NO. 127: RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT

No. 127

My dear Brethren:  Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

In viewing events of the year just past we usually give little or no attention to scientific achievement – due in part to our own limited knowledge of such matters, but also because they seldom have little bearing on coming events as outlined in prophecy. But in 1965 a piece of inventive genius came to our attention which we feel will delight and enlighten our readers. We are well acquainted with a business­man in Detroit, Michigan, whose brother-in-law is a technician for a very large cor­poration. About the beginning of 1964 this engineer was assigned the task of pro­ducing an instrument that would cause the human heart to beat after the patient had died. After about eighteen months of research such an instrument was developed, and they had opportunity to try it out on a man who had been dead for twelve hours. By that time the blood was in an advanced stage of coagulation, rigor mortis had developed, yet the invention caused the heart to beat and pump the blood through the arteries and veins in rhythmical and normal fashion. However, after twelve hours in death, the brain had become so damaged that it was impossible to revive it; thus, the technicians had a live corpse on their hands – with the pronounced convic­tion, however, that the dead man could have been restored to life had they applied their instrument soon enough.

This phenomenon becomes all the more impressive when we recall that it was not until the year 1628 that Dr. William Harvey, of England, published his first paper outlining that blood circulates through the human body through the action of the heart and the vascular system. That was eight years after the Pilgrims landed in New England. For the thousands of years before that discovery man knew little or noth­ing about the circulation of the blood in his body. Thus we have come a long way in a short time; and offers vivid consideration of the prophecy, “In the time of the end many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.” However, from this account let none presume that we cherish the thought that man will eventu­ally hold in his skill the power of life and death.  This is exclusively the privi­lege of our Lord Jesus. (John 5:26-29) Thus, while we do not discount the great “increase in knowledge,” yet we know man’s great knowledge could never gain for him the ability to “redeem them from death, or ransom them from the power of the grave.” And with this introduction we now proceed to consideration of the three essential topics usually considered in our New Year paper:

IN FINANCE

Once more we stress the wastrel spending that continues to pyramid the debt structure. In the past 36 years the national budget of the United States has been balanced only six times; and this in the face of unprecedented prosperity. Thus, the populace is forced to live speculatively, whether they like it or not. And this unsound practice is seldom given even passing notice, although now and then one of our abler intellects does speak up, such an instance being the following excerpt of a speech before the United States Senate – just after the Senator had described the plan to raise the national debt limit as “an exercise in fiction”:

“I do not know exactly what is to be done about it, but it becomes a rather interesting game. First, we raise expenditures and then we discover that we have run out of money. Then we have to lift the debt ceiling. After a while we spend more of what we do not have and then we raise the ceiling again.

“I like the fiction in the appropriation bills. Every one of them starts with the statement, ‘There is hereby appropriated out of funds in the Treasury not other­wise appropriated.’

“I think it is wonderful. There has not been anything in the Treasury that has not been appropriated for so long that the memory of man runneth not to the contrary. So up the expenditures and up the debt; then when we catch up with the debt ceiling, we shall raise it. Then we spend more to catch up with the debt ceiling.

“It is a great little business....

One of the most amazing, startling, and wonderful things about the debt is that the people have to buy it, and they do not know it. I have talked until I was blue in the face.... I look at an audience and say, ‘Be of good cheer. You are going to buy this debt.’ They look at me startled, as if I had hit them with a rock....’

“So I say to my audience: ‘You happy people. You are to be saluted.  You are to be cheered. You ought to be enshrouded in encomiums. You deserve the grand accolade. You own the debt. You bought it with your money.’

“If we can ever persuade the people that they have bought the hole in the doughnut instead of the doughnut, it may be that we shall start to come to our senses about this debt business and give it far more attention than it has had thus far....

‘All hail the most significant week in the history of the Republic. Raise the flags a little higher. Yesterday we pulled down Government income by $4 billion (Reference is to the excise tax cut. Ed.) Today we push up the debt ceiling by $4 billion. If there is anyone who can solve the magic and the mystery of this busi­ness, I will sit at his feet as his most eager pupil and say, ‘Tell me, pray, what is the answer to all this mysticism..... ?’

‘‘Mr. President, if the country is ever faced with any kind of economic crisis, we know what will happen. There will be a clamor such as has never been heard be­fore upon the machinery of Government.... We shall be told: ‘You must do this and that.’ It will all cost money. I am so bold as to predict –and I am distressed to have to do it – that the deficits and the lifting of the debt ceiling may become larger than is reflected in the bill that is before the Senate this afternoon...

A certain Bachelor of Science, also acutely aware of our top-heavy debt and interest burden, asks the question: “What if inflation suddenly got out of hand – ­changed from creeping inflation to galloping inflation? (Such as occurred in Germany under Hitler – JJH) Under these conditions an investor in Government bonds (or any other investment that pays off in dollars) may get back dimes instead of dollars.... When politics and economics clash, politics wins in the beginning, but economics always wins in the final rounds.”

At present the United States Dollar is a promise-to-pay NOTHING, and is certain to eventuate in the collapse of the “free” world. This will not occur, of course, until the mis-led average man becomes acutely aware that it is “raining” and that his “umbrella for the rainy day” is nothing but a sieve. The day of reckoning cannot be far off.

IN POLITICS

Politics continues to improve with age, which means it becomes more repulsive with each succeeding year. And it is quite unpopular today not to be political. As an instance, the visit of the Pope to the United Nations. He wished very much to see President Johnson, and President Johnson wished very much to see the Pope, each believing his prestige would be enhanced by the other’s approval. But then there was the aggravating quandary – The Pope would not belittle himself by calling on the President, and the President would not belittle himself by seeking out the Pope. So an appointment was ‘‘arranged’’ for the President in New York the night before the Pope was due to arrive; thus, he was conveniently available, and neither of them had to lose face by the meeting.  As one friendly commentator said, “They have thought of everything!” Yes, they thought of everything that might win some votes – regardless of how unprincipled the method might be. When Napoleon wanted to see the Pope, he didn’t ask the Pope for an interview, he ordered him to come to Paris and sent his army to Italy to see that his order was obeyed. As a result of that great humiliation the Pope died in France – he returned to Italy as a corpse.

Another situation that has a strong financial flavor, but is in substance really political, is the International Monetary Fund, which had its last conclave in Washington in the early fall. This august body is really a combination of Money in the Government business, and Government in the Money business, and few there be with the audacity to criticize those in such high position; but the London Statist made bold to do it in its October 22 issue, under the caption “After the IMF Feast”:

“The Governors from 103 countries returned to their capitals bloated with good cheer and $75-a-day expenses. The bankers and business men who mill around the outskirts of the meeting have done themselves a lot of good, and the journalists have had their usual blissful experience of rubbing shoulders for five days, drunk or sober, with men whom it would take them months at any other time to get within miles of.

“Idealists continue to complain that the $1000-odd that the dual host organiza­tions spend between them on this bean-feast might have been better used to feed the poor. But the Finance Ministers of the underdeveloped countries reply that they always have the poor with them, while a trip to Washington at the Fund’s expense is a unique way of completing their own education. The older world simply remarks that the meetings work – in spite of the maundering speeches – because although there are no decisions there is an unrivaled opportunity for taking the temperature of the international financial community.

“Nero fiddled while Rome burned.”

From the foregoing it will not require great insight to conclude that the very men who should label the IMF as a hollow hoax are the very ones loudest in their praise of it.  After all, $75 per day expense money (fully tax free) does not grow on every tree, and, Shame on You! if you feel inclined to criticize. It’s much the same as the Pope in his robe and jewels of glory and beauty. Could such a display possibly be wrong? Perhaps not – until we quote our Lord’s words: “The Kingdom of God cometh not with outward show.” (Luke 17:20, Dia.)

IN RELIGION

The religious events of the past year are also in keeping with the affairs of Finance and Politics. The Heavens continue to “roll together as a scroll.” This is perhaps best summed up by one financial publication under the Caption, “Thinking Things Over”:

“The most interesting thing about the Pope’s visit, when you think it over, was that it took place at all. It was not so long ago, as time is measured by history, that it would not have occurred to the Bishop of Rome to come to the United States of America. If he had, he would have set off an uproar of protest. Yet when Paul VI, Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church, spent a few hours this week in New York not only the city but the whole nation did him honor. The people lined the streets, the television cameras carried his every movement to people across the continent and the President of the United States journeyed from Washington to receive him.

‘‘All this made it a memorable occasion. It was also one to dramatize the great changes that have taken place in this country, in the world and within the Roman Church itself. Paradoxically it dramatized as well those things which endure amid the changes of men. One reason for the change, of course, is a simple statistical one: There are more Catholics in the United States than there used to be. The English Colonies from which the country sprang were almost wholly protestant, which in those days marked a political as well as a religious difference. Although we pride ourselves in the tradition of religious freedom, in most of those colonies Roman Catholicism was legally proscribed. As late as 1800 there were barely 50,000 Catho­lics in the whole country. Today their number approaches 50 million.....

“If we are more tolerant, it is because, as a people, we no longer care so much about those ideas. This is as true among the Catholics as among the Protestants, the Jews, or the non-believers in anything. Nowadays the arguments are debated with­out passion on quiet television panels. Or, to put the matter another way, the growth of religious tolerance among the people has been paralleled by an increase in relig­ious apathy. That this is so is in part, surely, due to changes within the Roman Church itself. It too has altered and is altering more. And if apathy is too strong a word for those who profess its faith, it is certainly true that those who profess it have lost their militancy, their unshaken certainty in the dogmas of 2,000 years in whose name, once, men were to put to wrack and wheel. The saints of the past would find it passing strange to hear assembled bishops debating not the issue but the words to express the acceptance of religious liberty by the one, true Church; or hear priests raising their voices to debate birth control and other long settled dogmas. There is no doubt that the winds of change blow through Rome.

“You do not have to be a Catholic, or even a Christian, to long for something that will restore to man his spirit, his kinship with something outside himself, a spirit stripped from him by the rationalizations of science and the materialism of ideologies.

“Put briefly, the surmise is that great numbers of people watched the Bishop believing not in anything, but wanting to believe in something, hoping for some mystery that would give them back again their faith. This is the strength of the Roman Church. If you read its history as a rational man, you cannot escape its brutality, its terrors, even its evils. Though raised up in the name of God, it is an institution created by men no less frail and fallible than their brothers. That is why in its past you can find anything you wish to look for.... We all long for what is lost. And so perhaps this brief visit served, if nothing else, to remind us of the paradox of our age.”

The foregoing is what would seem to be a detached viewpoint – probably not written by a Roman Catholic – furbished and moderated to cover over the heinous crimes of the “one true Church,” the sins of the past, which should be forgotten in the camaraderie of the present. But those of us who know the past for what it really is will have none of it; we leave it for those who are unschooled in the proper evaluation of such things. The plea for tolerance is merely the child of necessity – certainly not a product of the heart. “The beast which I saw was like unto a leopard” (Rev. 13:2) – spotted black and white as occasion would dictate. But the spirit of Combinationism is rampant on all hands, and is certain to grow worse before it becomes better. As one observer has stated, the “portest” is now removed from “Protestantism,” but the “ant” is still there; they are aimlessly  milling around.

Nor is R. G. Jolly one whit behind the chiefest of Combinationists, as was so clearly apparent at the Chicago Convention October 29-31. Some one put in the question: If the saints are to engage in Antitypical Gideon’s Second Battle to a com­pletion, would that not indicate that some of them are still here with us? And R. G. Jolly’s answer (not verbatim): “Brother Johnson states that the Little Flock participates unto a completion, which they did unto a completion when the last Little Flock member was glorified Oct. 22, 1950.” We now refer our readers to E-5:158 (23):

“The triumph of Gideon’s little army over a host typified the final victory of Christ and His followers over the hosts of sin... The 300 gained their victory in two battles. These type the two conflicts of the final victory of the Little Flock.” The first victory of the 300 was the confession of the sins of the people over Azazel’s Goat, which was completed by the fall of 1916 – with EVERY MEMBER OF THE LITTLE FLOCK THEN LIVING PARTICIPATING TO FINAL VICTORY. Then Brother Johnson continues: “The antitypical second battle represents the present (in the year 1938) conflict against eternal torment, and the Consciousness of the Dead, wherein the Little Flock participates unto a completion.”

Certainly only one befuddled by Azazel would be moved to offer the sophistical twist that Brother Johnson meant participation until the “completion” of the Little Flock in Glory (no matter whether the Battle was Victory to a completion for them or not); whereas, the Epiphany Messenger was clearly referring to the “completion” of the battle – the same as he was referring to the completion of the First Battle (which they victoriously completed). And hand-in-glove with this atrocity in error R. G. Jolly praised Billy Graham for bringing many to justification in Big Babylon – ­the same Billy Graham who uses his silver-tongued oratory to belch forth eternal torment and man’s “immortal soul,” thus offering an open challenge (as did Goliath to David) to those who are waging antitypical Gideon’s Second Battle. Here indeed is Combinationism in a most unsavory setting!

Fitting companion to the foregoing is Brother Johnson’s comment in E-5:151 (14): “Satan uses the Great Company for his purposes, while the Lord uses the Little Flock for His purposes” – to annihilate antitypical Zebah and Zalmunna. Thus, in the same breath in which R. G. Jolly now eliminates the Saints, he champions one who is among the chiefest in supporting Zebah and Zalmunna – the very ones the Little Flock are commanded to destroy. Having eliminated the Little Flock as leaders from the scene of battle, he now considers himself free to commend at least one of the leaders of Zebah and Zalmunna, who is offering these reprehensible errors to his converts. And how apropos are the Manna comments for November 14:

“Those who arise from among the brethren, taking teaching positions, and using them to falsify the teachings of the Word, are of two classes: Great Company and Second Death sifters. Both teach doctrines that are perver­sions of the Truth, though the latter class does worse than the former class in this respect. They do so to win a following. God’s Very Elect take heed of all three classes, and do so by studying, practicing and spreading the Truth.”

And all these Combinationists are fully convinced they can convert Israel to Christianity – that they can convert the entire world to Christianity – if they have the wherewith. All they need is YOUR money. Just a few of your dollars – and the same from millions of others like you – and the problem is practically solved. The same old package with just another label on it – Priesthood – Priestcraft – Priest-­“graft.” We believe it requires little persuasion that the ideal state for all professionals – doctors, lawyers, preachers – is for them to be economically inde­pendent. Then, with the fees eliminated, with no need for begging, with no occasion for false or padded charges, they could all afford to tell the truth, to follow their vocations for the love of it. ‘Tis an ideal devoutly to be desired!

While the Jehovah’s Witnesses have not the least sympathy for Combinationism with other groups – they are at the other extreme, rigidly sectarian – “bound in affliction and iron; because they rebelled (revolutionized) against the words of God (the Harvest Truth), and contemned the counsel of the most High” (the arrange­ments given by the Lord for the Harvest work) – Psa. 107:10,11. The Witnesses now make determined claim to being the “one true Church,” even as their great twin, the Roman Church, is reducing its claim of one true Church to an inaudible whisper in a desperate effort to effect Combinationism. And, just as the Roman Church went from error to worse error when they were most vociferous in their claims of in­fallibility, so the Witnesses now have lost one truth after another which once adorned them under Brother Russell. ‘‘Where the spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty”; and, conversely speaking, Where liberty is lacking, the spirit of the Lord is also sadly lacking. No one in their meetings is allowed to question the voice of “the Channel” (the Watch Tower publications); thus, the Apostle’s words to ‘‘prove all things” become meaningless to them. On p. 730 of the December Watch Tower the question is asked: “What freedom have the religious leaders of Christen­dom and Jewry given to them?” Therefore, we would now propound the question to the Witnesses – What freedom have your religious leaders given to you? Of our own knowledge we know of multiplied instances where their members have been disfellow­shiped for questioning the teachings and arrangements of the Watch Tower. Thus, there is less religious liberty in the Witness organization than in any other re­ligious organization on earth today.

As we consider the events of the year just past, with the overruling Goodness of Him who is ever mindful of the welfare of His people, we face the New Year with resolute confidence and the strong assurance that “No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper.” This, then, is our ardent wish for all, as we reciprocate the many Holiday good wishes that have come to us. “Beloved, I desire concerning all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health.... even as thou walkest in the Truth.” (3 John 2-3) And to all who “walk in the Truth” the promise is certain, “There shall no evil befall thee.”

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

.................................................................

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Sirs:

Would you please send me copies of “The Resurrection of the Dead” and “Where Are The Dead?” We have been discussing these topics in our adult classes. We would find them most interesting.

Yours truly,  Pastor ------- (First Lutheran Church) (NEW JERSEY)

.......................................................

Dear Brethren:

The Special Edition of The Herald of the Epiphany was read with heart interest. I am seeking Truth and Soul Righteousness.

Thank you so very much.  May Proverbs 9:11 be yours to continue this work.

Your sister in Christ. ------- (NORTH CAROLINA)

.........................................................................

My dear Brother  Hoefle: Greetings in our precious Redeemer’s Name and Present  King!

I am very late in answering your very kind letter.... and to thank you for your thoughtfulness......... Again, dear Brother, I am very sorry for my late answer, but this has not been done purposely, as I was in Canada visiting some friends and relatives...... But I am very thankful to our Heavenly Father, and our Lord Jesus because His Grace and strength is made perfect in my weakness.

Now as to the addresses of the dear friends – some are a problem – as I do not know which ones you now have..... so when I go over them I will try to remember and send them to you.....

Sister joins me in sending our Christian love and His Grace which maketh rich and addeth no sorrow to be your good portion in the Narrow Way for you, for our dear Sister Hoefle and all the dear friends meeting with you. Heb. 13:20-21; Hymn 7; 1 Pet. 5:10

By His Grace your Brother ------- (NEW YORK)

..............................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle:

Loving Christian greetings and many thanks for the regular appearance of your papers, which I still appreciate. Now, will you please send a few copies of the tracts – and any others you may have and consider suitable, at this special time in remembrance of the last Star Members ­Brothers Russell & Johnson. I find myself out of these special numbers. Thank you again for your faithful service.  Wonderful how the Lord provides!

Your sister in His name ------- (ENGLAND)

............................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Loving Greetings through our Blessed Lord!

Thanks for your letters of Sept. 29 and Oct. 5, and also for the good papers every month. I get many blessings from them and also from the faithful friends’ letters from other parts of the world.... I hope everybody is well again. My prayers are for you and all with you.

Your sister in the Faith ------- (PENNSYLVANIA)

...............................................................................

My dear Brother Hoefle: Christian greetings in His dear Name!

It has taken me longer to reply to your letter and questions than I ex­pected.... I was sure Sister ------- had records of these events – about Brother Daniel Toole’s entrance to Taft..... He changed his views to Bro. Johnson along 1933-1934, she said.... When I heard the Truth teachings, it was what I had been seeking all my life. I had loved the Bible and God since a child of five or six years of age, but the questions I asked no one seemed to have a satisfactory answer .... So with my husband to help me in the deep and true meaning of God’s Word I was well in­structed. He loved to go over each lesson. The Class had studies twice a week, and I was his student. It came so clear to him – where with me some verses seemed too deep. He was happy to clear it up. Each one in the Class used to say my husband had shown such improvement – grasped the Truth more than any one in the Class. But I saw the change more than they – due to his constant mind, desire to study more and get acquainted with the O.T. and N. T. His disposition was so changed from a fiery temper to calmness and peace of mind. On his job his co­workers were amazed at his knowledge of world affairs, and of the Bible according to present events....

With this last line I pray each of you and family are feeling quite well ­and I send Christian love to each one. As ever your sister in Truth, with prayers for each of us ------- (CALIFORNIA)

.......................................................

My dear Brother Hoefle: Greetings of Christian love in the Masters Name!

Thanks for the literature... I also received the December paper and found it to be very amusing (and tragic, too, for one who has had such great opportunities as R. G. Jolly! – JJH), especially in his presentation on Psalm 24, with his half-truths that are more misleading to the Measurably Faithful and care­less ones, as to give them a false and incorrect idea of crown-losers and uncleansed Youthful Worthies’ hope. We would say it is good that the “chronic fault-finder” is always there, for by now the ‘clean’ Leader of the LHMM would have gone very much further than he has. The Questions put to him at the Chicago Convention were intelligently put. They seem to have shocked him.... as can be seen by the way he answered them – especially the one on the Youthful Worthies and Consecrated Campers and THE BOOK OF LIFE – shows how much he is confused on these two classes. When he said Yes that these two classes begin to inscribe their names in the Book of Life now at consecration, it is nonsense (Yes, as applicable to his Conse­crated Campers, but quite true of the Youthful Worthies – an “elect” class – as Bro.  Johnson has so ably taught us. It seems R. G. Jolly has forgotten the elemental truth that the Book of Life for Restitutionists has not yet been opened--JJH)

Continue to pray for us, as we cease not to make mention of you. Christian love to you, Sister Hoefle and the dear ones with you.

Your  Brother  by  the  Grace   of   God, ------- (TRINIDAD)

NO. 126: THE PHILADELPHIA CONVENTION - JEHOVAH'S MOUNTAIN

No. 126

My dear Brethren: Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

At the Philadelphia labor-Day Convention R. G. Jolly discoursed on the above subject, parts of which were excellent so long as he adhered to the Truth. In fact, many of those present – unskilled in the Word of Truth – were loud in their praise of his service; which should occasion no surprise, as he always seems to have plenty of applause regardless of how atrocious his errors may be. This same characteristic has been in evidence in Big Babylon throughout the Gospel Age. All error must have some Truth in it, otherwise no one would believe it; and the case we now consider bears marked evidence of this truth.

The basic Scripture discussed was Psa. 24, with special emphasis on vs. 3 and 4: “Who shall ascend into the hill of the Lord?” He generalized on this question in a very misleading manner, never at any time offering the real truth on it. Half-truths are more misleading than whole errors; and the present in­stance is vivid proof of this conclusion. David's answer to his own question clearly demonstrates it would be only the Fully Faithful, the Little Flock, who would attain this glorious triumph: “He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart; who hath not lifted up his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully.” Thus, when attempting to palm this Psalm off as a promise to any crown-loser, it offers a very misleading error.

The word “hill” in the text is from the Hebrew “har” – meaning a mountain, or range of hills. In this instance we believe it is clearly apparent David was re­ferring to a specific mountain – Jehovah's mountain, Mount Zion. This is graphi­cally confirmed in Psa. 2:6: “I have set my king upon my holy hill of Zion” ­which the marginal references would read better thusly: “I have anointed my king (Jesus) upon Zion, the hill (“har,” mountain) of my holiness.” The word “hill” in this text is from the Hebrew “har” – the same word contained in Psa. 24:3. This same thought is also found in Psa. 72:3 (although the Hebrew “gibah” here for mountain): ''The mountains shall bring peace (prosperity) to the people.” As Brother Johnson has so convincingly shown, the mountains in this text refer to Mount Zion and Mount Moriah, and “the little hills” are Acra and Bezetha – all four of these promontories being found within the walls of the City of Jerusalem, the same being representative of the four elect classes who will indeed bring last­ing “peace and prosperity to the people” of earth: Little Flock (Mount Zion), the Ancient Worthies (Mount Moriah), the Great Company (the Hill Acra), and the Youth­ful Worthies (the Hill Bezetha). While Moriah is mentioned first in the Old Testa­ment, Zion – which later becomes prominent, especially after the Jews captured Jeru­salem at David's direction – is the higher peak of the two, picturing forth the superior position of the Little Flock over the Ancient Worthies in the Messianic Kingdom. Thus, it requires little elaboration to determine that “the Hill of the Lord” in Psa. 24:3 is just another way of saying, “Who shall ascend into Mount Zion”; that is, who shall attain to the glory of the Little Flock.

The specifications for this attainment are also Little Flock requirements and characteristics: (1) “clean hands” – “An honest life, clean actions, clean conduct, determined opposition and resistance to sin in all its forms,” etc. (See Berean Comments); (2) “a pure heart” – good intentions, “a single-hearted purpose” (not the double mind of the Great Company); (3) “who hath not lifted up his soul unto vanity” – “humble, meek, modest, candid and sincere” (not the over-weaning appro­bativeness found in some crown-losers – See E-10:585, top); (4) “nor sworn deceitfully” – “has not made a solemn covenant of consecration with the Lord and willfully despised or ignored it” (a charge recorded against all “Sinners,” or crown-losers). As Brother Russell has so aptly stated, “there is no excuse for any one to be in the Great Company,” because the Lord gave each and every one full cooperation and help to retain their place in the High Calling.

The Hebrew word “har” is the same word found in Isa. 2:2,3: “The mountain (har) of the Lord's house shall be established in the top of the mountains” (har) – ­that is, the Lord's Kingdom shall overtop or overrule all earthly kingdoms. And verse 3 clearly corroborates our conclusions aforegoing that “the hill of the Lord” is indeed only Mount Zion: “Let us go up to the mountain (har)of the Lord.... for out of Zion shall go forth the law” – visibly from the Ancient Worthies in Jerusalem, and invisibly from the glorified Christ (the spiritual Mount Zion).

These thoughts receive further proof from Isa. 25:7: “He will swallow up in this mountain (har) the face of the covering (of death) cast over all people, and the veil (of ignorance, superstition and fear) that is spread over all nations.” Here again “this mountain” (har) is from the same word as “the hill” (har) in Psa. 24:3. It is truly tragic to observe such an uplifting and delightsome reve­lation perverted in the manner it was done at Philadelphia; but Azazel means Perverter, and it seems almost impossible for R. G. Jolly to touch any Truth since his abandonment to Azazel in 1950 without injecting some perversion into it. Of course, this evil of perverting the Truth (Azazel means Perverter) is of long stand­ing, having come into prominence in the days of Samuel the Prophet. “Samuel's sons walked not in his ways but turned aside.... and perverted judgment” (1 Sam. 8:3) – perverted the true teachings of the Star Members into error. And this same evil has persisted all during the Gospel Age, as the wayward sons (crown-lost ministers) of antitypical Samuel (the Star Members) have perverted every steward­ship doctrine and large parts of right practice that the Star Members established. And, since 1950 R. G. Jolly is doing his best to conform to the evils of his kinsmen of the past. And because we point this out R. G. Jolly labels us “chronic fault-finder” – ­although we realize, of course, that is the only answer left to him. Clearly enough, the Lord found the same fault with him (perversion of the Truth and its Spirit), when He ejected him from the Little Flock. None of those “who lifted up his soul unto vanity” was permitted to “ascend into the hill of the Lord” – Mount Zion; and none of those who were ejected from the Holy belong to the “pure in heart,” and to those who had “clean hands.”

THE CHICAGO CONVENTION – “BIBLE QUESTIONS”

On Sunday morning October 31 some pointed questions, not originated or prompted by us, were submitted for answer by R. G. Jolly. The nature of those questions indicated very clearly that some of those present are doing some thinking – just as the answers also demonstrated very clearly that R. G. Jolly is still firmly in the clutches of Azazel, and is still motivated by “strong delusion.”

One such question was something after this manner: If we are to condemn any one as a sifter, should we not read some of his opinions ourselves, rather than just taking some one else's word for it? R. G. Jolly's answer (not verbatim): “When Jesus labeled Judas a sifter, did the other eleven Apostles decide they wanted to hear Judas' side of the matter?” This is the sort of answer the Jesuits have offered against all the Fully Faithful Reformers; and demonstrates, even to a novice, Azazel's sophistry. When St. Paul counseled “Prove all things,” was it his thought that our “proof” should be established by taking the word of a self-admitted crown-loser as sufficient? Just how many would have accepted the “Present Truth” during the Epi­phany had they followed such advice? In fact, early in the Epiphany R. G. Jolly himself strongly condemned the Society people for doing the very thing he is now advising. “How are the mighty fallen!” Such counsel is exactly what the Jesuits advise benighted Catholics to do – if they expect to continue as “good” Catholics. Of course, we realize only too well that he fears our papers, because he is not so befuddled by Azazel that he cannot recognize what would happen – and what in fact is happening – with those who do “prove all things” by reading our presentations without prejudice: They soon develop a distinct aversion for R. G. Jolly's “strong delusions.”

He also condemned us for ridiculing his Attestatorial Service, which early in 1954 he based upon the 1914 “parallel.” When such people as he fall into the hands of Azazel, they talk all sorts of nonsense; and the nonsense is so apparent in the present instance that even R. G. Jolly was crafty enough not to mention the “parallel.” In 1914-1916 every Little Flock member eventually engaged in that service; and it was accompanied by such marked success that no unbiased mind has the slightest doubt about its veracity. R. G. Jolly's 1954 effort was no “parallel” whatever in point of time (he claims his Attestatorial Service is still proceeding after eleven years, as against the 25 months in 1914-1916); it bears not the slightest resemblance in results (only an infinitesimal fraction of the Great Company has engaged in it, having even less of them now than he had at its inception in 1954); the “signs of the times” have not provided one iota of corroboration for his effort, whereas, there was unmis­takable proof in 1914 of that true Attestatorial Service. Thus, is it at all strange that we should ridicule his contention? It does not require a savant to recognize his claims for just what they are: Nonsense – “strong delusion” – counterfeit! They are so shallow, empty, non-existent that we would not even give them passing notice were it not that we consider it our obligation to issue a witness against him ­and against those who support him in his evil ways. “Had I not spoken unto them, they had not had sin, but now they have no excuse for their sin.” (John 15:22--margin)

Another question asked if we now have the Epiphany or the Basileia Tabernacle if the Epiphany ended in any way in 1954. Of course, this inquiry forced him to admit we are still in the Epiphany, even though he insists we have also entered the Basileia. Was there any such “parallel” in 1914? once we reached the Epiphany as the last special period of the Gospel Age, was not Brother Johnson very definite that the Gospel-Age Tabernacle was no more, the Epiphany Tabernacle had then re­placed it? And this is in keeping with his teaching in E-11:591 that only one Tabernacle operates at a time. And in all of this irresponsible prattle R. G. Jolly was very profuse in his accusation that we falsely claim our harmony with Brother Johnson; whereas, he claims he is the one who is adhering to the Epiphany Messenger's conclusions! It seems unbelievable that those people who were schooled in the sober teachings of the last “Principal Man” could now swallow such “Strong delusion”; but we should “think it not strange,” because the Epiphany is the time for “making mani­fest the counsels of hearts”; and we would be foolish indeed to believe this same “manifestation'' must not occur with those in the LHMM. “The mills of the Gods grind slow, but they grind exceeding fine!”

YOUTHFUL WORTHIES AND CONSECRATED CAMPERS – THE BOOK OF LIFE

There was also the Question: Do the Youthful Worthies and the Consecrated Epiphany Campers begin to inscribe their names in the Book of Life at their conse­cration in this life? To this R. G. Jolly answered, Yes – for both classes – and gave quite some elaborate “proof.” Well, here is Brother Johnson's dis-proof of R.  G. Jolly in answer to what is meant by names being written in the Book of Life:

“Sometimes it may refer to one's office activities in God's arranged plan... but the usual meaning is that of one's character being inscribed into a cov­enant. By this we mean developed a character in harmony with a covenant, thus enabling us to become a partaker of the covenant's promises. During the Gospel Age, every consecrated and Spirit-begotten one (except the 12 Apostles, who, before Pentecost, Luke 10:20, because of their pre-anointing were treated in the same way as the Spirit-begotten) at the time of his entrance into the High Calling began to inscribe his character into the Covenant in its Sarah features, which develop the Christ class. Some failed to continue this work, through allowing sin, error, sel­fishness and worldli­ness to interfere to such an extent that they fell into the Great Company. Thus they were blotted out of their places as Little Flock members. If unfaithful as Great Company members, they will be blotted out of their places as such, and out of existence entirely, i.e., go into the Second Death; but if faith­ful as Great Company members, they will inscribe their characters into those features of the Covenant typed by Rachel. The Ancient Worthies begin and Youthful Worthies also at consecration begin to inscribe their characters into the earthly features of the Oath-bound phase. If faithful, they will have their names written in heaven (Heb. 12:23) at the beginning of the Little Season, for they are among the antitypical Millennial-Age first born (Levites) who had no inheritance in the land.... Thus all the elect classes will ulti­mately have their characters inscribed into the all ­embracing Abrahamic Covenant in one or another of its features. In the Millennium, the non-elect, the Restitution class, will have to develop their characters in harmony with the NEW BOOK OF LIFE, the New Covenant revelations, which will then be given. As they progress up the highway of holiness, they will be symbol­ically writing their names in this OTHER Book of Life – inscribing their characters into the New Covenant.”

The foregoing is certainly in harmony with God's character, with itself, and with all Scripture; and R. G. Jolly's answer regarding his Campers Consecrated is in harmony with his “strong delusions” (pseudo-spiritually inspired). It will enable us better to understand the Epiphany Messenger's answer if we remember that the Little Flock is developed by Antitypical Sarah – the Little Flock and Great Company are com­prehended in the Rachel type – the Little Flock, Great Company and Youthful Worthies are embraced in the Hannah type (See E-13:19/11). The clear explanation of these various features of the respective types and antitypes offer not the slightest hint that any restitution class is included in them – be they supposedly consecrated now, or after the Mediatorial reign begins. And R. G. Jolly's inclusion of such in a Book of Life, which is not yet opened to any Restitutionist, is simply more of his nonsense (similar to the Jehovah's Witnesses frantic 'gathering' of their specialized brand of non-elect).

There were other questions, which we may treat in later papers, the answers to which were grossly perverted by R. G. Jolly. And throughout his parade of error there was interwoven his usual diatribe against the “sifters” in our midst – in exact fashion as was done by the “cleansed” Jews with Jesus in their Temple gatherings. But perhaps most tragic of all was to note the smiles of approval for his nefarious course by those in the audience who should know better – a precise duplication of the conduct against Brother Johnson early in the Epiphany. The chief priests, Scribes et al, falsely accused our Lord as they crucified him, while the ledlings were ''wagging their heads.” (See Mark. 15:29, 31) And as we observe the cup of “strong delusion” now being drained by those people who treated Brother Johnson and others so shamefully, it should cause no surprise that the same portion is also sent by the Lord to similar persons today; and we may be certain this will continue to a comple­tion. “Because they poured out the blood of saints and of prophets, thou gavest unto them also blood (error) to drink; they deserve it.” (Rev. 16:6, Dia.) However, we are strongly moved to issue a caution to our own readers that we “be not overcome of evil,” lest the same poisonous draft be meted out to us. Brethren, “Keep yourselves in the love of God”; and we keep ourselves in the love of God so long as we keep “the love of God” in us.

If there be any who think others may be retrieved from “the snare of the fowler” by this paper, they need only request additional copies – which will be sent free; or give us names and addresses, and we shall mail from here.

“Now, thanks be to that God, who always leads us forth to triumph with the Anointed one, and who diffuses by us the fragrance of the knowledge of him, in Every Place. Because we are a Sweet odor of Christ to God, among those who are being saved, and among those who are perishing; to these, indeed, an Odor of Death to Death, and to those, and odor of Life to Life; and for these things who is qualified? For we are not like the many, trafficking the Word of God; but really from sincerity, and as from God, in the presence of God, we speak concerning Christ.” (2 Cor. 2:14-17, Dia.)

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle Pilgrim

------------------------------------------------------------------

A CLARIFICATION

In our June paper No. 120, p. 8, we faulted J. W. Krewson for giving erroneous information regarding Christendom's Easter date; and one of his adherents wrote us a rather pointed note to the effect that we were in bad taste in our June comments because J. W. Krewson was simply quoting Brother Johnson, and she felt we should offer public apology for our offense. However, Brother Johnson's statement in the 1940 Present Truth is substantially identical to Brother Russell's comment in Parousia Volume Six, p. 480, which we quote in part: “The method of calculating the date for Good Friday and Easter Sunday in vogue among Lutherans, Episcopalians and Catholics differs from the foregoing in this: They usually, but not always, e.g., this year, celebrate as Easter Sunday the first Sunday following the first full moon after the Spring equinox, and the preceding Friday is recognized as Good Friday.” The follow­ing letter is our answer to her, as well as our statement for all our readers:

Dear Sister -------. Grace and peace through our Beloved Lord!

Referring to your recent letter in answer to mine of August 30, I think J. W. Krewson would be well advised to declare when he is quoting Brother Johnson – instead of copying from either Messenger as though it were from his own pen ­as it seems he is now following once more in the steps of R. G. Jolly. In the present instance, however, it has rebounded to his decided disadvantage.

Anyway, we have before us two statements: One from Brother Russell in Parousia Volume Six, p. 480, and one from Brother Johnson in Present Truth 1935, p. 35, col. 1 – one of which is right, and one of which is wrong. Is there any doubt whatever in your mind which one is right? If there is, you may find in any public library that Brother Russell's statement is the correct one. Brother Johnson knew this, too, as he read Volume Six; and he probably had been well-schooled on this point in his seminary education at Columbus, Ohio. Therefore, I must conclude – and I hope you will agree with me – that his 1935 statement was just a slip of the pen, a mistake he would readily have acknowledged had it been brought to his attention. In fact, my conclusion is verified by Brother Johnson himself on p. 35 of the March 1940 Present Truth, where he gives the answer much the same as Brother Russell gives it in Parousia Vol. 6, p.480.

So here we have a man (J. W. Krewson) claiming to be a teacher in the General Church, who has before him a correct statement and an incorrect statement – the in­correct statement later corrected by Brother Johnson himself; and of those three statements he chooses to publish the incorrect one for the information of his readers. Honestly now, my dear Sister, don't you think, under the circumstances, he is justly deserving of criticism? And don't you think I would be lax in my own obligations if I said nothing about such a distortion? I'm inclined to think he had you believing he was right until I informed you it was wrong. His statement is self-evident nonsense, regardless of where he got it, as his rule would make it impossible for Easter ever to come in March. Therefore, even had he said he was quoting Brother Johnson, I would still feel obligated to state the truth on it – for the benefit of my own readers, as well as for those of his adherents who read our papers.

Our November paper is already complete and has been forwarded to you and mother; but I shall endeavor to clarify what I have published by reproducing this letter, with terse comment in our December paper. Our December paper will not go to the printer for a few weeks yet, which will give you time to answer further if you wish.

While I am grateful to you for bringing this to my attention, I am sorry if it has disturbed you; and I hope you will believe that I have only your elective-­salvation welfare at heart when I send you my papers as I do.

Sister Hoefle and the others here join me in sending you and Mother our Christian love, with the assurance of our prayers that you may “know the Truth” and the freedom that is sure to come with it.

Sincerely your brother, John J. Hoefle

......................................................................

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Brother Hoefle:

I received your letter of Sept. 1 entitled, “Ten Years in Retrospect” – also the July 1 letter (The Roman Church and Its Little Twin). I read them, I feel, with profit. You and I see the Truth very much “eye to eye” – and that is to follow closely to what Brother Russell taught us concerning “God's Plan of the Ages.” I feel the doctrines he taught are Scriptural and true..... He thought Armageddon would be over in 1914, rather than just beginning............

 I assume you think I am one of the Jehovah's Witnesses. For a time I tried to go along with them.... but in Jan. 1917 Brother ------- and I went to the annual meeting of the Watch Tower in Pittsburgh... Brother and I felt Bro. Rutherford was the best suited to take over – and we voted for him. I tried to go along with them for a time, but became so thoroughly disgusted with the way Bro. Rutherford advertised him­self, rather than the Truth, that I fell away and associated with no one until Bro. Knorr took over. I like his attitude much better. When I married I began associat­ing with them again. I still believed the Truth, however, and had to tell them the Truth. This got me into trouble..... I told them I would keep still in their meetings (Prov. 6:16-19), but not outside. That is the way we stand today.

I love those Witnesses. Their zeal and earnestness sometime make me feel ashamed of myself. But they are blind, being led by blind leaders..... When we talk, to the average Jehovah's Witness we learn how little they know concerning the deep things of the Scriptures. (Note: We find they know very little about their own errors ­when faced with themJJH)

The Society brethren believe they are going through Armageddon and will be the nucleus of Christ's visible government here on earth. How foolish such an idea! And they think they will have to teach the Ancient Worthies their brand of present truth! Oh, how could they get so far astray from God's way – when it is made so plain in His Word? They reject the Ransom..... They reject the Resurrection and Restitution, disbelieving that the “Father judgeth no man,” but has put all judg­ment in the hands of His son Jesus Christ. They teach that God has been judging every individual that came into the world since Adam, and will resurrect and give life to only such as are in the “Memorial tombs.” (Note: These are some of the teachings many of the Jehovah's Witnesses deny – when faced with these errors. One Sister – who came into the Truth under Brother Russell – denied that the Jehovah's Witnesses teach these doctrinesJJH)

Now the question is – if Jehovah is using these Witnesses to do this work, why are they kept in such a measure of ignorance?......

I have been rambling on here at considerable length, and no doubt, you are getting tired.... I located in..... in 1954 when I retired, because they had a class already established here. After working with them for two or three years, I began to see that their doctrines were dishonoring my Father. It had been about 40 years since I had studied the “Scripture Studies.” But I still had the Truth in my mind. I was in a quandary. I felt the Society was the Channel the Lord was using, and yet they were so woefully wrong in their views – so far from the Truth taught us by Brother Russell. I began praying to Jehovah to give me the Truth – His Truth – right from His Word. Almost every night on my knees I pleaded with Jehovah to give me His Truth from His Book.... All this time I was reading and studying the Scrip­tures. The result is some of the things I have been telling you about. I began to feel elated, sort of patting myself on the back. Some of these things I didn't recall seeing in Brother Russell's writings. Then when I began checking with Brother Russell to see if he had these ideas, my ego surely dropped. He had all these things in print when I was in knee britches. I was glad, for I knew then Jehovah had answered my prayers. (When we seek the Lord in His appointed channels He will answer all who seek him in sincerity of purpose – from a pure heartJJH)

And now, Brother, may the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, richly bless you and yours, and all in your house, as you strive to do His will.

Sincerely your brother and sister in Christ ------- (FLORIDA)

...........................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Loving greetings in our Redeemer's Name!

Thank you so very much for the lovely birthday greetings, which was forwarded to me... I do appreciate your remembering me. Now I am fairly sure I wrote you telling you I planned to come here Sept. 10, but there was so much confusion I am not sure. It may have been after I found out about this trip, so I may be just repeating what I have told you. August 27 N's Uncle ------- 91 years old, died. The same day J's mother (86 years old) died........

I think I told you I have been so happy to have my bound ‘Hoefle’ papers and was re-reading them. Got up to about half-way in the 1960 articles...... so I hope to continue reading them.

With much Christian love to both of you and to all the family, I am

Your sister by His Grace, -------  (OREGON)

.......................................................

Epiphany Bible Student Ass'n

Mount Dora –

Dear Gentlemen:

My friend shared with me a Special edition of the Herald of the Epiphany. I was interested so much. It was an inspiration to me. Please send me a copy. I shall try to follow as it may seem to me good.

Yours truly ------- (MICHIGAN)

......................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle:

I'll try to answer your letter as soon as I get some data on Brother ------- his arrival in ------- and I feel better in head to write. I hope your brother-in-law is not in much pain, and the rest of your family are in good health.

I'll write a letter, D.v., last of October. Weather here is cooler.

No news from Brother ------- or from Sisters -------

Christian love from

Sister ------- (CALIFORNIA)

NO. 125: WISDOM - MADNESS - FOLLY

No. 125

My dear Brethren: – Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

Says Solomon in Ecc. 1:17,18: “I gave my heart to know wisdom, and to know madness and folly: I perceived.... that in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.” But the Wise Man observes also in Ecc. 7:3 – “Sorrow is better than laughter: for by the sadness of the countenance the heart is made better.” Surely, all God's Fully Faithful people will be In accord with the conclusion that by which “the heart is made better” is to be desired, for “out of the heart are the issues of life.” Solomon's wisdom is legend and truth with a large portion of the human race, whatever may be their religious beliefs or disbe­liefs. As Solomon realized he was King in Israel after the death of his father David, the enormity of his task had a very mollifying effect upon him – as was also true of the Epiphany Solomon after the death of his spiritual father (That Servant). The thought never once seized Brother Johnson that he should be 'king In Israel' after 1916 – just the reverse of others of much less ability who were ambitious to be “somebody” in the Lord's Household. This is beautifully outlined in 1 Kgs. 3:7, 9, 10, 12, “I am but a little child: I know not how to go out or come in.... Give therefore thy servant an understanding heart to judge thy people, that I may dis­cern between good and bad.... And the speech pleased the Lord, that Solomon had asked this thing. And God said unto him.... Behold, I have done according to thy words: Lo, I have given thee a wise and an understanding heart; so that there was none like thee before thee, neither after thee shall any arise like unto thee.” And further in 1 Kgs. 4:29-31, “God gave Solomon wisdom and understanding exceeding much, and largeness of heart.... And Solomon's wisdom exceeded the wisdom of all the children of the east country, and all the wisdom of Egypt. For he was wiser than all men.”

On one occasion we quoted this Scripture to Brother Johnson, asking how this could be true, since he freely admitted that Brother Russell had a position much superior to his own here in the end of the Age. His answer: I have the knowledge and understanding of God's word that he had, plus what I now have; and that makes more than he had.

It is well stated that “Genius speaks only to genius.” St. Paul expresses a kindred thought in 1 Cor. 2:11-16 (Dia.): “Who of men knows the thoughts of the man, except that spirit of the man which is in him.... We have received that spirit which is from God, that we may know the things graciously given to us by God.... Now an animal man does not receive the things of the spirit of God, for they are foolishness unto him; and he is not able to understand, because they are spiritu­ally examined.” Thus, our approach to God or to understanding the genius of man is calculated entirely upon our own ability to reach a viewpoint on the same level with such genius. Therefore, a lawyer sees eye to eye with another lawyer of the same caliber, a doctor of medicine to another physician, and so on. And, by the same token, the more we acquire of the Spirit of the Lord, the more shall we know the “mind of the Lord.,”

Physically speaking, the human race is divided Into three classes – the magnetics, the repulsives, and the neutrals. In the Bible the human face is often used to por­tray the quality of love; and, even In man's fallen condition, seldom do we find a human face that is repulsive to our vision. Consequently, there is only a small minority of repulsives – just as there is also only a small portion of magnetics; the vast majority are found among the neutrals. Also, the vast majority of human beings must receive their entertainment and relaxation outside themselves, which accounts for the great demand for actors and artists of various sorts. A few, however, are able to draw their pleasures from within themselves, and such people are never alone. Jesus was one of these, and to His disciples He had said, “I have meat to eat that ye know not of.” (John 4:32) He had that strong reassurance, that inner rest, calm and fortitude which were always His ''meat and drink,''

Of course, with almost every human being there is some brilliant experience – perhaps vague and passing quickly, interspersed with the great expanse of woe that clings as a blanket in this “valley of the shadow” – that brings some few heights of joy to ease the broad and persistent depths of sorrow. From such experience is spun the web of character which flows from the active loom of life, and which will be fine and beautiful, or coarse and homely, according to the skill, carefulness and fineness with which the Individual weaves his “garments of needlework” into a final destiny. It has been well spoken that if we sow a thought, we reap a word; if we sow a word, we reap a sentence; if we sow a sentence, we reap a habit; if we sow a habit, we reap a destiny. This makes clear why St. Paul ever sought to have God's people cultivate right habits of thought – “whatsoever things are true, honest, just, pure, lovely and of good report think on these things.” Such think­ing is certain to determine our destiny. “I have set the Lord always before me; because He is at my right hand I shall not be moved.” And any who come into God's Household and faithfully seek to “be transformed” by His Word, Spirit and Providence, develop a firmness of character and brightness of countenance that they otherwise did not have – whatever their classification and position, according to this world's standards, in life may have been.

''The whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together,” nor should God's people be foolish enough to think it shall not come nigh unto them. Even our Beloved Lord “learned obedience by the things which He suffered”; and “as He was, so are we in this world.” Few people can stand adversity, and fewer still can receive pros­perity and still maintain an even keel. one shopkeeper put the sign In his window, “Hats enlarged to fit any promotion”; and it is little wonder that Solomon was forced to conclude that ''vanity, vanity, all Is vanity.” “What is that In thine hand?” the Lord had said to Moses; and this query comes with equal force to each in his own place, for “it is required of stewards that a man be found faithful.” The vast majority strive and strain for the pelf that perisheth, but which they think will permit them to say, “Soul, take thy ease,” as had been true of the inhabi­tants of Sodom, where “pride, fullness of bread, and abundance of idleness was found in her”; but to all who regard the things of time as transient and elusive, the following verse will find acceptable lodging:

When fortune smiles, and full of mirth and pleasure

The days are flitting by without a care,

Lest you should be content with only earthly treasure,

Let these few words their fullest import bear:

This, too, will pass away!

It is a common expression, “You can't take it with you”; and, while this may be true of what we have in perishing things of clay, it is certainly not true of what we are in excellency of character. This latter none can take from us, nor does God ever forget it, as evidence Isa. 49:15,16, ''Can a woman forget her suckling child? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee. Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands; thy walls are continually before me.” Thus, riches may vanish, health may fail, friends forsake, and enemies take up reproach and revile us – yea, even “brethren cast you out” – despair and despondency may come in like a flood (''re­proaches have broken my heart”), yet full victory is assured to those who keep up the ''good fight''; the promise is theirs, ''Ye shall reap if ye faint not.” It is aptly stated that we may never have full appreciation of good food until we have been ravenously hungry, nor enjoy the cool refreshing waters of the hidden spring until we have first crossed the desert. one philosopher once intentionally forced himself to go without water for three full days in high summer that he might experience the gripping joy and satisfaction of assuaging such a thirst. (Please consider we do not advise any of our readers to pursue a like experiment; we are certain to have a sufficiency of tribulation to tax the strength of the least unto the greatest even as we do our best to travel life's pathway in even stride. “In the world you shall have tribulation.”)

In the midst of the cares, perplexities and difficulties, from “fightings without and fears within,” we may find solace in the example of Job, ''Though He slay me, yet will I trust Him.” (Job. 13:15) God's Fully Faithful people may rest in the sublime words of St. Paul (1 Cor. 10:13), “There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able (to bear); but will with the temptation also make a way to escape.” Therefore, if we break a leg, let us remember that thousands of others “without God and without hope in the world” also have broken legs; if we suffer the loss of loved ones, “we sorrow not, even as others which have no (sub­stantial) hope” (1 Thes. 4:13), and who also mourn the loss of those dear to them. “Behold, I have chosen thee in the furnace of affliction” (Isa. 48:10); but the arm of flesh has its limitations in ourselves and in others, nor will weak man ever be permitted to stay God's great purposes – in His people as individuals, or in His great eternal purpose for humanity as a whole. “When He giveth quietness, who then can make trouble?” Those who have never served as a “good soldier” under the Great Captain can know nothing of such consolations. Such “good soldiers” may appear to men to be solitary sentinels on the isolated outposts of the “good warfare” for Truth, but each may rest secure that he is never alone – “Lo, I am with you all the days, even to the end of the Age.” And the years of experience, if properly applied, enable one and all to “endure hardness as a good soldier,” even as St. Paul gave eloquent testimony of the refining and enduring effects of his own faithfulness as a “good soldier,” “I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith: Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love His appearing.” (2 Tim. 4:7,8)

Mankind in general does much too little thinking. Even here in the United States, where the burden of the curse has been eased so very much during the past fifty years, there is a large segment of the population that works eight hours a day, sleeps eight hours a day, eats and drinks and is entertained in some insipid form for eight hours a day – and they think the rest of the time! However, there are those who do think, and think very straight and clearly; as Shakespeare put into the mouth of one of his characters, ''Yon Cassius thinks too much; such men are dangerous!” And, while schemes dark and sundry may emanate from those whose thoughts are evil, yet there can never be too much of thinking on the better things – those things St, Paul gives in his epistle to the Philippians. Much of the thinking of human beings has been based upon unsound premises, such as the old Roman philosophy, “Without slaves there can be no leisure; without leisure there can be no thinking; and without thinking there can be no progress.” All the more enlightened nations have long since dis­carded that doctrine.

“Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh,” and good listeners often gain quick and sure insight into the hearts of those they meet just by allow­ing them to talk. “As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he”; and the thoughts of the heart are certain to reveal themselves in one form or another, because “A man's wisdom maketh his face to shine, and changeth the strength of his countenance.” Thus, a wise and good man will be motivated by just and good thoughts – which will cause him to speak and act justly, nobly; “the wisdom which cometh from above is without partiality and without hypocrisy.” This is the grand ideal, of course, which no member of the fallen race can achieve in perfection; but the appeal on every hand to “think” offers eloquent testimony to the rating that the better-born among men give. to it. It is said that the one and all-gripping slogan of John D. Rockefeller was, “I am bound to be rich”; and rich he became – perhaps the world's first billionaire. But those who labor for “the wisdom from above” also acquire a wealth which the world cannot know, neither can it take away; whereas, “the meat that perisheth” is so often only too quickly dissipated. It is a proper observation that “distance lends enchantment,” and that the pasture in other fields always appears to be greenest; yet it is also a solid truth that “familiarity breeds contempt.”

Perhaps the most tragic example in all history of this sage expression is to be found in Jesus' own family and the locale in which he grew to manhood. It was in Nazareth that His boyhood acquaintances had contemptuously said of Him, “Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? And they were offended because of Him. But Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honor, but in his own country, and among His own kin, and in his own house. And he could do there no mighty work... And he marveled because of their unbelief.” (Mark 6:1-6) There is no record that any of Jesus' brothers and sisters accepted Him when He was here; and at the cross there is the pathetic spectacle of Jesus resigning His mother to “that disciple whom Jesus loved” (the Apostle John), rather than to one of her own sons. We have often pondered, What will His brothers and sisters think of themselves when they experience the “common salvation,” and realize that they then stand in life because of the one they knew so well that they would have no part of Him during His ministry of sorrow!

But the appeal to all who have accepted Him is that they be “transformed by the renewing of their minds” that they may know what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect will of God. (Rom. 12:2) Nor shall we succeed in this “transformation” except by “thinking on these things”; therefore, it is well that we “give our hearts to know wisdom” – the wisdom which is first pure, then peaceable, etc. And this appeal to all God's people to “get understanding” enables them to “know the Truth, and the Truth shall make you free.” This is just the reverse of all heathen and of all false Christian religions, which instruct their adherents to allow their priests to think for them on matters religious; otherwise, they may become confused. This is especially true of the Roman Catholic system, which for­bids its devotees to read the Bible for themselves, or to read any literature not accepted by the board of censors – as is also true of its “Little Twin” (the Jehovah's Witnesses). This same attitude was followed by the Society after Brother Russell's death, just as it has been advocated by some since Brother Johnson's death. Brother Johnson gives this in E-3:311 – “J.F.R. sought to prevent the Societyites from partaking of the spiritual feast offered.... Personally, by letter and by instructions to his pilgrims he not only counseled against reading that and other teachings that appeared in The Present Truth, but he specifically told his adherents, some of whom were burning the copies of The Present Truth that were be­ing sent to them, not to burn them, but to send the papers back to the publisher unopened, with the word “refused” written on the wrapper.... and thus he sought to prevent their getting any more copies of this journal.” This same advice has been given by R. G. Jolly regarding our publications, and we have received some of the same kind of “refusals” written on the wrapper from his sectarian devotees. We should “think it not strange,” when such errorists follow in the footsteps of their predecessors in error. Such bigotry should sound an immediate warning to all who have been enlightened in even slight degree by Present Truth. Of the Roman system it has been aptly observed that their slogan is, “Reading (other than Catholic literature) is doubt; doubt is heresy; and heresy is Hell.” It was indeed reading of the Bible that made of Martin Luther a ‘heretic’; had he not read, he would have remained a loyal “believer,” a cringing serf of the Roman system.

And, while thinking of the right sort is advocated throughout the Holy Writ, we should ever consider that thinking of the wrong sort can quickly lead to the morass of confusion which is to be found In so many quarters. The words of Jesus are so very pertinent here, “Wisdom is justified of all her children.” Thus, the Roman Church correctly teaches that there is but one true Church, which is the cus­todian and steward of the Truth. This Truth none can deny; but they then proceed with the next step – We are that true Church. All who accept this second premise are then easily led captive to the enslaving precepts of the system. By the same token, if one is falsely labeled a ‘sifter,’ those who believe the falsehood would then easily be deterred from investigating that person's teachings. But we are admonished to “stand fast in that liberty wherewith Christ hath made you free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.” However, even while advocating the fullest freedom in God's Household, there is also that restraining precept, “Ye were called unto liberty, only use not liberty as an occasion to the flesh.” Thus, “all things are lawful, but all things are not expedient.”

We are told to “prove all things, and hold fast that which is good.” However, if this text be not read with sanctified reason, it may be badly misleading. It is not possible for any of us to prove all things; but it is possible – and proper ­to prove all things we accept that pertain to religious truth; otherwise, it would not be possible for us ever to “know the Truth.” As the Bereans of old “searched the Scriptures daily to see if those things taught to them were true,” so should we also; and this alone will make us “rooted and grounded in the faith as ye have been taught,” a burning and a shining light. All such, who ''hunger and thirst after righteousness (the Truth and the spirit of the Truth) shall be filled.”

Therefore, let all consider that ''wisdom is the principal thing; therefore, get wisdom; and with all thy getting, get understanding.” Such is our prayer for all our readers.

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

.......................................................................

QUESTIONS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Question: – Do the quasi-elect have the “peace of God”?

Answer: – No – only the sanctified have the “peace of God.” The peace of God is only for the elect in this Faith Age. So long as the quasi-elect retain their duty-love to God and Man, that they attained in the Court, they will retain the “Peace with God” that is their portion in making this most important first step. God gives His peace – “the peace of God” – only to those who have a justifying and sacrificing faith, the faith required for those who walk a narrow way – the elect ­during the reign of sin and evil, which is a step farther than Justification; and only the elect (the Little Flock, the Ancient and Youthful Worthies, and the Great Company when cleansed) are blessed with this peace during the Gospel Age. Brother Johnson has a splendid article on this subject In the November 1944 Present Truth.

................................................................................

Question: – When the Great Company are In Azazel's clutches, do they have “peace with God” and the “Peace of God”?

Answer: – No, they do not! They violate both their Justification and Sanctification vows – some more and some less. In proportion as they have violated their vows, in that same proportion they lose their “peace with God” and the “Peace of God.” The Lord does not uphold their evils of teaching and practice, which they get from Azazel – nor does He grant them victory In controversy. This is so very clearly revealed in the course of King Saul in 1 Sam. in chapters 13 through 31. Only the Fully Faithful are able to put all their adversaries to flight. “I will give you eloquence and wisdom, which all your opponents will not be able to gainsay, or resist” (Luke 21:15, Dia.), is one of the exceeding great and precious promises reserved only for the Fully Faithful. Note especially the Berean Comments on this Scripture. Azazel doesn't uphold them either; he doesn't mind how much they are humiliated and defeated because of the errors he has given them. He doesn't love them; he wishes to destroy them. But the Lord loves them so long as they remain In the Household, even though He doesn't spare “the rod of affliction.” The rod of affliction is no comfort to them, but rather humiliating and unappreciated. But the rod – either to correct, or refine, whichever the case may be – to the Fully Faith­ful is a rod of comfort to them, because they want the Lord's correction; they want to develop a character ''mete for the Master's use.” (See Psalms 23:4)

Not so with the Great Company so long as they are doubleminded: Their fleshly mind desires to do things in accordance with their will and way. Until such time as they become single-minded, this same condition will exist in them; but when they have had enough and “cry unto the Lord” in their distresses (Psa. 107:13), He will deliver them. R. G. Jolly touched on this Psalm (vs. 22-28) as applicable to the world, at the Philadelphia Convention, but he didn't refer to verse 13, a specific text that applies to his Class. We are living in the Epiphany period when persons, principles and things are being made manifest. The Great Company either as a Class, or as Individuals in their leaders (in the Little Babylon groups as well as in Big Babylon) have not reached this point yet – they have not “cried unto the Lord” to deliver them from their bondage of error (although those Individuals – cleansed as such all during the Age have had their proper buffeting and no doubt “cried unto the Lord.” – We refer specifically to the leaders and Class cleansing): rather they have persisted in their revolutionism even after they have been clearly refuted by the Lord's faithful Star Members' teachings. They are still sitting “in darkness and in the shadow of death, being bound in affliction and iron” (Psa. 107:10). When the prophecy is fulfilled – “mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all” (Rev. 18:21), then the “great multi­tude” will cry unto the Lord for their deliverance.

....................................................................

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Brother Hoefle: Loving greetings In our Precious Redeemer's Name!

Your kind letter with the tracts enclosed received some time ago – and thank you very much. Of course I appreciate them very much – because they are a Part of the precious Harvest Sickle, and part of the Fifth Volume of Studies in the Scriptures. We used to put them out a few years back, especially “Where are the Dead.”

I never met Brother ------- you mention, but I have heard of him. I do not know what became of him – whether he stayed with the Society or where he is. Here are the names and addresses of some members of our class for your mailing list; I do not have all their home addresses.

May the dear Lord continue to bless and keep you – and all the dear brethren with you in the Narrow way. This is my sincere prayer for all of you.

Your Brother by His Grace In His Service ------- (NEW YORK)

.......................................................................

My dear Brother Hoefle: Greetings In the Master's name!

Yours of July 19 came to hand quite safe and was received with much appreciation and thanks. Thanks also for the August and September papers and the tracts....... I really enjoyed the August paper – agree that it is the crown­lost leaders and their supporters that built up Great and Little Babylon; and it is their errors that are at the bottom of every sifting – error of teaching and prac­tice, even up to this day of the Epiphany. I also note what you say about priest­craft and priest'graft.' These are the doubleminded ones who try every conceivable means to gain numbers and material gains, as you make reference to J. F. Rutherford and his slave labor – and at the same time claiming to be strictly adhering to Pastor Russell, or in the case of the Epiphany brethren, claiming to adhere to both Pastor Russell and Pastor Johnson.

I also enjoyed the September paper – Ten Years in Retrospect. It is indeed enlightening and encouraging. Question of General Interest of the No. 123, I think with one stoke of the pen you have wiped off the “strange fire” of Campers Conse­crated and quasi-elect Consecrated. I only hope their advocates would read that number and take note of all the references you make pointing to Brother Johnson's writings to the contrary of these false teachings.....

All the dear friends are in good spirit, thank the Lord, and ask to tender their love to you and Sister Hoefle and to the dear ones with you – as well as to those with whom you come in contact. And so comes our prayers on your behalf as we also solicit yours. To the All-Wise God, be glory through Jesus Christ forever! Amen. (Rom. 16:27)

Your brother by His Grace, ------- (TRINIDAD)

.................................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace through our Blessed Lord and Master!

It is a pleasure to write you, as much blessings are received in your response. I must acknowledge the receipt of ... lbs. from Brother ------- May the dear Lord bless him for his labor of love! We wish we could all say more and do more at times for the Lord. He is so gracious toward us!

The monthly articles are so interesting and add strength to the faithful at this dire time of need. In your September article – Ten Years In Retrospect – you stated you were hopeful R. G. Jolly would have recovered.... But if I understand aright I see him.... acting very daring in his wayward course. I have read and noticed how Brother Johnson dealt very kindly and justly toward those who opposed the Truth In his times – very much as you have been trying to do toward those of our times. But will they take heed? Oh, when the light in one become darkness, how great is that darkness! (Matt. 6:23)

May God continue to bless you as you strive to serve Him faithfully. With this comes my warm Christian love for you, Sister Hoefle and the dear ones with you.

Sincerely your brother ------- (JAMAICA)

.........................................................................

My dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace be multiplied!

I must thank you for your kind letter to me, and to know I have been in your thoughts and your prayers... These have brought much consolation to me at this time. I can assure you, my dear Brother, that my present experiences have enabled me to live closer to my Lord and Redeemer (Psalms 119:67); and I do rejoice in His promises that all things must work together for my good, and to them that love God – the called according to His purpose (Rom. 8:28)

May the Lord Jesus Christ and our dear Heavenly Father continue to bless and keep you in His love while you continue to abide faithful in His service. Continue to pray for me, as I cease not to make mention of you in my prayers, Love to the dear sisters and other brethren with you.

Your sister in the Lord, ------- (TRINIDAD)

..........................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

Enclosed is letter to Brother ------- It is a very good letter and right to the point. It should deeply impress him. Sister ------- and I feel so happy at seeing you Sunday, Sept. 5, in Philadelphia – and we did enjoy spending a little time with you both in your hotel. It felt so good to see you both again ­and we trust we all received a rich blessing from the Lord.... We shall look forward to receiving the tracts.

Warmest Christian love ------- (NEW  JERSEY)

NO. 124: THE JULY-AUGUST PRESENT TRUTH

No. 124

My dear Brethren: Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

As promised in our September issue, we now consider certain features of the above paper, in which R. G, Jolly indulges in his usual name-calling - ”Chronic faultfinder, opposing errorist,” etc. -in a desperate effort to retain in “the snare of the fowler” those of his readers that he has persuaded not to read our papers. (See Acts 13:8-10) Indeed, we are quite happy it is not necessary for us to indulge in name-calling. All we have to do is tell the truth about RGJ; that is more than enough! As we have previously quoted, “You can fool some of the people all the time, and all the people some of the time,” but it needs no argument that we never fool the Lord any of the time. Nor have the members of the “great multitude fooled Him any of the time, notwithstanding all their loud professions and claims of “great works” (which will be burned). When they said “Lord, Lord, open to us” (Matt. 25:11) He knew them not. He is now manifesting His rejection of that Class (in this Epiphany period) by their “strong delusion” (See 2 Thes. 2: 11-­also Berean Comments) And by such tactics, “Offenses needs must come, but woe unto him, through whom they come.” (Luke 17:1) To such the Lord pronounces the sentence, “There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Matt, 25:30--See Berean Comments).

On pages 50-52 R. G. Jolly treats of “The Parable of the Pounds,” as though we were in the Parousia and have no additional special Epiphany light on the subject ­as though he were one of the crown-lost leaders in Little Babylon who refused Epiphany Truth. He refers to “a considerable class” and then proceeds to classify the “wicked servant” as the “foolish virgins the Bride’s companions, a great multitude, not wholly copies of God’s dear son,  those who all their lifetime were subject to bondage through fear of death.” (“They were loyal to God, but they did no more than maintain their loyalty,” Bro. Russell says--Question Book, p: 309) All this nomenclature is scriptural and correctly applied, but why stop there? Why not clearly describe the “Great Company” so clearly and superbly described by Brother Russell in many places -and especially by the Epiphany messenger in Volumes 15 and 4? Why not also classify them as the “unprofitable servant” of Matt. 25:30; and why not explain that the word ‘‘wicked’’ in Luke 19:22 is from the Greek word “poneros,” meaning “Bad malignant, miserable”? And why not explain, too, that this same word “poneros,’’-is translated “evil” 38 times in the New Testament? We know that he would probably have done this before 1938 -so, if he is the ‘cleansed’ Levite leader he claims to be, why shouldn’t he remember this pertinent Epiphany Truth? But above all, why did he not include the following from the Epiphany Messenger in his treatment of this Pounds Parable?

“Remembering that the slothful and wicked servant (of this Pounds Parable--JJH) represents the Great Company, we can see how, from the standpoint of speaking of a part of a thing for its whole, the pound can be taken from the one and given to the other. In the first place, that part of the pound that consists of acceptableness of the human all for sacrificial purposes is taken entirely away from the Great Company (Note: They have no part in the sacrificial service -sin-offering ­and most certainly no part in the Star Members’ prerogatives, something they didn’t even have when they retained their crowns---JJH); for its humanity ceases to be a part of the Lord’s antitypica1 Goat … Henceforth lacking essential features of the pound, they may be properly spoken of as having their pound taken from them (which the Scripture corroborates--JJH) …as long as they retain their place in the Great Company, they still  retain the robe of Christ’s righteousness; but they have spotted it badly (especially by withholding Present Truth and perverting both Parousia and Epiphany Truth as R. G. Jolly is now doing--JJH). The Lord gives the pound taken from the slothful, to the faithful servants...a notable and over­shadowing instance in which the Lord took away both the pounds and the talents from the Great Company in the Truth as a class, and gave them to the Little Flock as a class....giving these to the Little Flock for Jordan’s first smiting from 1914 to 1916” (E-6:229,230 -And this is something That Servant didn’t make clear - the Truth on the subject not being revealed to him. It was for the Epiphany Messenger.)

Having omitted the foregoing very vital and clarifying substance of the Pounds Parable, he yet has the brazen effrontery of Azazel to state in his first paragraph on p. 60:

“It is only as we hold to ALL (emphasis by RGJ himself!) the Scriptures as expounded by the two Messengers and harmonize them properly that we have the fulness of the Truth.”

In the person of R. G. Jolly we have the only leader of any Truth group anywhere (so far as we know) who admits he is a crown-loser, thus self-evidently confessing that he has had his pound taken from him. Yet this same crown lost leader (who lost his pound .. as qualified by Brother Johnson in the quotation aforegoing from E-6 :22.9) ­now hurries to tell us he knows all about it (?) in producing this article with the most salient Epiphany Truth omitted -all the time claiming that he is “holding fast” to both Parousia and Epiphany Truth! Only one befuddled by Azazel would attempt such a performance. Truly, Fools (foolish virgins) rush in where Angels fear to tread! Understand, of course, had this been produced by a crown-lost leader in other groups -who never claimed to have received Epiphany Truth -then we couldn’t “find too much fault” (except their refusal to accept the Truth). Yes, indeed, he is “holding to ALL the two Messengers’ taught”! And we readily recognize that he is doing so when he omits vital points on the Great Company (clear Epiphany Truth) as he “smooths” the way for himself and others of his kind. We recognize, of course, that he is smarting under the crushing refutation we gave him on the Talents Parable; and we realize only too well that he was prodded to his present attempt with the “pound” by Azazel in an effort to humiliate him still further. And we urge our readers to believe we make this latter statement in sympathy, and without rancor or malice.

Nevertheless, in this connection we believe it in order to impress upon our readers that R. G. Jolly admits he has lost his pound -admits that he is a part of the “unprofitable servant” of Matt 25:30, cast “into outer darkness” (error) ­admits he failed in full faithfulness to smite Jordan in 1914·16 -admits he was forced from the Holy and away from the Lampstand, the Shewbread and the Golden Altar in 1938, thus receiving the first feature of his fit-man experiences (unfavor­able circumstances) -admits he has lost his anointing (the spirit of understanding) ­all of these things being part and parcel of his open confession that he has lost his crown. And with all of this, Brother Johnson -as late as 1943 -openly published that he was not then yet cleansed; yet seven short years later he claims (by his acts) to have emerged from his “captivity in the dungeon” (See Ex. 12:29) with all the answers to all the questions, and just about every answer wrong. It is little wonder his failures have been so pronounced; that his humiliations have been so acute (as in the Talents controversy, and now in the Pounds debacle, etc.). And this will continue to be his portion until he makes open confession and recants with that “godly sorrow (that) worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of” (2 Cor. 7:10 -See Berean Comment), or is eventually forced from the Household completely.

THE EPIPHANY CAMP IN THE FINISHED PICTURE

In the sub-caption as above on page 61 R. G. Jolly offers some more of his “profane, empty declamations” (2 Tim. 2:16, Dia.); so we would begin by asking just one simple question: Are we now in the finished Epiphany, or are we not? If he knows whereof he speaks, then surely he should have an-answer for this, but we opine he will not publish one, because if he does he wil1 find himself. In a quagmire of confusion whichever way he answers. Furthermore in the very quotation he gives from E-10:672 why does he not include the following? “Non-Truth Great Company and youthful Worthy brethren and new ones not yet consecrated are to be won for the Truth, some of whom will be won before Babylon is destroyed and others of them afterward.” Quite often he resorts to the evil of quoting from the Messengers, or from Scripture, citations that definitely disprove his con­tention, so we now quote what Brother Johnson said early in the Epiphany of similar would-be somebodies!

“Why do they so often quote passages to prove points positively disproven by those very passages? Is it not because they are in Azazel’s hands, and are thus blinded by him, and at his direction palm off his errors on the dear unsuspecting sheep of God’s Flock?

And we must remember, too, that this is the first time in Gospel-Age history where we have a self-admitted crown-lost leader, loudly contending that he is ‘cleansed,’ and at the same time revolutionizing against great light -having both Parousia and Epiphany Truth at his disposal, He admits that he has been removed from the “more than conqueror” Class; but by his perversions and ‘gazing’ clearly manifests that he is not yet of this “conqueror” (cleansed Levite.) Class, Brother Russell explains ----- these two classes on p. 138, Question Book: “A conqueror is one who finally triumphs. The Great Company class will all be conquerors”, except those who will die the second death.....To be more than a conqueror is to do something more, something greater, than to enter eternal life by the skin of the teeth,  (It seems that Brother Russell classifies all Great Company as entering eternal life by the skin of the teeth. (JJH) A more than conqueror does something special.  For instance, the Lord Jesus not merely kept the law, but additionally he laid down his life, sacrificially. So he was more than a mere conqueror.” ­

And be it noted, that prior to his manifestation in 1938, RGJ was equally emphatic with Brother Johnson in his description of crown-lost leaders in other groups -quite blissful in his ignorance that he was really talking about himself.   Prior to 1938 he was much more busily engaged, as a Pilgrim under the Epiphany Messenger’s supervision, with crown-lost leaders than we now are engaged with dis­cussing him and his errors (and, be it further noted, that: he was apparently very clear on Tentative Justification, the Camp and the Court, etc., before 1938 ­but unfaithfulness makes one forget formerly-held truths, See E-13:488, bottom). But what a reversal we see in him now! Time after time he attempts to minimize, or pervert Scriptural denunciations of the Measurably Faithful Class -for himself chiefly, as well as for any others of that Class that may now agree with him. Instead of carrying on with the Epiphany Truth and manifestations (for the special benefit of his ‘kinsmen’), he is now just as busy in attempting to replace himself in the “good and faithful Servant” Class -in the “faithful unto death” Class (Rev. 2:10 having exclusive application to the Litt1e Flock) -attempting to seize for himself a “cup”-an exclusive privilege of the Star Members -See E-8:l92, 193; E-9:383; E-10: XXIV, appendix;··”E··U:1.91.), and offering “strange fire” (false doc­trine· See E-U: 190, bottom, and p, 191) in such usurpation. Certainly, all of this now makes his position much more precarious than those of his “kinsmen” who err through ignorance (of Epiphany Truth particuarly), “From anyone to whom much is given much will be required.” (Luke 12:l.8--Dia.) And our Lord’s words apply with equal force to those of his partisan Great Company and Youthful Worthy supporters who now en­courage him in his wayward course.

Then he makes passing reference to E-10:114, but even he does not have the audacity to quote the complete context, which we now do as follows: “Another and still stronger reason that J is the “he”of verse 10 is this: that the message of v. 11 will not be due-until Oct. 1954, when the Epiphany. begins to lap --into the Basileia, Kingdom; for 1954 is the date that the last member of the Great Company will get his first enlightenment that will bring him into the Truth by Passover, 1956: after 1954 no more Youthful Worthies will be won (Note: This one clause is all RGJ seizes upon to support his “house built upon the sand”--JJH); and after 1954 no more persons will enter the tentatively justified state. (This one clause alone makes a shambles of the entire three pages RGJ offers to “prove” his points--JJH) Hence the exhortation: “He that is unjust (the tentatively justified, who are not actually justified, not just), let him be unjust still (remain tentatively justi­fied, and not consecrate); and he that is filthy (the impenitent Sinners, who in no sense are clean), let him be filthy still (remain in his then condition); and he that is righteous (Levites of the Great Company and youthful Worthies, who, being in the Court, are righteous), let him be righteous still;  and he that is holy (Priests are holy, since they are in the Holy), let him be holy still.” Certainly, when we come to a time when no more consecrations are possible for Gospel-Age pur­poses, it would be useless to exhort the tentatively justified to consecrate (This refers to the 1954. date, now much stressed by RGJ--yet he is not only urging such to consecrate as “useful” even here in 1965--11 years later--but he also is trying to bring new ones to accept his newly concocted tentative justification in the Camp!-JJH) and sinners to repent, for the tentatively justified and the sinners could arise no higher from their standings before God under such a condition (yet it is only since 1954 that RGJ is building his Epiphany Camp “in the finished pic­ture” with his Consecrated Tentatively-justified (?) Campers--JJH); hence, only at such a time could the first and second exhortations of v. 11 be given, but, of course, the exhortation for the Great Company, Youthful Worthies and Priests to continue faithful will remain appropriate as long as they are in the earth. Thus the nature of these four exhortations, coming in the order in which they come in v. 11, proves that these exhortations will be given by the Epiphany messenger; for in the order given they will not come until from 1954 onward (even though the Epiphany Messenger died in 1950 -four years before these predicted events should occur-­RGJ is offering this citation to ‘prove’, his 1954 date--JJH).”

Of course, only one befuddled by Azazel would select one lean and isolated clause from such copious declaration to ‘prove’ his point -which reveals the desperation in which he now finds himself; and only one befuddled by Azazel would have the temerity to emphasize that we should have “ALL from the Messengers” to keep in balance our beliefs, as he himself ignores completely about 95% of the foregoing quotation; and as he ignored the Epiphany clarification of the Pounds Parable. As we have previously stated, it is the interpretation of Rev. 22:10-11 that governs in this matter, the date 1954 being only incidental and subordinate to the interpretation. We ourselves accept the entire interpretation as correct; but, since the interpretation did not operate at 1954 (anymore than it operated in 1950 at the demise of the Epiphany Messenger), we believe it is only the most elemental of Scriptural exegesis that should cause us to recognize the mistake in the date-- just as was true of Brother Russell’s mistakes when his expectations did not materialize in 1914-1915 as to the length of the Time of Trouble (the same also being true of the Epiphany Messenger on his 1954 date as respects the length of the Time of Trouble: the Epiphany and the Time of Trouble are identical). “Are we now in the “finished picture” of the Time of Trouble? In 1954 just nothing occurred to verify that date as the end of the Time of Trouble; therefore, one befuddled by Azazel would continue to stress such a date, and refer to a quotation which di­rectly contradicts his present contention. Does he claim that no Great Company can now lose his standing, and no Youthful Worthy can be remanded to the Camp, to parallel the Saints condition in 1914 with 1954-56? Does he also claim we are now in the fin­ished picture of the Time of Trouble? We doubt that even he is so befuddled by Azazel that he would make such a claim. But, since the Time of Trouble and the Epiphany are identical, we should - when speaking of “the finished picture” -be able to sub­stitute Time of Trouble for Epiphany any time we discuss the subject. Let R. G. Jolly try that in his discussions under review; then his Levitical nonsense will be manifest to all.

And, since he insists upon considering “ALL Scripture” pertaining to any given subject, why does he continue to ignore Psa. 46:1-3; Elijah’s whirlwind ascent into Heaven; and Zech. 8:10 -”Before those days hire for man could not be obtained, and hire for beast was there none. And neither to him who went out, nor to him who came in was there success by reason of the danger, Yea I let all men loose each one against his neighbor,” (Rotherham) Here is Brother Johnson’s comment on this latter text:

“The connection shows that this is to occur after the foundation of the Church beyond the vail was laid, but before the glorified temple would be completed. Hence, it evidently refers to the time of Anarchy after Armageddon).”(E-6:630, par. 1) Yet, RGJ has his temple completed not only before Anarchy, but more than fifteen years before the violent features of Armageddon have even commenced! And he is the one who is counseling that “ALL Scripture” should be considered on any given sub­ject! Of course, all of this is in keeping with the course of his “kinsmen” of the past, those crown-lost leaders who perverted every Stewardship doctrine entrusted to them by the star Members. (See E-8:192, past middle) He is now very much occu­pied in perverting (Azazel means Perverter) Brother Johnson’s Stewardship doctrine: The Epiphany and its relation to the Epiphany Elect -with his “changing laws” (doctrines) of the Court and Camp. Also, new doctrines are “gazing” for all but Star Members. See E-l0 XXIV, appendix; and Moses, Aaron and Miriam –Type and Antitype in Chapter 2 of Epiphany Vol. 9. He is also completely silent on the Sam­son picture (see Berean Comment on Judges 16:30), although we have repeatedly empha­sized Brother Russell’s clear explanation of this type as a decisive contradiction to his present contentions.

CONCERNING TENTATIVE JUSTIFICATION

And with similar Azazelian trickery he accuses JJH of That Evil Servant’s tactics in handling the subject of Tentative Justification (accuses us of that which he him­self is most guilty), stressing that we use a quotation from 1920 to bolster our views. Even if that were true -which it is not -that 1920 quotation is repeated in Brother Johnson’s publications of 1938, with no change whatever suggested by him. Thus, anyone would be justified in naming that as a 1938 quotation – a fact that anyone not befuddled by Azazel would know, as it is elemental. However, we now offer a number of other citations from both Messengers that completely disprove his entire “house built upon the sand” -the “house built upon the sand” being the Great Company structure because it has been built by the “unprofitable servant” of Matt. 25:30 and the “wicked servant” of Luke 19:22.  Our first reference is from E-6:713: 

“These two arguments prove that the New Covenant must operate after faith (tentative -JJH) justification ceases to operate, i.e., after the Gospel Age.”

If we are now in the Epiphany as distinct from the Gospel Age (as RGJ now claims, with which, however, we do not agree, as we believe the Epiphany is the last special period of the Gospel Age, just as the Epiphany Messenger taught), then faith justi­fication is no longer in operation -no longer available for anyone -according to the above citation. We now offer something from E-11:167, 170:

“Only during the Gospel Age can our Lord’s merit be appropriated by faith alone (thus, if the Gospel-Age picture in any sense is completed, as RGJ now contends, then faith -tentative -justification must be a thing of the past--JJH) ....there will be no more faith justification working during the Millennium….When this (Gospel) Age ends Christ’s merit will cease to be an imputable thing.”

Also the following by the Epiphany Messenger: “The fact that all Israelites of the camp who left Egypt at the age of 20 years and upwards, except Joshua and Caleb, died in the wilderness under God’s disapproval (Heb. 3:7 – 4:2) demonstrates that the camp represents, for the Gospel Age, those rebellious nominal people of God, who though desiring some harmony with God, either never attain or else cease to retain even Tentative Justification, i.e., in the finished picture, those who are less than tentatively justified.” -(E-6: 195. bottom) “It does not allow for any symbolization of that condition in which unconsecrated believers are – a condition by far more important than that typed by the Camp (the Court condition is the only place where Tentative Justification is pictured, which Brother Johnson tells us is a “condition by far more important than that typed by the Camp” -JJH) ...One’s journey from the Camp to the Gate cannot at any stage represent a real faith in Christ as Savior, inasmuch as the Court curtain represents things connected with faith -the outside of it a ‘wall of unbelief’ in Christ’s righteousness to those outside, the inside, of it a ‘wall of faith’ in Christ’s righteousness to those inside.” (E-6:l99) We have been very pronounced in presenting this Truth against RGJ’s errors on the Camp: No place in the Camp to symbolize Tentative Justifica­tion, much less consecration!

Tentative Justification and the imputation of Christ’s merit in this Gospel Faith Age are inseparable; and let us keep in mind that every word Brother Johnson ever wrote about either was after we had come into the Epiphany (he was the Epiphany Messenger!), which he himself emphatically declared to be the last special period of he Gospel Age. ­

R. G. Jolly complains about our use of something that Brother Johnson wrote in 1920, so we observe that the above was published in 1948. But even the 1920 piece was published in book form in 1938 without alteration of any kind, so the 1920 date is just as applicable as the 1938 date – and just another evidence of R. G. Jolly’s desperation for some talk when he has nothing to say. Further, in corroboration, we now quote from E-4:322 (9): 

“During the transitional period -between the Gospel and Millennial Ages -those Levites, the tentatively justified, who will not consecrate lose their tentative justification, i.e., cease to be tentative Levites and are put out of the Court.” Tentative Justification and Leviteship are synonymous, and when one loses one he loses the other.­

The following from ‘‘What Pastor Russell Said,” p. 312, is also directly to the point: “‘At the close of this Age there will no longer be a tentative justification.”

At the bottom of p. 61, col. 2, R. G. Jolly quotes Brother Johnson to the effect that “The Epiphany Camp in the finished picture is the condition of the loyal tenta­tively justified.” While Brother Johnson in other places describes such people as merely the “faith justified,” we need not argue the point here. Had Brother Johnson stated himself here, as he has clearly done in other places, he would have said, “the loyal former tentatively justified.” But he resorted to a common practise of refer­ring to this Class in terms formerly applicable to them -much the same as many of us referred to “Judge” Rutherford long after he had vacated his judge’s office. Here again R. G. Jolly is resorting to a twist that is prompted by desperation. In this reference by R. G. Jolly there is not the slightest hint that such “loyal justified” will be a consecrated class; that is something R. G. Jolly himself has injected into the picture -and it is on this point that we now take issue with him -on the quasi-elect in the finished Epiphany picture being a consecrated class. However, we first qualify this statement with Brother Johnson’s comment in the June 1945 Present Truth, p. 96, top of col. 2:

“During this Epiphany time the faith-justified who have been the Gospel-Age Levites are by the lapsing of their faith justification remanded, the untrue ones among them to the Epiphany Camp, the untrue ones among them without the camp.” A question would now be in order: Does R. G. Jolly understand the meaning of the word ‘lapsing’? In previous papers we have detailed that “the truly repentant and believing” of those remanded to the camp are exactly the same characters as they were while in the Court, their remanding to the Camp being only because of their failure to consecrate -that they lose their tentative justifica­tion (the Grace of God) when leaving the Court; and the above citations from Brother Johnson clearly support our position on this, but in no place does Brother Johnson support R. G. Jolly’s contention that this Class becomes consecrated (while sin is in the ascendency -during the time when such consecrations would bring “elect” rewards) after their ejection from the court -or that there is any other kind of persons consecrated in the Camp in the finished Epiphany picture (because the Camp then holds all those persons who could not win out under such adverse condi­tions, so they await the Kingdom opportunities for all Restitutionists -See Epi­phany Vol. 12, p. 526; also pp. 187,188, 218, 319 and 320). And we might add that Brother Russell’s teaching did not support J. F. Rutherford’s Jonadab Class either (although the Witnesses still “contend for the faith -”false doctrine” - once delivered to them by J. F. Rutherford!). Much of R. G. Jolly’s conglomeration he received from his “cousin” Krewson, who now leaves him to defend the error, as he goes com­placently on with others of his individual pet errors.

We believe it well to emphasize here that there is fundamentally no difference at all in the tentatively justified in the Court of the large Gospel-Age Tabernacle, and the unconsecrated tentatively justified in the Epiphany Tabernacle; and on this Truth R. G. Jolly seemed very clear before 1938, And during the Gospel Age any who deserted their true repentance and belief would then lose their tentative justifi­cation and be forced from the Court -just as would be true in the Epiphany. How­ever, we know of no Scripture that places a time limit for possession of this “Grace of God”; it probably differs with different individuals. And from this we can safely conclude that some tentatively justified in the Gospel-Age Tabernacle were continued in their Court position over into the Epiphany; the mere change of time would make no difference to such until their allotted time to utilize the “Grace of God” had been consumed. He should remember that Tentative Justification is a con­dition -not a place -and is typified by the Court; and when the Court condition is no longer available for entrance, then the Tentatively Justified condition is no longer available. A mere babe in the Truth should be able to recognize this point,

But the situation will be different in the finished Epiphany picture – at the end of the Time of Trouble – at the end of which every individual will be forced from the Court who has not consecrated (forced from the condition where it is possible to make consecrations before New Covenant opportunities are available – See E-4:406); and, until that occurs, it could not properly be said we have reached “the finished picture” (the beginning of the end of the Time of Trouble). However, with R. G. Jolly’s present contention -although he has not said so in so many words ­if there could be no more consecrations to Youthful Worthiship after 1954, then all those tentatively justified who had not consecrated by then would automatically have been forced from the Court into his present Camp, leaving only the consecrated in his present Court. And, when such a situation arrived, it would automatically force all others from the Camp. Does R. G. Jolly contend this is the situation NOW? And is it his contention that his (fictitious) Camp now contains only two classes of tentatively justified -the consecrated and the unconsecrated? And, when will it be finally determined that his present unconsecrated have “received the Grace of God in vain”? In his fully-abandoned condition (Without supervision and restraint of the Star Members) he is overworking his “besetting sin” of making types and pictures (See his letter in Nov. 15, 1910 Watch Tower--”I began with the help of Strong’s concordance to delve into the meanings of words. I sought to make pictures and draw types from nearly every chapter in the Bible,” he said of himself).

TYPES PROPERLY APPLIED

In E-3:232, top, Brother Johnson offers this conclusion: “When Biblical types are antitypically fulfilled, there is to be found a most remarkable and soul-satisfy­ing agreement between the type and the antitype; and this agreement leads to in­creased faith and good works.” Such was certainly true of all antitypical inter­pretations given us through Brother Russell and Brother Johnson; and it is quite apropos that we now present one from Brother Russell that is so pertinent to our subject:

“The person seeking God draws near as he enters the Gate and comes to the Brazen Altar, He sees this Altar and what it means. To him it means that he is a sinner….He recognizes that the sacrifice was necessary to make atonement for sin....Now, the Court represents all the believer’s experiences in Justifica­tion, from the time he enters the Gate, coming into the Court, passing the Brazen-Altar, till he comes to the Door of the Tabernacle. It is Tentative Justification, from the time the individual begins to take the first step.” (Question Book -412-415) Here we have an antitypical interpretation that presents logic and strong appeal to everyone “who is of the Truth.” It certainly is soul-satisfying!

But let us now compare the foregoing with R. G. Jolly’s presentation of Justification in the Camp. Has he offered one bit of proof by way of securing such Justifi­cation? No, indeed he has not! And he hasn’t given it because he doesn’t have any. His Justification in the Camp is pure invention (picture-making and fictitious) on his part -a fit companion for Romanism’s Pergatory, which also finds no true support in the Bible. Both of these aberrations are the cunning work of Azazel – both pro­duced by those befuddled by him, and believed by those similarly influenced. RGJ’s Campers do not pass through any Gate anywhere (except those he has forced out in his “picture” of 1954) -they do not consider the Brazen Altar in their course -they do not observe the Laver as they approach the Door of the Tabernacle. They simply arrive at their Justification and Consecration out of thin air; and we are offered now a tangible illustration of Brother Russell’s conclusion that it is the Great Company who “fight as one that beateth the air.” (1. Cor. 9: 26 -See Berean Comment) Any “rooted and grounded” in Parousia and Epiphany Truth could not be carried away for long by such ‘‘wind’’ (See Eph. 4: l4, and Berean Comment).

On page 62, col. 2, par. 1, R. G. Jolly reaches the pinnacle of Levitical non­sense and confusion when he says “Brother Russell used the term ‘household of faith’ in two senses: one for the consecrated, and the other for the unconsecrated be­lievers.” Yes, indeed, he did! But, did he ever say those believers in the Camp were among the justified Household of Faith -anti typical Levites? The Household of Faith is not pictured (as RGJ ‘pictures’ his Campers Consecrated) in the Camp. In Tabernacle Shadows, p. 55, par. 2, Brother Russell makes himself very clear when he states “all believers, the entire ‘household of faith’ – the Levites,” (It is only those who have no inheritance in the land who belong to the Household of Faith; and only those who consecrate in the Court, and continue faithful therein -will remain of the Household of Faith.) Thus he makes it very clear that only those within the linen curtain were the true “Household of Faith” the Levites.” There is no Levitical standing shown anywhere in the Camp – Gospel-Age or Epiphany Camp. There­fore, we are forced to describe his comments on page 62 as errant nonsense and confusion, and is a clear demonstration of the extremes to which those go who forsake any of the Truth with which they were once sanctified; truly, they become “leprous”! Let us remember that during the Gospel Age -as also in the Epiphany, the last spec­ial period of the Gospel Age -there are millions of believers in the Camp, but they are not “truly repentant” believers who accept Jesus as their Savior (who apply the saving “blood” of our Lord for their personal cleansing – available only in the Court during the Gospel Age, including the Epiphany--tentative or actual). In Vol. 8 Brother Johnson states that in the very broad sense we may include in the “Church” all who make any profession of Christian belief; yet he also often uses “the Church” in exclusive reference to the Little Flock. And in no place does he include the en­tire Church among the justified--in the Court or in the Camp. However, in the fin­ished Epiphany picture (at the end of the Time of Trouble) -when the truly repentant believers are remanded to the Camp, it will then contain the “truly repentant.... but unconsecrated Jews and Gentiles” -just as taught by the Epiphany Messenger in E-10:209. But until such time, the Camp contains those rebellious against present- day requirements for obtaining “peace with God” that the Household of Faith enjoy (the Levites- the tentatively justified in the Court). R. G. Jolly, not discern­ing this difference, makes himself ridiculous in the statements now being reviewed-­a clear proof that the oil in his lamp “has gone out.” (Matt. 25:8)

In this connection, it is nothing new to see those in error accusing those faithful to the Truth of being drunken, as evidence the Jews at Pentecost accusing the Apostles of being “full of new wine.” (Acts 2: 13) This is more noticeably true in the case of Hannah being accused by Eli in 1 Sam. 1:14: ‘‘‘How long wilt thou be drunken?” And note Brother Johnson’s comments on this thing in E-13: l4--”The crown--­lost leaders (typified by Eli--JJH) denounced the faithful as errorists, and exhorted them to give up their errors.”

What a familiar ring the foregoing offers to R, G. Jolly (also a crown-lost leader) now putting forth the accusation of “opposing errorists,” etc.! And, if Brother Johnson were here now, R. G. Jolly would be denouncing him - instead of us just as he did actually do in 1938 (See E-10:585 and 646). We believe Brother Russell’s comments in the July 1, 1916 Watch Tower, Reprint 5916, are a fitting complement to the above:

“Those who have been teaching errors will soon be ashamed (Isaiah 66:5), while the fire of this day will only manifest the truth to all. No power, no tongue, no pen, can successfully contradict the truth, the great Divine Plan of the Ages. It is strong before its enemies and before all who make assaults upon it, and ere long the folly of its foes shall be made known to the whole world. “There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. “ (by the Great Company -See Matt. 25:30 and Berean Comments--JJH)

And to this we would add the words of Solomon in Proverbs 10:5, 9 & 13: “He that gathereth in summer is a wise son; but he that sleepeth in harvest is a son that causeth shame. He that walketh uprightly walketh surely: but he that perverteth his ways shall be known. In the lips of him that hath understanding wisdom is found: but a rod is for the back of him that is void of understanding.” And we would counsel all to “Be ye not as the horse, or as the mule, which have no understanding,” (Psa. 32:9)

                                       Sincerely your brother,

                                        John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

-----------------------

CORRECTION: -On page two, par. 1, of our August paper we inadvertently stated the period of the Judges as 430 years. It should read 450 years

………………

BROTHER BAXENDALE HAS FINISED HIS COURSE “WITH JOY”

My dear Brother Hoefle: May grace, and peace be your portion through our Redeemer!

Our dear Brother Baxendale died July 12. Sister...and I traveled to Oldham On July 9, staying with Sister.....and then went to see Brother Baxendale the following afternoon and evening. Although he suffered a good deal of pain at times, he was happy and ready to go when it was His will. He told us he had no malice or hatred in his heart toward any, but loved them all. It was very touching, because so many misunderstood him -and because, too, he stood out against false doctrines and arrangements. He did his best to sing Hymn 171 and one of the nurses joined in.  Sister Baxendale was told that he was often in prayer. Another hymn he tried to sing was Count Your Blessings. Sisters-----visited him, too -and we were glad we went also. We went home the day he died, but there was a letter in the post asking if Brother----would take the service. So 1 replied that I would. Sister went also, arriving Oldham July 15 and then on to Eccles, Manchester Friday, July 16. The funeral service was evidently in blessing, for Sister Baxendale asked for a copy.... Sister----was able to pass on some tracts and they were gladly received. Some day it will bear fruit to His Honour and Glory. In all this, our dear Sister Baxendale was a good example of carrying out a Christian faith. “We sorrow not as others, who have no hope.” The following day, July 17, Sisters----and I went to Glossop to see Sister-----,et al. we were warmly welcomed and had a very nice time together. Found them appreciative of your monthly papers. They sent a spray of flowers in memory of Brother Baxendale; also Sisters------and ourselves. In all there were 17 who want us to return be­fore the winter sets in. Sister----joins me in love to yourself, Sister Hoefle and all the dear ones assisting you.

Your brother by His Grace --. (JGD) (ENGLAND)

NOTE: - Had the above information reached us before our September paper was com­pleted for mailing, we would have included the name of Brother Baxendale along with that of Sister Condell and Brother Roach, as we believe those observa­tions in our September paper apply equally to him, He, too, was valiant in defense of the Truth he loved -a “good soldier” in the “good fight” of faith. JJH

………………

 Epiphany Bible Students’ Ass’n

Dear Sirs:

After reading your papers on The Resurrection and Where Are The Dead. I am requesting, if possible, you to send me The Three Babylons and What Is The Soul. Thanking you,--------(CONNECTICUT)

………………

 Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace! You will be interested to know that we recently went to a Jehovah’s Witness Convention, and were able to get out quite a number of the Three Babylons tracts. This was very appro­priate for the occasion, as the afternoon topic was on Babylon. It was reported there were Over 11, 000 there. Brother----drove us right in front of the place where the crowd was greatest. Some thought the tract was especially designed for the meeting (which it was!), while others were very rabid -saying “I’m a Jehovah’s Witness and don’t want to read anything else,” (about the same attitude of some in the LHMM group who are just as rabid toward us, if not moreso). We could have told them that they wouldn’t have much success if they received the same answer, and attitude, from Baptists, Methodists, etc. But we didn’t bother to answer them. Several brought the tracts back and said they had had one and read it before -which they may have; that they wanted none of us! They are indeed a sect-bound rabid group, generally speaking - with their leaders incul­cating in them the Satanic lie that their organization is the Lord’s organization on earth -and to look elsewhere might mean their eternal annihilation. One person asked me if we were of the Dawn. I said, Certainly not! When I did several came up and took the tracts.

We believe this is a good work toward Little Babylon, and we are getting much the same treatment from Little Babylon that the Parousia brethren got from Big Babylon under That Servant.

Our warm Christian love to you, with the prayer that your work in the Lord will continue to prosper, By His Grace, -----­

NO. 123: TEN YEARS IN RETROSPECT

No. 123

My dear Brethren: – Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

On August 15, 1955 we distributed our first paper against the sins of teach­ing and practice of R. G. Jolly and others of his “kinsmen”;  and little did we realize then the work that lay ahead of us. However, we humbly make open con­fession of gratitude to our good Heavenly Father for the strength that has been ours to keep up “the good fight” – physical, financial and spiritual strength, combined with the faithful and steadfast cooperation and encouragement of many faithful brethren, both in our own house and among those scattered throughout the United States and many foreign countries. Thus, all our “needs” have been met on every occasion. At the time of Brother Johnson’s funeral in October 1950 we entertained not the slightest desire, nor the faintest expectation that our sit­uation would change so drastically in five short years and would continue as it has over the past ten years. Prior to 1950 we believe the testimony of many good and faithful brethren would attest to our general course toward God’s people in an earnest endeavor to “follow after the things which make for peace, and the things wherewith one may edify another” (Rom. 14:19), so that our present acti­vities are not of our own choosing – “for necessity is laid upon me” (I Cor. 9:16) to pursue the course that has been ours over the past ten years. However, during the years since 1950 we had entertained the fond hope that R. G. Jolly would even­tually repent and recant of his present deflections – as he seemingly had honestly done after his 1938 debacle with Brother Johnson; and, while clearly enough our charitable appraisal has been awry up to now, we yet have not abandoned all hope in this respect.

Nor would we claim that during that time we have avoided all mistakes, be­cause such is not the case. Hindsight is always better than foresight; but the Lord has allowed His most faithful, capable and prominent people of this Gospel Age to make distressing mistakes, so it hardly seems reasonable that we should be spared. Thus, we accept the failings of the past as among the ‘‘all things for good” (Rom, 8:28) – although we just as readily declare that they have not been “for best.” But we express gratitude, too, that none of our mistakes have been degrading in character, or unjust toward those with whom we have to do; there­fore, we confidently declare with the great Apostle Paul, “I am free from the blood of all men.” At no time have we made the mistake of disfellowshiping brethren to cover up our slanderous actions toward them; nor have we made the mistake of slandering or disfellowshiping any who have honestly and decorously disagreed with our teachings.

Neither have we attempted to restrain our readers from reading the writings of others.  Rather, of those who have the time and inclination we have heartily encouraged them to place our paper side by side with other opposing works, then determine for themselves wherein lies the truth – to “prove all things, and hold fast that which is good.” And in similar spirit we have never counseled those in sympathy with us to “avoid them” that do not agree. Instead, we have encour­aged those well instructed in Parousia and Epiphany Truth to seek out those in other groups in an honest effort to “show them a better way.” Over these past ten years many have disfellowshiped us for no other reason than that their leaders instructed them to do so. Certainly, this is to their shame, and gives clear proof that they are sadly among “the unstable and the unlearned” – so much so that they lack the ordinary courtesy of a commonplace greeting upon meeting. Such a course is morally and Scripturally wrong – is quite contrary to Brother Russell’s teaching in Vol, 6 – but in exact harmony with the conduct of J. F. Rutherford toward Brother Johnson and other faithful brethren.

This “path of error” (Jas, 5:20, Dia.) was first advocated among Truth people in 1917, at the beginning of the Epiphany, when J. F. Rutherford stressed the “avoid them” policy toward all who resisted his evils of teaching and practice (See E-6:513). It presents vivid reminder that we are still in the Epiphany, which is ‘‘making manifest the counsels of hearts” (1 Cor. 4:5), and offers sad evidence that there are yet many of like mind as was JFR, who were once instructed in Parousia and Epiphany Truth. And, while we may take solid encouragement in noting that these are forced to “avoid” us because of their own incapacity to defend their beliefs, yet it is a truly sorry spectacle to see that so many we once considered “established in the PRESENT TRUTH” (2 Pet. 1:12) must now be de­scribed by St. Paul’s words in Heb. 5:13, Dia.: “Every one partaking of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness; for he is an infant.” A paragraph from That Servant in the July 1, 1909 Tower (Reprints 4429) is very fitting to the case:

“If others lose their hold and claim that they can no longer thus see with us, our pity should be for them that the light that they had has gone from them. Let us not smite the blind, but rather be kind and generous toward all. The greater the number of the blind, the greater is the blessing and privilege of those who do see. Let us remember the Master’s words, ‘If the light that is in thee become darkness, how great is that darkness.’ Such are in a more pitiable condition than the world who never saw. Let us remember, too, that all kinds of blindness are more or less contagious and let us guard our spiritual sight as one of the most precious boons given of the Lord.”

The true power of God’s people lies in their sound understanding and skillful handling of the Word of Truth, which is able to refute all the gainsayers – “eloquence and wisdom, which none of your adversaries shall be able to gainsay nor resist.” As we have refrained from advancing any new doctrines, we have never been forced to pervert or completely cast aside any of the Harvest Truth that has been provided (by the last two Principal Men) for this “evil day”; whereas, those who have not adopted this course have been forced to offer “strange fire” (false doctrine), and to cast aside large portions of that Truth which once sanctified them. In more than one sect of Little Babylon do we hear vociferous acclaim of adherence to Brother Russell’s teachings, all the while they are forced to ignore completely large parts of the Parousia Volumes and Watch Towers articles – ­just as many since 1950 are doing with Brother Johnson’s teachings, all the while they are forced to ignore large parts of the Epiphany Volumes and Present Truth articles.

Those who have invented a quasi-elect consecrated class – in direct repudia­tion of Brother Johnson’s clear teachings (See E-lO:209) – can no longer teach large parts of Epiphany Volumes 4, 5, 10, 11 and 12; as they must likewise abandon large parts of Volume 3 because of their perversion of the Elijah type. Also, because of their complete disregard for the “abandonment process’’ of Azazel’s Goat, both the “cousins” must now tacitly ignore substantial parts of Vol. 15 (See E-15:519, 527). Yet these people unashamedly insist they adhere closely to the Epiphany Messenger’s teachings – such claim being nothing more than open and blatant fraud. (The legal meaning of Fraud is – Misrepresentation of a material fact, or concealment of a material fact.) And for such a course they are without excuse, because we ourselves have repeatedly directed their attention to Volume 15, and other basic and fundamental Parousia and Epiphany Truth, and have stressed its Scriptural veracity and our own harmony with it – ­the only response from them being the charge of “sifter, errorist,” etc., hurled at us.

Justification is one of the fundamental doctrines of the Bible, being as it is inseparably linked with the doctrine of the Ransom. The two cannot be separ­ated, it was this thought that prompted us to produce the Justification article in our No. 120 on June 1; and the ardent response that has since come to us from many sources has encouraged us in the belief that there are still substantial numbers of faithful brethren who “continue in the things they have learned, and have been assured of, knowing of whom they have learned theme” We are assured that many are solidly confirmed in their rejection of Campers Consecrated – just as all of us were persuaded of the non-existence of J. F, Rutherford’s “Jonadabs” by Brother Johnson’s annihilative refutations. And being blessed by the Lord of a clear understanding of Justification and kindred doctrines, it has never been necessary for us to resort to any of the spiritual “witchcraft” (especially de­ceptive false teachings) that is so prevalent on every hand. And for this we are also deeply grateful.

The worst culprits of all in claiming to be what they are not are the Jehovah’s Witnesses. Their claim of adherence to the teachings presented by Brother Russell has no foundation whatever in fact; rather, they have perverted, or totally denied, every Harvest Truth he proclaimed. As one outstanding example, they have twisted the Bible chronology out of all recognition to the way he pre­sented it, their claim now being that “the six thousand years are about up.” Thus, they are almost one hundred years wrong on the chronology; in fact, they are even wrong on the way J. F. Rutherford gave it some forty years ago. At that time he and his associates published a commendable defense of the true chronology against the 19-year error that the PBI-Dawns attempted to Inject into it. Whether he then later gave them their present error we do not know. This one Instance of “believing as Brother Russell did” is an identical twin to the average nominal churchgoer who claims also a wholehearted belief in the Bible, all the while he ignores or distorts the major part of it. Their perversion of the chronology has also forced them to abandon completely the “parallel dispensations.”

It is well that we keep clearly in mind that it is the crown-lost leaders and their like-minded Youthful Worthy associates during this Epiphany period who have been the chief offenders in the perversion of the Harvest Truth (Azazel means Perverter) – and we refer now specifically to those who once claimed to be in “Present Truth.” It has been the crown-losers all during the Age that have done the same thing with the Stewardship Doctrines of the Star Members – with all of them loudly proclaiming their rigid adherence to the very Truth they were mutilating.

During the Parousia most of those who were sincerely “established in the Present Truth” (2 Pet. 1:12) were so thoroughly schooled in its various features that they had no difficulty in refuting all the gainsayers; none of them were forced to run away from their opposers – rather, it was just the reverse: The gainsayers soon learned they were up against the razor’s edge when in conflict with the “Russellites,” and few of them needed more than one such experience to make them very wary thereafter. But today we see just the reverse: Those most loudly claiming they are in full harmony with Brother Russell or Brother Johnson need only to see those of us approaching, who really do adhere closely and faithfully to the Harvest Truth, for them speedily to change direction and quicken their steps to avoid contact. We have had many such personal experiences from various groups. Truly, “Every one who does vile things hates the light, and comes not to the light, that his works may be detected. But he who does the Truth comes to the light, so that his works may be manifested that they have been done in God.” (John 3:20,21¾Dia.)

By this recitation we do not mean to set forth the belief that everything has been wrong that these crown-losers have done.  True, they have all been “double minded” (See E-15:519, bottom, and p. 520, top); and we here once more stress the fact that the evils they have committed have been motivated by that part of their double minds that fostered the designs of Satan – such evils being usually in their relations to God, Christ, the Little Flock, the Youthful Worthies, the Tentatively Justified, and with one another – those specifically in the House­hold of Faith. And such evils have not been clearly apparent to the unskilled eye of the world about them. Rather, the world generally has been much more im­pressed by their good deeds, because many of them have wrought mightily in “re­proving the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment” (John 16:8) – they have preached vociferously against immorality, against the tobacco and alcohol evils, drug habits, etc. To all outward appearances they have been ‘agin sin’ – ­so much so that the great bulk of Christendom has mistaken them for the Very Elect, even as they gave misjudged second rating to those who will actually be first in Kingdom honors.

And let us not overlook that the Good Word of God specifically charges those who now receive the chief honor from “the unstable and the unlearned” are the very ones who all during the Age have “hated and cast out their (fully-­faithful) brethren” (Isa. 66:5). We have the assurance, too, that all those of “good and honest heart,” skilled and well-schooled in Harvest Truth, are not misled by the clamor of the majority, but rightly discern the “profitable ser­vants” from the “unprofitable servants.” The clear evidence is however, that the “great multitude” and their numerous followers have been consistently wrong – ­just as wrong as was the crowd before Pilate who kept shouting, “Crucify Him.” In this our day many worldlings are much impressed with the profuse quoting of Scripture by the Witnesses – notably so, the Russian atheist Commune – such not having the discernment to realize that almost every text they quote is partially or completely perverted or misapplied. Satan himself has also quoted Scripture in the same erroneous fashion. (See Matt. 4:6)

As we observe the situation presently before us, we are so often impressed by the words of Jesus: “Many will say to Me in that day, Master, Master, have we not taught in thy name? and in thy name expelled demons? and in thy name performed many wonders? And then I will plainly declare to them, I never approved of you. Depart from Me, you who practice iniquity.” (Matt. 7:22,23 – Dia.) This point is so clearly revealed in the situation with Israel (typing Christendom) and their King Saul, whom they chose in favor over the noble and fully-faithful Sam­uel, and shouted with gusto, “Cod save the King!” (1 Sam. 10:24)

To illustrate this clearly: For the past 35 years we have been very well acquainted with a member of antitypical Saul, and were invited to attend a testimonial dinner for him some fifteen years ago. The President of Chrysler Motors Corporation presided at that meeting. Also present were Edgar A. Guest, world-famous poet, as was also Detroit’s leading preacher, known throughout the United States, along with many other outstanding citizens of the locality. This member of antitypical Saul had been heralded by certain prominent people as ‘‘One of Detroit’s two most useful citizens”; and during his acceptance address that evening he made quite some play on his great performance in 1926, at which time he had raised $6,5OO,OOO for the YMCA there. And during all that time the members of antitypical Samuel were not even noticed by the people who were shouting, ‘‘God save the King!”

It is indeed a sad commentary that the world’s standard of values is so much askew. “Bond-servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not ....as men-pleasers, but in sincerity of heart, fearing the Lord.” (Col. 3:22, Dia.) Even in the case of Jesus Himself the Jews certainly shunted Him to the background in favor of the preachers of “the letter of the Law.’’ ‘‘When we shall see Him, there is no beauty that we should desire Him.” (Isa. 53:2) And all during the Age His faithful followers have received similar treatment, the plaudits of the multitude going to the “preachers of righteousness,” with very little being accorded those who truly did “bear witness unto the Truth” (John 18:37), and “followed in His steps.” (1 Pet. 2:21) There have been notable exceptions, of course, such as Martin Luther, Thomas Cranmer, John Wesley, and a few others of whom, because of their special ministry, the world also took some note.

During the past ten years some have resented our efforts, but that is to be expected. We would “think it strange” if it were not so. But others have heard us gladly, so that the number of our brethren whose eyes have been opened to “the pestilence that walketh in darkness” (Psa. 91:6) has steadily increased, the num­ber at present being more than double what it was in 1955. And, while this in­crease brings a certain satisfaction, we take far greater pleasure in the quality of those who have wholeheartedly responded. We mention specially Sister Condell, of Jamaica, and Brother Roach, of Trinidad – both of whom were among the most highly regarded of Epiphany brethren before their open denunciation of R. G. Jolly. And we could make mention of quite a few other similar cases of brethren still living, which precludes mention of their names – brethren whom Brother Johnson mentioned to us personally as standing high in his good estimation as fully-faithful. And, if they were among the fully faithful up to 1950, then they are yet so, regardless of any other rating a self-admitted crown-lost leader and his ‘cousin’ may now give them. It is not our wish to place a strain upon modesty, yet we feel impelled to record here – as did the Apostle Paul in defense of his ministry – that at no time did Brother Johnson ever offer the slightest hint that we were among the unfaith­ful or the measurably faithful. Rather, on at least one occasion he wrote us after this manner: ‘‘Because of your faithfulness, I do many things for you, my dear brother, that I have not done for others.” In reverse fashion, however, manifested crown-losers have quickly proceeded to besmirch the fully faithful when no longer restrained by the Star Members – notable examples of such calumny resting on the doorstep of J. F. Rutherford, R. G. Jolly, et al.

However, It is well that we keep in mind that this is the day of small things, and that “there is no restraint of the Lord to save by many or by few.” In some instances we have continued to send special articles (after a period of waiting) to sect-bound brethren who have requested their name be removed from our mailing list; and in a few cases we have had gracious response, once they realized the true situation – although getting much private and public reviling from our opponents for our course, the very same course that was pursued by the Epiphany Messenger toward such brethren. However, we have of our own volition removed quite a few names from our list, and have declined to add some who have made request through others, realizing from their ‘fruits’ (conduct) – the lack of courtesy and appre­ciation of the Truth we uphold and defend – that we can do them no good in their present condition. And this will continue to be our practice as we receive silence on the part of some, and indifference and ingratitude for the good we have tried to do them. As Brother Russell has pointed out, we are not looking for wolves, dogs, etc., but only for the lambs and sheep – neither are we “greedy of filthy lucre.” Our only ambition is “to be faithful to the Lord, the Truth and the Brethren,” as we endeavor to “quit ourselves like men” in the “good fight” of faith we are waging.

Brother Russell stated his case nobly and well when he counseled that each of us should proceed in the Lord’s service as though the whole responsibility rested upon us individually, but consider in our hearts (in His “rest”) that the entire responsibility rests with the Lord. This is our own attitude, and we ponder in this connection the parable of Jesus as most fitting to the occasion: “The King­dom of the Heavens resembles a dragnet, being cast into the sea, and enclosing fishes of every kind; which, when it is full, they draw to the shore, and sitting, down, gather the good into vessels, but throw the useless away.  So will it be at the end of the Age. The messengers will go forth, and will separate the wicked from among the righteous; and I will throw them into the furnace of fire; there will be the weeping and the gnashing of teeth.” (Matt. 13:47-50, Dia.) It should be noted that the words in the last clause of the foregoing are identical to those Jesus stated regarding the “unprofitable servant” of Matt. 25:30, the same being the Great Company. And, since the Great Company are factually a “great multitude,” it should not surprise us at all to see them attracting many who think as they do; truly, “Birds of a feather flock together.”

Once seeing this situation clearly, it should not disturb us in the least. Rather, let us all the more determine to “Walk as children of light (Truth).... You were indeed formerly darkness, but you are now light in the Lord.... The fruit of light is in all Goodness, and Righteousness, and Truth.” (Eph. 5:8,9 – Dia.) “All things being reproved are manifested by the light... Therefore, awake, 0 sleeper! And arise from the dead, and the Anointed One shall shine upon thee.” (Eph. 5:13,14 – Dia.) And to this we would add some very appropriate comments by Brother Russell, found in Reprints 3142:

“It is not the approval of the ‘wolves’ in sheep’s clothing or without it, that is to be courted by the under-shepherd. He will, however, have the approval of the Chief Shepherd, sheep who have their senses exercised by reason of use.... And since the holy Spirit gave special warnings that in the end of the Age evil men and leaders astray” would wax more and more bold .... is it not due time for all the sheep to recognize these facts, and not to be deceived by ‘feigned words’ and ‘fair speeches’?.... Not only did the Apostle Paul thus direct the under-shepherds, but he points out the advisability of this to the flock, since it is thus that the Chief Shepherd leads and feeds and keeps His flock.... Let us stand fast, therefore, in that liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free – allow­ing no one to pen us up by human creeds; neither allowing any to lead us out be­yond the bounds fixed for us by the Chief Shepherd, into liberties, licenses and speculations that He never authorized (such as Campers Consecrated, tentative justification outside the linen curtain – Christ –, errors on the general doctrine of justification, gross perversion of the truth on all elective classes and free grace salvation for Restitutionists, errors on the time, length and purpose of the Epiphany, etc., etc. – JJH). Let us abide in Him, keeping ourselves in the love of God, as saith the Apostle.”

Sincerely your Brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

------------------------------------------------------------------

QUESTION OF GENERAL INTEREST

QUESTION: – It is my understanding that all in the Court in this Faith Age are Levites; that the Tentatively Justified consecrated, as well as the unconsecrated (in the Court) are also Levites – although ‘tentatively’ so; but that the Great Company are actually Levites. If this is true, then couldn’t it be possible there would be a Class of the Tentatively Justified in the end of this Age in the Epiphany Camp, although not Levites?

ANSWER: – You are right that all in the Court are counted as Levites, although Brother Johnson did not mean the Tentatively Justified consecrated, or unconsecrated, when he referred to transitional Levites and Levitical error here in this Epiphany; he especially meant crown-losers, a fixed class of Levites – that is, fixed after they have cleansed themselves in the ‘great tribulation’ and washed their robes in the blood of the Lamb (Rev. 7:14).

But, until that time, the Great Company are portrayed as specially “leprous” when they teach error or corrupt arrangements in their ministry toward each other and the tentatively justified (See E-4:276, 32). The Tentatively Justi­fied unconsecrated and the Youthful Worthies are, as you suggest, only ‘tenta­tive’ Levites, because they can lose their standing in the Court and be remanded to the Camp without experiencing the second death – which is not true of the crown-lost Levites. If the latter leave the Court condition, they are eternally lost. But we must remember that Levites and the Court type Tentative Justifica­tion, and when one ceases to be a Levite, and is remanded to the Camp, he also ceases automatically to be Tentatively Justified (See E-4:322). We must remember that Tentative Justification is for Gospel-Age purposes. The faithful Youthful Worthies, however, are different from the unconsecrated Levites in the Court ­they retain their standing and will be of the Gershonite Levites in the Kingdom. The unconsecrated Tentatively Justified who fail to consecrate while in the Court, lose their opportunity for consecration until the Highway of Holiness is opened up for Restitutionists, when remanded to the Camp, and leave the Household of Faith entirely in the end of this Age –  in the finished picture of the Epiphany. They will have their opportunity under the New Covenant in partnership with the true quasi-elect Jews and Gentiles of former times.  These true quasi-elect are antitypical Miriam – the believing Jews who in the Old Testament times were not faithful enough for Ancient Worthyship.. and believing Gentiles during the Gospel Age who, while faithful unto death in justification, did not consecrate (See E-11:293). These are the quasi-elect – the unconsecrated – as set out in no unmistakable terms by the Epiphany Messenger. However, the faithful Youthful Worthies will have the “Better Resurrection” in partnership with the Ancient Worthies described in Heb, 11.

As to there being a tentatively justified Class in the Camp, there is no such Class, except those referred to as respects their former standing in the Court. If they retain their good character qualities, they will have the same position of those during the Gospel Age who were faithful unto death in their justification – although bereft of the Grace of God which once sanctified them for consecration for elective purposes in the Faith Age. These are referred to as the “truly repentant and believing, but not consecrated Jews and Gentiles” (E-10:209). There is no ‘narrow’ way in the Camp; and absolutely nothing to show a consecrated class In the Camp in this Faith Age.

Another Reason why they cannot consecrate now (in the Camp) is because Jesus’ merit does not extend to the Camp – tentatively or in any other way. And without that merit no one can be acceptable to God in consecration in this Faith Age! If we keep the Tabernacle picture in mind, we won’t go too far astray. “The Bullock was slain in the ‘Court,’ which we have seen typified the condition of faith in and harmony with God, the highest attainment of the flesh, the human nature. Jesus was in this condition, a perfect man to God” – the bullock in the type (Tabernacle Shadows, p. 54, par. 3). ‘‘And Aaron shall offer his bullock of the sin-offering which is for (represents) himself, and make an atonement for himself (the members of His body – the under priests) and for His house (all believers, the entire ‘Household of Faith’ – the Levites).” (Tabernacle Shadows, p. 55, par. 2) So Jesus did not offer Himself for any one outside that Court during this Faith Age (including the Epiphany period and the “finished picture”); but only for those in the Court – the Household of Faith. “During the Epiphany (those who fail to consecrate in the Court –JJH) cease altogether to be of the Household of Faith, having used the grace of God in vain” (E-4:406). The Epi­phany Messenger’s teaching is directly opposite, and antagon­istic, to what R. G. Jolly teaches – namely, that his Campers Consecrated ARE of the Household of Faith. and are walking a ‘narrow’ way in the Camp! But we have the blessed assurance (in the faithful teachings) of both Messengers that this Is just some more Levitical error and nonsense – “leprosy.”

-------------------------------------------------------

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Brother Hoefle: “The peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus”! (and Rom. 8:6)

Your issues of June and July have been gratefully received, and I thank you in the name of our dear Lord for His Truth.......... I enjoy your July item, as I can pass it on to my Israel friends. The Jehovah’s Witness item is of great interest in Israel, and since 1959 this group has been of great interest to a group of Israel students – I mean on the JW you are writing about. To inform you, in 1959-61 The ........ of the Hebrew University has a group of scholars who study the various aspects of the existing relations between the United States and Israel. Professor M------, the Director... also directs this study group....... As a member of this, Dr. J------- has been assigned to study the relations between the various Protestant groups, etc., and specially in this connection Dr. M------- was studying the attitude of Pastor Charles T. Russell, to the Problem of the Restoration, and to the emergence of the State of Israel. I kept visiting the office of Dr. M-------, as I was well acquainted with Dr. W------- same office rooms. Our Six Volumes and Towers I placed in their service, until now I am a visitor on these and other Truth items. I feel this article, in the light of history of our day, may be welcome – as I am sure it will be. If you would mail three or four, I shall see to it that they get into the proper hands, as I shall call their attention to your letter to our free brethren.

The Jehovah’s Witnesses are at work here, but can’t get any following – since 1958 just a little group. But the Arab country they are welcome, and make – we are told – many friends, only because of their teachings against Israel, Gentiles – all churches – Yes, even Bible Students of all kind of groups, have made themselves ob­scured. Too bad they have not heeded Brother Russell’s advice (specially not to preach Christ to Jews, nor to try to convert a Jew). Brother Russell had learned well how to make friends with Jews, and not to pull the “veil” before God Himself will remove the veil – except those who are inquiring or called of God even now ­but this is my own observation by experience; it remains to be seen.

A special calling remains in Israel, and those of the Elijah still remaining well may be able to understand. But here in Israel our God is present in the hearts of remaining true Israel, searching for faith and Truth. But we have to receive the key to this Truth...... I am sure is taking place in Israel, for the Truth will again come from Israel. To be of comfort in Israel is my calling for quite a few years – ­making friends to meet God’s remnant (Acts 3:25). Will mail you a book if you will receive it for your labors – a little appreciation from Israel.

Somehow I felt an urge to write this letter.... and yet am so very busy in my little service in Israel, as I am being blessed just following His leading me. I am richly blessed to meet God’s Israel He is calling..... Your letter of July 1 may be a special blessing to Israel Watchers in Zion, as the JW’s in the Arab lands have given them in their hatred a “Bible” answer for the complete annihilation of Israel. So I hope your letter in the proper hands here will give the Truth for and from Israel.  God bless your mind and heart! (Prov. 16:1,2,3)

------- (ISRAEL)

.....................................................

The following is a copy of our letter to a Jehovah’s Witness re our No. 121.

Dear Brother ------- Christian greetings!

It is my understanding that you called by with the specific intention of visiting with me, and I am quite sorry I was not here; but I am told that about the last remark you made when leaving was that you are in complete harmony with the teachings of Brother Russell. You may be sure I am very glad to hear this, because that is my own position, and it certainly makes you and me brethren “in the faith, as we have been taught.” I would be quite happy to have another visit from you most any time if you will telephone me first, so I will be sure to be here. Or, I could call to see you if you would rather have it that way. But for now, I quote below a paragraph from the July 1, 1916 Watch Tower by Brother Russell, which will offer an excellent basis for discussion when we meet:

“The Apostle Paul in his writings lays special emphasis upon the fundamental importance of correct doctrinal teaching. It made no difference whether Paul or Apollos or even an angel from heaven taught anything, it must be in harmony with the foundation doctrines which had been given them by the Lord. (Gal. 1:6-12) He assured the church that what he had taught them was from God, and that even if an angel should bring them another Gospel, it would be a proof that such angel had de­flected from loyalty to the Lord. That Jesus Christ died to secure the redemption ­price for Adam and his race is the foundation doctrine of the church, which was received from Jesus Himself and from His faithful mouthpiece and which was shown in the Divinely-given types of the law. Whoever taught this fundamental truth faithfully was a real help to the people of God. Yet even such a teacher might help them to build, even on this proper foundation, a faith and character structure which would not stand the tests of the great day of the Lord; for the fire of that day would surely prove the nature of this structure. Consequently, both teacher and pupil would suffer loss and be saved only ‘as through fire.’”

With this comes my Christian brotherly love and cordial good wishes for your spiritual welfare, with the hope that this may be the beginning of a mutually help­ful Christian relationship.

Sincerely your brother,  John J. Hoefle (July 5, 1965)

.....................................................

NOTE: – From the Sister’s letter, quoted on p. 8, it would seem the Witnesses are also setting aside the Scriptural Truth concerning the Jew – as they have done with about every truth in the Bible. Isa. 2:2,3 is so clear it seems incon­ceivable that those once instructed in Brother Russell’s clear teachings concern­ing the Jews could now go so far astray: “It shall come to pass in the last days (of this Gospel Age, into which we have already entered) that the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains (above and dominating these present Gentile Governments – mountains) .... and all nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall say, let us go up to the mountain (Kingdom) of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob (often in the Old Testament “Jacob” is used to desig­nate the natural Jews – in contrast with Israel, the spiritual, or Gospel-Age chosen people of God – true Christians)... for out of Zion (spiritual Israel) shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem (from the resurrected Ancient Worthies).” This is stressed by-St.  Paul in Rom. 1:16: “The power of God for salvation to every one believing; both to Jew and to Greek” – “first to the Jew, and then to the Greek.” (Rom. 2:10)

These Scriptures clearly ascribe a priority to the Jew, regardless of the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ claims concerning themselves – and regardless of R. G. Jolly’s claims ascribing a priority to his present Campers Consecrated (above all other quasi-elect, including the Jews!).

.....................................................

The July-August Present Truth arrived late, as usual – some days after we had mailed our August paper, and a few days after this September paper had been prepared for the printer. However, we assure our readers a detailed and conclus­ive answer to the July-August Present Truth by October 1, D.V.