NO. 517 THE ENDS OF THE AGES

In 1 Cor. 10:11, Dia., it is stated, "These things [the five evils related in vs. 6 thru 10] occurred to them typically [from the Greek tupos, meaning type], and were­ written for our admonition, on whom the ends of the ages have come." This Scripture had its primary application in the end of the Jewish Age, with its secondary application applying to the end of the Gospel Age. However, there have been "ends" of other previous Ages; and with the ending of each one some outstanding event occurred -either violent or of ominous portent, or both. But those occurrences were foreknown by only a very small minority, with the vast majority of mankind either having no knowledge whatever of coming events, or ignoring the warning concerning them.

Regarding Noah, it is written that he was "a preacher of righteousness" (2 Peter 2: 5), so we may safely conclude that he did his share of preaching concerning the approaching deluge; but Jesus said' that they went on eating, drinking, marrying, etc. (Luke 17:27), in the ordinary affairs of life "until the flood came and destroyed them all." Thus, the first world Age ended with a stupendous act of violence, which destroyed all human beings except those in the Ark.

The Patriarchal Age came next, which ended with the death of Jacob. It also ended with a certain tenor of violence -Jacob and all his descendants (70 in number) were forced into Egypt because they were hungry. At the time both Jacob and Joseph (two of the "just" men described in Hebrews 11) considered the move into Egypt as a blessing from the Lord. Had they had the slightest premonition of subsequent events, they would certainly not have made the move; but that knowledge was purposely withheld from them because God was there beginning a tupos (Greek for the English word type), which was the most comprehensive of all Old Testament types in that it had application in the Gospel Age to the enslavement and deliverance of God's people from antitypical Egypt (the world of sin), and to the deliverance of all the remaining individuals of the human race in the Millennium, and having its grand finale at the end of the Little Season, when will be fulfilled the antitype of the destruction of Pharaoh and his host, and the deliverance of all the sheep into everlasting Paradise restored. While the event of the Red Sea was not the end of an Age, it was the end of an era, and with it came the mass destruction and violence of the Red Sea episode.

In the strictly limited sense, the Patriarchal Age (the "fathers" -2 Pet. 3:4) refers to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (the Jewish Age began with the death of Jacob -when his twelve sons each became the head of one of the tribes of Israel). They are definitely the ancestors of what we recognize as the Jewish race. However, in the broad sense the Patriarchal Age began with Noah, with his son Shem being the progenitor of the Jewish race -Shemites, or Semites, as the name is now used.

At the end of the Jewish Age and the beginning of the Gospel Age came again events of great portent -the Advent of Jesus, followed by great violence in the year 70 in the destruction of Jerusalem and the unbelieving Jews, with only a very small minority once again understanding the turn of things. The Jews had been given the Divine revelation at Sinai, with the strict ritual of the Aaronic priesthood and their whole religious system; and that system had become so imbedded in their hearts and minds that it was indeed meat and drink to them -although they had strayed far afield from the real intents and purposes of the various ceremonies. St. Paul had told them that the things that happened to the fathers during their forty-year stay in the Wilderness of Sin were very pointedly tupos (types) of things that were happening during St. Paul's life; but they "made their hearts as adamant stone [diamond point], lest they should hear the law, and the words which the Lord of hosts hath sent in His spirit by the prophets." (Zech. 7:12) And extreme violence by the Roman Army resulted in the destruction of many of them, and the overthrow of-their religious and political establishments. Once more we have presently come to "the end of the age" -the Gospel Age; and again a "time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation" -extreme violence on every hand -a greatly enlarged repetition of the condition in the days of Noah, when "the earth was filled with violence." (Gen. 6:11) And here once more only a mere segment of the population have had even a blurred understanding of events. When the violence broke forth in 1914 there was perhaps thirty or forty thousand subscribers to Brother Russell's Watch Tower, from a total of about two billion members of the human race. A certain num­ber of the latter had heard the forecast of impending doom, but gave little or no heed thereto, although many millions then living had not even heard of what was coming.

And just as great changes came with the passing of the Jewish Age, so even greater changes are now in progress, with just a small minority understanding their significance. And this applies with more or less force even to those who claim to understand "the present truth." All who have even a smattering of present truth understand that the time will arrive here in the end of the Age when there will be no further opportunity to partake of the "high calling." Some have properly concluded that such a condition has already arrived -in the rather distant past -that the "plowman overtook the reaper" (Amos 9: 13) when the reaping work came to a stop in those countries of Christendom that were engulfed in the World War in 1914.

The Jewish Age reached its fullness at its end, when the Messiah made His appearance. "The people that sat in darkness saw great light." (Matt. 4: 16) The time of favor for the Jews reached its sad end at the time they "crucified the Lord of Glory." Immediately thereafter the nation began to wane, and was completely unstable in the year 70, when the dispersion began, the priesthood and the ceremonial features of the Law were completely obliterated. A certain degree of analogy may be made here in the end of the Age with the Truth Movement, which reached its climax in 1914-16, after which that Movement also began to wane. All who are at all familiar with conditions then know it would be an insult to Brother Russell to compare his brilliant performance with that which followed his death. And that change at 1916, when he died, has been sadly deteriorating in the years that have followed. Shortly after the Apostles passed away the great Apostasy appeared, which developed in scope and strength until the Bible itself was given little or no study; people believed what they were told by their renegade leaders. And a similar phase has been developing with us since 1914, so that today many so-called Truth people do not even know what Brother Russell taught; he is seldom quoted by many, as they also blindly accept what their leaders tell them.

It is a notable feature of the Jewish and Christian religions that each of them began with a true priesthood (Aaron and his sons), which slowly degraded into priestcraft, then into priestgraft ("a den of thieves" when Jesus arrived -Matt. 21:13). The twelve Apostles followed the course of Aaron even more rigidly than did Aaron -never took up a collection. When St. Paul acknowledged a gift from some of his beloved supporters, he said this: "Not because I desire a gift: but I desire fruit that may abound to your account." (Phil. 4: 17) And he relates some very interesting features of his self-denials in 2 Cor. 11:21-28.

Most Truth people today still believe that the 144,000 described in Rev. 7:4; 14:1, etc., is a literal number; but it is impossible to reconcile that belief with some of their other teachings. Taken as a whole, those organizations that have developed from the Parousia Truth Movement contain many more than 144,000 who think they are of that number, thus there is something sadly askew somewhere. Brother Russell was firmly con­vinced that he was conducting the reaping of the Gospel-Age Harvest, which persuaded him to the further opinion that it would end shortly, after which no more would enter that select group of the 144,000 who "stood with the Lamb on Mount Zion." He saw, too, that a considerable time would elapse between the selection of the last one of that group and the establishment of the Kingdom in power and great glory. This prompted him to write the following article (Reprint 4835), into which we have inserted a few comments of our own, none of which change the thought of the writer; they simply offer a little elaboration:

THE REWARDS OF SACRIFICE

"I beseech you, therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service."  (Rom. 12:1) Nowhere in the Scriptures are we commanded by the Lord to sacrifice our earthly rights and privileges. The Divine commands end at the line of justice. In other words, justice and righteousness are one and the same thing. Sacrifice, self-denial, taking up the cross to follow Jesus, are all propositions way beyond the Divine law. The Law Covenant proffered a perpetuation of human life to all who would fulfill its re­quirements. None of the Jews, with whom that Covenant was made, were able to fulfill those requirements, except the One who came from above and for whom was provided a perfect human body, which enabled Him to keep the requirements of the Law Covenant, entitling Him, therefore, to everlasting earthly life.

The New Law Covenant (Jer. 31:31-34), under the antitypical Mediator, will offer the same reward of everlasting human perfection to al1 who will fulfill its requirements. Its superiority over the first Law Covenant will consist in its having a better Mediator, capable of helping mankind fully out of condemnation, death and weakness and authorized so to do because of the merit of His "better sacrifices."

But while Jesus, born under the Law, was obligated to the conditions of that Covenant and fulfilled them, and thru them had a right to everlasting earthly life -He did more. He sacrificed that earthly life -laid it down (John 10:17,18) -permitted sinful men to take it from Him without resistance, although He had the power to call for legions of angels for protection. This was His sacrifice. He did not sacrifice sinful weaknesses, for He had none. He sacrificed perfect life and all His legal rights and privileges. His reward for so doing was exaltation from the human nature to the Divine nature -far above that of angels, principalities and powers. (Eph. 1:21) Thus exalted, He has the human rights (which He never forfeited) to give Adam and his race -their ransom-price. These He will give to them in the end of this Age, applying them to the sealing of the New Law Covenant, under which Israel and all mankind may be restored to all that was lost thru the first man's disobedience.

SIN-OFFERING SACRIFICES ACCEPTABLE DURING THE GOSPEL AGE ONLY

Throughout this Gospel Age the Law Covenant has continued upon the Jews only, the remainder of the world of mankind being without any Covenant with God and waiting for the "times of restitution" under the New Law Covenant of the future. (Acts 3:19-21; Jer. 31: 31-34) It is during this time (the Gospel Age) that God draws and calls a certain loyal class and gives them an opportunity of sharing with their Redeemer in sacrificial death. The faithful will be counted His members, or His Bride or joint-heirs in His Kingdom of glory and honor and immortality. All men, in proportion as they know the Divine will (what is just, from the Divine standpoint), are correspondingly duty bound to fulfill that righteous requirement or Law of God to the extent of ability. But those desirous of fol­lowing in the footsteps of Jesus are shown what they can do more than justice; but they are not commanded to do more. All sacrificing is a privilege, not a duty, not a command. In harmony with this, St. Paul writes, not commandingly, but entreatingly, "I beseech you, brethren… present your bodies living sacrifices." He did not command this. To have made it a command would at once prevent the opportunity of sacrifice. What we sacrifice is something that is not commanded. Whatever is commanded of God is obligation and not sacrifice.  

The Ancient Worthies presented their bodies, laid down their lives, renouncing earthly rights, but they did not sacrifice for sin. Why? God did not call for human sacrifices for sin prior to Jesus' sacrifice of Himself. God was unwilling to accept imperfect, blemished creatures at His altar. They might lay down their lives, but He would not count-them sacrifices. Jesus was accepted as a sacrifice for sin because He was perfect, and His followers, since Pentecost, have been acceptable as sacrifices, because they were perfect -made so by the Redeemer's imputation to them of a sufficiency of His merit to compensate their blemishes. The spirit-begotten are reckoned perfect so long as they are faithful.

Aaron was commanded to offer the sin-offering sacrifices of the Day of Atonement "without blemish," which he scrupulously did. And it is probably true that the renegade priesthood that developed later also meticulously followed that procedure, because those priests would have died had they offered a blemished animal; and we have no record that any of them ever did die thru failure to keep that law. Jesus in His perfection was the antitype of the Atonement Day bullock; and His Gospel-Age followers -represented in the Atonement Day Lord's goat -are reckoned perfect because of the perfection of Jesus Himself.

Thus this Gospel Age is called the "acceptable day [or time] of the Lord," because, during this Gospel Age, God is willing to accept a predestinated number as joint-sacrific­ers with Jesus, But as soon as that' predestinated number shall have been completed the acceptable time will immediately end. No more presentations will be accepted as sacrifices -the antitypical Day of Atonement will have ended in its sacrificial part.

But suppose that some should present themselves after the close of the "acceptable time"; what would be their status and God's dealing with them? Since God is unchange­able, we must assume that He would always be pleased to have His creatures devote their lives wholly and unreservedly to the doing of His will, as He was pleased with the faithfulness of the Ancient Worthies to lay down their lives before a Covenant of Sacrifice was in force. We may reason that as God has promised human perfection to those Ancient Worthies who laid down their lives, He would be willing similarly to reward any who might follow the same course after the completion of the Church -after the ending of the "acceptable time" of sacrifice.

Quite likely, therefore, there will, be some in the end of this Age who, although faithful unto death, will not have been begotten of the Holy Spirit and not attain the spirit plane of being in the resurrection, but who will come forth members of the same class as the Ancient Worthies, who were developed before this Age began.

THE PRESENTATION OF ONESELF ALWAYS A REASONABLE SERVICE

In view of these facts our advice to all who love the Lord and who desire to be in complete fellowship with Him is the same message that has gone forth throughout this Age -"We beseech you, brethren, by the mercies of God, present your bodies living sacrifices." We cannot now assure them that, after presenting themselves as sacrifices, God will accept them as such and grant them spirit-begetting to a new nature; but we can assure them that God always gives large rewards to those who manifest their faith and loyalty towards Him and His cause. We can tell them, too, that, to our understanding, the Scriptures teach that the Ancient Worthies (of which they may be a part if they fail to be accepted to the new nature) will be highly honored of God, perfect on the human plane and made "princes in all the earth." (Psa. 45:16) We can assure them that, to our understanding, these princes will have a glorious precedence over the remainder of mankind as the special representatives of the invisible Messiah class for a thousand years. We can assure them that, to our understanding, after participating in that glorious work, these princes will be uplifted at the close of the Millennium to the spirit plane of being -as part of the antitypical Levites. (Excerpts by John J. Hoefle, No. 324, June 1982)

___________________________________________________________________

ASSAD DOESN'T NEED TO THREATEN ISRAEL BARAK IS DOING IT FOR HIM

Ehud Barak has apparently gone back to Clinton for help with his local public relations campaign. He still thinks that it was Carville who won the election for him rather than Netanyahu's failure to lead. Who but an American public relations whiz would think to sell the Golan give-away to the Jewish People by using coercion tactics?

Who ever heard of an experienced soldier explaining to his own people that we should surrender, because, if we don't, the enemy will go to war with us? Who ever heard of an elected Prime Minister of any country make such an absurd statement? When the Israeli Prime Minister publicly threatens his own people by telling us that, if we fail to achieve a peace agreement with Syria we are inviting war, he is actually being the representative of our enemies I III He is telling us, in effect, that we have no choice but to surrender to Syria for "peace." If we buy this garbage, then the next item on the agenda is giving away Judea, Samaria, Gaza and Jerusalem to Arafat for exactly the same reason! And why stop there? Certainly the Arabs living in the north would prefer to be a part of the PLO state. Why not give them Haifa? And what of the Arabs living in Jaffa? How can we interfere with their desires without inviting war? There is no end to this self-defeating policy.

The fact is really simple. Once you set the precedent that you are prepared to surrender without a fight, then the list of demands and demanders grows proportionately. Everyone wants a piece of the Israeli pie. And if we are giving it away, why shouldn't everyone come to get his free piece? No country ever gained respect and/or peace by appeasing its enemies. On the contrary. History has shown us that those who back down to coercion only invite more of the same. Those who speak of gaining peace by surrender to tyranny are cowardly self-deceivers.

Barak warned us that we should remember the scuds that were fired upon us by Iraq. Perhaps we should also remember the right wing Israeli government which chose not to fight back. Had we responded to the first scud with our own military might, there well may have been an end to it immediately. Instead we trusted our security to the hands of Bush. Doesn't it seem strange that the combined might of all those superpowers was unable to neutralize little Iraq? It was nothing less than a miracle that far more harm wasn't done to this country.

Somebody should tell our leaders that we are not a vassal of the United States. Any leader of a sovereign nation has, as his first responsibility, the obligation to defend that nation. Shamir failed to do this both during the intifada and the Gulf War. And Barak is presently failing by counseling surrender to Syria. It is nice to dream about making everyone's mother happy in the knowledge that we are building a new world of peace and tranquility for their children. But it is criminal to suggest that by surrendering to ruthless tyrants such will be the case.

Now, before we find ourselves with our backs to the sea, is the time to back away from Barak and bring this government down. Any coalition partner who can remain in this government at this time does not deserve the support of the Jewish people in the next election. Let Shas and the NRP have the courage to at long last act like Jews and walk out of this government of treason.

Whatever game Mr. Barak is playing with Syria, it is important for all of us to recognize that peace is certainly not one of the outcomes. If Barak is truly an honest man, then we have nothing to worry about. He clearly stated that he is not willing to depart from any of the Golan Heights without a full peace. If we do not have true peace with Egypt and the East Bank of Israel, then we certainly will never achieve such a peace with Syria. But the problem is that we are all participants in self-deception.

Abraham Lincoln once asked one of his aides to tell him how many legs a cow had. Perplexed at the question the aide replied that a cow has four legs. The president was pleased with the answer and then asked him how many legs the cow would have if we called its tail a leg. The aide replied that, in such a case it would have five legs. President Lincoln quickly responded that this was a big mistake. To call a cow's tail a leg does not make it one.

We are calling a process of successive surrender to our enemies peace. But calling surrender such a name doesn't change the fact that it really isn't and never will be peace.

(A Voice from Hebron, by Gary M. Cooperberg, December 20, 1999)

"BIBLE SHIFTS FROM HISTORY TO HUMANITIES: TALLAHASSEE -Students in Marion and Levy counties were asked during an exam on 1 Corinthians, 'Why is it hard for a non-Christian to understand things about God?'

"In Okaloosa County, students were asked, 'What is Jesus Christ's relationship to God, to creation and to you?'

"Among the harshest critics has been state Rep. Curt Levine, D-Boca Raton, who asked for the Department of Education, investigation. Levine criticized the 'anti-semitic and proselytizing instructional materials' being used in Some of the counties.

"Other counties where the Bible courses are being taught include: Escambia, Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Gulf, Taylor, Madison, Columbia, Clay, Levy, and Hillsborough." (Excerpts from The Orlando Sentinel, March 17, 2000)

"ISRAEL GIVES UP MORE LAND IN BID FOR PEACE: The move, effective Tuesday, leaves Palestinians in control of 41 percent of the West Bank. JERUSALEM -In the past, Israel has refused to negotiate the release of Palestinian prisoners from east Jerusalem because it does not recognize Palestinian jurisdiction over residents from the sector of the city it captured in the 1967 Mideast War.

"Ahmed Sublaban, chairman of the Palestinian Prisoners Club in Jerusalem, said the prisoner release will help to move the peace negotiations forward because 'it shows the families [of the prisoners] that the peace process is tangible and that they can benefit from the fruits of peace.'

"He called on Israel to release all of the approximately 1,650 Palestinian prisoners being held for anti-Israel activity -so-called security prisoners."

(Excerpts from Associated Press, March 20, 2000)

"ARAFAT'S POPE: If the past is prologue, the present should be a defiant rebuff of historic moral lapses. Regrettably, though, the lapses are often intentional and represent immoral prejudice.

"Not heeding the lessons of Pope Pius' collusion with Hitler during the Holocaust, Pope John Paul II has aligned himself with Yasir Arafat. Religious leaders should be the arbiters of religious and moral law, not the henchmen of executioners. John Paul II, in signing an accord with the PLO condemning Israel's control of east Jerusalem as 'morally and legally unacceptable, ' has involved the Holy See in a relationship reminiscent of that of Pope Pius XII's with Hitler.

"The Vatican's vestigial anti-Jewish overtones reverberate throughout the centuries. The Pope's actions bring to mind the echoes of Jewish supplicants throughout the centuries who were barred from praying at the holiest of sites in Israel. Never have Catholics, Muslims, Jews and the world's religionists been entitled to the degree of free religious access that they enjoy since those areas have been under Israeli jurisdiction. The religious character of Jerusalem has remained unqualified since the city's unification in 1967. That is by the grace of the Israeli government, a government that the Vatican sees fit to impugn in morally unacceptable terms.

"The papal pronouncement follows on the heels of a 1998 assessment by the Vatican's foreign minister calling the Israeli presence in eastern Jerusalem an 'illegal occupation.' Yet, that same moral outrage was absent when Jews were denied the right to pray at the Kotel from 1948 through 1967, when Jordan controlled east Jerusalem.  

"The moral outrage of the papacy seems misplaced, fifty years after Pope Pius XII could not muster enough moral revulsion to condemn Hitler and the Final Solution. In 'Hitler's Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII, ' John Cornwell examines the geopolitical influence that Pope Pius exerted on the European theater. Vatican documents verify that he used 'moral blackmail' to solidify Rome's authority on Germany. That authority offered the most powerful endorsement of Hitler with the 'Reich Concordat,' the treaty with Hitler that legitimized his program to kill the Jews. It was by Pius' hand that moral and ethical outrage were purged from Catholic doctrine.

"The Vatican has, as yet, not come to terms with Pope Pius' complicity in the murder of millions of Jews. Until that happens, the Church should accept that moral indignance is the exclusive dominion of moral individuals, whose resume does not include terrorism 'and murder. Otherwise, John Paul II will be Arafat's Pope, as much as Pius was Hitler's Pope.

(What's On Your Mind, by Assemblyman Dov Hikind, The Jewish Press, February 25, 2000)

"AN OPEN LETTER TO JOHN PAUL II: Sir: When the news came out that you were meeting with Yasir Arafat about some moral issue, I was filled with great hope. Finally, I thought, someone was going to show moral leadership and demand from this man that he turn himself in as a war criminal. Yes, it looked as if you were going to ask that he be tried for the murder of innocent Jewish children. It appeared that you were going to exhort the world to reconsider its removal of him from the list of international terrorists, and ask the U.S. why it backed off its oath to never negotiate with someone it had termed a ruthless murderer.

"Imagine my surprise when you met with Arafat to issue a joint proclamation stating that any attempt by the Jewish State to control Jerusalem's fate is 'morally and legally unacceptable.' Of all things to hear from you sir! You who expressed regret for what your church had done to the Jews over the ages. We thought you had pledged to be a friend of Israel. Why, then, would you interfere in the internal affairs of Israel, an inter­vention which could cause serious harm to the Jewish State?

"You say that 2,000 years ago, a rabbi from Nazaretb fought to keep Rome from interfering in Jerusalem. Well, today, on that issue, this rabbi from Monsey agrees with him completely. Evidently, you don't. How unChristian!

"Interference by your church in the internal affairs of Israel conjures up the wish of Justin Martyr, one of your early saints, who wanted Jewish towns to be consumed in flames, and demanded that no Jew be able to go to Jerusalem.

"Let us look at the record of the powers who have controlled Jerusalem, and their efforts to protect its places holy to various religions:

"Israeli soldiers died (you should read the list of their names) recapturing Jerusalem because they did not want to take the city by bombarding it which would have destroyed some of your churches. That respect for what various groups consider holy places was not demonstrated by the Jordanians and their Palestinian inhabitants who, while in control of Jerusalem, smashed Jewish synagogues and used them for latrines. And now -you, sir, a man whose predecessors rejoiced in the sacking of Jerusalem, stand together with the head of those Palestinians -a murderer of Jewish children -a man whose Koran considers you an infidel -and you both feel you have the right to preach to the Jews about the morality of control of Jerusalem!  Jerusalem, the city which your very Bible states as belonging to the Jews. Jerusalem, the city which, had it been under Jewish control in 1939, would have been a haven for escapees from the Holocaust. The Jews had no one to speak up for them then. Your predecessor Pius XII fell silent. That was bad enough. But, now, as nazism rises once again in Austria and Germany, as Iran and Iraq load up with Scuds, you demand that Jews not be in control of Jerusalem.

"Not on your life, sir! Your voice could serve as an instrument of peace in the world. Joint statements with a murderer have the very opposite effect. There is still time to reconsider.

 "The Jewish national memory is very long. We remember what happened to us 60 years ago. We also remember what your church leaders did to us and to our city throughout the centuries -especially Godfrey of Bouillon, who, in the First Crusade of 1095, wrote to Pope Urban II stating that 'in the Porch and in the Temple of Solomon our people had the vile blood... up to the knees of their horses. ' "In the words of a recently martyred Rabbi, Never Again, sir, Never Again." (The Spivak Report, by Rabbi Yaakov Spivak, The Jewish Press, February 25, 2000)

___________________________________________________________________

QUESTION OF GENERAL INTEREST

QUESTION -In the parable of the sheep and the goats (Matt. 25:31-46) to whom does the word nations refer?

ANSWER -This parable is entirely applied to the world, to the nations [peoples], the heathen in the Kingdom. For centuries the Jews had been accustomed to thinking of themselves as God's nation, God's people. All others they styled heathen, Gentiles, the people, the nations; and in the prophecies God treated the matter from this stand­point. So when spiritual Israel was received into Divine favor as the Royal Priesthood, the Holy Nation, the Peculiar people, all the remainder of mankind was properly enough to be thought of and described as "the nations," "the Gentiles."

In line with this our Lord in this parable tells what is to befall after His Kingdom shall have been set up -after the selection of the true church class to be the Bride, the Lamb's wife and joint-heirs in His Kingdom, in His throne. This, we notice, is very clearly stated by the Master, saying, "When the Son of Man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels [saints] with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory." (v. 31) Who, after proper consideration, will say that this is a matter of the past? Who will dispute that this is a description of Messiah's Kingdom following His Parousia and His Epiphaniea at His Second Advent?

Then follows the description of the work of the Millennial Age. "Before him shall be gathered all nations." (v. 32) This means all the people of the world outside the Lord's Holy nation, His peculiar people, the Church and other elect classes. Everybody except these will be before His great white throne of justice, mercy and love; that will be their judgment time. "When thy judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants will learn righteousness." (lsa. 26:9) "Bec ause he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men in that he hath raised him from the dead." (Acts 17:31)

For centuries the nations have claimed to be Christian kingdoms and called themselves Christendom, which means Christ's Kingdom. But God never approved of calling these nations by the name of Christ. Their only right, aside from the vote of the people, is in God's limited grant to rule until He comes whose right the dominion is. Let it be recognized that the best and the worst of earth's nations are but "kingdoms of this world," whose lease of power from God is now expired and they will give way to their ordained successor, the Kingdom of Messiah.

Read what God tells Israel in Jer. 30:11: "For I am with thee, saith the Lord, to save thee: though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee: but I will correct thee in measure, and will not leave thee altogether unpunished." This is repeated in Jer. 46:28.

Since nations will have no resurrection as nations, their reaping would come in this present evil world. (Gall: 4) The decision has already been made against present governments and institutions. "Mene, Mene, Teke1, Upharsin... Thou art weighted in the balance and found wanting." (Dan. 5: 25-28) The nations have been judged and now the eviction is taking place. We have seen the fall of one nation after another. Some have long since disappeared.

The establishment of the Lord's Kingdom will be in the top of these Kingdoms while they still exist (Isa. 2:2, 3; Micah 4:1) -that is, it will replace them. So while these nations are crumbling His Kingdom is rising. And the people will "go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob." Hallelujah!

NO. 516 ST. PETER'S KEYS

"Upon this rock will I build My Church; and the gates of Hell [Hades, the grave] shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven." (Matt. 16:18, 19) 

For some unaccountab1e reason numerous Catholics have gotten the thought that we are their foe, just as Presbyterians, Methodists, Episcopalians, Baptists, etc., have gotten the impression that we are their foe. We are a foe to no human being, and especially to no Christian. We believe more fully than do Methodists in Free Grace-which ultimately God's grace will reach every human being. We believe more emphatically than do most Presbyterians that the Church is an especially elect class, and is now being gathered out of the world to be God's agents in the ultimate blessing of all the non-elect. We believe with Baptists that only the Elect, the immersed, will constitute the Kingdom of God, although we deny their claim that baptism in water is the real immersion. We hold, with the Apostle, that it is baptism into Christ's death. Similarly we hold to the great Catholic doctrine that there is only one true Church, founded by the Lord Jesus Christ through His Apostles, nearly nineteen centuries ago. We are aware that several churches claim to be Catholic -the Anglican Catholic, the Syrian Catholic, the Greek Catholic, and the Roman Catholic. Each claims to be the true Church and reprobates the others as heretical.

But we take the still broader, catholic ground. We hold that the word catholic means general; and that any limitation, such as Roman Catholic, Greek Catholic, etc., to that extent denies their catholicity. Perhaps, therefore, we are really saying that we are more catholic than any of these brethren. We must prove our point or be misunderstood. We hold, and few, if any, will dispute it, that the one catholic or universal or general Church of Christ is the one mentioned in the Bible -"the Church of the First-borns, written in Heaven." If this be admitted, our next proposition is that the Lord in Heaven records as members of His true Church the saintly only-whether Roman Catholics, Anglican Catholics, Greek Catholics, Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, etc.

Have we not here the one Church, the Catholic Church, the universal, the only Church which the Bible recognizes? In the past we have been too narrow and have supposed that God was as narrow as ourselves. It was on this account that in the past Presbyterians, Roman Catholics, Anglicans, Baptist and Methodists persecuted and were persecuted, because each thought itself the true Church. Are we not all getting broader conceptions of our God and of His Church? Do we not see that a part of our mistake was in calling the outward organization the Church of Christ, instead of remembering that the Lord alone writes the names of the Church, that He alone reads the hearts, that He alone is the Judge, and that He alone has the right to blot out the names of those who become reprobates? St. Paul wrote against the spirit of sectarianism, already manifest in his day -some saying, “I am of Paul"; others, "I am of Peter," etc. The Apostle asks, "Is Christ divided?" (1 Cor. 1:10-13) So, today, if with us, he would ask, "Why Romanists, Anglicans, Baptists, Methodists, etc.? Is not the name of Christ enough?" He explains that these different names of old signified a sectarian spirit, the spirit of division, that failed to recognize the true Head of the Church, His true representatives and His true members. The trouble is the same today. The entire foundation of divided Christianity would disappear and all the true Church of Christ -all real saints -would be speedily manifest, if true catholicity were acknowledged.

The one great obstacle to unity is the erroneous doctrine respecting the eternal torture of all not members of the Church. We must open our eyes wider and see that many of our theories were not taught by Jesus and the Apostles. We must see that the Church is a comparatively small company of saintly footstep followers of Jesus, irrespective of sectarian lines; that the Bible teaches not that these are to look over the battlements of Heaven to all eternity and see all others in torment, but that they are to demonstrate their loyalty unto death and in due time be associated with Messiah in His great Millennial Kingdom, which will bring knowledge and opportunity to all the families of the earth-the living and the dead (Rev. 20:11-13).

St. Paul declared that the saints of God, the true catholic Church, "are built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the Chief Corner Stone." (Eph. 2: 20) The Twelve Apostles are here referred to in their double office -  Apostles especially commissioned by the Lord as His representatives and prophets, mouthpieces, for the proclamation of the Message of the Church. Jesus, referring to these same foundation stones, pictures the Church of Glory as the New Jerusalem, and its twelve foundations as twelve precious stones, in which are the names of the twelve Apostles of the Lamb -no more, no less -St. Paul being God's choice to take the place of Judas, the betrayer of his Lord and Master. To think of St. Peter as the only foundation for the Church would be to deny Christ’s teaching and St. Peter's own statement -that the entire Church is symbolically represented as living stones built together by the Lord through the Holy Spirit (1 Peter 2:4-6). It was a costly mistake when our forefathers, overlooking this well-established point of Scripture, thought of the bishops of the Church as Apostolic Bishops, and took their decisions in councils assembled as the voice of God to and through the Church. The voice of God to and through the Church came only through "the twelve Apostles of the Lamb." All others so claiming are denounced by Jesus Himself as false Apostles (Rev. 2:2). God's true saints of all denominations should ignore all human creeds and return to the Bible and its declaration of "one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all." (Eph. 4: 5, 6) Are we more loyal to human organizations than to God, His Truth, His Church -all saints and one people, imbued with one spirit, the world around -the real catholic Church?

As St. Peter was only one of the twelve foundation stones of the Church, so, likewise, he was only one of The Twelve to whom the Lord declared, "Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in Heaven; and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in Heaven" (Matt. 18:18) -the same statement exactly that on another occasion He made to St. Peter only. But He gave the keys to St. Peter alone. Would it seem reasonable that Jesus should tell the twelve Apostles that God would do anything that they bade Him do -taking to Heaven whom they pleased and excluding whom they chose? Would it be wise or safe to entrust to poor humanity such dictatorial powers respecting the eternal interest of even one individual? Assuredly not!

When we remember that these Apostles declared that they were men of like passions with others, that St. Peter himself dissembled on one occasion and on another denied his Master, we are the more convinced that Jesus did not mean that God would abdicate His authority and wisdom in favor of any twelve men. What, then, does this passage mean? We answer, It implies that the Lord would so overrule the utterances and writings of His twelve Apostles as to make them safe guides for His Church. To these Apostles would be given through the Holy Spirit at Pentecost wisdom enabling them to understand which things of the Jewish Law were binding upon the Church and which not binding. Their decision would be absolutely right, and the entire Church might have confidence that what the Apostles bound or loosed on earth was equally bound or loosed in Heaven.

As an illustration of this binding and loosing, see Acts 15:28, 29. To get back into proper relationship with each other and rid of all sectarian systems, God's people must recognize that only the words of the New Testament Apostles and Prophets are authoritative, properly representing the Divine mind. Other things men have bound and loosed on earth, without recognition in Heaven. The things necessary to the Church are found only in the Bible, as St. Paul declares (2 Tim. 3:16, 17).

THE CHURCH UPON THE ROCK

"Other Foundation can no man lay than that which is laid, Jesus Christ." (1 Cor. 3:11) In the Divine arrangement Jesus Christ is the Foundation, the Rock, upon which is built the entire superstructure of His Church -the one Catholic, world-wide Church. On this Rock, Christ Jesus, as St. Peter declares, all the Church is being built as a Temple of God (1 Peter 2:4-10). The New Jerusalem, the Church in glory, had twelve foundation stones, built upon the one Foundation Rock, the Lord Jesus Christ. It would manifestly be erroneous, therefore, to suppose that our Lord abdicated His own place in the Church in favor of St. Peter, much as He loved His impulsive disciple. What, then, did Jesus mean when He called St. Peter a stone, spoke of building His Church upon "this rock," and declared that the gates of Hell (Hades, the grave) would not prevail against it? We reply, Jesus went down into the prison-house of death, Sheol, Hades, the tomb; but on the third day the gates of Sheol, Hades, were opened, and He came forth. These gates will not prevail against the Church, as they did not prevail against her Lord. This is an assurance of the resurrection of the dead.

To understand St. Peter's connection with the Rock Foundation of the Church, we should read the preceding context. The disciples had told Jesus the common talk respecting Himself. He then asked them, "Whom say ye that I am?" St. Peter answered, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God." This was the first public declaration of Jesus' Messiahship. Even the disciples had only now come to recognize their Teacher as the long-promised Messiah. Jesus answered, "Blessed art thou, Simon, son of Jonas; for flesh and blood hath not revealed this unto thee, but My Father in Heaven. Thou art Peter [a stone, ready for the spiritual Temple, the first one to publicly acknowledge Jesus], and upon this rock [the Truth just declared, that I am Messiah] I will build My Church." In the Greek the word Peter Signifies a stone of moderate size, while the word here rendered rock signifies a mass of stone -a foundation. Our Lord Jesus Christ evidently meant that St. Peter's statement was a recognition of Himself as the great Foundation of the Divine Plan -Messiah. Upon that foundation truth, that Jesus is Christ, the Church would be built; and St. Peter was the first living stone to build himself upon that foundation by believing and confessing Christ. St. Peter himself gives us the same thought -that he and all others of the Church, are living stones, being builded together as a Holy Temple of God. This entire Gospel Age has been devoted to the building of these stones upon that great Foundation Rock, Christ Jesus. As soon as the great Temple of God shall be completed, this Gospel Age will end and the New Dispensation be inaugurated, for the blessing of all the families of the earth.

To St. Peter our Lord said, "I will give thee the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven." What did He mean? We shall not suppose that any who are sufficiently intelligent to read this article are stupid enough to think Jesus meant that Heaven is locked up, and that nobody could get in except as St. Peter would open the door or gate. True, some have voiced such fantastic notions. But we refuse to believe that intelligent people could be in earnest in any such view, the absurdity of which is apparent. What the Lord meant is very simple, very beautiful; and we see exactly how it was fulfilled. He indicated that St. Peter, the first to confess Him, was to have a special honor in connection with the inauguration of the Church on earth. By the expression, "Kingdom of Heaven," is meant the Church, a class being called out of the world to become with Christ the ruling power of the world during the Millennium, through the great resurrection "change." (1 Cor.15:42, 54)

Jesus meant that St. Peter would be honored in being permitted to do an opening work in connection with the Church. The Bible shows us two different opening works and two different keys. The key is a symbol of power or authority or an initiative. St. Peter used his first key of privilege on the day of Pentecost. When the Holy Spirit came upon the early waiting Church, it was St. Peter that used this key. Standing up with the other Apostles, he lifted up his voice, explained the situation and opened the door to the Church of Christ for the Jews, admonishing them of their opportunity to enter. He told of the merit of Christ's death and how He had risen and had ascended on High, and how forgiveness of sins was, therefore, preached in His name (Acts 2:14-36).

The second key to the Kingdom of Heaven -the Church, the embryo Kingdom preparing for glory -St. Peter used three and a half years later. Then the seventieth week of Divine favor prophetically appointed to the Jews expired, and the time that "Gentiles might be fellow-heirs with the Jews of the same Promise" came. The opening work was with the household of Cornelius, to whom St. Peter preached Christ. The Lord blessed the preaching and granted the Holy Spirit to Cornelius and his family. Thus the Gentile door into the Kingdom was thrown wide open (Acts 10). "That repentance and remission of sins might be preached in His name to all people." (Luke 24:47) God never gave power to bishops, priests or ministers of any denomination to forgive sins. "Who can forgive sins but God alone?" Nor did Jesus give authority to His Apostles to forgive sins. They might preach repentance and forgiveness, but only in His name. Any child of God is Scripturally authorized to declare that Christ died for human sin, and has thus made arrangement by which all repentant sinners may be forgiven. It is an honor to be the bearer of such a Message from God to men; and every child of God is fully commissioned to tell the Divine Message to all who will hear. In proportion as God's people throwaway their sectarian spectacles they can read God's Message in the words of Jesus and the Apostles.

Let us hold fast the precious Word which Jesus exhorted us to search and which is sufficient that the man of God may be thoroughly furnished. Let us remember that there is only one true Church, each member of which is a saint, related to God and the Lord Jesus Christ through faith, repentance and remission of sin and the begetting of the Holy Spirit; that it is the only Church that is catholic, universal; and that a member of the Body of Christ is a member of that Body anywhere. "Ye are the Body of Christ and members in particular." (1 Cor. 12:27)

Blest be the tie that binds

Our hearts in Christian love!

(Herald of the Epiphany, July 15, 1943, pp. 25-26)

__________________________________________________________________

WEIZMANN'S RESIDENCE RE-OPENS

One of Israel's most historic homes -designed by Erich Mendelsohn, one of the most important architects of the century -is once again open to the public. Its grace and innovative styling is as vibrant today as when it was first completed. The private Rehovot home of Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann, and his wife, Dr. Vera Weizmann, has not only been restored to its original beauty, but has been elevated to museum level.

"This combination of legacies is of rich importance in both Jewish and universal terms," says Hanan Alon, the Weizmann Institute's vice president for international affairs and public relations. "Dr. Weizmann's importance and contribution both as an architect of the Jewish state and a pioneering scientist are expressed in all facets of the Weizmann Institute of Science, so we find it fitting to be entrusted, now, with administering his home as well."

Chaim Weizmann bequeathed his home and its l1-acre estate to the State of Israel upon his death in 1952, at age 78. Consequently, the Jewish Agency for Israel and the State of Israel instituted Yad Weizmann to promote his contributions to the Jewish people and administer the property. Vera Weizmann continued to live in the family home until her death in 1968, and was buried next to her husband on its grounds. A few years later, the house was opened to the public, enabling Israeli school children and visitors from around the world to experience history where it was made. Twenty years of continuous activity, however, had taken a toll on the house, and it had to be closed. In time, Yad Weizmann decided to empower the Weizmann Institute to seek funding for restoration of the estate, which borders the campus of the institute.

The challenge was great, because the decision was taken not only to refurbish the house, but also to restore it to its original condition. Architect Mendelsohn designed the house long before establishing his international reputation; his first project in the future State of Israel.

The building's design is as modern as anything being built today, bearing testimony to Mendelsohn's reputation as a Modernist and Expressionist. It bears the architect's signature of sweeping curves, which seem to defy being executed in cement. Structurally, the house comprises a concrete frame and silicate bricks, two layers of insulation, and a stucco exterior. Equally characteristic is the use of a staircase connecting the two floors. From the outside, the windows serve as a visual "spine" from which the rest flows in symmetry. Internally, the spiral staircase and the natural light bathing it contribute to a soothing ambiance. Impressive as the structure is in position and size, it does not belie the fact that it contains 22 rooms, along with wide verandas on the second floor, overlooking the gardens and with a view to the Judean Hills.

The restoration work brought together a microcosm of what Chaim Weizmann had worked for as a Zionist; expert restorers, immigrants from the former Soviet Union, an Israeli born curator; the grandson of Mendelsohn's largest private client; and immigrant construction supervisor from Kiev and a furniture restorer from St. Petersburg.

"It's our luck, that we had this. wave of immigration from Russia in the 1990s," said Merav Segal, Weizmann House curator and archivist. "All of our restorers except two are experts in their specialties."

Working under the supervision of curators from the Israel Museum and Prof. Anita Shapira, a historian and the chair of Yad Weizmann, the home's original form and interiors were faithfully restored. In fact, Mrs. Weizmann's meticulous records served as a guide to the restorers, who thoroughly researched her notes and documents.

Similarly, project architect Hillel Schocken approached the effort differently from ordinary projects. "This was not typical architectural work,” he explains. "My goal was that no one should know I had been there; that if Mendelsohn entered it, he would see it as something he had designed and which had been kept well. This was not easy, since we had to install some modern features, such as an air-conditioning system, then find a way to conceal it."

Mendelsohn took a holistic approach to his work, designing not only the house, but also the garden and its paths. Mendelsohn lost a battle of wills with Dr. Vera Weizmann, however. Dr. Weizmann insisted on her own preferences in furnishings. This brought a certain British flavor to what Mendelsohn had hoped would be a total statement of new Hebrew architecture, expressed in both design and materials.

One can imagine that he would have approved of the additions eventually made to the estate. Among the additions include a monument to the Holocaust and a sculpted entrance gate, both by Israeli artist Danny Karavan.

Visiting the home prior to its rededication on the anniversary of Chaim Weizmann's death, the country's current president, Ezer Weizman (who has dropped one 'n' from the family name), expressed his great satisfaction with the faithful restoration of his uncle's residence.

(Jewish Journal, L'Chaim, January 11, 2000)

___________________________________________________________________

POPE APOLOGIZES FOR CATHOLICS' SINS

The pontiff asked God's forgiveness for wrongs committed by the church throughout the centuries. VATICAN CITY -In an unprecedented moment in the history of the church, Pope John Paul II asked God's forgiveness Sunday for the sins of Roman Catholics through the ages, including wrongs inflicted on Jews, women and minorities. The apology was a personal landmark for a frail, ailing pope who vowed to cleanse and reinvigorate Catholicism for its third millennium.

"We forgive and we ask forgiveness," he said at several points during the solemn Day of Pardon Mass at St. Peter's Basilica.

The church burned heretics at the stake during the Inquisition. Armies of the faithful slaughtered Muslims during the Crusades. And during the Holocaust, some Catholics stood silent in the face of Nazi genocide.

The pontiff did not specifically mention such infamous wrongs during the service. Few specific groups were mentioned, and no names were given.

Still, the references were clear, both in John Paul's words and those of the five Vatican cardinals and two bishops who confessed sins on behalf of the church.

Cardinal Edward Cassidy recalled the "sufferings of the people of Israel" and asked divine pardon for "the sins committed by not a few [Catholics] against the people of the Covenant."

After a moment of silent prayer, the pope responded: "We are deeply saddened by the behavior of those who in the course of history have caused these children of yours to suffer, and asking your forgiveness, we wish to commit ourselves to genuine brotherhood."

Several Jewish leaders praised his penitential words but said they expect more during the pope's March 20 through 26 visit to the Holy Land. During his trip the pontiff will visit Israel's Holocaust memorial, Yad Vashem, and the Western Wall, the holiest site in Judaism.

The director of Yad Vashem, Avner Sha1ev, called Sunday's Day of Pardon both "significant" and "historic."

 Israelis want papal mention of Holocaust. JERUSALEM -Israel's chief rabbi said Sunday that he is "deeply frustrated" by Pope John Paul II's failure to mention the Holocaust in his appeal for forgiveness for the sins of Roman Catholics.

Rabbi Israel Meir Lau joined other Israelis in expressing hope that the pope omitted the Holocaust from Sunday's service only because he is planning a specific apology during his Holy Land pilgrimage next week.

"To mention The Inquisition from the year 1492 and to exclude the Wannsee conference from 1942 demonstrates a severely warped view of history," Lau said in a statement. Wannsee Lake in Berlin is where the Nazis planned the elimination of the Jewish people.

Israeli and Jewish leaders do not directly blame the church for the Holocaust, the systematic murder of 6 million Jews by the Nazis and their allies during the 1939-45 German occupation of Europe.

Still, the role some Catholics played in helping to carry out the genocide, the church's silence and the ideological succor the Nazis drew from the church's voluminous anti-Jewish doctrines -most repudiated only in the years after the Holocaust -have led to deep-seated skepticism of Vatican statements among Jews.

During the service at St. Peter's Basilica in Vatican City, the pope referred to the Jews in a prayer: "We are deeply saddened by the behavior of those who in the course of history have caused these children of yours to suffer, and asking your forgiveness we wish to commit ourselves to genuine brotherhood."

Lau said he hoped that the pope was reserving his Holocaust apology for his visit to Yad Vashem, Israel's Holocaust memorial.

I hope deeply that the pope of today, whom I appreciate very much for his doings and for his condemning anti-Semitism, will complete the asking of forgiveness next week in Yad Vashem in Jerusalem," Lau told Associated Press Television News.

(Associated Press, March 13, 2000)

___________________________________________________________________

QUESTIONS OF GENERAL INTEREST

QUESTION -Did the Lord make the earth habitable for man and beast in six literal days?

ANSWER -No. There are several "days" mentioned in the Bible -some of 40 years, and a 1,000 years is a day with the Lord. Psa. 90: 4 tells us "For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night." And 2 Peter 3:8 tells us: "But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.'"

But let us not reason that the earth, beasts and man were created in 6,000 years. That, too, is far too short a time for this great work. Then how can we figure it? Each day was the same length, so That Servant gave us the Truth on the matter in Volume 6, Chapter One. For details we can look it up. For now, the answer is that each day with the Lord in this instance was 7,000 years long.

So we don't want to make a case for Science by contending that the earth was made habitable in Six Literal Days. We agree with scientists that six literal days is a ridiculous assumption. Another reason for not believing it was six literal sun days, the Sun, Moon and Stars were not made until the 4th day (Gen. 1:14-19).

The Lord calls as a Day many periods of different lengths of years. The 40 years in the wilderness is called a day by God; the Day of Vengeance (which is many years), Jer. 46:10; the Day of Calamity, Jer. 46:21; the Day of Trouble, which is upon us now, Jer. 51:2. We do not know how long this Day of Trouble will be and probably will not know until its end.

QUESTION -Do you believe That Servant's chronology?

ANSWER -We believe all his Bible Chronology that is verified by the signs of the times.  Many Bible Students believe Brother Russell was That Servant, but don't believe all he taught. We believe what he taught when it is supported by the Bible. His Bible Chronology for 1874, 1914, etc., was supported by the signs of the time. However, there is one event for 1874 that hasn't been fulfilled, and that is the Jubilee. The completion of the Jubilee period is still future, and we will have to wait and see if his chronology of that is correct. Some speculate on that, which is all right, but we will know only when it is fulfilled if his prediction is correct.

He announced that the Kingdom was set up September 21, 1914 in Reprint 5632. This was in harmony with his teaching that the Harvest was a 40-year period. We find this in his book What Pastor Russell Said, as well as the six volumes. He gives this in The Time is at Hand and others of the six volumes. Do the Lord's people believe he gave that date from his own ideas or from Bible chronology? We do not believe That Servant would treat God's people in such a way.

___________________________________________________________________

IN MEMORY OF HERMANN BEZNER

Hermann Bezner, Emek Ha Shalom, Yokneam, Israel, died January 8th, 2000; he was 99 years old. He was born in Besigheim, Germany, and was already as a young man interested in the teachings of Charles T. Russell, an Early American Christian Zionist. Pastor Russell then was the leader of the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. This was before the Society changed his teachings under a new leader, J. F. Rutherford, who founded Jehovah's Witnesses in 1931.

Hermann followed Romans 12: 1 and consecrated himself unto death with Christ. He knew that we now live in the seventh Millennium after Adam was created and that during this Millennium Christ's Kingdom shall be established beginning with Israel in Palestine.

Pastor Russell and his followers criticized the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church, who supported Adolf Hitler and the National-socialists. Particularly they criticized the Doctrine of transubstantiation. Hermann and his twin brother as followers of Charles Russell had to flee. Hermann fled to Austria, where he hid himself for seven years at a small mountain farm. His brother stayed behind and was killed by the National socialists. Hermann started a supermarket in Vienna after the war.

Hermann, who had dedicated his life to Christ and Christ's Kingdom beginning with Israel, bought in 1962 land just south of Mount Carmel, where he believed the hills of Ephraim lay. There he and his helper, Joseph Elisha, laid out the beautiful farm, Emek Ha Shalom. He and Joseph wanted to show how beautiful Israel could be, when cultivated with love and care.

People in thousands came to Emek Ha Shalom to listen to Hermann who spoke of Daniel 12: 1: "and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was ... " He knew that Christ has given His perfect human vital energy to mankind, and therefore will not be a human being any more. He also spoke of the future Israel. All his listeners will remember his nice big painting, where beasts of prey dwelt with the lamb, which means that in the future men of wolf-like disposition shall not any more be allowed to live on people of lamb-like disposition as now usually is the case in churches and sects.

Everyone passing the main gate of the farm was met by a picture which reminded of Isaiah 2:4: "and they shall beat their swords into plowshares ... " Hermann was indeed a founder of a Valley of Peace.

We his friends in Sweden shall remember Hermann with gratitude and honour the memory of him.

(Anders Karlen and Leif Malmkvist)

Stockholm, January 15, 2000.

We join with Anders Karlen and Leif Malmkvist in their love and appreciation of Hermann Bezner. We are sure that God in His tender mercy for Hermann will reward him according to his faithfulness.

___________________________________________________________________

"IN THE VALLEY OF 'THE SHADOW"

BROTHER EDWARD M. BURKE, Sr. finished his course Friday, February 4, 2000, born March 28, 1922. He was with the U.S. Naval Intelligence in World War Two: attended Dartmouth Co11ege in Office and Training Program: attended the Rollins College class of '49 as Captain of the Tennis Team: attended University of Miami '49, '51 (law). Ed Burke, after a previous stint, returned as Vice President and General Manager of the Forsgate Country Club. His career for the past few years before he came to his home in Eustis, was as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Deer Creek Country Club.

Survivors are Sister Betty and their son, Edward M. Burke, Jr., and brothers, Robert Burke and Thomas Burke of New York, and sisters, Marie Penicko and Eileen Schmidt, of New York.

Brother Burke was coming to the Bible Study of Epiphany Bible Student Ass'n for some time before he became ill, and even after he became too ill to attend he kept up with the lessons. Such brethren cannot be replaced. After he learned there was no cure for his illness he said, "I don't know how much time I have, but I want to do good as long as I live." He often said he was happier than he had ever been. We loved him and mourn with his family. Everybody loved him that knew him well.               

He is now "asleep in Jesus" awaiting the resurrection of the Just (Acts 24:15), and will be one of the "princes in all the earth" (Psa. 45:16) in the Kingdom.

NO. 515 EPIPHANEIA - APOKALYPSIS

Frequently the question still comes to us: Is there an Apokalypsis as a special period of time here in the end of the Age? Those of our readers who are informed in Epiphany Truth are fully convinced that the Bible does clearly define an Epiphaneia as a special period of time in the end of this Age, which we hope to clarify later in this paper. This Epiphaneia could also be designated the Apokalypsis, because both words as an act and as a period of time are synonymous; but the Scriptures that definitely reveal this period contain the word Epiphaneia in the original. Thus, we are more meticulously adhering to Bible designation when we use the word Epiphaneia, rather than Apokalypsis, when we discuss this period.

However, before proceeding to further analysis of our subject, we would stress that there are no clear Scriptures at all that outline an Apokalypsis as a special period of time following the Epiphaneia - just none at all! As stated, we could label the Epiphaneia, the last special period of the Gospel Age, the Apokalypsis as a secondary appellation. However, whichever designation we accept, the two are concurrent, inseparably linked together; they are decidedly not two different periods of time.

As an act, and as a period of time, Epiphaneia and Apokalypsis do have the same application - although they are not synonymous in the strict sense of the word. Many translators give Epiphaneia as bright shining, forth shining, uncovering, etc.; whereas, they offer revelation as the meaning of Apokalypsis. Viewed critically, it is impossible to have one without the other, which explains why they are synonymous as an act and as a period of time. Thus, it requires the bright shining to produce the revelation. For instance, the Book of Revelation, the last book of the New Testament, has been with us since the Apostle John wrote it; but it cannot possibly be understood - revealed, uncovered - until the bright shining (Epiphaneia) makes it clear. While Martin Luther saw the explanation for some parts of Revelation, other parts of it he could not possibly understand because the bright shining had not arrived to reveal it - in the "due time." Just one instance: The 1260 days (1260 literal years) of the Beast (Rev. 13:5) could not possibly be clear to him because those years did not end until 1799 (and prophecy cannot be understood in detail until it has been fulfilled, or is in process of fulfillment) - when the Pope's power was broken by Napoleon - about 250 years after Luther's death.

Thus, it will be seen that the bright shining and the revelation have continued in limited measure throughout the Gospel Age; and there is also an Epiphaneia - or Apokalypsis - designated as a special period of time here in the end of the Age; but it cannot truthfully be stated that there is a special Apokalypsis period apart from the Epiphaneia - or the Epiphany, as we call it. For instance, 2 Timothy 4:1 says, "The Lord Jesus shall judge the quick and the dead at His appearing [Epiphaneia] and kingdom [Basileia]." There is no mention of His judging in the Apokalypsis, as a period apart from the Epiphaneia. And all Bible Students will surely admit that we are yet in the judging period of the elect and of the world - the world in the sense of the "judgments of the nations [not individuals]." Regardless of how little time that judging would consume, it must be evident that it is nevertheless a special period of time. And, again, "That wicked one whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness [Epiphaneia] of His coming [Parousia]." (2 Thes. 2:8) Here is a statement concerning the time and method of Antichrist' s destruction. It also clearly sets forth a period of time for the Epiphany here in the end of the Age, the time in which we are now living.  There are no such Scriptures anywhere to designate an Apokalypsis apart from the Epiphaneia as a period of time; but, granted that there were, we must self-evidently still be in the Epiphaneia because Antichrist is still with us.   Thus the Epiphaneia must continue until that destruction occurs; and, since it is one of the special features of the Time of Trouble, it should also be apparent that the Epiphaneia and the Time of Trouble are identical; the one cannot end until the other ends. But nowhere in the Bible are these things declared regarding an Apokalypsis apart from the Epiphaneia as a period of time.

In corroboration of the aforegoing, we offer the following from E-4-15, bottom and top of page 16: "The words epiphaneia and apokalypsis, in the sense of an action, and in the sense of a period, are synonymous... There has been a gradual epiphanizing, revealing, ever since 1874 to the Church; but, so far as the world and the Great Company are concerned, this has gradually been going on since the tribulation began in 1914; and will increase and finally come to a climax at the end of the Epiphany - the end of the Time of Trouble. This is the reason why the Time of Trouble is EMPHATICALLY the Epiphany, the Apokalypsis, for it clearly with more distinctness than the preceding period manifests pertinent persons, principles and things."

And this "manifesting" is certainly true of those "pertinent persons" who once accepted the above teaching, but have now departed from it - whether in whole or in part - because that is the Truth today the same as it was the Truth when it was written sixty years ago. The Epiphany Messenger had sound foundation for his teaching of the Epiphany and the Time of Trouble as an identical period of time. It was given him and us by the Parousia Messenger - That Servant. But the would-be teachers of today have no sound foundation for their "New Views" from either Messenger - no hint of another period from either Messenger, and no hint of an "extended" Basileia overlapping to include three major features of the Epiphany, or the Time of Trouble.

EPIPHANEIA-APOKALYPSIS IDENTICAL

The word epiphaneia occurs six times in the New Testament - translated five times as appearing, and once as brightness, the latter occurring in 2 Thes. 2:8. The other five texts are 1 Tim. 6:14; 2 Tim. 1:10; 4:1; 4:8 and Titus 2:13. Aside from 2 Tim. 1:10 (which refers to the First Advent), all other five occurrences refer to the Second Advent and the Time of Trouble. In the sense of the second period of our Lord's Second Advent it is limited to the time between the Parousia and the Basileia. It is used to designate the period of the great tribulation, the Time of Trouble. Remembering that the epiphaneia and the apokalypsis are one and the same time and that this period is for the benefit of the world and the Great Company, we can readily see that the Scriptures teach that the Epiphany, as a period, is the Time of Trouble. (See E-4, page 21, par. 14)

Another Scripture relative to our subject is 2 Thes. 1:7,8: "The Lord Jesus shall be revealed [apokalypsed, uncovered by the epiphaneia, bright shining] from Heaven with His mighty angels [the agents whereby He will wreck the present order - the main agent being the "sea," the lawless elements of society] in flaming fire [fire in the Bible generally designates destructive forces - See Dan. 7:11], taking vengeance on them that know not God [the Second Deathers in the Nominal Church], and [on them] that obey not the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ [the Second Deathers in the Truth Movements] " That this is still future, but a part of the Epiphaneia period is further revealed by 2 Pet. 3:7, Dia.: "The present Heavens and the Earth [the present social order], by the same word, are treasured up, being kept for fire to a day of judgment and destruction of impious [second-death] men." All such are to be eliminated in the approaching, but still future, holocaust of destruction - the "flaming fire" of this Epiphaneia.

Further corroboration of the same is to be found in Zech. 12:9,10, wherein is described the Lord's epiphanizing of Himself to Israel: "It shall come to pass in that day that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem [in the end of the second phase of Jacob's Trouble - Zech. 12:1-8; Ezek. 38 and 39] and I will pour upon the house of David and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem the spirit of grace and of supplication, and they shall look upon Me whom they have pierced [Rev. 1:7]; and they shall mourn for it [for having pierced Him at Calvary]." All Truth people recognize at once that this passage refers to the end of Jacob's trouble, and that it proves our Lord’ s revelation of Himself to Israel as their long rejected Messiah. Hence these two verses   prove that the Time of Trouble and the Epiphany are identical. By the above passages we have proved that the Epiphany began with the War in 1914, will progress through Revolution, and will end with Anarchy and Jacob's trouble. Its beginning, progressing and ending with the Time of Trouble demonstrates its identity with the Time of Trouble.

TIMELY QUOTATIONS FROM THAT SERVANT

Note now the following from That Servant on the Epiphaneia under the sub-heading of PAROUSIA FIRST - EPIPHANY AND APOKALUPSIS FOLLOW: "In its light we can now see that our Master will be present for a time, in the Harvest time of this Age - invisibly present doing a work in His Church, before any outward sign or revealing to the world takes place. His work in His Church will be the separating of the true from the merely nominal - the 'wheat' from the 'tares.' His revealing will be in the 'flaming fire' the great Time of Trouble with which this Age will close, and in which the 'tares' shall cease to be tares'… Another parable also shows that before revealing Himself in any manner to the world, He calls first His own servants and reckons with them. (Luke 19: 15-2 7) . . . Nor can any but the few hear and appreciate the evidences, or understand the Master' s words that as the world knew not in the days of Noah, even thus shall it be in the presence of the Son of Man (Matt. 2 4: 37) - they shall. know not, and the ordinary avocations of daily life shall continue, until disturbed by the commotion and trouble of the EPIPHANEIA, the APOKALUPSIS of the King in the pouring out of the seven last plagues - when the judgments of the Lord shall be abroad in the earth and the inhabitants of the world shall learn righteousness." (February 15, 1902, Reprints 2956-2957)

Haven't the "commotions of this Epiphany period disturbed the ordinary avocations of daily life"? Certainly it is self-evident that the world since 1914 - the beginning of the Epiphaneia, the Time of Trouble - now is most cognizant of a great change. Often do we hear the remark that we are in a "Time of Trouble" since 1914, even by those who have no concrete knowledge of present truth. But those who have departed from the Truth on the Epiphaneia and the Apokalupsis, the Time of Trouble as given us by That Servant, manifest that they are no longer faithful to the Truth that once sanctified them. That Servant clearly and distinctly differentiates between the reaping feature (the Parousia) and the Time of Trouble (the Epiphaneia). Thus, in casting aside these Scriptural teachings, they teach error mixed with Truth - such as teaching the High Calling still open (after the trouble has disturbed the world in general) - or inventing non-existent classes, replacing the Truth with their errors.

And here is something else from That Servant's pen: "The fact also that so many have been thus accepted since 1878 seems to imply that there has been a considerable vacancy in the list of the elect, and that it is gradually filling up. It is not for us to say how much of a vacancy remains, or just when it will be filled. We fully believe, however, that it will be filled before the close of the 'Times of the Gentiles,' which we think will end with October, 1914." (January 15, 1913, Reprint 5168, col. 2, par. 7)

Yet, despite the signs of the time, and the evidence all about us that we are in the Great Tribulation, the Epiphaneia, the Time of Trouble, since 1914, we have brethren today teaching that the High Calling is still open. If we are to accept the teaching that the High Calling is still available for newcomers, then we must accept that just about all the Very Elect prior to 1914 lost their crowns in order to make room for the "large crowd" immersed since then in the various groups that in 2000 still teach such to their candidates.

WANDERING FROM THE TRUTH

In James 5:19, Dia., the Apostle speaks of some who "wander from the Truth"; and his language is probably motivated by the various wanderings from the Truth of fleshly Israel in their journey from Egypt to Canaan. The first wandering from the Truth - the one most dominant in determining their destiny - was the Truth brought by the two spies, Joshua and Caleb, when they returned from "spying out the land of Canaan." (See Num. 13 and 14) Instead of accepting the Truth from these two, they chose rather to hearken to the false and discouraging report of the ten spies. And that rejection of the Truth, resulted in their wandering in the wilderness for forty years - a year for each day of the spying activity. (Num. 13:25; 14:34) And let us keep in mind that during that forty years of wilderness wandering every male of twenty years old and upward (Num. 14:29; 1:45; 26:64), who had left Egypt, died - all except two - Joshua and Caleb. Only those two passed over Jordan into Canaan - a very "little flock" indeed when compared with the "great company" who died in the wilderness.

In addition to the rejection of that first and all-important truth, the Jews made further secondary wanderings from the Truth, five of these being clearly defined by St. Paul in 1 Cor. 10:6-10. And the Apostle states in verse 11 that those wanderings from the truth "happened unto them for ensamples" - "types," see margin. With this direct statement before us that those things were "types," it is only logical and proper that we should make search for their antitypes.

It would seem the first of these occurred in the Jewish Harvest - when the Lord, the Apostles, the Seventy and others made diligent and truthful search of the Gospel Age Canaan land, the same being a type of the sphere of the Truth and the spirit of the Truth. But there in that first antitype again it was only a very "little flock" who accepted the Truth. In doing "among them the works which none other man did" - miracles never before seen in Israel - our Lord had influenced only about 500 (1 Cor. 15:6) to full belief - a very "little flock" when compared to the thousands of unbelievers in Israel who rejected Him. There the "great company" of Jews listened to the evil report of the Scribes and Pharisees - (just as it is today), with the resultant "wandering Jew" (almost the entire race) during the 1845-year "double" of the Gospel Age.

Concurrently with the Jewish wandering, there was also a Christian wandering - likewise prompted by "wandering from the Truth." The Lord had told them He would come again to establish His Kingdom; His followers should await His return. Instead, they, too, became weary of waiting, believed the false report that they should establish the Kingdom. The result was Great Babylon, the "great company" falling in the Gospel Age wilderness "wandering," with only the faithful "little flock" entering goodly Canaan land (the Truth and the spirit of the Truth).

PRESENT-DAY WANDERINGS

Then came the Parousia in 1874, and with it a more intensive spying of the land (the sphere of the Truth and the spirit of the Truth) than probably ever before; at least more so than at any time since the Jewish Harvest. And by the end of those forty years we believe it requires little argument that once more it was the "little flock" that abode by the Truth, with the "great company" listening to false spying reports. When That Servant died, spiritual bedlam followed immediately; and, regardless of how we view any particular group, it should be apparent to all that much confusion prevails. And, self-evidently, that confusion has brought with it intensified and multiplied sorrows. Compared in retrospect with the Parousia, the symbolic carcasses of the "great company" of Spiritual Israel are in evidence on all hands in this Epiphany "wandering."

But, while it is proper that we note the decay in the world's affairs, our main concern is with those who "wander from the Truth." Clearly enough, this could refer only to those once "in the Truth," the same being the various individuals among Truth groups who have fallen prey to false leadership, thus believing the report of the ten false spies. Most prominent among these in recent years are those once claiming to be in the Epiphany Truth, but who have "wandered" from it by casting aside completely this Epiphany period - or "perverting" it by combining it now with the Basileia. And for all of these - except for those who become completely reprobate - we may anticipate the eventual antitype of Num. 14:1: "the people wept that night." This weeping is mostly still future, of course, but we may rest in the faith of its eventual occurrence.

CHARACTER BLEMISHES NOT SUFFICIENT FOR JUDGMENT

We are cautioned not to condemn our brethren for their conduct insofar as their human frailties are concerned (unless grossly and persistently immoral - having become completely demoralized) - since it is only God who can read the heart, and can make the proper allowance and judgment for that. But when any "wander from the Truth" that once sanctified them, we can then know that the Lord knows there is something wrong with their hearts, their characters, otherwise He wouldn’t' permit them to "wander" thusly. But with some of the Lord's people, they do just the reverse of this: If a brother or sister is courteous and refined, and lovable in their human natural characteristics, they are very generous toward them - even when they "wander from the Truth"; while at the same time not having the proper love and regard they should for others who haven't "wandered from the Truth" - who often have crude manners and many human frailties that are trialsome to others (even though they seek to "continue in His Word" insofar as they are able) . These things ought not to be! Certainly many of the misleaders (of the Truth and its Arrangements) have been men of fine deportment, and good secular education, otherwise they wouldn't have been able to establish the errors they have, and lead others astray. But if we are to "abide in His Word," we are to rate our brethren by their faithfulness, or unfaithfulness, according to the "faith once delivered unto the saints." Quite a few brethren went along with JFR's errors, being unable to "discern between Truth and Error," until he became offensive in his morals. Then, they, too, forsook him!

That Servant tells us in the September 1, 1916 Watch Tower, Reprint 5949, top, col. 1: "Let us remember, too, that God has promised to keep and guide the minds of those whose hearts are loyal and true to Him. We should therefore conclude that if the Lord is thrusting any one out of the light as unworthy of it, into the outer darkness of the world, if He is permitting unfaithful ones to be seduced by the great enemy … We are to remain with the Lord and those who are walking in the light ... When the Lord has put any out of the light (Matt. 22:13), we cannot hope to bring them back." And more from his pen: "However, none are ever permitted to be overcome who have not in some way been unfaithful to the Truth and hence unworthy of it. Upon all such God has said He would send the strong delusion, so that they shall believe a lie (2Thes. 2:11). 

Let us bear in mind, however, that there are many Youthful Worthies who have never received the Truth about their class, and it could not properly be said that they have "wandered from the truth" - the truth they never possessed. But those Youthful Worthies who have had the beneficent teachings and leadership of the Epiphany Messenger and who renounce and cast Epiphany truth aside can truly be said to have "wandered from the Truth." And the same can be said of the Great Company in Big Babylon: They never had Harvest Truth, although they are held accountable for not receiving it if they had the opportunity. But with those crown-losers who did receive the Truth during the Harvest, they have certainly "wandered from the truth" when they deny that we are in the Epiphaneia - the Time of Trouble - a new dispensation since 1914, as described by That Servant. And those leaders who have thus "wandered from the Truth" have contaminated the Youthful Worthies under their leadership. These Youthful Worthies will have to cleanse themselves of this contamination and errors in their "due time," but certainly they are less culpable than those Epiphany-enlightened Youthful Worthies who have "wandered from the Truth" on such a class to be won "from 1881 until Restitution sets in"- and those Youthful Worthies who have cast aside completely the truth on Youthful Worthies. (See E-4-337, 342)

For emphasis we reiterate the fact that all the males of twenty years and upward who had left Egypt died in the forty-years' wandering in the wilderness - all except two, Caleb and Joshua. Thus, only those two of all those adult male Israelites who left Egypt, were the only ones who actually inherited goodly Canaan land; and of the Israelites who eventually did come into that good station all - except two - were an entirely new generation. This then now forces us to the conclusion that the great majority of Youthful Worthies who are now in the "wandering" process will also die from their Class standing in the antitypical wilderness, making a vacancy for a new generation to attain that Class standing and replace those "wandering" Israelites. We further emphasize, however, that those Youthful Worthies who have not received the truth on their class standing cannot be referred to as "wandering" from that truth which they have not received.

Even without the type this should be readily apparent to the critical observer from the fact that so many of them now have so little of the Truth, and the spirit of the Truth, that once sanctified them - especially the Truth on Youthful Worthy opportunity. Many have forsaken the Truth that Youthful Worthies can be won "until Restitution sets in," and are now substituting a "consecrated" (?) class in the Camp to supplant them, in this Epiphany period when the Highway of Holiness is not available - and a "way" (Christ' s merit applied for the world) to enter it; and some have forsaken the Truth altogether on Youthful Worthies, now believing they are of the Little Flock, and that the High Calling is still open - all the while claiming strict adherence to That Servant's teaching, although openly admitting to repudiating the Epiphany Messenger and Epiphany Truth . That the Parousia Messenger taught such a class, and that the Epiphany Messenger merely elaborated on that class, is indisputable and very clear to all who have received the Truth "in the love of the Truth." However, we believe there are many Youthful Worthies in the various groups who haven't been taught the Truth on their class standing.

While the Ancient Worthies are now unchangeably fixed as to class and numbers, we know of nothing in the Scriptures that declares their number fixed before the last one - John the Baptist - was established in their ranks. Eventually their number may be revealed.

Furthermore, Brother Russell was emphatic in his statement that the Epiphany period is the Time of Trouble (and surely there are very few who cannot see that we are in the "Time of Trouble"); and it was stressed that its duration would be from 1914 to the end of Jacob' s Trouble - which is the period between the Parousia and the Basileia.

"Now, thanks be to that God, who always leads us forth to triumph with the Anointed One, and who diffuses by us the fragrance of the knowledge of Him, in every place. Because we are a sweet odor of Christ to God, among those who are being saved, and among. those who are perishing [those who are "wandering' from the Truth] …and for these things who is qualified? For we are not like the many, trafficking the Word of God; but really from sincerity, and as from God, in the presence of God, we speak concerning Christ." (2 Cor. 2:14-17, Dia.)

(John J. Hoefle, No. 334, April 1983

___________________________________________________________________

AMERICAN JEWS ARE SITTING ON A TIME BOMB

During my recent speaking tour of the United States, one of the key issues I discussed was the alleged "peace process." During a particularly lively and responsive exchange at a synagogue in Houston my audience proved itself to be very serious in analyzing my presentation. If the process in which we are now engaged is, as I state, a process of surrender which will not result in peace, rather in a war which we are making easier for our enemies to win, then what is the alternative? I assured my audience that I am not a proponent of war. Living in Israel with my family I have a more urgent desire for peace there than they do. What I refuse to do, however, is lie to myself and pretend that we are making peace when all we are doing is digging our own graves. We do not have a choice between war and peace. Our choice is to risk war now by not surrendering to our enemies, or to delude ourselves by engaging in pre-emptive surrender and calling it a 'peace process."

The fact is that the Arab war to destroy the Jewish State has never ended. All of the Arab states, including Egypt, and Jordan, continue to plot our destruction. All that has changed is the method.  This is no secret and anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear knows this fact. In spite of this leaders of the Jewish State continue to negotiate the terms of our self destruction with those of our enemies who are prepared to sit with us.  The PLO Trojan Horse has been pulled inside our borders. The only reason that illegitimate entity even agrees to continue to talk with us is the fact that such talk results in clear and measurable military advantages for it. Once these advantages come to a halt, so will the "peace" talks. There is not a shred of hope that our having given recognition to the PLO as having autonomous rights, or even recognizing a PLO state, will result in as much as mitigating its plans to destroy Israel. Yet our leadership still talks of "final- status," limiting our own rights to build homes in our country, and giving away more of our homeland to Arafat. These are all reckless and desperate gestures to convince ourselves that we are making peace with our enemies, even as they mock us. And now, the latest "news" is that Assad is prepared to continue discussing peace with Israel without demanding all of the Golan Heights as a precondition. He will permit us to give it to him after he graciously sits at the table with us. And Israel is delighted at this new expression of willingness to compromise.

One fellow in Houston, after clearly being disturbed by my assertion, asked me if my wife and I are prepared to defend ourselves. After all, he reasoned, if there will be an all out war in Israel, the army will be busy defending the borders and we will have no choice but to defend ourselves against the PLO.  Quite frankly, I found the question a cynical one and I told him so. The implication was that to stand up to our ·enemies is a reckless idea which will place us in danger. Yet by surrendering in advance of war we are not making ourselves safer, rather making the war to come that much more difficult to win.

Another problem with 'his question was the implication that I am courting danger merely by living in Kiryat Arba. I could have told this fellow that my apartment doesn't have a fancy electronic alarm system, nor do we lock or bar our doors at night as is common practice in Houston. What is more, I could easily have turned his question back to him. Are he and his wife prepared to defend their lives and property when the local anti semites go on a rampage in reaction to some unpredictable calamity which they may choose to blame on Jews, as has been done to our people throughout the ages in nearly every country in the world?

The fact is that, despite the stupidity and stupendous blunders of my foolish leadership, Israel is still, and will always be, the safest place in the world for Jews to live. The troubles we have here are of our own making. We do not have to tolerate terror. Rather than rewarding our enemies by giving them land, army bases, weapons and money, we should have vanquished them. It is we who are responsible for creating new havens for terror and for encouraging its continuation by having rewarded those evil deeds. It is also in the power of Jewish leaders in Israel to correct their mistakes and make our homeland safe for Jews to live. Perhaps if more sensible and activist Jews would come home and participate in shaping our destiny here we could affect a change in how we deal with our enemies.

But such is not the case in the United States. In that country we are a tiny minority. We are a highly visible minority which, as has always been the case, is very convenient as a scapegoat upon which to blame problems which have no obvious address. I remember reading bumper stickers years ago during the oil crisis in the United States, when gasoline was rationed for a while. The sticker read, "Burn Jews not oil." And that was nearly thirty years ago. Today there are many potential crises which can explode overnight and ignite a huge wave of anti semitic violence. A Jew who sits and worries about an unsafe Israel while being oblivious to the time bomb upon which he is sitting in his seemingly safe home in the United States is only deceiving himself and recklessly endangering himself and his loved ones.

Baruch HaShem, I live in Israel. Yes, my wife and I both have licensed handguns to protect ourselves, although we almost never feel the need to carry them. It is dangerous to live in a country where our government grants rights to terrorists. But it is a Jewish country. Even our most extreme leftists are still our brothers. We have tremendous problems to overcome among our own people. But all of us, left and right, religious and secular, are all in the same boat. The Arab terrorist doesn't care about our political affiliation or whether or not we put on tefillin in the morning.  He will murder us simply because we are Jewish, as did Hitler and Haman. When the war breaks out, as always our common threat will unite us.  And we are in our homeland.

But what of the Jew living in Exile? He too has problems among his own people. He too will discover that common threats will unite him with his brothers in Exile. But outside of Israel, where he is a tiny minority, even his unity is of little value. It is only in his homeland where it can save him. As one who was born and raised in the United States I certainly do not seek to condemn that country. It has been a place of refuge for many people and afforded incredible opportunities to my people. Its founding principles were even based upon Biblical concepts.  It is not to criticize America that I say these things. What I am addressing is the reality of Jewish history and Jewish destiny. There is only one destiny for the Jewish people and that is the Land of Israel. Redemption is a concept whose time has come. G-d has given a special gift to each and every Jew. It is the ability for us to express our faith in Him in very real terms. Right now, by making plans to come home while it is strictly our choice to do so, we can demonstrate to Him our faith and love. Soon this gift will be taken from us in that we will be taken out of the exile by force, or perish therein and lose that ability to express our faith. No one knows exactly when this will happen. But it is clear that redemption is progressing. Our rabbis ask the question, "Who is wise?' and they answer, "He who sees the future." Certainly our rabbis were not referring to fortune tellers. They were referring to people with common sense who can recognize the consequences of their actions. To pretend that our future outside of the Land of Israel is limitless is to lie to ourselves and put our families in unnecessary danger. To be wise is to realize that redemption is rapidly unfolding before our eyes, and that the future of the Jewish People is only in the Land of Israel.

(By Gary M. Cooperberg, A Voice from Hebron, December 9, 1999)

___________________________________________________________________

QUESTION OF GENERAL INTEREST

QUESTION - A TV Evangelist said that he would be happy to see God when he dies and goes to heaven, although he was afraid to face God. Is this proper?

ANSWER - No, it is not proper for us to be afraid of God.  We should have supreme reverence for God and be fearful of displeasing Him by intentional wrongdoing.  Fear in the Bible has two meanings - one meaning reverence and one meaning fearful, being afraid. The Evangelist does not "rightly divide the word of truth" (2 Tim. 2:15) Had he consulted a Concordance for the meaning of "fear" in the text he quoted, he could have given the correct interpretation of "fear."

"For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God; but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ." (2 Cor. 2:17) God does not frighten people into serving Him as many have taught. All who love Him must have fear (filial reverence) for Him. He is a God of Love, Justice, Wisdom and Power, and plenteous in mercy. "But thou, 0 Lord, art a God full of compassion, and gracious, longsuffering, plenteous in mercy and truth." (Psa. 86:15)

___________________________________________________________________

LETTER OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Emily:

Joseph Elisha committed suicide October 25, 1999, and Leif Malmkvist arrived at Emek Ha Shalom October 31st the same year to take care of things. He was helped by some friends of the truth. He stayed to November 26.

January 9th, 2000, Leif Malmkvist got an E-mail from the Mayor Haim Hakim, Megiddo, with the following message: "I am sorry to inform you that on Saturday 8.1.2000 early in the morning Mr. Herman Bezner passed away. Mr. Bezner died in the house for the elderly in kibbutz Hazorea. Mr. Bezner will be buried in Haifa cemetery on Monday 10.1.2000 at 15.00 hour.  This is the same cemetery were Mr. Joseph Elisha was buried." Leif Malmkvist and I have written the enclosed notice "In memory of Hermann Bezner." [This will be published in our May paper.]

All the best and many kind regards.                              Your friend, Anders Karlen                           (SWEDEN)

NO. 514 SOME THOUGHTS FOR THE MEMORIAL

"And it came to pass when the time was come that He should be received up, he steadfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem." (Luke 9:51)

As the passion of our Beloved Lord comes once more acutely to our attention because of "the cross," it is well that we meditate again upon The Apostle Paul’s words in Hebrews 12:3, Dia.: "Consider him attentively who has endured such opposition from sinners, so that you may not be wearied, being discouraged in your souls."

The annual observance of our Lord's death occurs this year after six P.M., April 17. We will celebrate at 2501 Morningside Drive, Mount Dora, Florida and we invite all of like mind to join us.

The Bible is very positive on the subject of the proper date for observing this sacred event: "And ye shall keep it up [the lamb] until the fourteenth day of the same month; and the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it in the evening.'' (Ex. 12:6) From this clear statement it should be readily clear that the condition of the moon is by no means a determining factor. The only consideration of the moon is to determine Nisan 1; and once that is established, then it is fourteen days until the observance should be held. Nisan 1 is established by the moon which becomes new nearest the Spring Equinox - unless that moon would date the "remembrance" before the Vernal Equinox - in which case the new moon of the following month should be used. Never before the Vernal Equinox is a hard and fast rule determined by both Brother Russell and Brother Johnson.

To memorialize our Lords death means to observe the memory of it, as the word indicates.  The ritual for this memorial was established by Jesus Himself as recorded by the various Gospel writers; and we offer the record from Luke 22:19,20: "And Jesus took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, saying, This is my body which is given for you; this do in remembrance of me. Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is of the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. "According to the Matthew account, when Jesus gave them the cup He said, "Drink all of you out of it.'' (Matt. 26:27, Dia.) Thus, the drinking out of the one cup emphasized the oneness of those that night, as well as all those throughout the Gospel Age who would partake of it "till he comes. "

Some may inquire whether the Apostle 's statement concerning the Lord's Supper, that it shows forth the Lord's death "till he come" (1 Cor. ll: 26), should not be understood to limit its observance and to make it no longer proper, since we believe that He has come. We answer, No; it will be proper to celebrate our Lord's death and our consecration down to the time when we shall have finished our course by actually dying.

The institution of this service was given after the Passover supper, which the Jews observed each year on Nisan 14 - just as Jesus and the Apostles were doing that night. Even to our time the Jews still observe the Passover once each year, although they are often a day or two off in determining the time; but the orthodox Jews still keep the feast with a solemnity befitting the memory of that awesome night in Egypt, when the Angel of Death passed throughout the land and smote the firstborn in every Egyptian house - from the least to the greatest; but at the same time "passing over" every Jewish house where the blood had been sprinkled on the doorpost and lintel, and none of them were slain that night so long as they remained "under the blood."  There is nothing in the record to indicate that any of them disobeyed that edict that night.

JESUS OUR PASSOVER LAMB

But we are told that “Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us.” However, instead of using the lamb and unleavened bread, we use the symbols that Jesus Himself instituted the night before He died - the unleavened bread and the wine, being substituted for the lamb and bread. Some may object to this course, but there is no record at all that the early Christians ever again used the lamb and bread; it was always the bread and wine!

"It is the Lord's passover" is given for emphasis - not a thing to be regarded shabbily. "Not slothful in business; fervent in spirit; serving the Lord." (Rom. 12:11) Thus were the Jews impressed with the dangers and difficulties of the journey ahead of them - just as the meticulous instructions for the preparation were also vividly lodged in their minds. This same logic is to be seen in the fact that they were to select their lamb on Nisan 10, which would allow them four days of meditation and sober examination, all of which was very strictly followed in the Memorials in the years ensuing, even to the time when Jesus arrived.

In the type the lamb was taken up four days before it was killed; and that was typical of Jesus, the Greater Lamb, presenting Himself to the Jews four days before He was "lifted up." But there was another compelling reason for the four-day interval. That most memorable of nights, when the Angel of Death would "pass over" the Jewish first-born, was not to be approached flippantly or carelessly. As each family took up its own lamb, and removed all leaven from the home, the course of these four days would put them into a proper mental attitude and contrition of heart for that awesome night . And this is well in keeping with St. Paul's words to all who commemorate the antitype; "Let a man examine himself" (1 Cor. 11:28,29) - not five minutes before the service, perhaps in public confessionals; not just an hour before the service; but let each do so in "sincerity and in truth" during the days preceding it.

And this text means exactly what it says; the Lord's people are not to examine each other; each is to examine himself. There are just two reasons why any should be disfellowshipped - gross immorality, or gross doctrinal deflection. Aside from these two reasons, none are to be debarred from the Lord's Memorial. The other position of the text permits reasonable liberty toward all who partake - "he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh condemnation to himself. " The justice of God is grandly demonstrated in St. Paul's words. We may not like the personal habits of others; we may consider them uncouth in appearance, speech, or mannerisms; but we are not to pass judgment upon such to disfellowship them from the Memorial assembly. We may be seated next to such a person; may be acutely cognizant of his limitations in the fruits and graces of the Holy Spirit; but we have the clear assurance that none of that will "rub off" onto us. If we have perhaps been overly liberal in admitting some to that solemn feast, we have the written word that such "eateth and drinketh condemnation to himself. So the matter is pretty much an individual one as regards the general run of human frailties: The Faithful should examine himself; the unfaithful imbibes condemnation to himself. Therefore, we are justified in erring toward the liberal viewpoint, as against too rigid a position.

After giving charge to Israel to keep the Passover, God then gave command for an annual commemoration: "This day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast unto the Lord throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance forever." (Ex. 12:14) Forever meaning age-lasting, the ceremony was to continue each year until the end of the Jewish Age - when the antitype would appear. Here we would emphasize that there was only one Passover - the one in Egypt; in subsequent years its observation was simply a memorial - much the same as we observe birthdays, wedding, anniversaries, etc. In the Memorials the Jews did not sprinkle the lamb's blood on the doorpost because none of them were in danger of dying then.

So also, there was but one antitype - "Christ our Passover"; the bread and the wine once each year being merely a Memorial of Him who perished on the cross.  And as the Memorial of the typical Passover was to be celebrated once each year, so the antitypical Memorial is to be celebrated once each year.

Following the institution of the Supper which memorializes His death, Jesus and His disciples sang a hymn, and then went out of the city to the Mount of Olives opposite - a distance of perhaps a mile. Apparently several important lessons were given to the disciples enroute to Gethsemene.  These St. John's Gospel records in Chapters 15-17.

The word Gethsemene signifies an oil press - a name that is full of significance. When we remember that Jews used the oil of the olives both for food and for light, and that Jesus is the Nourisher as well as the Enlightener of the world, we see a special fitness in His having His trying experiences, which almost crushed His soul, in a garden used for the crushing of olives and extracting their oil.

Gethsemene was not a flower garden, but an olive orchard or garden. The supposed site is still carefully preserved. In the garden are some very ancient olive trees. The Garden is supposed to have belonged to some of Jesus' friends; and there is claimed to be some evidence that John Mark, the writer of the Gospel of St. Mark, was the lad who was awakened from his slumbers by the commotion incident in Jesus' arrest and who came forth in his nightgown. (Mark 14:51,52)

Arriving at the Garden, Jesus left eight of the Apostles near the entrance, and went further into its shade with Peter, James and John. All were to watch, to be on guard against something that was to occur, something of which Jesus knew, but which seemed most improbable to the Apostles. They were unable to comprehend the Master' s despondency even though they sympathized with Him.

It was midnight and they were accustomed to retiring early. The strain of the evening, and weighty lessons which the Master had imparted, reacted in drowsiness. They slept, instead of watching and praying. This was true even of the three nearest to the Master.

Wishing to be alone in His communion with the Father, Jesus went a stone's throw farther into the shade by Himself. Time and again, in the agony which came upon Him, He came seeking human sympathy, only to find His dearest ones oblivious in sleep. Well had it been expressed by the Prophet, "Of the people there was none with me." (Isa. 63:3) He trod the winepress of grief alone.

Not until He had finished giving admonitions to His Apostles and had left some to watch at the entrance of the garden, did the Master seem to give special thought to Himself and to the momentous events anticipated within a few hours. As He was leaving His favorite three, He gave utterance to the weight of oppression which seemed suddenly to rest down upon His soul. He exclaimed, "My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death!" (Mark 14:33,34) - I feel as if I would die now, without coming to that great crisis which is before Me. We read that "He was greatly amazed and sore troubled." The Greek is equally strong, signifying utter amazement and anguish, carrying the thought of loneliness, homesickness, and friendlessness.

St Paul assures us that the Master's Gethsemane experiences were linked with fear- not fear of dying, but fear of remaining dead, fear that He would not be accounted of the Father worthy of that glorious resurrection which had been promised to Him on condition of absolute obedience. St. Paul says, "Who in the days of His flesh, when He had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto Him that was able to save Him out of death [by resurrection], was heard in respect to things which He feared. " (Heb. 5:7) He was saved out of death; and more than this, He was given the assurance by the Father that He would be saved out of death.

This is the explanation of the statement that an angel of God appeared to Him in the Garden and strengthened Him - gave Him the assurance from the Father that He had been faithful up to that moment, and that the Divine blessing would be with Him in the hour of trial just at hand. From that moment onward, all the fear and agony were gone. If the Father had approved Him thus far, and if the Father's blessing and smile went with Him, He could endure all things, come what might. Throughout the remainder of that night, and following day, Jesus was the calmest of the calm, under the most trying circumstance.  He comforted those who wept about Him; He committed His mother to the faithful St. John, etc.

"Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of Man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you." (John 6:53)  In this chapter the Lord is addressing the Jews, who believed not on Him, but murmured because He told them He was the true Bread from heaven. His expression, "eat the flesh and drink the blood," had a deep spiritual significance which none but the Israelites Indeed could receive. And this is still true today.  The world, when dealt with in the next age, by Jesus, will indeed have the opportunity to eat of His flesh - to appropriate the merits of His sacrifice; but they will have no opportunity of sharing in His cup - of drinking His blood.  Symbolically, the cup signifies the sacrificed life. The world will have no share in the suffering of Christ, represented in the cup.

"The flesh of the Son of Man" represents restitution to human privileges, i.e., the means to its attainment, and restores to man the life which he had forfeited - the life lost in Adam - human life, earthly life. It will be the gift of God through Christ. But the supplying of this Bread will not be sufficient. The world will need to eat of the Bread and have the assistance the Lord will give them through His Kingdom. Jesus said, "I am the living Bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this Bread he shall live forever." (John 6:51)

The Bread from heaven was our Lord's flesh, which He was to give for the life of the world. And Jesus explains this to be what was typified by the manna that fell in the wilderness. He said, "Your fathers did eat manna [in the wilderness] , and are dead. He that eatheth of this Bread shall live forever." (John 6:49-51) He also said, "Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone, but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit." (John 12:24) And He did fall into the earth and die. And the Church became sharers with Him in His death. They participate in His suffering and death, which the world will never do. They share in its outcome.

Do Youthful Worthies partake of the Lord's Supper? Most certainly they do! They are thankful and appreciative of what our Savior has done for them. They do not "suffer with Christ," nor will they "reign with Christ," - therefore they partake of the wine and bread, symbolizing our Lord's death as the Lamb of God and symbolizing their tentative justification. Their trial is for faith and obedience and not for life as was the saints trial, although they make the same kind of consecration as did the spirit-begotten: "Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger [the unbegotten], as for one of your own country [spirit-begotten]." (Lev. 24:22) Moreover, the Youthful Worthies are tentatively under an Advocate through their Tentative Justification, and are tentatively Sons of God.

When our Lord said, "For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed" (John 6:55), we understand Him to mean that this is the most valuable food and drink ever known. No other bread has such value, and no other drink could be so precious as this.

All the work of the Gospel Age, is the getting ready of the food for the world, and of the blood which will be sprinkled upon them.

At the beginning of the Millennial Age - as soon as the Church is joined to her Head beyond the veil - the blood will be sprinkled to satisfy justice for the world. Then, as the Mediator, Christ will proceed to do a work for all who will receive it. And that work is symbolically represented as sprinkling the people with the blood. In other words, every member of the race will be privileged to come into Covenant relationship with God through the Mediator, by accepting the terms which He will hold forth during the Millennial reign. This is "good tidings of great joy which shall be to all people." (Luke 2: 10) If they meet the requirements during the Messiah• s reign, by the close of that period they will be perfect; and He will present them before the Father, and all who endure faithfully the test then applied, will be received into full covenant relationship with Him.

In order that any of the race of Adam might profit by the sacrifice of Jesus, it was necessary that He should rise from the tomb on the Divine plane of life, that He should ascend to the Father and deposit the sacrificial merit of His death in the hands of justice, and receive from the Father "all power in heaven and in earth." (Matt. 28:18) As related to the world it was necessary also that, in the Father's due time, He should come again to earth, a glorious Divine Being, then to be to the whole world a Mediator, Prophet, Priest and King, to assist back to perfection and to harmony with God all who will avail themselves of the wonderful privileges then to be offered.

It is needless that we seek to dispute as to which was the more important event - the death of Jesus or His resurrection from the dead.  Both were equally important.  Had He not died there would be no basis for a reconciliation of Adam and his race, condemned to death.  Had He not risen there would have been no call of the Church during the Gospel Age to be the Bride of Christ.  Neither would there have been use for the promised Mediatorial Kingdom to be established at His Second Presence for the blessing of Israel and the world.

Be it noted that those who condemned Jesus to the cross were not the "beggarly elements" of that time, not the irreligious; it was the "good" people who were guilty of that - those who would not cross the Gentile door "lest they should be defiled for the feast." (John 18:28) And "As He is, so are we in this world." (1 John 4:17) The heathen Pilate strove to avoid the tragic miscarriage of justice; and it was the High Priest of Israel who "had the greater sin" in the matter. It was those people schooled in the Law, who "sat down and watched Him there" (Matt. 27:36) - watched the tragedy of the cross as the idly curious might watch a street-corner side show - watched the final hours of agony of "the Lord of Glory" with a calloused indifference that would be unbelievable were it not written in the sacred record.

And Jesus knowing in the final hours of that awful night, that He had "finished the work God gave Him to do," (John 17:4) resigned Himself to what was to be. The time for controversy had passed - "now is your hour, and the power of darkness" (Luke 22:53); so He "held his peace." (Matt. 26:63) "No man taketh my life from me; I lay it down of myself." (John 10:18) There is in this a lesson for us, too. The day previous and the day following observance of the Memorial should be a time of calm meditation insofar as lieth in us. If any wish to be contentious at that time, let them go their way for the time being; there will come more suitable occasions to answer such.

As always, we counsel the reading of Brother Russell's treatise on the Passover in Volume 6. We also, suggest the reading of Exodus 12 with Berean Comments five days before the Memorial; then the same with the pertinent writings of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John with Berean Comments. This should be most refreshing and helpful for a "man to examine himself."

With this comes Christian love to all God's people wherever they may assemble. And we offer a prayer for the Lord's nearness and rich blessing in the preparation for, and participation in this coming service. "Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us." (1 Cor. 5:7)

___________________________________________________________________

A POIGNANT IRONY

One of the most poignant ironies in the history of the Christian religion is the close association of astronomers after Copernicus with the Roman Catholic Church, which censored Galileo for the then-heretical view that the sun was the center of the solar system, not the Earth.

This irony is spelled out in numbing detail in an article in The Sciences, which traces the relationship to the Council of Nicaea in A.D. 325. It was there decreed that Easter should be celebrated on the first Sunday after the first full moon after the vernal equinox. You can do this fairly easily, of course, by recognizing the equinox, waiting for the next full moon and celebrating Easter the following Sunday. But a week at most to prepare throughout the world for the celebration obviously isn't enough.

To complicate the issue, the equinox and the full moon don't take place at the same times all around the globe, but having Easter celebrated on many different days wasn't appealing to a church promoting its "unity and universality," as the article put it. So the church calculated the date several years in advance and distributed calendars calling for Easter to be observed on a particular Sunday. The church's calculations were inaccurate and got worse.

So astronomers were called in to calculate the period between vernal equinoxes. They used a meridian line and a hole in a high window or ceiling to mark where the sun touched the line and then counted the days until it touched that same place again. Cathedrals were the only buildings large enough to allow this to be done with any degree of accuracy.

In effect, the church aided the scientific quest that established the sun's position at the center of the solar system, which church dogma denied.

(Winston-Salem Journal, September 3, 1999)

___________________________________________________________________

FROM THE DESK OF THE PRESIDENT

The year was 1947 and Jewish Agency leader David Ben-Gurion faced an almost impossible decision.  All about him were Zionist officials, considering themselves to be pragmatic, urging him to accept the United Nations' partition plan which would grant to the Jews a small and emaciated homeland within the territory of Mandatory Palestine, Vigorously, however, opposing the ceding of any territory to the Arabs, were the others, those who sincerely argued that the emerging Jewish state could never survive within such indefensible borders. Torn between the two camps, Ben-Gurion understood that resting heavily on his shoulders was a fateful dilemma that would effect world events and Jewish history for decades to come.

As it transpired, Ben-Gurion and the Zionist leadership finally opted for the UN's partition plan. In the end they concluded that the declaration of statehood was more crucial than the risk of attempting to return to all parts of the Jewish heartland. In their reasoning, they would accept "half a loaf" from the UN and continue to dream about someday in Israel's future securing for themselves the missing portions of Israel. The opponents, at the time, were bitter in their defeat, yet they necessarily had to develop their own pragmatism and move forward. They declared that they would continue to build upon all the land that Israel received and relentlessly strive, at every juncture, to eventually return to all of Judea, Samaria and Gaza. There was plainly too much work ahead for any notions of despair to be entertained.

Ben-Gurion himself sympathized with this approach and he clarified that accepting the partial territories would never act to abdicate the Jewish historical claim to the entire land: "If we were offered a Jewish state in the western land of Israel in return for our relinquishing the right of the Jewish People over the whole land of Israel, then I would postpone the state. No Jew has the right to relinquish the right of the Jewish People over the whole land of Israel.  It is beyond the powers of any Jewish body.  It is even beyond the power of the whole Jewish People living today to give up any part of the Land of Israel"

If one were to listen to the reports from today's media or the spin put upon the current political situation by other opponents of YESHA, one might begin to believe that the future prognosis for the YESHA settlement was dim and that widespread panic had already set in.  Indeed, newspaper stories assert that YESHA Council leaders are in despair, while the electronic media only provides its viewers with interviews by "men in the street" who believe all is lost. One might be led to believe that matters are bleaker for proponents of settling all of Israel, than those felt even in 1947. However, like much else about the media' s reporting when it concerns Israel, these stories are both inaccurate and maliciously deceptive. They are part of the seemingly never-ending campaign to project a misleading light on the strength and courage of the residents of the YESHA communities.

In my recent ongoing conversations with the leaders of YESHA and reports of our offices form our own sources, quite a different picture emerges.  The morale, spirit and ideological commitment in settlements is still going strong.  ABC, NBC the BBC, CNN and the readers of the New York Times would be surprised to find that there is no evidence of despair.  What might be described as a lack of focused leadership and communication, cannot be categorized as an abandonment of determination or of discouragement by the residents of YESHA communities. Much of the public impression, then that a crisis mood is in place is wholly fabricated and completely unfounded.

Just one example of this can be witnessed in the skewed perceptions of the difficult negotiations with the Barak government over the 42 new neighborhoods which were established in recent months. While the settlement opponents and global media focused on the 15 new neighborhoods that the government had insisted upon dismantling, little coverage was given to the other 32 new neighborhoods, YESHA leaders managed to secure forever. These 32 new neighborhoods were a tremendous victory for YESHA movement, yet the entire episode was universally portrayed as a desperate defeat. Unwilling to acknowledge our success, what one saw depicted on the news instead, was the spectacle of the struggle between the group of students and settlers at the Maon Farm peacefully resisting the Army. Reports and footage of the other residents quietly living in their 32 new neighborhoods and going about their activities was simply never presented.

But as anyone who objectively follows events understands, there have been a great deal of encouraging developments in the YESHA settlement. The 32 newly approved neighborhoods are being integrated into the existing towns and citizens from around Israel are still choosing YESHA as a desirable place to live. New highways and roads, including an important four-lane traffic artery that connects Northern Jerusalem to the Tel Aviv Highway is being completed. These new roads bring hundreds of thousands of Israelis living inside the Green Line into contact with our communities as they more easily commute to work. Many agricultural and infrastructure projects are also being launched. In addition, record numbers of students are studying in YESHA schools and plans to draw hi­ tech industry to such cities as Ariel are being actively promoted.

Still, one must not downplay the seriousness of the events unfolding and concerns over the final status talks. Many issues crucial to the YESHA settlements and to all Israelis still hang in the balance. As the Palestinians continue to voice their demand that Jerusalem is their capital, insistence over the security of cities such as Ma 'aleh Adumim, Pisgat Ze'ev, Ne've Yakov, and Givat Ze'ev are joined with concerns over the future Jewish sovereignty of the Old City. The issue of the fall out from bringing millions of Arab refugees into Gaza is directly connected with the abilities of the Israeli economy to confront its own unemployment problems. Moreover, the matter of withdrawing from YESHA territories now has Israeli scientists and farmers anxious over the much-needed water supplies they are being asked to abandon to the Palestinians. Demands for access to roads and highways by the Arabs increases the threats of terrorism and road safety to Israeli citizens living everywhere.

The Palestinians, today, sharply focus their attention on the behavior and mood of the residents of YESHA, utilizing it as a national barometer. Like the carrion birds of the desert, they circle over the settlement squinting to observe if the media reports of our imminent collapse are true. The Arabs know that if the YESHA leaders, who have always maintained an optimistic and confident frame of mind despite the disasters brought on by the Oslo accords, are staggering in despair, then they have truly succeeded in demoralizing the entire Jewish State. For this reason alone our leaders, rabbis and families are strenuously redoubling their efforts even as the birds of prey circle above. What might be perceived as weakness or fatigue in the settlements could well spread to encouraging and fueling Arab demands in every other issue under negotiation.

Only those who are unaware of the full facts would believe that a mood of hopelessness has set in amongst our camp. Like a torch passed to us by an earlier generation, YESHA's efforts to redeem the entire Land of Israel will vigorously continue. Despite the momentary setbacks, we will strive and persist in our projects to build schools, housing and religious institutions throughout Judea, Samaria and Gaza. In every inch of land under Israeli control we will pursue our renewal activities. Be assured that the residents of these communities have not given up any hope. They understand the historical, religious and security importance of their presence in maintaining this territory.

The turbulent political winds continue to blow but YESHA' s foundation remains strong. Together we can be proud that in the face the dream of Israel a reality.  In addressing a recent One Israel Fund-YESHA event, Member of Knesset Limor Livnat noted that Israel's fortunes were a lot like the stockmarket. "Just as the market goes through its periodic rises and plunges, the Jews also have their ups and downs.  In the near future, however, I for one am confident that Zionism and Israel's stock will again be on the rise very soon."

On behalf of all the YESHA communities I cannot concur more, I ask each and every supporter of our cause to continue to assist us with our renewal efforts in all the Heartland under Israeli control, firm in the knowledge that our efforts         in these territories will hasten and secure the inevitable return to the entire Land of Israel.

(By Steven S. Orlow, National President, One Israel Fund, YESHA, Yesha Report, Dec. 1999)

___________________________________________________________________

QUESTION OF GENERAL INTEREST

QUESTION - The New Testament is written to the Saints, but are there any texts in the New and Old Testaments meant for the world?

ANSWER - It is true that most of the Epistles are written to the Saints: "Beloved of God, called to be saints." (Rom. 1:7) "Unto the church of God ... called to be saints." (1 Cor. 1:2) "To the saints which are at Ephesus." (Eph. 1:1) "To all the saints which are at Philippi." (Phil. 1:1) "To the saints which are at Colosse." (Col. 1:2)

Thus it is clear that the New Testament is mostly for "the Saints." However, there is mention of other elect classes. For instance, Chapter 11 of Hebrews, which gives a long list of the Ancient Worthies. Also, Heb. 12:23 speaks of "just men made perfect." That Servant applies this to the Ancient Worthies, but we believe it must include the Youthful Worthies, since they are to be associated with the Ancient Worthies in the earthly Kingdom.

But the Apostle Paul addresses the world in general in his statement in Acts 3:19: "Repent and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out." To be repentant for your sins is one thing, but you must be converted (turned from your sins) or it will not mean that you are "repentant and believing." The "common salvation" is also spoken of in Jude 3. And Acts 17:31 says "he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness." What is commonly called the Lord's prayer also gives the two phases of the Kingdom - the earthly and the heavenly.

In the Old Testament this is spoken to the world: "Seek righteousness, seek meekness; it may be that ye shall be hid in the day of the Lord's anger." (Zeph. 2:3) The meek of the earth, the humble of the world in general who love justice and pursue peace will be partly hid in this Time of Trouble. In the French Revolution, which is a type of the Day of Vengeance (the Lord's anger), favors were shown to the just, generous and kind, and extreme wrath was visited upon the oppressors; and we believe it will be so during this Time of Trouble. "Except those days be shortened, there should no flesh be saved." (Matt. 24:22)  The Time of Trouble is especially designed for the oppressors - the wicked. (Mal. 4:1)

But this will not detract from those who died before the inauguration of the Kingdom. For, "all that are in the grave shall hear his voice and shall come forth." (John 5:28,29) "There shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust." (Acts 24:15)

NO. 513 RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT - PART TWO

“KISS SEALS ISRAEL’S BETRAYAL: One is tempted to compare the kiss offered by first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton to Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat’s wife to the kiss that Judas gave Jesus when he betrayed him in the Garden of Gethsemane – but the analogy breaks down because both Hillary Clinton and Soha Arafat are betraying Israel.

“In a statement nearly as outrageous as those made by Holocaust deniers, Soha Arafat said: ‘Our people [the Palestinians] have been submitted to the daily and intensive use of poisonous gas by the Israeli forces which have led to an increase in cancer cases among women and children.’ She also asserted that Israel has contaminated water sources with ‘chemical materials.’ Those Israelis are so clever. They can poison air and water in ways that affect only Palestinians while Jews escape harm. After an outcry by Israeli Prime Minister Ebud Barak and some Jewish leaders in the United States, Mrs. Clinton belatedly issued an objection to Mrs. Arafat’s remarks. Too little, too late.

“At this point in the so‑called peace process, it wouldn’t matter if Yasser Arafat were captured on videotape acknowledging that he has no intention of living up to any agreement and that his ultimate objective is to use the negotiations to weaken Israel to the point at which it won’t be able to withstand a final assault from armed Palestinians and Israel’s Arab neighbors. Arafat, in fact, has made numerous statements in which he has strongly hinted at or openly stated these objectives, but the Europeans, Americans and the United Nations merely blink because they want the issue to go away. They don’t care if Israel disappears in the process. There are peace prizes to be awarded and legacies to be ensured.

“Facts no longer matter. Newsweek reported last week that the National Security Agency learned it was Yasser Arafat who supplied the weapons for the 1983 bombing of the American Embassy in Beirut in which 241 U.S. Marines died. No matter. President Clinton lobbies for $400 million in aid to the Palestine Liberation Organization on top of an initial $500 million that has never been properly accounted for, amid reports that it was misspent.

“Clergy appointed by Arafat at al‑Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem regularly preach sermons calling for the ‘liberation’ of all the land, pre‑1967 Israel included, in a ,jihad that is ‘the responsibility of all Muslims.’ Various communications media controlled by the PLO accuse Israel and the West of employing Nazi tactics against them, which is ironic given the Nazi‑like rhetoric of many PLO leaders and Arab states against Jews and the West.

“Terrorists responsible for the deaths of innocent Israelis and visiting Jewish civilians are praised on PLO TV as saints and heroes. This year’s Palestine Prize for Culture will go to Abu Daoud, mastermind of the 1972 Olympic bombing in Munich that Killed 11 Israeli athletes.

“This is not the behavior or language of people who want to make peace with their neighbors. This is the behavior and language of war, the objective of which is the complete annihilation of the Jews and eradication of the state of Israel. The only way ‘peace’ negotiators can continue with this sham is by ignoring the words and actions of those negotiating in bad faith. The PLO negotiators think that they are carrying out Allah’s will and that it is legitimate to lie about their intentions to the pagan and secular infidels on the Israeli and American side.

“Islamic extremists are taking advantage of secularists in the Israeli and American governments and pragmatists such as Bill Clinton, who wants a ‘legacy’ in foreign affairs that he hopes will cover up his notorious domestic affairs. If the Jews have to die, who cares? They’ve died before. We’ll just build them another museum.

“We see Israeli soldiers yanking fellow Jews from ‘settlements’ and hear Barak speaking of a ghetto‑type fence to keep Israel’s enemies out. But neither evictions of Jews from land nor fences will protect Israel. Fences, in fact, have been used in the past to contain Jews in order to kill them more efficiently.

“As for kissing the target for destruction, Judas wasn’t the only one to employ the tactic. Members of organized crime have long done the same, kissing the one selected for death. With Mrs. Clinton and Mrs. Arafat smooching each other, we have a new scenario. The one who is about to die is not present. Her name is Israel.”(By Cal Thomas, The Orlando Sentinel, November 17, 1999)

“MIDEAST PEACE PACT MASKS INTENT OF ISRAEL’S ENEMIES: Put simply, the agreement signed by Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, and witnessed by Egypt’s president and America’s secretary of state, is a piece of theater designed to mask the true intention of Israel’s enemies: complete domination of all the land they continue to regard as Palestine. Such an objective remains in their language, in the sermons of their clergy, in their television news, in classroom instruction aimed at creating a new generation of Jew haters, and in their hearts.

“Israel’s enemies can be likened to a wild animal. The flaw in Western thinking has always been that such a beast will be satisfied with a small piece of meat and will not want the rest. In fact, the animal will continue to demand more and threaten you if you don’t give it to him. Finally, when you refuse to give any more, he will forcibly take the rest and then eat you.

“There is a cycle in the Middle East, of which the scenario in Sharm E1 Sheik last weekend is a part. Middle East commentator Clarence Wagner Jr. of the organization Bridges for Peace describes it this way: (1) The Arabs make great peace overtures that get Israel and the West excited; (2) Israel and the Arabs negotiate an accord that promises certain concessions from the Arabs in exchange for land given to them by Israel; (3) Israel gives them land, but the Arabs do not reciprocate; (4) the peace process stalls; (5) Israel is blamed; (6) the West pressures Israel to get on with the process; (7) efforts to jump‑start the process are made by Israel with input from the West; (8) nothing happens, the Israeli leader is ousted in election and his successor promises to do better; (9) go back to (1) and begin again, which is where Barak is.

“Palestinian negotiators promise minuscule things in exchange for the land that Israel pledges to give them. Who thinks Arafat is more likely to live up to these promises than previous ones he has consistently broken? Within hours after the signing ceremony, car bombs in Haifa and Tiberias exploded in what appeared to be a terrorist attack gone awry. Three people, apparently the perpetrators, were killed. An Arafat spokesman predictably denied responsibility, but Hamas and the terrorism network won’t be stopped by ink stains dried upon some line.

“While PLO negotiators claim to want peace, they are making preparations for war. According to an Israeli military spokesman, a new tunnel has recently been discovered running between the Palestinian and Egyptian sections of the Gazan border town of Rafiah (there are many other tunnels in territory relinquished by Israel). Inside the tunnel authorities discovered digging tools, ropes and other devices.

“Israeli military officials believe terror organizations are using the tunnels to bring arms, explosives and other dangerous items into the autonomous areas. Israel says all of the tunnels started from the Palestinian side. Why would a people supposedly desiring peaceful coexistence with Israel be engaged in activities one could properly discern as warlike?

“Once the latest land grab is finished, watch for Arafat to demand more land and, when he doesn’t get it, the West will put new pressure on Israel to give it to him.

“On May 15, 1965, Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasser declared: ‘Our aim is... the creation of a unified and contiguous Arab region from which Israel will be eliminated.’ There is no reason to believe this objective has been abandoned. There is reason to believe that the latest ‘peace’ accord will assist Israel’s enemies in reaching it.” (By Cal Thomas, Los Angeles Times Syndicate)

“ARAFAT HIDING BILLIONS IN AID MONEY: RAMALLAH – Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasir Arafat has concealed billions of dollars of funds in secret foreign bank accounts and investments, according to dissidents who said they hacked the computer system of the PLO headquarters in Tunis.

“Palestinian sources said the dissidents made the disclosure as part of a campaign against corruption by Arafat’s PA and in an effort to stop the European Union from honoring pledges to donate hundreds of millions of dollars to the PA. Last Sunday, the London based Telegraph quoted Palestinian sources in the West Bank as saying that Arafat has bought property in London as part of an effort to conceal PLO funds.

“The Telegraph said the hackers discovered that the PLO maintains about u5 billion [$8 billion] in numbered bank accounts in Zurich, Geneva and New York.

“The PLO also holds accounts in North Africa, Europe and Asia. They are not registered in the PLO’s name, but in the names of private individuals.

“The hackers also obtained records that the PLO owns shares on the Frankfurt, Paris and Tokyo stock exchanges, including stock in the German car giant Mercedes Benz, and property in prestigious areas of European capitals.

“The newspaper quoted a Palestinian as saying, ‘Why is he sitting on a mountain of gold, while there is a desperate lack of jobs and medical supplies here?’

“In 1994, the General Accounting Office of the U.S. Congress launched an investigation into Arafat’s finances. The report was never released because of pressure from the Clinton administration, but congressional sources said the report contains a ‘goldmine’ of information on where Arafat keeps his money.

“The network of concealed PLO money is known only to Arafat and two trusted aides. The Telegraph said the bulk of the funds are comprised of taxes levied on Palestinians working in Kuwait and other Gulf states and donations from Saudi Arabia.

“The newspaper published the story a day after Arafat launched millennium celebrations in Bethlehem, a project in which the EU and other donors have invested $180 million. Arafat has invited Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milosevic to Bethlehem, a move criticized by American officials.” (By Steve Rodan, The Jewish Press, December 10, 1999)

“ALIYA: A CHALLENGE TO AMERICAN ZIONISTS: I then went on to propose, among other things: ‘Zionist organizations should publicly commit themselves to the goal of a Jewish State. To this end they should promote the aliya of influential Jewish leaders NOW.’ Publicizing this manifesto – its rationale and objectives – would facilitate the development of what is now lacking in Israel: a serious opposition to the Government’s surrender to the Clinton‑Arafat alliance.

“But now I must go further. I am duty‑bound to say, with a tearful heart, that you, the leaders and supporters of American Zionist organizations, can no longer enjoy the luxury of criticizing Israel’s death march from afar. I know your agonizing frustration. I know of your ceaseless efforts to arouse Israel from its paralysis. But all this can no longer justify your remaining on the sidelines as pain‑filled spectators of Israel’s dismemberment.

“You must make every effort to come here and plant your feet where your heart is. You must come here and fight the battle on the battlefield, else you will never be true to your own convictions about Israel’s mortal danger. Instead, you will live a smug lie, content from afar to believe the lies of those leading Israel toward the abyss.

So come here and join me and let us fight the good fight for our people, our land, our heritage, and our G‑d. (By Professor Paul Eidelberg, The Jewish Press, December 10, 1999)

“FROM THE EDITOR:

As long as deep in the heart

The soul of a Jew yearns,

And towards the East

An eye looks to Zion,

Our hope is not yet lost:

The hope of two thousand years

To be free people in our land,

The land of Zion and Jerusalem.

Hatikvah (The Hope)

“Anthem of the Zionist movement, and national anthem of the State of Israel.

“SUNG AT THE First Zionist Congress in Basle 100 years ago, and on the occasion of the declaration of the State of Israel in Tel Aviv half a century later, these eight simple lines written by Naphtali Herz Imber in 1878 say it all.

“For if Israel’s 50th anniversary celebrates anything, it is the triumph of hope. Like an eternal flame, ignited by God and kept alive by the prophets through centuries of hate, this hope burning in the breast of the Jew kept him going, kept him clinging to the special identity assigned his people.

“In 1897, Theodore Herzl spread that hope like wildfire across Asia and Europe when he exhorted scattered Israel that, if they willed it, the return of their homeland need not be a dream.

“Fifty years of ferocious opposition worked to keep that desire a dream. But in 1948 the Jews, and the world, awoke to a new reality – Israel had been reborn.

“The physical resurrection of Israel did not make Hatikvah passe. For where the declaration of statehood sounded the victory of hope over 2000 years of despair, so has the celebration of the first 50 years marked the triumph of that continued hope over the enormous efforts – both military and diplomatic – that have been made to turn back the clock.

“Our hope, inspired by the same God and His ancient prophets, is to see the restoration of Israel completed in our lifetime, so that finally, when every Jew can spend his days in safety, beneath his vine and his fig tree, peace will have come to the Middle East, and the heart‑cry of Hatikvah will have been fulfilled. (Middle East Digest, 1999)

“DID YOU KNOW THAT...: A Jew invented the telephone – and exhibited it publicly 15 years before Bell patented his invention? Johann Philipp Reis exhibited his telephone to scientists in Europe in 1861.

“Almost 200 years before Columbus, a rabbi wrote that the world is round. Moses de Leon (1250‑1305) wrote that the earth is round and that it rotates. ‘The earth revolves like a ball...”’ (The Jewish Press, August 27, 1999)

“THE FINAL STATUS OF JERUSALEM: The final and only status of Jerusalem was affirmed by the Highest Court, 3000 years ago. Now, in supreme arrogance and blasphemy, a corrupt U.S. President, in support of an unrepentant killer, tells Israel that she must negotiate the division of that Holy City, Israel’s capital. Interesting, two immoral men dividing up G‑d’s City.

“Arafat and the Arabs have found that making claims of a wildly absurd nature plays well with Clinton, the EU (European Nation) and the UN (United Nations). Well documented history, supported by the hard facts of archeology make no difference to these nations and individuals who tell the Jews that everything will be all right if they abandon a small part of their Capital City, as they once again make ready to betray the gullible Jews. Even the Bible with its extraordinary historical detail of the relationship the Jews have with Jerusalem makes no difference to this gathering of all that is evil and venal.

“I am mindful of the Christian belief that a Great Evil will appear to lead all of us into a terrible period of war. I think that this creature has already sent out its advance men to pave the way. Never has the world seen such a broad coalition of pure evil as they ready themselves to challenge the authority of the Supreme Being.

“Regrettably, Jewish leaders in Israel and America have fallen prey to the Jewish habit of being willing to talk about anything – even their own deaths. Leaders of Israel and self‑anointed, dovish, Jewish American leaders respond to Arafat/Clinton’s claims to Jerusalem with, ‘OK. Let’s talk.’ No sane people with a shred of pride would willingly accept the partition of their Capital as a subject open for discussion.

“What should have been said is: ‘No discussions; no acceptance of advisory teams of Clinton’s Leftist Jews with plans to negotiate the final status of Jerusalem. There is nothing to discuss; nothing to negotiate. We reject any and all claims on Jerusalem. From this time on we will not speak of final status [or ‘final solution’] or any creative plans to divide the City by covering the words with political trickery so cleverly crafted by Arafat and the U.S. State Department.

“The G‑d of the Jewish people gave Jerusalem to the Jewish people in perpetuity. Who would dare challenge the decision of the All‑Seeing/All‑Knowing Highest Court in the Universe?

“The corrupt nations who make up the United Nations and European Union would laugh and reject without another thought any claims to their capitals. But Jews, being so reasonable, intellectual and dedicated to talk‑talk, are willing to discuss their own ‘right to live’ and their own ‘right to their only capital: Jerusalem.’ Moreover, the Arabs, refusing to live in peace with the Jews, declared a permanent state of war and attacked Israel in six wars – pledging to drive the Jews into the sea. Jerusalem was retaken, but not until King Hussein of Jordan razed 58 synagogues and used Jewish tombstones as splash plates for urinals. Jews – have you no pride, no shame?

“Christians and Jews must let this President know that he will not be allowed to betray Israel in lock‑step with a terrorist chief who has killed and ordered the killing of many Americans and Israelis. Let your Congressmen and women (including the President’s Democratic Party), know that he and they are defying G‑d and will suffer the consequence of defying His Will. Let them know they are shaping their own curse for the audacity of challenging His Far‑Seeing Judgement.” (By Emanuel Winston, Middle East Analyst and Commentator, The Jewish Press, May 21, 1999)

“THE LATEST CLINTON CON JOB! Yes, we at AFSI too were fooled by cunning Clinton’s latest con job. When Bill Clinton exercised the waiver attached to the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, we assumed that what we had been told is true – that the President had the right to stall on the building of the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem if he felt that U.S. security would be endangered. NOT TRUE! The waiver only applied to the use of money for ‘acquisition and maintenance of buildings abroad.’ It has nothing to do with stopping the relocation of the embassy from Tel‑Aviv to Jerusalem, Israel’s eternal, indivisible capital. Clinton is in violation of U.S. law – and 84 U.S. Senators wrote him a letter telling him so. It’s time the American public did the same.

“As for Hillary, now is the time to prove to her New York public that she isn’t merely mouthing statements in support of ‘indivisible Jerusalem.’ Let her use her influence with her husband and tell him to stop conning the American people and to follow through on U.S. law. As Bill Clinton pretends that what he’s doing is legal, Mrs. Clinton unashamedly panders to the public. Let her actions, not mere words, disprove AFSI’s claim that ‘Hillary Clinton is no friend of Israel.’

“Herbert Zweibon, Chairman of Americans For a Safe Israel, quote Arieh Stav, author of The Israeli Death Wish: ‘In case anyone has forgotten, Israel, and not the PLO, is Washington’s ally. Israel has five strategic agreements with the U.S., signed in 1975, 1981, 1983, 1985 and 1987... As a result, Israel is supposed to be, at least formally, Washington’s ally. On the other hand, Arafat and many of the heads of his organization are, under American law, habitual criminals, leaders of terrorist gangs...’ Zweibon asks, ‘Why, then, does Clinton continue to raise Arab expectations on Jerusalem by refusing to move the embassy? It is the Jewish capital of the Jewish State, and will never be anything else. The U.S. embassy should be moved there immediately.,” (The Jewish Press, August 20, 1999)

“THEOLOGY, WHITE HOUSE STYLE: Those who heard U.S. Vice President A1 Gore’s remarkable address on the occasion of Israel’s 50th anniversary could have been forgiven for thinking the American president‑in‑waiting an ardent Christian Zionist. Indeed, his speech at the Jubilee Bells celebration had all the ingredients of a pro‑Israel sermon.

“The tall and handsome Gore quoted from the psalm that for millennia nourished the hope of Israel’s second return to their land. He recalled the account of Jacob’s struggle with the Angel of the Lord. He paralleled Israel’s mistreatment at gentile hands with

Joseph’s cruel abuse by his brothers. He unabashedly propounded his belief that Israel’s restoration in 1948 was the fulfillment of Ezekiel’s vision about the valley of dry bones. And he closed with a traditional blessing to the God of Israel: ‘Blessed be Thou our God, ruler of the Universe, Who has kept us alive and has sustained us and brought us to this time.’

“Apart from the scriptures, Gore unhesitatingly recalled the suffering of the Jewish people through ‘the bitter centuries of your wondering and dispersion, your persecution and despair.’ Nor did he make any bones about the fact that, from the day of its birth to the present, Israel has had to struggle to survive in an extremely hostile world. He had Israelis eating out of his hand.

“Like Gore, President Bill Clinton often refers to the Bible in his speeches too, and about, Israel. Of course, it is hardly surprising that in relating to Israel people will frequently invoke scripture or references to God to support their actions or words. It was Israel, after all, who gave the Bible to mankind. And it is with Israel, more than with any other nation, that the Bible is ultimately concerned. But, as often as not, these spiritual elements have been used to deceive and disarm those who would otherwise have been on their guard. ‘Oh it’s all right,’ they say, ‘President so‑and‑so goes to church/is a Christian/has prayed with Billy Graham/believes in God so, clearly, we can trust him.’

“On a number of occasions, including in his address to the Israeli Knesset in 1994, and most recently to The Jerusalem Report (May 25, 1998), Clinton has recounted his old pastor’s warning: ‘If you abandon Israel, God will never forgive you.’ In the Report article Clinton makes a play on the words of the biblical Ruth when he tells Israelis: ‘Your struggle has become our struggle,’ and according to a close Jewish friend (also quoted in the Report), the Southern Baptist from Arkansas ‘knows the Jewish Bible and the New Testament practically by heart.’

“If this is true, Bill Clinton’s memory has lapsed on a few important occasions: On October 6, 1994, as he presided over the signing of peace between Israel and Jordan, the president exhorted the parties with what he claimed were the words of a world‑renowned Jewish Rabbi: ‘Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will inherit the earth.’

“In choosing to misquote Jesus, (who said the peace‑makers ‘shall be called sons of God’) Clinton either slipped up, or else purposefully twisted the scripture to substantiate what he was doing: assisting in the division of Israel’s land. Apiece, the size of the Gaza Strip, had been carved out of Israel and given to Jordan.

“On April 27, in a speech congratulating Israel on its 50th anniversary, President Clinton said: ‘As a Christian, I do not know how God, if He were to come to Earth, would divide the land over which there is dispute now... But I know that if we all pray for the wisdom to do God’s will, chances are we will find a way to close the gap in the next couple of years between what might be and what is.’

“Actually, any Christian with a knowledge of what the Bible says knows exactly how God would divide up the land – He wouldn’t.

“It is the Bible that states – without apology – that God gave the land of Israel, encompassing all of ancient Canaan, as an eternal possession to the descendants of Abraham through Isaac and Jacob. (See Numbers 34:2 and Psalm 105:8‑11)

“And it is the God of Israel who warns that He will judge the gentile nations for scattering His people and dividing up their land. (See Joel 3:2)

“No matter how fervently they proclaim their faith, the bottom line is that unless the U.S. administration changes its land‑for‑peace policy towards Israel, the very Bible Clinton and Gore use so liberally in speeches to win the trust of the Jews ultimately will show them up to be enemies when it really counts.” (By Stan Goodenough, Middle East Digest, 1999)

“HITLER’S POPE: Jewish groups have renewed calls for the Vatican to open its secret archives to scholars in the wake of the publication of Hitler’s Pope: The Secret History of Plus XII, a new book by British journalist John Cornwall.

“The book portrays the Pope as an anti‑Semite who helped Hitler consolidate power through the Vatican’s 1933 Concordat with the Third Reich ‑underscoring Jewish objections to the proposed beatification of Pius XII.” (World Jewry, October 1999)

“POPE PIUS’S 1943 LETTER AGAINST JEWISH STATEHOOD REVEALED: At the height of the Holocaust, Pope Pius XII made known to President Franklin D. Roosevelt his opposition to Palestine becoming a Jewish homeland, according to a letter from the U.S. Archives obtained by The Jerusalem Post from the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

“Dated June 22, 1943, the letter sent by A. G. Ciognani, the pope’s special representative to the U.S., to Ambassador Myron Taylor, Roosevelt’s special emissary to Pius XII, is believed to be the first explicit expression of Pius’s policy against Zionism conveyed to the American government.

“‘It is true that at one time Palestine was inhabited by the Hebrew Race, but there is no axiom in history to substantiate the necessity of a people returning to a country they left nineteen centuries before,’ the letter reads.

“‘If a Hebrew Home is desired, it would not be too difficult to find a more fitting territory than Palestine. With an increase in the Jewish population there, grave, new international problems would arise.’

“Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, said the letter ‘is an indictment of Pius XII, because it basically says that when the pope wanted a point of view expressed about how he clearly felt, he said it clearly. Where is a similar letter to Adolf Hitler, telling Hitler that the Vatican finds his policies against the Jews repugnant? But at the height of the Holocaust, the Vatican knew how to oppose the State of Israel.’

“Rabbi David Rosen, head of the Israel office of the Anti‑Defamation League and an expert on Catholic Jewish relations, said that ‘it has been well known for a long time of the shameful policy the Holy See maintained during that period, and this is just but one confirmation of that fact.’

“Rosen said Pius’s anti‑Zionism was a continuation of long‑standing Vatican policy, which all changed with the issuing of Nostra Aetate.

“Hier said the letter, which was found last month in research being conducted on Pope Pius, further spotlights the issue of the church’s moving forward his candidacy for sainthood.

“‘Many people have asked me, what is it our business who the Catholics appoint a saint?’ Hier said. ‘Normally I would agree with that. But in the presence of survivors, tens of thousands of whom are still alive in their last few years, that they should live out their lives knowing that the person whom they heard nothing from, nothing but silence, has been designated as a saint – many people around the world will say a saint was alive in the Vatican during the Holocaust. That is an insult to the memory of the Holocaust, and is an insult to the survivors.”’ (The Jerusalem Post, July 9, 1999)

Comment: No human can appoint anyone a saint, only God can do that.

“HIER WARNS AGAINST ELEVATING POPE PIUS XII TO SAINTHOOD: According to Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean and founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, it would indeed be a terrible mistake in judgment for Pope John II to designate Pope Pius XII, the Pope during the Holocaust, to sainthood as Vatican experts are predicting that Pope Paul will do. Rabbi Hier reacted to the prediction by Vatican observers in his ‘State of World Jewry Address’ at the 92nd Street Y.

“Hier said that, ‘Normally, it would not be the business of Jews to tell Catholics who their saints are. But Pius XII is surely an exception to that rule, because elevating him to sainthood desecrates the memory of all Holocaust victims.’ The rabbi noted that, ‘Pius XII sat on the throne of Saint Peter in stony silence, without ever lifting a finger, as each day thousands of Jews from all over Europe were sent to the gas chambers, with his full knowledge.’

“While many Catholic leaders refuse to acknowledge the truth about the role of Pius XII during the Holocaust and distort his role by accentuating the positive, Hier firmly stated that ‘this was the same Pope who refused to issue the unsigned encyclical that his predecessor, Pope Pius XI, ordered that would have condemned racism and anti‑Semitism.’ Hier said that the encyclical that Pius XII chose to disregard ‘was written by an American Jesuit Priest, Father John LaFarge, and was on Pius XII’s desk unsigned when he died.’

“Hier pointed out that the unissued encyclical that contained strong language. of condemnation of racism and anti‑Semitism was a lost opportunity in response to Hitler’s war against the Jews. The Orthodox leader stressed that not only did Pius XII fail morally and spiritually by not issuing the encyclical, but, ‘in fact, Mother Pascalina, who served with Pius XII as chief of his household since his days as Papal Nuncio in Munich, reported that the Pope, following Hitler’s attack on the Soviet Union in 1941, said novenas for the swift victory of the Fuehrer’s armies. He continued to do this after he knew very well what Hitler had done to the Jews of Poland. Although he understood that a victory against the Soviet Union would mean instant murder of the millions of Jews living there, he prayed for a Nazi victory.’

“Hier criticized those who defend the actions of Pius XII even to this very day. The rabbi said, ‘Pius, defenders often point to the fact that former Chief Rabbi Herzog and Golda Meir praised the Pope’s efforts regarding the Jews.’ But the rabbi explained that they ‘did not see the many documents now available. In addition, they were thanking him for his efforts on behalf of the Jews of Rome whom Pius had, in fact, helped in 1943 and early 1944. But by then, the Vatican had surely concluded that Hitler would lose the war.’

“Rabbi Hier insisted that the time has come for the Vatican to come clean and open its files, so that the whole world can judge for itself how the Vatican conducted itself as six million Jews were slaughtered by the Nazi machine.” (By Marvin Greisman, The Jewish Press, May 28, 1999)

“ARAFAT HASN’T REPAID U.S. FOR ITS HELP: The writer of the October 1 letter ‘U.S.‑ Palestinian ties are hardly special’ shows his anti‑Israel mind‑set by complaining about the ‘special ties’ between the U.S. and Israel. He is dead wrong when he says the United States did not or has not intervened in the farce called the Middle East peace process on the Palestinian side.

“After all, even Israel‑bashers such as this letter‑writer have to admit that Israel has been pushed by the U.S. to continue to give up land while the Palestinians have not been pressured to stop their terrorism against the Jewish state. And while Israel has received billions in foreign aid over the years, the writer forgot to mention that it is the only democracy in the region and has voted with the U.S. in the United Nations more than any Middle East nation – many of which whom hate us.

“The writer also forgot to mention that most of the $39 million the U.S. has given Yasser Arafat and the Palestinians is missing – stolen – and unaccounted for. No wonder we have held up giving these thieves any more.” (Palm Beach Post, October 13, 1999)

“HANDSHAKE ANNIVERSARY: Historic moment in Mideast peace occurred six years ago: Six years after the historic Rabin‑Arafat handshake on the White House lawn, the Palestinians can point to a mixed bag of results from the Oslo peace process.

“Of perhaps most importance to them, the Palestinian people are closer than ever before to achieving their goal of statehood.

“During the past six years, the Palestinian Authority has received worldwide backing for the creation of a state.

“Arguably the most important support has come from President Clinton, who while not explicitly saying he backs statehood, spoke during a visit to the Gaza Strip last December of the Palestinians’ having ‘a chance to determine their own destiny on their own land.’

“And while some Israeli officials still have trouble uttering the words, it is commonly believed that the final‑status negotiation will be concluded with an agreement on an independent Palestinian state.

“The negotiation, which began last Monday, the sixth anniversary of the Rabin‑Arafat handshake, will deal with what the newly born state will look like, not about whether it should be created. Most observers agree that Israel, first and foremost, will be looking for a demilitarized state.

“The Palestinian Authority, meanwhile, has during the past six years created the ruling apparatus for an eventual state.

“The self‑rule government has a Cabinet, legislative council and government ministries that provide basic services like health and education. In addition, there is a considerable police force – far larger, according to Israeli critics, than what was agreed to in the Oslo accords – as well as a wide network of often competing security forces.

“While Israeli officials have charged that the Palestinians are in possession of illegal weapon supplies, the Palestinian Authority has no army.

“Not least of all, the Palestinians have in Yasser Arafat a leader who, despite being the target of frequent criticism, ‘still enjoys uncontested popularity,’ according to Brig. Gen. Amos Malka, the chief of Israel Defense Force intelligence.

“Despite the gains achieved since the historic September 13, 1993, handshake, the Palestinians still have numerous obstacles to overcome.

“As human rights groups have frequently charged, the Palestinians have no real democracy.

“Despite the existence of a legislature, most all important decisions are made by Arafat and his closest aides – who are frequent targets of corruption charges. Members of the legislative council have repeatedly called for a larger hand in government, to no avail.

“While there are dozens of newspapers, they are subject to close governmental scrutiny. Several editors have found themselves over the years under pressure from the self‑rule authority of the secret services, which often take over the role supposed to be handled by the Palestinian legal system.

“The self‑rule government also has a powerful internal threat in the form of the Hamas fundamentalists, who reject the Oslo process altogether. While the Hamas opposition is more or less under control of the Palestinian Authority, it hangs like a constant threat over the future of the government, particularly in a post‑Arafat era.

“On the economic level, the Palestinians are confronting many of the same woes they did six years ago.

“Unemployment is still widespread, hovering around 30 percent in most of the self-rule areas.

“Despite a massive infusion of international aid, there has been no meaningful economic revival. And given the lack of a meaningful economic infrastructure, the prospects for a turnaround anytime soon are fairly bleak.” (By Gil Sedan, Palm Beach North Jewish Journal, September 21, 1999)

“MISSIONARIES SAID TO BE BRIBING IMMIGRANTS WITH MATERIAL BENEFITS, TICKETS ABROAD: Charges that hundreds of Christian missionaries are exploiting the difficult social and economic situation of new immigrants were voiced last week by Adi Eldar, chairman of the Union of Local Authorities.

“Eldar made his charges in a letter to Internal Security Minister Shlomo Ben‑Ami, asking that he direct the police to deal with the issue. A spokesman for Ben‑ami said that the minister has not had time to consider the issue.

“However, Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi Yisrael Lau said that the law which forbids anyone from encouraging another to change his or her religion for material gain is not being enforced...

“Lau said that the missionaries work in deprived neighborhoods and offer material benefits, including air tickets abroad, so that those who convert can leave the country. He stressed that the issue of missionary activity abroad is one which should concern not just the rabbis, but all levels of society...

“According to Eldar, there are hundreds of missionaries active in local groups, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses and messianic Jewish congregations, as well as dozens of missionaries sent by groups in Europe and the U.S. He said that their activity is concentrated in localities in which there are many new immigrants, such as Upper Nazareth, Karniel, Haifa, Jerusalem, Ashdod and Beersheba.” (The Jerusalem Post, November 26, 1999)

“MISSIONARY MONEY: British based missionary organizations have an income of well in excess of $1.5 million to fund the conversion of Jews, according to a report in a British Jewish newspaper.

“According to the latest available accounts, the three major missionary groups, the Church’s Ministry Among the Jewish People, Jews for Jesus, and Christian Witness to Israel are all officially registered charities.” (World Jewry, November 1999)

“DELICACIES: An Israeli food festival held recently in Tel Aviv featured new fruit and vegetable species developed with the help of the Israeli Agriculture Ministry at the Volcanic Agricultural Institute.

“Among the new produce scheduled to be grown for export are a tiny sweet watermelon, a crossbred cucumber melon, tomatoes and peppers of all sizes and colors, as well as pears and apples which resemble oranges and melons.” (World Jewry, July 1999)

IN MEMORY OF JOSEPH ELISHA SCHMIDT

Joseph Elisha was born in Czechoslovakia in 1949. He came to Israel in 1972 and has worked for Israel and its settlers ever since. He helped Herman Bezner lay out the beautiful farm Emek Ha Shalom. He knew English and learned Hebrew to translate Bezner’s lectures from German to Hebrew.

The article The Premature End of Brother Joseph in the Jewish newspaper Yedyot Ahoronot, November 12, 1999, does not give the correct idea of Bezner’s and Joseph’s work at Emek Ha Shalom. The current theme for Bezner’s lectures was the future Israel according to the Bible. He and Joseph wanted to show how beautiful Israel could be if it was cultivated with love and care.

Bezner’s lectures reminded the many visitors to Emek Ha Shalom of Jeremiah 31:31,32: “Behold the days will come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah; not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers, in the day that I took them by the hand, to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was a husband to them, saith the Lord.”

Herman and Joseph did not teach the end of the world – the earth – but the end of “THIS PRESENT EVIL WORLD” – and epoch. They spoke of “THE WORLD TO COME” – another epoch. They knew Ecclesiastes 1:4: “the earth abideth for ever.”

The New Covenant means that you have to believe in Messiah, who gave His perfect human vital energy to mankind, and obey two great commandments. The first is: “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.” The second is: “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.” (Matthew 22:37‑39)

You must not judge Joseph for his suicide. He was very overworked and couldn’t eat or sleep. He worked at the farm, he wrote letters to many friends of the true word of God according to Charles T. Russell, An early American Christian Zionist; he wrote even to us his friends in Sweden, and he took care of Herman. It was too much.

We shall remember Joseph with gratitude and honour his memory.

Anders Karlen and Leif Malmkvist                 Stockholm, December 4th, 1999.

We join with Anders Karlen and Leif Malmkvist in their love and appreciation of Joseph Elisha Schmidt. We are sure that God in His tender mercy for Joseph will reward him according to his faithfulness.

___________________________________________________________________

Our heartfelt thanks and appreciation for the many beautiful Christmas cards expressing love and prayers. Be assured that our warm Christian love and prayers are ever with you. We wish for all our readers that they will grow in Grace and Knowledge of the Lord for a blessed New Year, as “The path of the just is as the shining light, that shineth more and more unto the perfect day.” (Prov. 4:18)

ANNOUNCEMENT: The Memorial for 2000 is on Monday, April 17, after six p.m.