New Testament. This laver was used for all to wash therein; the justified who were in the court could wash in it; the consecrated of the Little Flock... the Great Company could also cleanse themselves in this antitypical laver. The anti­typical laver, therefore, is a matter of Importance for the cleansing OF ALL OF THE CLASSES THAT ARE IN RELATIONSHIP WITH OUR HEAVENLY FATHER.” (All emphasis ours—JJH)

Here is some more on this general subject of speculation from E-9:127: “Many a Priest, speculating on matters not yet due in the Holy and on things in the Most Holy, and by such speculation seeking to set aside things due in the Holy, have lost their crowns and occasioned ‘many’ others to do the same, and thus they perished as Priests and thus became of the Great Company. This we see exemplified on all sides in the Epiphany. Some of these have continued their speculations to such a degree as to cause themselves and others to perish as Great Company Members. Youthful Worthies have speculated themselves into perishing as such, have fallen back into the antitypical Camp (with RGJ’s Campers Consecrated!—JJH), died as Youthful Worthies. Vs. 21, 22, 24 show that all these classes can do this evil thing – ­speculate – and reap its consequences – perish. V. 22 urges that especially the priests sanctify themselves, separate themselves from this evil of gazing. This corresponds to the many warnings given the antitypical Priests in the Parousia and the Epiphany not to speculate lest the Lord unpriest them.”

In confirmation of the foregoing, an elder of a Michigan Ecclesia announced at the Philadelphia Convention that their special effort this Fall would be with RGJ’s tracts – Comfort for the Jews and Evolution. The Epiphany Messenger’s arrangement for these Special Efforts in the Fall and in the Spring was to partici­pate in Antitypical Gideon’s Second Battle – the fight against the two King Errors – ­Consciousness of the Dead and Eternal Torment. So the tracts, Where are the Dead, What is the Soul, and the like, are for these Special Efforts – if we are in harmony with the Epiphany Messenger’s arrangement. We believe some excerpts from E-9:344, 346 would be most appropriate here:

“As an opponent of Babylon’s errors, Bro. Russell’s chief exploits consisted of his attacks on the doctrines of eternal torment and the consciousness of the dead... One of the best ways in which we can continue one phase of his work, and thus co­operate with the Lord in fulfilling the prayer, God bless his memory, is vigorously to prosecute antitypical Gideon’s Second Battle.... Will we not, dear brethren, one and all, do our utmost so to celebrate our dear Pastor’s annivarsary, as a most fitting way of increasing the blessing of his memory to the glory of God and of Christ in freeing others from the above-mentioned errors, in attacking of which our beloved Jashobeam freed so many, including almost all of us?.... Who is on the Lord’s side in this matter? May we all answer, ‘Here am I, send me!’” And in E-5:251, there is this: “Let such do this work, leaving to the Levites the work of pro­claiming Millions now Living, etc. (Campers Consecrated, etc.—JJH),... let us concentrate our attacks against the doctrines of Eternal Torment and the Conscious­ness of the Dead!” (If we listen to some of the prominent Evangelists in Big Baby­lon we must realize that the Battle is not over—JJH)

But now since the Epiphany Messenger is not with us, the LHMM has set these Epiphany arrangements aside – just as other Levitical groups have done with the arrangements of That Servant. And these Special Efforts are now to not only honor That Servant, but also includes the Epiphany Messenger! The “blind leading the blind” into more and more error and violation of Parousia and Epiphany arrange­ments! Yet they loudly proclaim “full harmony” with Parousia and Epiphany Truth and arrangements!

GROSS CLERICALISM AND SECTARIANISM IN LHMM

Recently we received a letter from the brother who wrote the letter on p. 6 in our No. 149; and we now quote this follow-up letter by him:

“Mr. Hoefle: I don’t know why you sent your letter (written to Brother........ to me. But in so doing, you only confirm what I said in my letter to the Brother about your writings. You did not state truthfully when you said I called you names. My statement was made against your writings, and not in respect of you, the man.

“You state that your No. 148 no doubt discomfited me. That is impossible, because I did not read it. Anything coming from your pen I commit to the flames WITHOUT READING. I do so because you were disfellowshiped by the LHMM, and on that account I consider you as an heathen man and a publican. (Matt. 18:7) This is our Lord’s instruction, and as such I will not read your writings. (Emphasis ours—JJH)

“I consider this correspondence closed, and I don’t want you to use any gangster method in forcing your letters on me. I remain -------” (TRINIDAD)

This brother says in the above letter that he refers to our writings and not to us, “the man” – yet in that very same letter he says, “Anything coming from your pen I commit to the flames without reading” And his reason for this, he says is, “because you were disfellowshiped by the LHMM” (Manifestly not because of our writ­ings, which he hasn’t read!); and on this account, he says, “I consider you as an heathen man and a publican.” It seems to us that it is “the man” here that he refers to – just any ‘man’ the LHMM disfellowships – and not our writings! Or is disfellowshiping writings another new (?) truth since 1950? Self-evidently, this brother is very much mixed up when he can make two opposite and contradictory state­ments in the same letter and expect us to believe both of them!

So long as RGJ has “friends” like this, he doesn’t need any enemies. Compared to this, his enemies would be “a cup of cold water.”

Many of the partisan Society brethren did the same thing to the Epiphany Messenger perhaps just as foolishly as described above – “just because the Society disfellow­shiped him”! (the Lord’s will for them!) So, they, too, considered Brother Johnson “as an heathen man and a publican.” In both instances such brethren are Baal Kissers. Brethren persisting in such conduct lose their class standing, if we are to accept the Epiphany Messenger’s teachings. Clericalism and Sectarianism are great sins. Their motto is – “My party, Right or Wrong!” The faithful Youthful Worthies are counted as victors over both these evils.

However, that is not true of the Great Company as a class (although they must as individuals finally overcome, if they retain their class standing). In E-5:229, the Epiphany Messenger tells us that they are not counted as overcomers of these two evils – Clericalism and Sectarianism – as they are among the main forms of their Revolutionism, manifesting their Leviteship. (This, of course, is also true as respecting measurably faithful Youthful Worthies.) “Hence the type very properly contains no representation of their activity against Sectarianism and Clericalism.” (E-5:229) But of the Youthful Worthies he says, “On the other hand, from the type we infer that the Youthful Worthies overcome in their own characters the spirit of Sectarianism and Clericalism, and are thus privileged to have their verbal battling against the prince errors of antitypical Midian accounted as their capturing and executing them.” And we trust the exposure of such evils in our brethren of the LHMM will inure to the good of all, and to the cleansing of the pertinent brethren of these two prince errors, and accounted unto us as a part of the “verbal battling” in “capturing and executing” Oreb (Sectarianism) and Zeeb (Clericalism). Please see Epiphany Vol. 5, pp. 226-229, on Oreb and Zeeb.

THE SEPT-OCT. 1967 PRESENT TRUTH

On pages 78-79 the above paper gives an account of the Philadelphia Conven­tion – the same Convention we have reported aforegoing. Among other false state­ments, RGJ says JJH and wife “continued to seek to ingratiate themselves with others, including especially ‘babes’ in the Truth.” The ‘babes’ to whom he refers approached us; we did not approach them. And in not a single instance did we ask for an address, offer any of our literature, or attempt to discuss controversial Truth sub­jects. We simply gave them the common courtesy we would offer to any man in the street after they had been introduced to us. Therefore, RGJ was either misinformed, or he is offering one more display of his “bad conscience and not a few misrepresen­tations.” (See E-10:585, top) As for ourselves, we are not at all solicitous of acquiring the plaudits or homage of any who would embrace a character of “bad con­science – many misrepresentations – loquacious, repetitious and false-accusing.” (See E-10:591, par. 1) Our mailing list has been growing rapidly with names whose vision embraces a better level. As will be noted from our contradictions of RGJ’s statement on pages 78-79 concerning us, his accusations are in the main simply some more of his falsehoods – falsehoods probably instigated by the crushing refutations we have given his errors on Isa. 41:19 and 1 Cor. 15:24. As Brother Johnson has stated in E-4:221,222: “Whenever religious errorists and frauds cannot meet the exposures of their false doctrines or evil practices by argument, Satan fills their mouths with false and malicious slanders against their exposers.”

RGJ says the Convention “was filled with many precious blessings from the Lord, both in the Truth and in the spirit of the Truth.” In our account of the Convention we recorded some of the errors on Baptism by Bernard Hedman, and the errors of RGJ himself in his discourse on “The Inauguration of the New Covenant.” Describing such errors as “precious blessings from the Lord” has become common per­formance during this Epiphany period – now so rampant with “the pestilence that walketh in darkness.” (Psa. 91:6) Recently faith-healer Oral Roberts held sessions in Detroit with as many as 5,000 in attendance. One man told us he had come all the way from Nova Scotia for the “precious blessings from the Lord.” The same expression is also frequently forthcoming from innumerable members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses after any of their conventions. Truly, “the human heart is deceitful above all things.” (Jer. 17:9)

MORE ON ISA. 41:19

On pages 74-75 of this same paper RGJ offers his usual “profusion of words,” and his usual name-calling, in a verbose attempt to offset our refutation of his error on Isa. 41:19; and he endeavors to show that Brothers Russell and Johnson agree with him. As we pointed out in our June paper No. 144, Brother Johnson’s application of this text to this Epiphany period points out three groups of uncleansed crown-losers. This one statement should have sobered RGJ in his attempt to pervert this text (Azazel means Perverter). Whenever a prophecy has more than one fulfillment – the same as a type which has more than one fulfillment – the various fulfillments have a similarity of operation. Therefore, to apply v. 19 to uncleansed crown-losers now, then make it apply to perfected and righteous persons at another period is just some more of his nonsense – and reveals once more that the “oil in his lamp” (the spirit of understanding) has gone out, and that he is now reaping the reward of “outer dark­ness” of the “unprofitable servant” of Matt. 25:30 (see Berean Comment).

It should not require an astute mind to recognize that the unsaved world will arise in the same “desert” condition of moral depravity with which it entered the tomb. “As a tree falleth, so shall it lie.” Nor should it require a savant to recognize that all the Elect – including the Christ Company – will be absorbed in eliminating that “desert” quality from the human race. Thus, were we to accept RGJ’s talk here, we could with equal propriety place the glorified Christ in the “desert” condition, too. Note that Brother Johnson’s explanation points out three uncleansed groups of Levites here on earth; whereas RGJ now wants us to accept at least one per­fected group in Heaven in his Millennial interpretation. We repeat that there is no symmetry, no similarity, to his second application of the text – that it is just some more of his nonsense.

There was sound reason for Brother Johnson to apply this text to the three groups of uncleansed Levites here in this Epiphany period, because they are afflicted with the pestilence that walketh in darkness” (Psa. 91:6). Thus, they are truly in the “desert” condition – SPIRITUALLY – just as the unsaved world is in the “desert” condition physi­cally, mentally, morally and religiously. Very evidently, RGJ does not see this clearly – being himself in Azazel’s clutches – or he would not have attempted the per­version that he has of this text. We can look forward with joyful anticipation to the time when the most of them will be cleansed – when they will no longer be in a leprous “desert” condition; especially so, when they have reached spiritual perfection. But it should not require great illumination to understand that it will then be the extreme of nonsense to describe their grand spiritual state as a “desert” condition. And for now, only one in a very confused spiritual state of mind would attempt such eisegesis. Indeed, RGJ was hard put in his attempt to drag Brother Russell and Brother Johnson to his support, as neither of them ever offered us such vagary. In the citation he offers from Brother Russell there is not the slightest hint that he would place the perfected spiritual Great Multitude in a “desert” condition.

Aforegoing we have quoted Brother Johnson to the effect that any attempt by a crown-loser to bring forth a new doctrine would be “gazing” (Ex. 19:21), and would result in error. If we keep this thought always in mind, we shall have little trouble with RGJ’s errors. This present error is simply an attempt on his part to substantiate his previous error of Campers Consecrated (a class he says can have justification, righteousness, outside the linen curtain, without Christ’s righteous­ness); thus, we should conclude without much research, that his contention cannot possibly be right; i.e., if we accept what Brother Johnson has told us re “leprous” Miriam. Nor will it be necessary for us to resort to any name calling to prove our point.

DISFELLOWSHIPMENT BY GENERAL CONVENTIONS

At top of p. 79, col. 1, RGJ says his 1966 Philadelphia Convention “was not a disfellow­shipment action by a General Convention, as JJH falsely alleges in his paper.” Then on p. 78, col. 2, line 10 from bottom, this same RGJ says “they (JJH and wife) are not welcome at any of its meetings, especially its general conventions.” And at top of p. 79, col. 2, par. 1, there is this: “John J. Hoefle and his wife at our general conventions.” (Underlining  ours) If the 1966 Philadelphia Convention was not a general Convention, just which of his meetings does RGJ describe as “general” Conventions?  As Brother  Johnson has so ably stated, When these people fall into the hands of Azazel they talk all sorts of nonsense! And here is simply another example of it. And this sort of double-talk RGJ defines as “precious blessings from the Lord” – with himself as “an undershepherd for the Lord.” What tragic abuse the Lord has tolerated from those in Azazel’s clutches! And what bedlam they attempt to palm off on the sheep as “PRESENT TRUTH”!

SIX OR SEVEN SAVED CLASSES FROM AMONG MANKIND?

On p. 75 of the Sept-Oct. Present Truth, RGJ presents a treatise on Seven Saved Classes of Mankind. As most of our readers know, Brother Johnson taught Six Saved Classes from among mankind; and he used Scriptural logic and Scriptural proof for his teaching. Six is used in many instances to designate evil ­especially in connection with the world under the curse – 6,000 years. So we should expect Six Saved Classes from the world of mankind, the number of those saved from the curse – the seventh saved class to be the recovered fallen angels. RGJ also once taught only Six Saved Classes from among mankind, which we quote below from his Nov-Dec. 1957 Present Truth:

“Thus we find indicated in Heb. 3:17 the following six classes: Fleshly Israel – the fig tree; the Great Company – the vines; the Little Flock – the olive; the non-elect world – the fields; the Youthful Worthies – the flock; the Ancient Worthies – the herd. Five of these (the four elect classes and the Quasi-­elect) are the classes which will more particularly cooperate in the blessing of all the families of the earth, and the sixth, the non-elect world, is the one which (aside from the faith classes) will be blessed during the Millennium under the great promise made to Abraham, though the sheep among them will also join in bless­ing others (Matt. 25:31-40); Comp. Joel 2:28 – ‘daughters shall prophesy’). These six are the six saved classes from among mankind, pictured also in Joel 2:28, 29 (see E Vol. 17, Chap. 2). In Joel 2:28, believing Fleshly Israel and, subordi­nately, the persevering unconsecrated faith justified ones of the Gospel Age (who are of the Quasi-elect – see P ‘55, pp. 20-23, 41-44; ‘56, pp. 20-27) are repre­sented by the ‘sons.’ Likewise, in Hab. 3:17 these faith justified ones of the Gospel Age seen to be included, subordinately, with believing Fleshly Israel.”

Compare the above with his present teaching in the Sept-Oct. 1967 Present Truth. Of course, crown-lost leaders can always see a new (false) doctrine that the Star Members couldn’t see – they contend “the path of the just is as the shin­ing light, that shineth more and more unto the perfect day” – so they must set aside the teachings of the Star Members and replace them with their ‘advancing’ light (?). The Jehovah’s Witnesses are very adept at this, and it seems that RGJ is learning fast. As we have repeatedly quoted, the two Messengers taught there would be a class of unbegotten conse­crators in the end of the Age – from 1881 until Restitution sets in – who would be the Millennial Associates of the Ancient Worthies in reward And service. For walking a narrow way during the reign of sin and evil – which is indeed a very difficult way – they would be rewarded with the ‘better’ resurrection, etc. Restitution has not set in yet, and we see no reason to set this teaching aside for a new doctrine invented by a crown-lost leader, or by Jehovah’s Witnesses. We prefer to “continue in what we have learned and been assured of” – knowing of whom we have learned these Truths. Let those of ‘like mind’ join with the Campers Consecrated, the “great crowd,” or the Quasi-elect consecrated, but let us who would be faithful to the Lord, the Truth and the Brethren, fight the “good fight,” and earnestly contend for the faith once delivered unto the saints.

THE CHICAGO CONVENTION

Beginning on Friday, October 27, the first testimony meeting was held at 2:00 p.m. – just seventeen years to the day and hour – Friday October 27, 1950 – when Brother Johnson was entering the grave. And, with some of those present at this Convention who had been in tears at Philadelphia that sorrowful day, we were especially interested to note what testimonies would come from those people. But, sad to say, not one word about the Epiphany Messenger from any of them. All were ardent in their praise of present blessings – under the leadership of a Levite. And once more we were painfully reminded that it has been ever thus, all during the Gospel Age – Israel chanting the praises of antitypical Saul while ignoring anti­typical Samuel. Also, we were reminded of the words of the Lord in the type to downcast Samuel: “They have not rejected thee, they have rejected Me.” (1 Sam. 8:7) Indeed, it is little wonder that the Lord allowed such to be led into error after error under the leadership of antitypical Saul (King Saul is a type of crown-lost leaders up to Armageddon); and especially so has this developed during this Epiphany night. “And He gave them their request; but sent leanness into their soul.” (Psa. 106:15) And this is all the more lamentable when we remember that substantially all we have today of Present Truth came to us through the Parousia and Epiphany Messengers – a part of antitypical Samuel.

GAZING

When RGJ was discussing Ex. 19:19-21 at the Philadelphia Convention, he was emphatic that the Youthful Worthies who now criticize him – or criticize any other member of the Great Company (his “higher class”) – were violating this text – were “gazing” – and thus would perish as Youthful Worthies. According to the defini­tion of ‘gazing’ given us by the Epiphany Messenger, it means the attempt of under­lings in God’s Household to interpret those Scriptures which only the Star Members should analyze and clarify. Even the ledlings among the Priesthood could become guilty of this, which, if persisted in, would demote them from the Little Flock to the Great Company; which, if then further persisted in, would eventually send them into the second death. It should be noted from the foregoing that there is not the slightest hint that any one is “gazing” merely because he criticizes other members of the Household, even though the criticism be wrong, and directed at a higher class, including the Star Members themselves. Therefore, at no time did Brother Johnson charge “gazing” to the most acrimonious critics of Brother Russell, even though they criticized him unjustly. But of those who attempted to produce a new doctrine, or explain intricate types, etc., he charged them with “gazing” – they were guilty of this offense. And he was most pronounced in attacking the crown-lost leaders in Little Babylon who attempted to produce a new doctrine, or offer interpretations of types they did not understand (“gazing”). Nor did he ever reprove or criticize us (a Youthful Worthy) for our positive stand against such “gazers” and perverters; in fact, he advised us personally – being a Youthful Worthy Pilgrim – that we should offer such resistance. Often did he commend us for resisting such “gazers” in our encounters with them (the crown-lost leaders in Little Babylon). And RGJ himself requested us to attend a Little Babylon Convention (where we were not welcome!) and make such resistance – which we did; and he was high in his praise of us for the victorious resistance we made – and that to the brethren gathered at one of his General Conventions in Philadelphia. But that was before he became part and parcel with his kinsmen in Little Babylon in such perversion and gazing.

We digress a little here to quote RGJ’s comment at the Sunday morning Question Meeting at Chicago regarding the Dawn leaders’ ‘proof’ that the High Calling is still open: “He knew because two were consecrating to the High Calling that very after­noon – and he knew they could understand “spiritual things” (which the natural man cannot do). RGJ said ‘a brother’ had related that incident to him. Well, let all be informed that we ourselves are the ‘brother’ who told him that; and he asked us to relate our experience from the platform at the Philadelphia Labor Day Conven­tion the year Brother Armstrong of England first visited America after Brother Johnson’s demise. Some may read this who were then there, and we stated that the Dawn brother’s logic simply reminded us of the small backstreet shopkeeper who placed a sign in his window: “Don’t go elsewhere to be cheated; Come here.” Be it noted that RGJ approved our course in resisting the errors of the crown-lost leaders then, but now he not only disapproves of such a course by Youthful Worthies against crown-lost leaders, he teaches they will lose their class stand standing for so doing – although we are pursuing the same course now that we did then – the course advised by the Epiphany Messenger (as well as by RGJ then).

Applying this now to our own situation, our worst opposers cannot honestly accuse us of presenting a new doctrine (although we are “contending earnestly” for the doctrines given to us by the Star Members); but it cannot be disputed that RGJ has certainly done so with his Campers Consecrated – tentative justification outside the linen curtain – outside the righteousness of Christ. Just because we criticize a Levite, that would not stigmatize us as a “gazer.” Thus, once more RGJ is guilty of perverting another teaching of the Epiphany Messenger – the truth on “gazing” – and Azazel means Perverter! As Brother Johnson has stated, one error forces acceptance of other errors to support it – a course which RGJ is forced to pursue here to bolster his “strange fire” of Campers Consecrated. Thus, it is he who is doing the “gazing” – not JJH. Of course, this is in keeping with Brother Johnson’s observation that such perverters usually accuse others of what they them­selves are most guilty of doing. The Truth is slowly – but surely – catching up with him, as it will also do with all these pseudo leaders before this Epiphany has ended. The Epiphany is for the very purpose of “making manifest the counsels of hearts.”

QUESTION MEETING

At the Question Meeting it was asked: “Brother Johnson taught that new Youth­ful Worthies would be won after Armageddon. Are you in harmony with this teaching?” After quite some flimsy flapdoodle about the dishonesty of the Question, he then proceeded with profuse detail to explain that Brother Johnson once held that view ­– a view which he later changed after he saw Armageddon would not arrive at 1934, as he for a while thought. RGJ then cited p. 114, of Vol. 10 (which was published in 1941) and the interpretation of Numbers 12 to ‘prove’ Brother Johnson had later changed his mind on the matter.

Well, so far as we know, the only place Brother Johnson made the statement involved in the Question is on page 672 of Volume 10 – the very same Volume RGJ cited for his ‘proof’ (except further on in the book). Thus, his statement is not before what is contained on p. 114 of that book; it is rather much later on. Of course, this won’t influence his sleepy adherents – even if it is pointed out to them; but we state it for the record and for those whose eyes are not closed in deep sleep. Here is what the Epiphany Messenger says: “In addition to those implied in the preceding points, which apply to the Lord’s Truth people, there will be a large work: (1) whereby our non-Truth Great Company and Youthful Worthy Brethren, and new ones not yet consecrated, are to be won for the Truth, some of whom will be won before Babylon is destroyed and others of them afterward.” (E-10:672) And further, “the Epiphany Camp, which will consist of the loyal justified and the converted loyal Jews” (after Babylon is destroyed in Armageddon—JJH)

Another Question: “Did Brother Russell or Brother Johnson ever ask a General Convention to endorse a resolution to disfellowship sifters?” Here again he engaged his usual ‘sleight-of-hand,’ never at one time answering the question – although he did set up several straw men, which he proceeded to dissem­inate with his cunning words. He even offered the falsehood that he himself had never offered such a resolution, so we now quote from his Nov. 1966

“MINUTES OF THE GENERAL CONVENTION

Laymen’ Home Missionary Movement Held at its International Headquarters..... September 3, 1966 – 8:00 p.m.

“After introductory remarks by the chairman, the following resolution was presented to the general assenbly.... THAT the dismissal from the Pilgrim ser­vice and the disfellowshipment of John J. Hoefle by the Trustee, with the statement that he is no longer in any sense a representative of or for the Movement, as recorded in The Present Truth magazine, March 1956, page 33, be and hereby is fully endorsed and supported.... David Lounsbury, of Winston-Salem, North Carolina, moved that the above resolution be adopted by the Laymen’s Home Missionary Movement. This motion was seconded by William Eschrich, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin; John Treble, of Miami, Florida; and others. After due consideration and discussion, and after the resolution was again read by the secretary before the assembly, the motion for its adoption was passed unanimously.”

There were many other questions and answers (?) we could comment on here, which we leave for a future writing, believing the above is all sufficient for our present needs.

On Sunday afternoon – October 29 – we listened to the testimonies of various brethren who were so wonderfully blessed by the Convention. One brother mentioned that the Conventions get “better and better” as time goes on. This brother was at many Conventions conducted by the Epiphany Messenger – the last Star Member ­yet he finds conventions conducted by a Levite who proclaims most noisily that there are no saints there (nor anywhere else!) are “better and better” (than those con­ducted by the Epiphany Messenger when saints were present among them). Yet he must surely know that the Messengers taught there would be a dearth of the Truth and its Spirit – among the consecrated as well as among the mere professors – after the Church is glorified. So as far as crown-lost leaders are concerned (who pervert the “faith once delivered to the saints” – to the Star Members), this state­ment is received joyfully. How can any Convention – where no saints are present ­be “better and better”? Though corruption in all Little Babylon will become more and more prevalent until the “fires” of Armageddon will consume the present ‘heavens’ (religious powers in Big and Little Babylon) is a Truth all should know who are rooted and grounded in Parousia and Epiphany Truth.

But it was the same when That Servant was removed. The majority gave the same praise for JFR – that his Conventions were “better and better” (than That Servant’s Conventions)! And the Jehovah’s Witnesses continue to give forth this kind of praise for their “System of Error.” History does indeed repeat itself.

Our cordial good wishes to all our brethren for the Holiday Season. And may “The blessing of the Lord, it maketh rich, and he addeth no sorrow with it” be your portion – with peace through Jesus.

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

------------------------------------------------------------------

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Epiphany Bible Students Association

P. 0. Box 97

Mount Dora, Florida

Dear Sirs:

Would you kindly send me a copy of the following pamphlets:

No. 1 – Where Are the Dead? No. 2 – What Is the Soul? No. 3 – “The Resurrection of The Dead”; No. 5 – “Two Distinct Salvations”; No. 6 – God’s Great Sabbath Day.

Very sincerely,

Pastor -------

Zion Lutheran Church   (KANSAS)

..................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Greetings in the Master’s name!

Yours of Sept. 13 has been received, and we are glad to learn that you and Sister Hoefle attended the September Philadelphia Convention. Also in the same letter your enclosure of Question and answer, and the advice. Brother ------- sent me a copy of his answer to you. He is a sectarian to the bone. As you have said, ledlings rarely rise above bad leadership. It was the spirit of sectarianism that was with John Calvin (caused the hate) that caused the death of Servetus – and that to the stake.

We have also received the 300 more of No. 7..... Enclosed is a list of names for tracts.

Warm love to all the dear ones, to you, Sr. Hoefle and the Bible House family, from the brethren here. We remember you in our prayers and ask that you remember us. The Lord make his face to shine upon thee, and give thee peace.

Your brother by the Lord’s Grace ------- (TRINIDAD)

..................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle and Beloved of the Lord: Grace and peace!

It is my great privilege to write you a few lines on the way you stand for the Truth. Dear Brother, when we look at the Divine Plan of the Ages, pp. 241-242, we see some things also. May God bless you! Daily Manna, Sept. 25 – Truly He is able and willing to save to the uttermost all that come unto God by Him!

May God bless you all! Brother -------. (TRINIDAD)

..................................................................

Dear Brother: Grace, Mercy and peace from God and our Lord!

Your letter to hand. The point I was trying to make is that the Lord’s reign (Mediatorial) has not begun, because the Present Evil World keeps going. Satan, the prince or ruler of this “present evil world” must be bound for a thousand years... The great High Priest after the order of Melchisedec – King of Peace – will then reign. It requires all of the Gospel Age to complete the sacrifice of the Atonement before the blessing begins to go to the world. The Ransom price is for the use of the faith class now – the elect – and as soon as that is finished, the blessings of the world will then begin.... I could say a lot more, but please see the refer­ences given.

Your brother by His Grace ------- (ENGLAND)

..................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and Peace!

I want to tell you that I very much enjoy your good writings – both the letter and the spirit of them. I feel that you are doing a work of great value to the whole Church. By the whole Church I mean all truly consecrated to God ­whether spirit-begotten or not.

For the past several months I have two copies of your monthly papers. Previously I had received but one. Two copies are not needed.... There is now no other Truth brethren in the city or community, to my knowledge, with whom I could share one. There were others in the past, but they have moved away. So now I have no class association as I had for many past years. There are the J.W’s in the city, but I am acquainted with none of them. Sometimes younger members call to hand out tracts or sell books. I doubt they would be interested in your regular paper, but might accept a special edition...... Brother Johnson died on my birthday. As I am not affluent and am retired on no income but Social Security, I am not in position to make much of a contribution..... but I am sending you a check to help out in a small way on postage and other expenses.

I pray that God will bless you, your work and coworkers, your family and all the Church of God everywhere.

Your brother by His Grace ------- (MISSOURI)

..................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace be multiplied!

Your good letter received, and we thank you for the infor­mation on the Convention – and also the blessings you enjoyed on your visit with the dear brethren in Conn. and Mass. Yes, Brother we did know about the sale of the Tabernacle. We subscribe to the PT.

We shall be anxious to hear from you first-hand on the trouble in Detroit... We have read with deep interest your October article, No. 148. You certainly have taken care of RGJ. That ought to hold him for awhile. But will it? We shall see.

We thank our dear Heavenly Father daily for His rich blessings to us – temporal, spiritual and His Providential overruling and guidance from day to day; also for your encouraging letters we receive monthly. Dear Brother, truly we are living in a wonderful time when all these things are happening in the world, and to think and to know of the past and present. But the glorious future that awaits the whole human race! How appropriate is our Lord’s Prayer today. May our dear Heavenly Father continue to bless you richly, dear Brother Hoefle, as you stand fast for the Parousia and the Epiphany truth. Sister ------- joins me in sending you all at Mount Dora warmest Christian greetings, and the Lord’s richest blessings in your service to all the brethren.

Your brother and sister by His Grace. ------- (NEW JERSEY)

..................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle:

Thanks very much for the Prayers, Christian good wishes for my better health and welfare. I took your letter with me to.... to share with dear Sister ------- She is not getting any younger – like myself, failing in physical strength – but mentally happy, having the Heavenly Father’s teachings for living. It keeps us in an everlasting calm mind for living with our surroundings of Ills and afflictions.

Please hold my mall until I send a new address. I will write as soon as I can. Dear Sister ------- and Sister ........... send their Christian love and best Christian love and prayers to all our dear brothers and sisters there with you.

Lovingly, Sister ------- (CALIFORNIA)

..................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle:

It is with much pleasure I am writing to tell you of how richly the Lord blessed me last Sunday. Early in the morn­ing I attended class where we studied E Vol. 11 (Exodus) after which three of us sisters went to an Episcopal Church with the Gideon tracts – also to a Methodist Church which was nearby. As usual a few refused the literature, but in the main they were graciously received.

In the afternoon we attended a Martin Luther program (picture), which was very good. It was in the Civic Center and put on by two Lutheran ministers. After the program we gave out the Reformer tracts and every one was so pleased ­even asked for more.

Oh how we do thank the Lord for the privilege of rendering a little service! It was indeed a great blessing.

May the Lord continue to bless you in your work is my prayer.

With Christian love to you and to Sr. Hoefle, Sister ------- (KANSAS)

..................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace!

I have been waiting for the November letter, as I have been anxious to see the report of the Philadelphia Convention. You folks must have been present all right according to the Present Truth I received yesterday and read with much interest. I see you have Bro. Jolly quite worried! I was amused at his attempts to answer you on Isa. 41:18-19. All he said was O.K. if the verses pertained to Millennial con­ditions (Brother Russell) – and any Truth person could agree. Bro. Jolly has a great faculty for talking all around a question. Notice that he did not attempt to answer the first part of the June 1967 paper on Jolly’s suggested changes for E Vol. 17. He can’t do that and he crawled away from that issue.

I received the November paper yesterday and sure enjoyed every bit of it. Also glad to see the new format of the monthly letters, as it will save paper and postage, and the Lord’s money; and if you make a larger issue, it will not be too hard to put out.

I would stress the fact that Bro. Jolly is perverting the doctrine on the Seven Saved Classes, as taught by Brother Johnson, a Star Member. Mankind has been imperfect since the Fall. Six is an imperfect number, signifying the imperfect six classes of mankind. Joel 2:28-29 is a Scripture to the point. So this is a case where unclean Levites try to pervert the teachings of the Star Members.

Have been wondering if you ever hear from Brother .......... Is he in any way favor­able to you? Also, have you heard from Brother ......... ? Hope he is still favorable. Also I’m wondering who the sister is from Michigan that wrote the letter in the November circular....... I am wondering if I know her. It was a nice letter, but you needn’t answer if it would violate a confidence.

How are the oranges (crop) this year? Sister hasn’t been feeling too well lately. Hope Sisters ------- are well. Give our love to them. I think we will stay home this winter.

With much Christian love, Your brother in Him ------- (MICHIGAN)

..................................................................

Epiphany Bible Students Association

Mount Dora, Florida 32757

Dear Friends:

Will you kindly change the following address from Dr ------- West Market Street

Methodist Church...... to Dr ------- Editor......  Thank you!

Sincerely,

(Signed)

Secretary to Dr. -------- (NORTH CAROLINA)