NO. 475B: ZIONISM IN PROPHECY

by Epiphany Bible Students


No. 475B

(Continued from No. 475A, May 1996)

PASTOR RUSSELL: I will read in your hearing from the Holy Scriptures, Leeser’s translation, the Hebrew version:

Psalms 102:14‑16: “Thou shalt arise, 0 Lord; for thou wilt have mercy upon Zion; for it is time to favor her, for the appointed time has come. For thy servants hold dear her stones, and her very dust they cherish. Then shall nations fear the name of the Lord, and all the kings of earth thy glory.”

Mal. 3:1,5,6,7: “Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall clear out the way before me; and suddenly will come to his temple the Lord, whom ye seek; and the messenger of the covenant, whom ye desire; for, behold, he is coming, saith the Lord of hosts; and I will come near unto you to hold judgement; and I will be a swift witness... For I the Lord – I have not changed; and ye sons of Jacob – ye have not ceased to be. From the days of your fathers did ye depart from my statutes, and did not keep them. Return unto me, and I will return unto you, saith the Lord of hosts.”

Ezekiel 16:60‑63: “Nevertheless will I indeed remember my covenant with thee in the day of thy youth, and I will establish unto thee an everlasting covenant. And thou shalt then remember thy ways, and be confounded, when thou receivest thy sisters, both those that are older than thou and younger than thou; and I will give them unto thee for daughters, though not because thou wast faithful to the covenant. And I will establish my covenant with thee; and thou shalt know that I am the Lord: in order that thou mayest remember, and feel ashamed and never open thy mouth any more because of thy confusion, when I forgive thee for all that thou hast done, saith the Lord Eternal.”

Jeremiah 31:31‑37: “Behold, days are coming, saith the Lord, when I will make with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant.

“Not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day that I took hold of them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they have broken, although I was become their husband, saith the Lord.

“But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel, after those days, saith the Lord, I will place my law in their inward parts, and upon their hearts will I write it; and I will be unto them for a God and they shall be unto me for a people.

“And they shall not teach any more every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord; for they shall all know me, from the least of them even unto their greatest, saith the Lord; for I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin will I not remember any more.

“Thus hath said the Lord who bestoweth the sun for a light by day, the ordinance of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, who stirreth up the sea that its waves roar. The Lord of hosts is his name.

“If these ordinances ever depart from before me, saith the Lord, then also shall the seed of Israel cease from being a nation before me during all time.

“Thus hath said the Lord, If the heavens can be measured above, and the foundations of the earth be searched out beneath, then also will I reject all the seed of Israel, for all that they have done, saith the Lord.”

Isaiah 40:1,2: “Comfort ye, comfort ye my people, saith your God. “Speak ye (comfort) to the heart of Jerusalem, and call out unto her, that her time of sorrow is accomplished, that her iniquity is atoned for; for she hath received from the hand of the Lord double for all her sins.”

My Jewish Friends And Others: I have pleasure in being before you today. I am here because of your invitation, for which I thank you. I am pleased to have an opportunity of speaking to my Jewish friends and neighbors in this city. All the more so because I believe that some, in the name of Christ, have dishonored his name in various persecutions against your race.

I cannot be surprised, my dear friends, that after centuries of persecution you should feel that it would be almost a miracle if you should hear a Christian speaking the words of our text to the Jews, in defense of the Jews. I am pleased, therefore, to have this opportunity of saying that I have no sympathy whatever with the conduct of the Russians, nor with the demoniacal conduct of the so‑called Christians of Roumania. We read, too, of the fact recently that in Roumania there was a terrible scene enacted when so‑called Christians dug up the dead of the Jews, brought their carcasses and laid them on the doorsteps. Dear friends, this is not properly attributive to the Christianity which I stand for. I am glad that I stand for no such misrepresentation of the One whom I recognize as my Creator, as my Master, and one who is of your race.

Nothing in his Word ever directed his followers to thus misrepresent the principles of righteousness, justice. I should like in one word to tell you the very reason why there is such conduct on the part of some who have named the name of Christ. It is this: That during the period we call the Dark Ages, when ignorance was prevalent throughout the civilized world, various false theories and doctrines, quite contrary to the Law of Moses, quite contrary to the teaching of Jesus and the Apostles, were brought in. So we find that today the name of Christ is attached to various theories which you and I and all Christian peoples recognize as sinful and wrong and dishonest. By all Christian peoples I mean the Christian people in general whom you meet in this land of liberty; a very different view, you will notice, from that held by Christians of Russia and Roumania and some other parts.

The whole world is swayed by the power of the mind. When a man’s mind is disarranged his conduct will be in harmony with the disarrangement. What wild and unreasonable things are often done by the insane because the mind has gone wrong. I am not charging the Christians in the Dark Ages with these things, but I am charging it, dear friends, to that which the Scriptures call “Doctrines of Devils,” promulgated in the name of Christianity, and some of those doctrines of devils are very devilish indeed. One of these doctrines is what I hold responsible for all the various injustices that have been done to your race – the doctrine that our Heavenly Father, when he created the race, also made a great place of eternal torment and purposed that the great proportion of these human creatures whom he made should be cast into this eternal torture. All of this we believe to be very dishonoring to God, and it is because of this wrong theory respecting God and his character and his purposes toward the children of men that the world has witnessed such terrible persecution of the Jews – and all done in the name of love.

It is not surprising at all that practically all Christian people believe that every Jew is going to eternal torment. So I say, with the thought before their minds that the great Creator has damned every Jew to eternal torment, is it any wonder that those who believe such a thing should act like demons? It is no wonder! A man is bound to be conscientious and we must admit that these people are acting according to their consciences, but if a man is conscientious he will act according to his light or according to his darkness, and this gross darkness which came upon the civilized world 1,000 years ago, from which we have scarcely emerged, is responsible for the misrepresentation of the Almighty’s character, and is responsible for the persecution of the Jews. Have we not been told that every man should seek to be in harmony with and should follow the example of his God! Whoever, therefore, has a devilish conception of God will have a devilish form of conduct. And theoretically that has come upon Christian people who are slowly emerging from the gross errors of the Dark Ages. Many errors still cling to them; for instance, the doctrine of eternal torment. These Christian people believe this to be the doctrine of the Bible, and I thought the same. I also thought that I was getting it from the Bible, but I found out differently, my dear friends. I found out that I had been taking the traditions and creeds of men, and I had been told that these creeds fairly represented the Word of God, and under the impulse of the refusal of my mind to follow such a leading I became a kind of an unbeliever, totally rejecting both the Old and the New Testaments; and I know, therefore, how to sympathize with those who are called Higher Critics. I know how to sympathize with those who feel that there is no real intelligence in the Bible.

But, dear friends, after having had this experience, by God’s grace I came back to the Bible itself and made an examination along its own lines, and today I am a believer in not merely the New Testament, but in the Old Testament also. I have the opinion that both Jews and Christians have to a large extent neglected the intelligent study of the Word of God and I would like not only to awaken all the Christians – men and women – to study the Bible, but I would also like to awaken all the Jewish people to a study of the Word of God, a study of your own Scriptures, which contain the most wonderful message. They explain all the affairs pertaining to your people.

After making a thorough study of the prophecies I found the whole picture of the world there, and I thank God so often for these prophecies! They are not yet fulfilled. Certain portions of them have been fulfilled; and then there are other things that God has for the Jews and for the Gentiles.

To my understanding, God has two salvations – a special salvation, which is only for a mere handful – merely a saintly few, and as soon as the saintly few have been selected as the body of the Great Messiah he will fulfill all the glorious things the Jews have been hoping for, which you and I have been hoping for, and which the whole world has been hoping for. Do we not all see the need of a great Deliverer for the Jew; do we not see the need of a great deliverer for the whole world; do we not see that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together, waiting, waiting for your Messiah, my Messiah, for the Messiah God has promised, the Messiah of the whole world?

When we come to see what our God is doing, then there is a great sympathetic bond I believe between every intelligent Jew and every intelligent Christian. We have one God, the Father of all, and we have one hope in his glorious plan, and the glorious hope of this plan is all centered in the Messiah that has been promised to the Jews for these 3,500 years since the day of Abraham. God, foreknowing what he would do for the blessing of the world, declared in advance to Abraham that through his seed all the families of the earth would be blessed.

He intimates that there would be two kinds of Abraham’s seed – he would have a heavenly and he would have an earthly seed. Remember how in the Scriptures he said, Thy seed shall be as the stars of heaven and also as the sands of the seashore. These two seeds eventually shall bless the world. As soon as the heavenly seed shall be completed – and we believe that that time is near at hand now – then the blessing of God will begin to come to his earthly seed. And what do we see, my dear friends? Do you see the condition in which we are as a race? Do you see the sickness and weakness of the world of mankind today? Do you realize that sin is the very cause of all this, and do you know that God has declared, as I have read in your hearing, that the time is coming when he will blot out all those things which are the results of sin? You and I, and all mankind, are suffering from these things and they will all pass away. Does this not mean that in due time the wilderness shall blossom as the rose, the solitary place shall be glad for them, the knowledge of the Lord shall fill the whole earth as the waters cover the great deep and none will need say to his neighbor, Know the Lord? We have not had that time yet! It is still in the future. That is the glorious promise of God which Israel is looking forward to if they are looking in the right direction; Christians are also looking forward to this, and all nations look forward to it.

As I have read, not only is the blessing to come to Israel but also to the Gentiles. That is my understanding, dear friends, of what the Bible teaches. Let us look for the great antitypical Moses, this great antitypical David, this great antitypical Melchizedek; this great one that is mentioned by Daniel, the prophet, when he said: Then shall Michael (the archangel) stand up (assume control) and there shall be a time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time, and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. God is making a record of those who are true Jews; he has a book; he has an account, and you and I realize that. We know we are not living here in vain. You and I believe that the Great One who created us has something more in store for us than the brute beast. What is that glorious thing that he has provided?

Our Scripture tells us that under this new regime which shall be inaugurated when Michael shall take control, Israel will be the first to be blessed, as God said in the Scriptures which I have read in your hearing. It shall come to pass as the Lord God has said. After those days I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not according to the covenant I made with them when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, but a new covenant, like the former, but more glorious. As the first covenant had a mediator so this new covenant will have a mediator, a better mediator. As Moses led the people on the right way, so also will the antitype of Abraham, Isaac, and Moses, the greater one than Moses, do. There cometh a greater one than Moses. Now this one will be the one through whom all the promises of God will come to Israel, and through Israel to all men.

To my understanding, dear friends, the Scriptures are very clear in their statement that this New Covenant will be for Israel only and that all the nations of the world, if they desire to receive the blessings of that covenant, must come into Israel, so that during the reign of Messiah, which will be for 1,000 years, all nations will be pressing into it that they may become members of Israel, and so the nations will eventually come to be a part of Israel, as the Scriptures say – the seed of Abraham, like the sands of the seashore filling the whole earth – and every one who will not become an Israelite, who will not come into harmony with God, with that divine law, with the New Covenant, will be cut off in the Second Death. The Scriptures say that at the end of Messiah’s reign every one will be perfect; all will be of the seed of Abraham, and his seed shall then be as the stars of heaven and as the sands of the seashore. But during his reign every one who will not hear that prophet will be destroyed from among the people.

Then, you inquire, why is it that God has so long delayed? Well, my dear brother, whether I can make the matter clear to you or not, it is a fact we all recognize, that he has delayed. And during this delay of now more than 3,500 years from the time that promise was made to Abraham, from the time God took his oath, bound himself to the blessing of all the families of the earth, and bound himself that the blessing should come through Abraham’s seed – from that day to this, in all 3,500 years, your faith as a people has not failed. And in my estimation it is one of the most miraculous things in the world today to see the faith of Israel as a people. I esteem it, my dear friends, to be a miracle itself. No other country has ever done anything like this. No other nation is the seed of Abraham, as God has revealed this matter.

God gave an illustration of the delay, you remember. The covenant made to Abraham was made a long, long time before Isaac was born, and so God’s promises to Israel, natural Israel, the seed of Abraham, have been long deferred, and to our understanding in a certain way that we may not have time to fully discuss this afternoon. Our thought is that now God’s time has come, as we read in Psalms 102: “To favor Zion, for the appointed time is come.” Do you believe that he did found your nation, and that he had a purpose in respect to that founding? Do you believe the promises? Do you believe that the Lord’s promises will yet be fulfilled? Do you believe that he is able to do so? My dear friends, I am afraid that some of the Jews are getting weak in their faith respecting the promises of God. God’s purposes ripen slowly, but if the Scriptures are true, and we have a right understanding, Messiah will very shortly be manifested in power and great glory, not visible to men, but as a spirit being, invisible to men, as Daniel described, you remember: Who as God – one like unto God, with power. Yes, my dear friends, with power; with power through Israel to fulfill all the glorious promises God made to Abraham and confirmed to Isaac and to Jacob.

Let me give you an idea of one way in which I think of this matter. I refresh your minds respecting the history of Israel; how after God dealt with your people through judges, he gave them kings, and the name of the last king you remember was Zedekiah. Upon Zedekiah God pronounced a great sentence which has since gone into effect. Let me remind you of the words of the Prophet addressing Zedekiah, the last king of the Jews. I understand about Maccabeus, king of the Maccabees, but the Maccabees were not Jews. God has promised his blessing to Israel and Judah. Now I will quote you the words of the Prophet Ezekiel, 21:25:

“And thou profane and wicked prince, whose time has come that iniquity shall have an end. Thus saith the Lord God: Remove the diadem, and take off the crown: this shall not be the same: exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. I will overturn, overturn, overturn it: and it shall be no more, until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him.” Who is this one that is coming? Who is this one that is to take the throne of David? Who is this one that is to be the successor to Zedekiah? Did God not promise to David “the sure mercies of David,” that of the fruit of his loins he would raise up this one? This was not fulfilled at that time. It must belong to some future time because the sure mercies of David were pointed to after that time and they have not yet been fulfilled. That great Messiah is not a man, for no earthly being is able to accomplish for Israel, and through Israel for the world, the wonderful things which God has declared this Messiah shall accomplish. He is to bless all the families of the earth – not merely those living at that time, but also all those who have gone down into the sleep of death. That is the time of which Daniel speaks, that in this day many who sleep in the dust of the earth shall come forth; and some shall shine as stars in the firmament.

Now, my dear friends, a certain period of time from the time Zedekiah lost his crown is measured all the way down. What do we find for this measurement in the Word of God, in the Holy Scriptures? Through the Prophet, God has given a measure which reaches from Zedekiah, from the time his crown was taken away to the time that it would be restored. You remember how it was at the time Israel was discarded from divine favor as a nation – not the people but as a nation; the crown was taken away from them as a nation, was removed, to be no more until the Messiah, but still they would continue to be God’s people. This shows the difference between God’s people and God’s nation. But at the time the crown was removed from the brow of the king of Judah, a lease of power was given to the Gentiles.

I remind you that Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, was the one who took Zedekiah prisoner. I remind you that he had a wonderful dream and Daniel the Prophet was there and interpreted the dream. I remind you what the dream was; that he saw a great image – head of gold, breast of silver, belly and thighs of brass, and legs of iron, and the feet of iron and clay mixed. I remind you that Daniel gave an inspired interpretation of that dream. Daniel said that Babylon was the first, or head of gold; that after Babylon would arise another kingdom, a universal kingdom; and then a third, and then a fourth. You remember who these are: First, Babylon; second, Medo‑Persia; third, Greece; fourth, Rome. Rome came in fourth and was represented by the legs of iron – the strongest empire the world has ever known. Since the Roman empire departed as an empire, what do we have? Papal Rome. This was shown in the image by the feet of iron and clay mixed, the feet being part of iron and part of clay; the iron representing the Roman or civil power and the clay the religious influences or addition to the Roman civil power. So these ten toes seem to indicate also the kings of Europe of the present time, for they have been the successors and their empires are more or less of religious and civil power combined; as for instance, the kingdom of England is not merely a civil but also a religious monarchy, and so with the other monarchies in Europe. They have the religious feature represented in the clay and the civil power represented in the iron. This is a picture of the whole world and all the empires of earth to whom God gave a lease of power more than 2,000 years ago.

We see how this has been fulfilled. What will follow this? Is this great image to stand forever? NO! Was Babylon to last forever? No, it was cast away and was succeeded by Medo‑Persia. Did it last forever? No, it was followed by Greece. Greece was followed by the Roman empire. Did it last forever? No, it merged into Papal Rome. What about all this? What was the end of this prophecy of Daniel? The king beheld in his vision and a stone was cut out from the mountain without hands and smote the image – Where? In Nebuchadnezzar days, the head? No. In the Medo‑Persia days? No. Where? In the feet; smote the image in the feet at the end of the Gentile times. If you and I see it that way then we must see that we are now somewhere at the time of the feet and we should expect that the time for the smiting of the image in the feet by the stone would be near.

You remember the result; that the stone which smote the image in the feet accomplished the complete destruction of the Gentile empire. The great image went to pieces and the wind carried it away; there was no place found for it. And the stone became a great mountain and filled the whole earth. And Daniel’s interpretation of that stone is that it represented the Kingdom of God. He is pointing out how the dominion was taken away from Zedekiah and given to Nebuchadnezzar, and to all of his successors, and that the kingdom power would revert to Israel. Messiah, the head of Israel, will become the great stone that will eventually be the kingdom which will fill the whole earth, and bless the whole world. Is that a plain picture? I hold that it is. Is it a far‑fetched interpretation? I hold that it is not. I hold that there is no other interpretation possible; we must either believe that or give up the whole matter. If we see that the first part has been fulfilled in the past, does it not confirm Daniel’s prophecy to you and to me, and to as many as have ears to hear, that the latter part is just as sure of fulfillment as the first part?

Another part of this prophecy shows us that there were seven times determined upon this great people. What is a time? A time is a year. Seven times, seven years. Not literal years. More than literal years. There is a symbolical year used in prophecy which is reckoned on the basis of a lunar year; twelve months of thirty days each, or 360 days – each day representing a year. One symbolical year, therefore, would represent 360 years. How many would be represented in seven times? I answer seven times 360 years would be 2,520 years. And if we measure those 2,520 years from the time that God took away the diadem from Zedekiah and gave a lease of power to the Gentiles, what do we find? We find the 2,520 years will soon expire. And what would that mean? That would mean the time to restore Zion has come, and that, my dear friends, is part of my message to the Jews.

You have suffered persecution for centuries; God has surely promised you a blessing, and the time of fulfillment is near, and the blessing that will come upon you is so much greater than you have ever dreamed of that we are astonished to see the grace of our God and the wonderful lengths and breadths of his mighty plan.

The reason that you and I have been inclined to go after infidelity and to reject the Bible is that we never saw the plan of God as there outlined; never appreciated its wonderful promises, never appreciated the fact that God will bless every member of our race. “In thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed,” and that includes the knowledge of God, and the knowledge of his power, and the knowledge of his guidance, and the knowledge of the blessing that will come through the great Mediator of the New Covenant.

Well, how would we measure this period of time? You might say you would count it a few years sooner, etc., but I will tell you how I measure it. I find that the year of Zedekiah is the year 606 which we call in our common reckoning BC I forget how it is spoken of by the Jews, or the word that they use. 606 years BC and 1914 years AD will make what? 2,520 years. What do you see? You see forces at work today that the world has never before seen; every intelligent man sees something wonderful that he does not understand. We hold that the only proper conception of the things that are happening in your day and mine are seen only from the divine standpoint. From God’s Word we can know something of what the commotion of our day signifies. Can any deny that we have commotion in our day? That we have wonderful things in our day? That ours is a most wonderful day, for electricity, steam and all the wonderful inventions that come along these lines? How should we understand these things?

Some tell us these are all a result of our having large heads; that we are brainier than any people who have ever lived on the earth. Is this true? As far as you are concerned, and I know as far as I am concerned, you and I recognize great characters of the past that were greater than any of our day. Is it not true that Moses has not today his equal in the world as a law‑giver? Is it not true that David could touch more hearts than any other poet in the world? Surely! Shall we say, then, dear friends, that all this great blessing of our day is merely the result of ours being a “brain age” and that we are so brainy today? Let us take the Scriptures for it, let us take the words of the prophet for it, that this is the “day of preparation.” Preparation of whom? Messiah. That is what we have been praying for, for Messiah and for the great kingdom of God; for the blessing that God has declared shall come through the seed of Abraham to all the families of the earth. Do you not see that these are the beginning of the blessing? My understanding from the Bible is that the blessings which you and I are enjoying today, the most wonderful blessings the world has ever known, are only the beginnings of God’s blessings. I thank God that the great blessing is thus coming to all people and tongues. I thank God we have this hope of Messiah.

As an illustration, the one who has been instrumental in bringing forward many wonderful things from electricity, Mr. Edison, says himself that he has no great intelligence on the subject of electricity or any other subject; he himself tells that he merely stumbled into these things. The simple interpretation is that God’s time has come for the lifting of the veil of ignorance that has been in the world, and therefore the blessing of the Lord is coming out here and there.

I remind you of your Jubilee system, inaugurated by Moses; how it pointed forward to a great time of blessing. You remember under the jubilee arrangement that on the fiftieth year every one should again receive what had been lost; everything should go back in accordance with the original arrangement. What did that mean? I agree with you that it was a very good law; I agree with you that it was a very simple law put into operation on a very similar scale to our present bankruptcy law; it was typical of something in the future, typical of a great rest day.

Do you not as Jews hold to the promise of the great period of Messiah’s Kingdom when the great Sabbath of rest and peace will come to all the world? I understand that you do. I certainly do. Now this great Sabbath year, this great Jubilee, is another picture of the great day to come, Messiah’s reign, his Kingdom, the restitution spoken of, with every man restored to his former estate – that which was lost. Do you know that our Scriptures, your holy Scriptures, read that God created man not in an imperfect condition but in his own image, in his own likeness, perfect morally, perfect in mentality? Do you agree with me that the Scriptures, your Scriptures, show that so perfect, so absolutely perfect was Adam that even when the sentence of death came upon him he did not crumble into dust in a few years, but for 930 years he was going down into death? As we mark the history of the world coming down to us we find that the average of human life is only about 35 years. In our day we have come down to the very limit almost, and I have noticed within a week the state­ments of some, an English physician of prominence, and an American physician of prominence, and they both reached about the same conclusion, that at the present rate of the mental decline of the human family, 268 years more would make everybody insane. The world is becoming insane so rapidly that these gentlemen figured out that we would all be insane in 268 years. What does this mean? A great fall of our race, in the strength of mind, in the strength of body, which perhaps some of you have discovered already. Many of my friends have told me that they had a nervous breakdown. That means that none of us is equal to the strain.

Now, my dear friends, if you have the Bible standpoint that God created our first parents in his own image and likeness, and that sin came upon them, and that mentally, morally and physically we have fallen – if we have this before our minds, and then the great Jubilee, we see that man will be restored to his former estate – to all that he lost. That would be restitution according to the Bible. Now I hold, that, we either stand for God and the Bible or we stand against it. I stand for the Bible, and the Bible stands for Israel, and therefore I stand for Israel; and the Bible tells of restitution; of Divine favor, and therefore I proclaim it. I am glad, therefore, of having this opportunity of addressing so many of the Jewish people here and of pointing them to their own Scriptures as teaching these things, telling of the good things God has in reservation for you.

What, in view of this, is the lesson of the hour? It is this, my dear friends: That we should seek justice, and not merely seek the land of Palestine. I may say here that it is not at all my conception of the Bible teaching that the eight millions of Jews in the world are going to Palestine, even though it has been estimated that, under most favorable conditions, the land could support more than twice that many. It is my thought that some of your most earnest and saintly people will go to Palestine quickly, and that the rejuvenation there will be astonishing to the world. We have no thought whatever that it is God’s plan respecting the Jews that all Jews will return to Palestine, but the time has come when it is the duty of every Jew who is not going to Palestine personally, to give his sympathy, to do all in his power to help every Jew that does desire to go there, and should be specially desirous of assisting financially those of the Jews who are now suffering in Russia, helping them back to Palestine, and establishing there great enterprises. (Applause.)

In regard to your Zionistic ideas, I believe the due time, the set time, as our text says, to remember Zion has come; therefore God raised up for you a certain great leader, Dr. Herzl. Through his efforts the attention of the whole world has been attracted to Palestine, and to the Jews, and the original covenant. This I understand was a political move – not religious in any sense of the word – for the benefit of the Jews living in places where they suffered persecutions. It was also with a certain justifiable national pride that Israel might have a home like other people, and national distinction, and this would give them a share and a proper recognition by the world of the right of a government, and the right to share with others, as members, in the blessings belonging to the human family; that was the original proposition, and it has done a great deal. It is not necessary for me to tell you that the Zionist movement has reached practically its limit, that you have gone nearly as far along that line as you can go. What then? Should you feel discouraged? I say that this is NOT the time for discouragement. This is the very time for encouragement! (Applause.)

We have come to the very time, dear friends, when that realization is to come in, when the promises given in the Word of God to your race are about to take hold upon you as a people and fire your hearts as never before. They say, as some have said to me, Pastor Russell, those who are interested in the Zionist movement are only the poor. The rich of our people do not seem to be interested in it at all. I know nothing of that matter, dear friends, but I have this to say. If my understanding of the matter is right, the voice of Moses is going to the rich, the leaders of the Jewish people; the very foundation of your national character is laid in your religion. And whatever touches your religion, and your religious sentiments, and your faith in God, and your faith in the promises made to Abraham, that is going to stir you as a nation as nothing else has ever stirred you. I believe that we have come to the time, the set time, in which God will restore Zion, and that this fulfillment of Isaiah 40:1,2 is true: “Comfort ye, comfort ye, my people, saith your God, speak ye comfortably to Jerusalem, Cry unto her that her warfare is accomplished, that her iniquity is pardoned, for she hath received of the Lord double for all her sins” – a second portion for all her sins, and a blessing must immediately follow. We are in that very time, dear friends, to my understanding. How largely this will move the hearts of all, and that quickly!

If I rightly understand your prophecies – God’s prophecies which you recognize – they indicate that Jacob’s trouble is not over yet, that this trouble will still be with you, and that you will have more persecution and not merely in Russia, not merely in Roumania; I do not know, my dear friends, whether it will extend to this country or not; but doubtless it will be done also in the name of Christ – and I am sorry for that fact. It is sad indeed to be obliged to admit that these tribulations will probably come to you from professed Christians. How ashamed I feel of those who thus dishonor the name and the teachings of my Master, I cannot find words to express!

They are deluded. They have misunderstood the Teacher whom they profess to follow. Their thought is that God will torment eternally all who do not profess the name of Christ. Controlled by delusion, they are serving the great Adversary and dishonoring Jesus. At the same time God has in these trying experiences of your people a purpose – to develop your people, and to test your faith, and to keep you together as a people and make you a homogenous people. But as the trials and difficulties of the patriarch Joseph were God’s providences to lead him on to influence and power and honor, so will all these experiences and persecutions work blessings for your race and tend to drive them out of their present satisfaction and make them long for home – for Palestine. These experiences, in connection with the voice of the prophets, which will henceforth more and more ring in your ears, will be the providences of God to accomplish for you more along the lines of Zionism than personal pride and national patriotism. There is no other race that shows such persistency as the Jewish people, and this is all centered upon the religious sentiment, faith in the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of Jacob, faith in the promises of God that in the seed of Abraham all the families of the earth will be blessed; and as those persecutions come and as the great time of trouble shall come upon all the world – never mind whether it be in 1916 or not; any way that you can interpret that prophecy, no matter which way you do it, you cannot land very far from 1915 to 1916 – God’s promise will be fulfilled. In every direction in the world today, my dear friends, we see signs of great trouble, not only financial, but also capital and labor storms, and the people and the governments and the religious systems of the world will all be in conflict according to the Scriptures. I remind you of Daniel 12:1, which marks our day, declaring: “At that time shall Michael [the antitype of Michael, one like as God] stand up, the great Prince [Messiah].” Then what? “And there shall be a time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation,” no, nor ever will be again. “At that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.”

My dear friends, when that time of trouble comes over Christendom, over the civilized world, a great many of the wealthy Hebrews will want a place of safety and I think that place will be Palestine. The Bible clearly indicates to my mind that many wealthy Jews will go back to Palestine. The Scriptures clearly show that the end of Jacob’s trouble will take place right in Jerusalem; the persecution from the civilized world will drive them there and that finally the time of Jacob’s trouble will come; then, as the Lord declares, in the midst of that trouble he will reveal himself, not as a man, but manifest his Divine power, as the prophet declares: “The Lord will go forth and fight for you as he fought for you in the day of battle,” pointing back to the time when God fought for the Jewish people. In that day he will fight for Israel as in the day of battle. Then there will be a manifestation of his kingly power, and then the blessing will begin, and at that time also will appear, according to the Scriptures, your ancient Worthies, your saintly ones, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David – all the holy Prophets. These will not appear as imperfect men when they come because they have demonstrated their worthiness and faith in God, but will appear as perfect men, and of these it is written, you will remember, by one of the prophets: “Instead of thy fathers they shall be thy children,” and Messiah shall be made prince over all the earth; all the people of the world will be under this government; it will be a kingly government, my dear friends. You remember the great King of Israel will be the Messiah on the heavenly plane, invisible to man, the Prince of Light as supplanting Satan, the Prince of Darkness, and this great one will have the earthly government; your ancient Worthies, your saintly ones, will be princes in all the earth, perfect as men, and under the direction and guidance of the heavenly Messiah they shall be rulers amongst men, as the Scriptures declare: “I will restore thy judges and counselors as at the first.” You remember he gave them a counselor, a law‑giver in Moses and not a king, and so this represents a kind of a republic, if you please – not a real republic, but a theocracy. God will be the great one, Messiah will be his great representative to bring righteousness and peace and blessing to all the earth, and lift up mankind from the degradation and weakness and imperfection of sin, and Messiah will operate through these saintly ones of the past, to bless not only Israel, but through Israel to bless all mankind, all the families of the earth.

I thank God, my dear friends, for such a glorious hope, and I suggest to you all that you should come to the point where you will be seeking the Lord, for he says: “I will pour upon them the spirit of prayer and of supplication.” I would that all Jews were in the attitude of prayer and supplication toward God and looking for the fulfillment of all the prophecies which God has written for our admonition and encouragement. Your desires should be more and more for God and righteousness and you should be seeking to do those things pleasing to him, and to cultivate those elements of character without which no one could secure a place in the great institution that is to bless the world. Dear friends, God will not receive a man merely because he is a Jew. There must be something in you, something specially in harmony with the divine character, or he will not use you. I think one thing God will be specially pleased with in respect to Israel is faith, faith in God, faith in his promises, and I do tell you that I love and appreciate the faith that has been manifested by Israel for these 3,500 years, and I believe Almighty God is very much pleased with that faith. We see, according to the Scriptures, that this was the very quality in Abraham which made him specially pleasing to God, and he was called a friend of God, and so then the Jews who would be in harmony with God must be men of faith and not faith without action, but faith and action, and your action will be in accord with your faith in the glorious promises which God has made in the Bible.

It has been suggested, and I think it a very good plan, my dear friends, that we close this service by the singing of a hymn which I understand you are well acquainted with.

Our Hope

So long the ancient fires blaze

In ev’ry staunch Jewish soul,

And Eastward we longing gaze

Toward Zion, beloved goal‑

Not lost is our hope of old,

Graven in our hearts so deep,

To return to that land foretold,

Where our loved sires sleep.

While yet our eyes with quenchless tears

Yearn for our one‑time land,

And by graves of sleeping seers

Our hosts resolve to stand‑

Not lost is our hope of old, etc.

Thrills yet every brave Jewish heart

With love of flag and land,

Hope from us shall ne’er depart

Of our return – a triumphant band‑

Not lost is our hope of old, etc.


NO. 475A: THE JEWISH MASS MEETING

by Epiphany Bible Students


No. 475A

Pastor Russell, of the Brooklyn Tabernacle, Addresses an Enthusi­astic

Audience at the Hippodrome, New York, N.Y.

October 9, 1910

Brother Russell received an invitation to address a Jewish Mass Meeting in the great Hippodrome Theater of New York City. The invitation and Brother Russell’s response to the same follow:

NEW YORK, September 20, 1910.

Pastor C. T. Russell, Brooklyn, N.Y.

DEAR SIR:

Your sympathetic interest in the Jewish people for years past has not escaped our notice. Your denunciations of the atrocities perpetrated against our race in the name of Christianity has added to our conviction that you are a sincere friend. Your discourse on “Jerusalem and Jewish Hopes” has struck a responsive chord in the hearts of many of our people. Still we doubted for a time if any Christian minister could really be interested in a Jew as a Jew and not merely from a hope of proselyting him. It is because of this feeling that some of us request you to make a public statement respecting the nature of your interest in our people and we desire you to know that the statement you did make was very satisfactory. In it you assured us that you are not urging Jews to become Christians and join any of the sects or parties of Protestants or Catholics. That statement, Pastor Russell, has been widely published in the Jewish journals. We feel, therefore, that we have nothing to fear from you as a race. On the contrary, in that statement you mentioned that the foundation of your interest in our people is built upon your faith in the testimonies of our Law and the messages of our Prophets. You may well understand how surprised we are to find a Christian minister acknowledging that there are prophecies of the Bible still unfulfilled, which belong to the Jew and not to the Christian, and that these prophecies, according to your studies, are nearing a fulfillment of momentous interest to our Jewish race and, through us as a people, to the nations of the world.

These things, Pastor Russell, have led to the formation of a Jewish Mass Meeting Committee, which, by this letter, requests you to give a public discourse, especially to our people. If you will kindly accept this invitation, will you permit us to suggest a topic for your address, which, we believe, will be very interesting to the public and especially to the Jews, namely, “Zionism in Prophecy.”

As for the meeting: We suggest Sunday afternoon at 3 o’clock, October 9. We have secured an option on the Hippodrome, New York’s largest and finest auditorium, for that date, and we hope that this date and the place will be agreeable to your convenience. We assure you also of a large audience of deeply interested Hebrews, besides whoever may come of the general public.

Trusting to hear from you soon, we subscribe ourselves,

Yours respectfully,  JEWISH MASS MEETING COMMITTEE.

------------------------------------

BROOKLYN, N.Y., September 21, 1910.

Jewish Mass Meeting Committee, New York City.

GENTLEMEN:

Your kind invitation to address the Jewish Mass Meeting in the New York Hippodrome Sunday, October 9, at 3 p.m., came duly.

I thank you for the confidence which this invitation implies. The date you have selected is not only appropriate in its relationship to the Jewish New Year, but it is very suitable for my own arrangements, as I leave on October 12 for appointments in London and elsewhere in Great Britain.

Amongst the several prominent members of your race suggested for chairman of the Mass Meeting, I select Mr. John Barrondess, because I have had the pleasure personally of conference with him and because I know him to be very loyal to the interests of your people and because I believe him to be very highly esteemed as such in the counsels of your race.

Faithfully and respectfully yours,  C. T. Russell.

------------------------------------

During the week preceding the Mass Meeting many thousand copies of a special paper printed in Yiddish were sold at news stands and distributed with other Yiddish papers. This paper contained quotations from Brother Russell’s writings and sermons, and a report of his findings in Palestine during his recent visit to the Holy Land. In this paper were two very significant cartoons.

One represented an aged Jew seated in a graveyard, surrounded by tombstones. Each of these stones represented one of their dead hopes. The picture shows that the Jews have reached their limit – all hopes practically dead, and they do not know which way to turn.

The other picture represents the Jew as waking up – he hears a voice, and, looking up in a surprised manner, he sees Pastor Russell who holds in his hand a scroll of their prophecies, and is pointing to them, and to the New Jerusalem in the background, which will soon rise out of the ruins of the present city within the walls. Thinking these cartoons will be of interest to others, we reproduce them on the following pages.

------------------------------------

(New York American, Monday, October 10, 1910)

Pastor Russell Cheered by an Audience of Hebrews

Four Thousand in Hippodrome Applaud When Venerable Brooklyn Clergyman Advocates Establishment of a Jewish Nation. Hearers Who Came to Question Gentile’s Views on Their Religion Find He Agrees in Their Most Important Beliefs. Preacher, After Hailing Them as One of the Bravest Races on Earth, Says Kingdom May Return to Them by 1914.

The unusual spectacle of 4,000 Hebrews enthusiastically applauding a Gentile preacher, after having listened to a sermon he addressed to them concerning their own religion, was presented at the Hippodrome yesterday afternoon, where Pastor Russell, the famous head of the Brooklyn Tabernacle, conducted a most unusual service.

In his time the venerable pastor has done many unconventional things. His religion is bounded by no particular denomination, and encompasses, as he says, all mankind. His ways of teaching it are his own. But he never did a more unconventional thing than this – nor a more successful one.

He won over an audience that had come – some of it, at least – prepared to debate with him, to resent, perhaps, what might have appeared like a possible intrusion. “Pastor Russell is going to try to convert the Jews to Christianity,” was the word that many had received before the meeting “He wants to proselyte us.”

RECEIVED AT FIRST IN SILENCE.

In the crowd which filled the big show house were scores of rabbis and teachers, who had come to speak out in case the Christian attacked their religion or sought to win them from it. They had questions and criticisms ready for him. He was received at first in a dead silence.

But the Pastor did not seek to convert the Jews. To their unbounded delight, he pointed out the good things of their religion, agreed with them in their most important beliefs as to their salvation, and finally, after a warm advocacy of the plan of the Jews establishing a nation of their own, brought about a tumult of applause by leading a choir in the Zionist anthem: “Hatikva – Our Hope.”

A more interesting audience the Hippodrome never held, perhaps. From all parts of the city came serious‑minded Hebrews to hear what it was an alien, a Gentile, might have to say to them at a service held during their week of feasting, Rosh Hoshkana. They were quiet, well‑dressed, thinking men and women.

Among them were many prominent figures of the Hebrew literary world. Some of these escorted Pastor Russell to the Hippodrome in a motor car and then took places in the auditorium. The literary men recognized the pastor as a writer and investigator of international fame on the subject of Judaism and Zionism. Some of those present were Dr. Jacobs, editor of the American Hebrew; W. J. Solomon, of the Hebrew Standard; J. Brosky, associate editor of the same; Louis Lipsky, editor of the Maccabean; A. B. Landau, of the Warheit, Leo Wolfsohn, president of the Federation of Roumanian Societies; J. Pfeffer, of the Jewish Weekly; S. Diamont, editor of the Jewish Spirit; S. Goldberg, editor of the American Hebrew; J. Barondess, of the Jewish Big Stick, and Goldman, editor of H’Yom, the only Jewish daily.

NO RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS THERE.

No symbol of any religion at all greeted them when they gazed at the Hippodrome stage. It was entirely empty save for a small lectern and three peace flags hanging from silken cords above. One was the familiar white silk banner with the Stars and Stripes in its center, together with the words, “Peace Among Nations,” in letters of gold. Another bore a rainbow and the word “Pax.” The third was a silken strip bearing miniature representations of all the nations’ flags.

There were no preliminaries. Pastor Russell, tall, erect and white‑bearded, walked across the stage without introduction, raised his hand, and his double quartette from the Brooklyn Tabernacle sang the hymn, “Zion’s Glad Day.” The members of this organization are Mrs. E. W. Brenneisen, Mrs. E. N. Detweiler, Miss Blanche Raymond and Mrs. Raymond, Emil Hirscher, C. Meyers, J. P. MacPherson and J. Mockridge. Their voices blended perfectly, and the hymn, without any instrumental accompaniment, was impressive.

But still there seems an air of aloofness about the audience. They did not applaud, but sat, silently watching the stalwart figure of the pastor. When he began to talk, however, they gave him respectful attention.

With a powerful, yet charming voice, that filled the great playhouse, the unconventional clergyman made his every word audible to every hearer. His tones pleased their ears, his graceful gestures soon captivated their eyes, and in a few moments his apparently thorough knowledge of his subject appealed to their minds. Though still silent, the 4,000 were “warming up” to him.

RESERVE AND DOUBT VANISH.

It was not long before all reserve, and all possible doubt of Pastor Russell’s entire sincerity and friendliness were worn away. Then the mention of the name of a great Jewish leader – who, the speaker declared, had been raised by God for the cause – brought a burst of applause.

From that moment on the audience was his. The Jews became as enthusiastic over him as though he had been a great rabbi or famous orator of their own religion. He hailed them as one of the bravest races of the earth – having kept their faith through the persecutions and cruelties of all other people for thousands of years. And he predicted that before very long they would be the greatest of the earth – not merely a people, any longer, but a nation. By a system of deductions based upon the prophecies of old, the pastor declared that the return of the kingdom of the Jews might occur at so near a period as the year 1914. Persecution would be over and peace and universal happiness would triumph.

As he brought his address to a conclusion the pastor raised his hand again to his choir. This time they raised the quaint, foreign‑sounding strains of the Zion hymn, “Our Hope,” one of the masterpieces of the eccentric East Side poet Imber.

The unprecedented incident of Christian voices singing the Jewish anthem came as a tremendous surprise. For a moment the Hebrew auditors could scarcely believe their ears. Then, making sure it was their own hymn, they first cheered and clapped with such ardor that the music was drowned out, and then, with the second verse, joined in by hundreds.

At the height of the enthusiasm over the dramatic surprise he prepared, Pastor Russell walked off the stage and the meeting ended with the end of the hymn. He was congratulated by scores of men and women who had come in indifferent, if not hostile, frames of mind, and he made a friend, they all declared, of everyone who had heard him.

A stenographic report of the entire discourse is presented in No. 475B, June 1996.


NO. 474: MORE ON ISRAEL

by Epiphany Bible Students


No. 474

Days Of Great Danger: Jonathan Sacks, the Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, recently spoke out concerning the Jewish peoples’ regathering to Zion without a vibrant biblical faith. This physical return without a spiritual return is unique in Israel’s 4,000 year history and has set the stage for Israelis to adopt a secular world view concerning their identity, calling and future.

This in turn has now played into the hands of their enemies...who have seized the opportunity to disinvest Israel of her God-given birthright, the land. Naturally all this is being done within the parameters of the morality of the New World Order. Israelis are being told that they have no other option other than to be pragmatic and negotiate. Strangely the goal is always the same, the Jews must give up everything and in return they will be given pieces of paper guaranteeing peace! All this at a time when the international order is witnessing a growth in anti-Semitism.

Moreover the media constantly pushes the idea that Israel has grabbed land as part of its greater Israel philosophy. This too has never been true since she only acquired land in wars sparked by Arab aggression. The Arab agenda in each case was total liquidation, and Israel’s agenda was purely that of survival.

Now slowly but surely Israel is being forced back to pre-1967 borders all in the name of “we have no other option.” But there is another option, the option of belief in and trust in the God of Israel.

Such belief does not turn those who have it into fundamentalist fools –  no –  on the contrary it gives hope and encouragement and enables Israel to seek peace, as Menachem Begin did, from a position of strength. It must be remembered that major events in Israel’s modern day restoration and pilgrimage all enjoy biblical precedent. God has been with them in a miraculous way, why then should He fail them now?!

All that has failed now is faith and courage. Hereunder then is Jonathan Sack’s comments and our editorial on the tragic events that have transpired in Israel lately.

Chief Rabbi Rebukes Jews For Building A State But Losing Faith: The Chief Rabbi will speak tonight of a crisis in Judaism, arguing that after Zionism’s “return to the land” there must now be a return to faith.

In an address to mark the beginning of Selichot, the penitential period leading up to the Jewish New Year next week, Dr. Jonathan Sacks, who will deliver his address at the Western Marble Arch synagogue in London, says people are losing the will to live as Jews.

“A hundred years ago we had the faith but not the land,” he says. “Today we have the land, but what has happened to the faith?”

Dr. Sacks believes that “whether those who built the state [of Israel] were religious or secular, whether they were driven by love of the land or fear of anti-Semitism, something larger than any individual was at work...the Shekhinah, the Divine Spirit as it enters the human heart.”

Taking as his theme teshuvah, meaning return, he adds that Zionism, founded as a movement in the 1890s, worked for return to the land. But for the Biblical prophets, teshuvah meant a return to the land and to the faith: the two were “inseparable.”

Dr. Sacks says: “That is why Zionism was only half a return. It was the first time in history Jews contemplated a return to the land that was not also a return to the faith, a physical teshuvah without a spiritual teshuvah. And that is why we face a crisis today.” (By Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent, Christian Action for Israel, 4th Quarter 1995 Newsletter)

Yitzhak Rabin 1922-1995:  In Memoriam: In New Orleans, 25 years ago, when he was the new Ambassador to the United States and I was with the San Francisco Chronicle, I spent an early morning hour with him, one-on-one.

I remember him as dour, but courteous;  not given to humor (as every other Israeli I have ever known), but seriously thoughtful.

I was enormously impressed with this extraordinary soldier whose photograph I had seen, with Moshe Dayan and the Israeli paratroopers, just after they liberated the Western Wall, only days before I arrived on assignment from San Francisco.

That scene is etched forever in my memory and in the history of the State of Israel, which these two soldiers did so much to help establish and defend. This picture will always be his memorial and most signal honor.

We talked of many things, there in that deserted ballroom of a New Orleans hotel, where he had come to make an award to a convention president whose support for Israel had been significant. I mentioned Britain’s General Orde Wingate, master of guerilla warfare who instructed the Jewish Night Squads in the art of successful combat against the Arab pogromist infiltrators of Jewish settlements; this singularly devout Christian and devotee of Holy Scripture, who took Abyssinia back from Mussolini, accompanied by his Jewish chief of staff, who I once interviewed in Haifa. Rabin’s face lit up at the name of Wingate: “He was my great teacher.”

General and Ambassador Yitzhak Rabin was similarly enthusiastic when I mentioned a friend of my father at West Point, killed in action fighting for Israel on the road to Jerusalem: Col. David (Mickey) Marcus. I mentioned that I had visited Mickey’s monument, but I could not read the Hebrew on the memorial. He said that he would look into that, and when I returned to Israel four years later, I saw that the memorial was in English as well as Hebrew.

I also recall mentioning the use of napalm in Israel’s retaliatory raids. I noted that whenever that happened, every TV correspondent in Amman and Beirut was invited to hospitals, where every available burn victim was exhibited –  and televised –  as a victim of Israel –  whether or not that was true. He said that he would look into this as well, although he noted that napalm is without peer in knocking out artillery and missile batteries.

In my joining with so much of the civilized world in mourning this leader with whose prime ministerial policies I so strongly disagreed, I pray for his soul. Just as I pray for this Holiest Land on earth –  which has become one of earth’s bloodiest.

I wonder if the 27 year-old suspect, a law student from Herzliya, is at all aware of the terrible consequence of this assassination with which he is charged.

Is he, there in the closest possible custody, aware that those Jew-hating creatures in Beirut began their obscene celebrations –  even as Prime Minister Rabin’s strongest political critics and opponents in the Knesset were joining the worlds decent people in mourning?

Is this assassin aware that his gunning down a Prime Minister may well lead to the continuance of the policies which he and other Israelis –  especially the 160,000 residents of Judea and Samaria –  so desperately oppose?

Has he heard news reports that there were even some young Israeli over-reactors who told reporters that opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu of the Likud Party is a murderer? This brother of the commanding officer who died leading the raid on Entebbe – under Rabin’s watch – would not dignify that extremism with a response. Instead, he called upon the nation to unite, and noted:

“Even in the United States there are loonies. But it would be inappropriate to try to stigmatize parties and debate in Israel. We debate; we shout, but we don’t shoot. It’s an elected government. Bring it down in the polls.”

Perhaps this law student suspect reached his conclusion as a result of so many, many unavenged murders of Israelis (and two Americans) since the first handshake with Arafat at the White House.

Once more, as we have heard incessantly, “The peace movement will not be stopped!” Acting Prime Minister Shimon Peres ought to think very, very carefully about this. He must surely remember another horribly harrowing part of the history of modern Israel –  which brought the infant nation to the brink of civil war.

It took place in 1948. The regular troops of the new State of Israel had astounded the world, by standing up to and repelling five Arab armies –  including the Spit-fires of King Farouk’s Egyptian Air Force, and the heavily armored and well-trained troops of “Glubb Pasha” –  Britian’s General John Glubb’s Arab Legion, which invaded from the Kingdom of Transjordan and were able to take the Old City of Jerusalem.

During a truce, one of Israel’s leading guerilla groups, the Irgun Zvai Leumi, attempted to land a shipload of desperately needed arms and ammunition. This ship, the S.S. Altalena, had been sent and supplied by Americans such as the renowned playwright and newsman, Ben Hecht, who staged a benefit musical on Broadway. But David Ben-Gurion ordered the Altalena to surrender its cargo to the regulars, the Haganah, whose elite strike force, the Palmach, was massed for possible battle.

When the Irgun commander refused, the order was given to open fire. And one of that ship’s crew, who I interviewed in New York, recalls that they had to take the Irgun commander by force and get him off the ship –  along with several dead and wounded. The name of the Irgun commander was Menachem Begin. (Ed. note:  18 passengers were shot to death as they swam to shore.)

Since the name of the Palmach commander who opened fire was Yitzhak Rabin, I was surprised to read or hear so many American Jews express surprise that one Jew could fire on another. And I hope very much that a similar optimism is not applied to dismissing any possibility of civil war.

Along with my prayers for Yitzhak Rabin, I pray that Peres and whatever government that follows will NOT abandon the Jewish residents of Judea, Samaria and the Golan; will NOT cede land which is essential for any reasonable hope of national defense; and will NOT be naive enough to expect that Arafat’s U.S. taxpayer-subsidized “Palestine” Police will apprehend –  or even try to control –  Hamas, Hezbollah, Abu Nidal or George Habash.

Let us remember the good and courageous things done by Yitzhak Rabin. As we commend his soul to the Lord of Hosts.

(Lester Kinsolving is host of “Uninhabited Radio:  The Les Kinsolving Show,” which is broadcast in the Baltimore area on radio station WCBM 680)

(By Les Kinsolving, Outpost, November 1995)

Will Israel Be Just A Footnote In History?: Years from now, perhaps when Israel may only be remembered as a footnote in the history of a once strange people called the Jews, social scientists will try to understand what led this tenacious race to commit national suicide. No nation in recorded history survived for so many centuries against such indomitable odds and then suddenly decided to surrender, at the very height of its miraculously resurgent economic and military power. It surrendered, moreover, to a brutal enemy vastly inferior to it in every conceivable parameter but demographics. Animal psychologists will try to understand the behavior of lemmings who plunge into the sea by the countless thousands in periodic frenzies of mass suicide by reference to what happened to the Jews at the end of the 20th century. After emerging victorious in five successive wars of national defense, they accept the fiat of their venal leaders who willingly give up their hard won national patrimony to a gang of international terrorists. One can only assume that many Jews in Israel, in the space of a few years, have become so degenerate and materialistic, so devoid of any semblance of national dignity, that they permit their defeated enemies to dictate the terms of their national existence.

While the century-old Arab threat to the existence of the Jews in the Middle East remains a daily fact of life, a more ominous internal struggle has arisen that threatens the essential cohesion of the Jewish nation. For many decades, an often uneasy truce existed between a dominant secular Jewish nationalism and Jewish religious tradition. The crisis that we witness in the so-called “peace process” is dominated, in my opinion, by this latter factor and it is one that merits far more attention than it has received to date.

Actually a change also has taken place in both the composition and relative strengths of the two groups. The secular Jewish nationalists who controlled the country through their power in Mapai (today’s Labor Party) up to the Yom Kippur War, and for several years thereafter, possessed a vastly different perspective from the Labor/Meretz secularists of today. By the same token, the religious Zionist camp has immensely grown in size, in depth of commitment to the State, and is no longer on the periphery of Israeli society. Religious Zionists have replaced the socialist Zionist chalutzim to become the new dynamic elite, in the military, in pioneering settlement, and in other vital national areas. For example, while the other kibbutz movements are demoralized and losing members, have seen their idealism replaced by the grossest aspects of Western culture, are heavily in debt, and constantly kept afloat by huge government handouts, the religious kibbutz movement has maintained its agricultural base, is not encumbered by debt, and does not have a moral problem.

Secular Zionism reached the pinnacle of its achievements in the Six Day War of 1967. Unfortunately, the government of Israel was totally unprepared to exploit a victory of that magnitude for the long term security of the country. The Arabs never accepted the consequences of their overwhelming defeat and immediately made their position crystal clear in the Khartoum Conference of November 1967 when they enunciated the three famous “nos”;  no negotiations with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no peace with Israel. At the same time, many secular Jewish intellectuals, both in Israel and in the Diaspora, felt uncomfortable with that triumph, even though an Arab victory would surely have resulted in another holocaust for the Jews. In fact, these secularists have difficulty conditioning themselves to the concept that Jews have the same right as all other peoples to exercise military power in their own behalf and to benefit from that success. Jewish leftists (they call themselves “liberals”) have always placed a very low priority on the interests of their own people.

For almost thirty years now, a dangerous polarization has become increasingly apparent within the body politic of the Jewish people, which the Arabs have quickly discerned and taken advantage of. It is between the growing liberal, humanist, internationalist tendencies in some segments of Israeli society and the rise of a stronger Jewish nationalism, based upon traditional Judaism that views the Jewish people from the kaleidoscope of history going back to Abraham.

The so-called “peace process” as pursued by the Rabin-Peres-Meretz Government of Israel is as much an expression of the dimensions of the conflict over critical directions in Israeli society as it is an expression of the government’s support to reach an accommodation with the Arabs. Nationalists –  and this today increasingly means traditional Jews –  perceive what is taking place as a threat to the basic tenets of Zionism and to the fundamental values of Judaism. They are shocked by the attempt to undermine the distinctive character of the Jewish State, the disregard, even hatred of religious tradition.

Meretz and elements in the Labor Party press for the legalization and expansion of public transportation and entertainment on the Sabbath, homosexuality as a publicly-sanctioned lifestyle, the importation of non-kosher meat, elimination of the Jewish right of return, change of the national anthem so as not to offend Arab sensitivities, et cetera. Yael Dayan, a Labor Party Member of the Knesset, flaunts her contempt for Jewish sensitivities by spending Yom Kippur on a Tel Aviv beach in a bikini.  Shulamit Aloni of Meretz boasts of eating pork and scoffs at accepted tenets of the Bible. Yossi Beilin claims that he could not find a rationale for urging his children to marry within their faith. Jewish intellectuals such as Amos Oz berate nationalism as the “curse of humanity.” However, they apply that stricture only to Jewish nationalism, not daring to do so to Arab or to any other Third World nationalism.  Toward the patriotic Jews in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza they show absolute contempt because they are devoted to Zionism and to traditional Judaism. The Hebrew-speaking Canaanites of Labor/Meretz tremble with fear at the growing power and numbers of traditional Jews who believe in the Torah and in the destiny of the Jewish people. (It is interesting to note that in the U.S., Jewish Jews are more comfortable with and have far more in common with the Christian Right than the pagan Jewish left.)

Between these two groups there is an unbridgeable ideological chasm that time can seemingly only exacerbate. In the standoff between the secularists and the religionists, there is probably a much larger body of Jews who are in neither camp. However, they are fearful of what they perceive the secularists are doing to their special position as Jews in a supposedly Jewish country. They fear for their security after the creation of still another Arab state in the tiny postage-stamp-sized area between the Jordan Rift and the Mediterranean Sea. The consequence can only be an immeasurably weakened and more vulnerable Israel that will invite aggression.

The cosmopolitan Jews who control today’s Israeli government welcome a strengthening of the Arab position in Israel, despite the security perils that it poses, as a counterweight to the religious Zionist position. The Jews at Israel’s helm claim to advocate a liberal, Western-style democracy, free of rabbinic influence and devoid of the State’s Zionist/Judaic character. Such an Israel, shorn of Jewish particularism, would move to nullify the Zionist dream of a distinctive Jewish homeland. In truth, its survival would become pointless and more difficult to defend intellectually and militarily. The only patriotism it could claim would be that of an amorphous, secular, humanism which has little relevance anywhere in the world and certainly not in the brutal, fundamentalist milieu of the Muslim Middle East.

Many years ago, in fact shortly after the founding of Israel in 1948, people discussed and feared the coming “kulturkampf” that they foresaw breaking out among the Jews. The clash between Jews is now erupting full blown in the framework of the so-called “peace process.” But, in truth, the eruption that is now taking place has a significant history and a number of interesting antecedents.

The Brith Shalom Movement was founded in 1925, soon after the Arab riots of the early 1920s. The society was founded in Jerusalem to foster Arab-Jewish friendship. It boasted some famous Jewish personages such as Arthur Ruppin, Gershom Scholem and individuals from both Mapai and Mapam.  They advocated a democratic bi-national state composed of Jews and Arabs. The idea did not elicit the slightest echo from the Arabs and it was attacked by all Zionist groups, including Mapai (Labor).

To prove that the appeasement strain never long remains dormant among certain segments of Jews, the Brith Shalom idea was revived in 1936, at the time of the murderous Arab riots in which hundreds of Jews were killed and wounded. The left wing Zionist groups involved in this effort called their new organization the Society for Arab-Jewish Understanding. Those few Arabs who voiced sympathy with the aims of the Society were quickly killed in typically brutal fashion by other Arabs.

Six years later, the Brith Shalom idea was revived and called Ihud, under the leadership of the distinguished American Reform rabbi and idealist, Judah Magnes, who was then president of the Hebrew University, and Ernst Simon. Strange to relate, when this latest effort at reaching out to the Arabs was taking place in 1942, the Arabs in the Middle East made no effort to mask their strong sympathies for Nazi Germany. In Europe, under aegis of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who found refuge during the war in Berlin, European Muslims from Bosnia were actively recruited to an all-Muslim unit of the SS. Ihud, which did not go out of existence until 1964, was likewise composed of that segment of Jewish intellectuals who were denounced by no less an authority than Josef Stalin, the virulently anti-Semitic dictator of Russia, as “rootless cosmopolitans.”

Obviously, the stark decades of Zionist struggle against indefatigable Arab hostility has not dampened the ardor for a bi-national state in certain ‘progressive’ circles. That formula, although not explicitly spelled out, now lives in the Rabin-Peres-Beilin initiative by which a Jewish government agrees to concession after concession to gain the acceptance and love of the Arabs. The Jews of Israel are promised peace and security if they surrender the heartland of their nation, the strategic military assets of Judea, Samaria, Gaza, and the Golan Heights, along with precious water resources, to the implacable PLO enemy. Just consider how much greater the prosperity and security of the Jews of Israel will be when they also surrender the Galilee. Transfer of the Galilee to the new “Palestinian” state is already very much on the political agenda of Israel’s Arab citizens. Israel will then have fully fulfilled her contribution to the PLO Grand Strategy for the step-by-step elimination of the “Zionist entity.” (By Irving Kett, Outpost, November 1995)

Days Of Great Danger Continued...: More than ever events in Israel require a careful, unemotional and might I say, biblical response.

To be sure the act of violence that has traumatized the nation is to be soundly condemned and rejected. Neither God nor a civilized society can tolerate this form of evil.

However, while this is true the almost unique status to which Yitzhak Rabin has been elevated is to be questioned. He was not the “pillar of fire” leading the whole camp of Israel as he did not enjoy the overwhelming support of his nation. Indeed the recent vote in the Knesset on the second stage of the “Peace Process” revealed that he enjoyed less than half of the confidence of his people. The five Arab MKs plus the grave consequences of embarrassing the U.S. President, played a major and deciding role in passing the accord. This just happens to be a fact!

In addition to open vilification of the Likud party that attempts to identify them with the fanatical right-wing is to be rejected. To be sure the international order is behind this for reasons of their own.  They want peace at Israel’s heavy cost. The polarization of the country has more to do with international pressure than anything else. It is interesting to note that at Yitzhak Rabin’s funeral President Clinton made it clear that Israel will continue to enjoy superpower support just so long as she continues with the “Peace Process.” This is blackmail!!

If we add to this the sad circumstances now surrounding the settlers the picture becomes even more discoloured.

The settlers are largely religious but they are not the monsters the media is seeking to portray them as. They have, because of: (1) Strong religious convictions, and (2) Government policy embracing the labour and Likud governments since 1948, been the backbone of the Zionist dream and the security buffer in times of crisis. In order to fulfill these roles they have toiled in unbelievable hardship and in this they were sustained largely by their faith in the Bible and the God of Israel. Now the Zionist dream has been redefined and they are being vilified by the very people that asked them to do what they’ve done...and by the world media. The behaviour of a few radicals is constantly portrayed as the actions of all!!

It is to be noted that God-fearing Judaism has held the people of Israel together during the dark years of dispersion, persecution and Holocaust. Central to this process of survival has been the weekly gathering of Shabbat.

Now however, belief in the Bible is called fundamentalism and one is labeled “right-wing.” There is no doubt in my mind that the forces now at work, even in Israel, are undermining the very basic tenets of Judaism. All is myths we are told and the Bible is not a reliable document declaring the will and purpose of the only true God. With no “absolute” guiding the affairs of the Middle East we all descend into the murky unreliable waters of secular humanism. For in this scheme of things all things are relative and man is basically good.

The facts declare otherwise!  The God who has miraculously sustained Israel over 4,000 years is still around and, as David the King of Israel testified man is born in iniquity or as the Book of Job declares, “He is born for trouble as the sparks fly upward…” or as Jeremiah stated, “The heart of man is desperately sick and wicked above all things.”

The new morality being forced on Israel will plunge her into increased confusion and weakness. This is just what her enemies want!

This tidal wave of new morality is lamented by British Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks when he states: “Sin becomes immorality, immorality becomes deviance, deviance becomes choice and all choice becomes legitimate..”

This brings us to the most difficult question of all namely, “has the labour government betrayed the Zionist dream?” There are three ways of answering this vital question: (1) If one is swept up into the trauma and emotion of the last weeks events the answer would be a resounding no!... and... (2) If one subscribes to the New World religion of secular humanism the answer would be no,...but... (3) If one believes in the veracity of the Bible the answer is yes!

The issues now facing us are critical for one cannot believe the Bible and support the Peace Process unconditionally.  The solution that honours God’s Word and supports peace is the real one for it invites the engagement of the God of Israel. History clearly affirms this in Israel’s restoration, protection and survival.

Now however Israelis are being faced with one option only. That is the one that discounts the Bible and what God says in favour of a solution that brings war closer. This situation has divided the Jewish people once again –  as in the days of the original celebration of Chanukah –  the solution is coming from “Greece.”

What principles have brought Israel to this crisis? (1) The principle of “spitting.” An old saying states, “A people frequently spat upon will in the end believe that they are wrong.” For too long Israel has had to endure the spitting of the world. She has finally embraced the accusation of occupier and oppressor. Once this “quantum leap” in Israel’s consciousness was achieved, the road to division, appeasement and danger was easy.

Dave Hunt writes: “In any war, propaganda plays a vital role. In the current war of words over who has the right to the Holy land, the world media seems deaf to Israel and overly sympathetic to whatever complaints the Palestinians may make. Israel is the ogre that stole their land and grinds them down in poverty...”

(2) The “Trojan Horse” Principle. The enemy is now within the gate! Is this exaggeration or merely believing what he himself has to say? In this regard I refer to Yasser Arafat. As recently as October 1995, after the 2 stage accord was signed, he rushed back to Tunis to seek the support of his PLO executive committee and to again assure them that this was nothing more than the implementation of the stage plan of 1974. What principles have brought Israel to this crisis?

Furthermore in a mosque in Johannesburg he called for a Jihad against Jerusalem. Not picked up upon by the media, because of ignorance, was his simultaneous description of the present peace accords as being identical to the one that Mohammed made with the Quraish tribe of Mecca.

Mohammed signed a peace treaty with the Quraish only to break it two years later in a war of destruction. Arafat clearly stated that this is the process now under way.

About this event Israeli analyst Moshe Zak writes: “It was not lies of stupidity that characterized Arafat’s Johannesburg remarks, but stupendous candour. His forthright, unambiguous remarks were reminiscent of Mein Kampf, in which the author Hitler was blunt about his plans, so much so that his adversaries didn’t take him seriously. Arafat did not commit any slip of the tongue in Johannesburg. He used his call for a Jihad and cited Mohammed’s agreement with the Quraish tribe to test his thesis that Israel would swallow that, too.”

(3) Fundamentalist Principle. Anyone believing in the Bible is now a fundamentalist bigot! No longer is the Bible Israel’s title deed to the land. This fact was publicly stated by labour party leaders.

By turning Bible believers into fundamentalist lunatics the international media has swiftly destroyed the mainstay and foundation of Israel’s existence. From this point onwards everything is up for negotiation even the heartland of Israel bequeathed by God to her.

No-one likes being branded and Jews have been branded too long. Now they want to join the international community like any other nation. The problem is this: anti-Semitism has no logic or reason behind it and, as in history, so still now, it will not go away. It is demonic for it endeavours to destroy the glorious future that the God of Israel has for His people. Given these realities; where do we go from here? Well we have to face:

(1) The Reality Of Islam.  Much has been said and written about the dangers of Islam. To be sure this is the driving force behind the so-called Middle East conflict. A recent Jerusalem Post editorial stated: “As long as the danger of Islamic militancy looms, all talk of a positive, significant change in the attitudes of the Arab and Moslem world towards Israel is recklessly, dangerously premature.”

We believe this and we must therefore in the light of it continue to press for a well armed Israel protected by defendable borders.

Israel’s existence challenges the credibility of the Quran. For the Quran to survive Israel must be liquidated. One cannot negotiate with this.

(2) The Reality Of The God Of The Bible. Israel’s restoration and survival has been miraculous. No-one can deny this. Her modern pilgrimage has clear biblical precedent even the attempt now being undertaken to divide the land and, by so doing, destroy her. (Joel 3:1-3)

We are to be encouraged since in the final analysis God has pledged Himself to be the faithful protector of Zion. (Zech. 12:1-9)

Israel has returned for the second and final time. (Isaiah 11:11) She will not be destroyed. Difficult days most certainly lie ahead but His Word and promise will not fail. “He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps,” declared the Psalmist. Isaiah states that “No weapon formed against her will prosper.” (Isaiah 54:17)

A glorious day awaits Israel and we must now not lose heart because we have come to the very door of it! Call me a dreamer, a fool or deluded but I believe in it. (Isaiah 66:9-14)

“Do I bring the moment of birth and not give delivery?” says the Lord.  “Do I close up the womb when I bring to delivery?” says your God.  “Rejoice with Jerusalem and be glad for her, all you who love her;  rejoice greatly with her, all you who mourn over her. For you will nurse and be satisfied at her comforting breasts; you will drink deeply and delight in her overflowing abundance.” For this is what the Lord says: “I will extend peace to her like a river, and the wealth of nations like a flooding stream; you will nurse and be carried on her arm and dandled on her knees. As a mother comforts her child, so will I comfort you; and you will be comforted over Jerusalem. When you see this, your heart will rejoice and you will flourish like grass; the hand of the Lord will be made known to his servants, but his fury will be shown to his foes.”

(3) The Reality Of The Believers. In closing may I urge you all to pray for Israel. Prayer is not weak and meaningless. It is the great work of all those who love the God of Israel and His Word. Scripture calls upon us to “Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.”(Psalm 122:6)

Those who pray are thus most significant and Israel, now more than ever, needs your regular prayers.

Almost as if foreseeing our day the prophet Daniel writes: “And by smooth words he will turn to godlessness those who act wickedly toward the covenant, but the people who know their God will display strength and take action and those who have insight among the people will give understanding to the many...”

In the light of this, let us be encouraged and prayerful...and let us not be discouraged and fearful. Zion needs us all as never before.

“Fear not, nor be afraid [in the coming violent upheavals]... Is there a God beside me? There is no other Rock... Sing O heavens... For the Lord has redeemed Jacob, and He will glorify Himself in Israel.” (Isaiah 44:8,23, Amplified)

(Malcolm Hedding, Chairman –  Christian Action for Israel, 4th Quarter 1995 Newsletter)

=======


NO. 473: SOME THOUGHTS FOR THE MEMORIAL

by Epiphany Bible Students


No. 473

“As oft as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do proclaim the Lord’s death till he come.” (1 Cor. 11:26)

TWO PASSOVER MEMORIALS: We trust that all of the Lord’s consecrated people everywhere will avail themselves of their privilege of memorializing the death of the Redeemer for our sins. As our Lord and the Apostles met and symbolized His death in advance of the event, so it is appropriate for us to meet on the anniversary to celebrate His sacrifice.

This is one of the most interesting features of Jesus’ earthly ministry. The doing of this annually, in harmony with the evident purpose of the Lord in establishing this Memorial instead of the Jewish Passover, makes the occasion a very impressive one, much more so than any celebration which ignores the anniversary feature and celebrates occasionally – monthly, weekly, quarterly, etc. Let us not find fault with others who do differently; but, as opportunity offers, let us inform them of our reasons for observing this great event on its anniversary.

Jesus knew that the Apostles did not know that this was to be His last supper with them. Although He had intimated the nearness of His death, His disciples had found it impossible to comprehend that any such disaster could be so near at hand as He had intimated. Jesus, however, with full consciousness of what it meant, was longing for the consummation of His work. It was probably on the very day at the close of which He and His disciples went to eat the Passover that Jesus said, “I have a baptism to be baptized with; and how am I in difficulty until it be accomplished!” (Luke 12:50) – a baptism into death, which was finished the following day.

Peter and John were the two disciples sent to make ready the Passover. Evidently Jesus was at Bethany, at the home of Lazarus, when He sent this word. It is supposed that the large upper room in which the Passover was eaten by Jesus and His disciples was the same one in which the apostles and others were gathered to await the Pentecostal blessings.

In the evening of the same day, Jesus with the entire twelve met in this room, all the preparations having been attended to. They met to celebrate the Jewish Passover at its appointed time. The lamb had been roasted, and the unleavened bread prepared, also the bitter herbs. Everything, we may be sure, was exactly in conformity with the original requirement; for Jesus and His apostles were bound by every feature of the Jewish Law as much as were other Jews – the new dispensation not yet having been ushered in. Every feature of the law was binding up to the time of the Pentecostal blessing, which marked the Divine approval of the sacrifice of Jesus and the Divine acceptance of all those who had become His disciples by a full consecration.

KINGDOM HONORS DESIRED

So far from realizing that they were on the eve of a great tragedy, the apostles believed that Jesus would very soon be enthroned as King. They remembered His promise that they should sit with Him in His throne. This promise seemed so near of realization to them that they could think of little else but the degree of honor which they would have in the Kingdom. They seemed to feel that unless they contended stoutly for it, they would not get so honorable positions. Perceiving their attitude of mind, Jesus said to them, “The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; but ye shall not be so; but he that will be greatest amongst you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.” (Luke 22:25,26)

These were the new standards, difficult for them to understand; and apparently they are still difficult for the followers of Jesus to comprehend fully. The one who will be chief in the Kingdom will be the one who was the chief servant in the flesh. This greatest servant of all was, of course, the Lord Jesus Himself. But the Master intimates that the same principle holds good in respect to all of His followers. Whoever of them will most faithfully, most earnestly, most zealously, serve the brethren will thereby be increasing his favor with God, and be preparing himself for so much higher station in Messiah’s Kingdom.

With the thought that any menial service would signify admission of their unworthiness of a high place, the disciples made no arrangement for feet‑washing, not wishing to assume the role of servant. In that sandy country feet‑washing was almost a necessity when sandals were worn. By way of rebuke, Jesus arose from the table and performed this menial service for His disciples, telling them the import of the lesson – namely, humility – and intimating that no matter how humble a service they might be able to render to each other, they should be glad to render it.

This lesson is still with us, not as a form or ceremony to be performed, but as an illustration of a principle. Any humble act of service done to one of the Lord’s brethren corresponds to this feet‑washing.

THE CRISIS IN JUDAS’ LIFE

The Passover Supper proceeded – the eating of the lamb with the bitter herbs and the unleavened bread, which considerably resembled thick pancakes, and which was sometimes used instead of a spoon to sop up the essence of the meat. One of the Gospels declares that Jesus began to be heavy-hearted, and then said, One of you twelve, eating with me as my guest, as a member of my family, is plotting my betrayal.

There may have been a double object in this statement. First, it would show the disciples that Jesus was fully aware of the premeditated betrayal. They would not, therefore, think that something had happened to Him unexpectedly, or out of the Divine program. Second, our Lord may have meant this as a final reproof to Judas – to startle him, to cause him to think. At very best a traitor’s course is dishonorable, but doubly so when the traitor accepts the hospitality of the one against whom he is plotting and eats his bread.

Consternation spread amongst the disciples; and one after another they asked, “Is it I?” The import of this question would be, It is not I whom you have meant! Even Judas joined in the general inquiry, “Is it I?” The Apostle John was seated next to Jesus, and St. Peter beckoned to him that he should ask the Master who was meant. It was probably a whispered inquiry, heard by Jesus only. Our Lord’s whispered reply was, “It is the one to whom I will give a sop.” Presently, having prepared a special sop, a mark of special interest, he handed it to Judas. Thus St. John and St. Peter knew the affair.

Apparently it was but a short time after this that Judas withdrew, the record being that “Satan entered into him.” (John 13:27) The spirit of the evil one got complete control of him while he stopped, and weighed and balanced the matter of selling his best friend for thirty pieces of silver. It is entirely probable, therefore, that Judas was not present when Jesus, a little later, instituted the Memorial Supper which Christians now celebrate.

THE SIGNIFICATION OF THE MEMORIAL

The Memorial Supper which Jesus instituted is totally separate and distinct from the Passover Supper, and yet they are closely related; for the one was the type and the other its archetype, or higher type, with a still higher signification. In the one a literal lamb was used to typify Jesus, the Lamb of God; in the other, the archetype, the breaking of the bread represented the death of Jesus.

The Jews celebrated the birth of their nation and its deliverance from Egyptian bondage. This had its start in the passing over of their first‑born when the tenth plague came upon the Egyptians. St. Paul shows us that the first‑borns of Israel, spared in that Passover night, typified the Church of the first-­borns, spared or passed over, in the present time, while the night of sin prevails and before the morning of Messiah’s Kingdom is ushered in.

We are not to understand that the apostles comprehended Jesus’ meaning when He explained to them the signification of the supper which He instituted. Rather, as He had already foretold, the Holy Spirit brought these things to their attention and enabled them to comprehend their meaning, after they had received the Pentecostal blessing and enlightenment. Now we may see the import of Jesus’ words, “This is my body, broken for you.” We perceive that He could not have meant, as some have thought, that the bread was turned into His actual body and the wine into His actual blood. He could not, therefore, have meant more than to say, This bread symbolically represents my body, which is to be broken for you; and this wine represents my blood, which is to be shed for you tomorrow – my life given up.

Neither should we think that Jesus meant that special virtue would result to the disciples from the eating of that bread and drinking of that literal cup. We should properly look far beyond these things, and see that He meant this: Only as you by faith partake of the merits secured by death can you have the great blessing provided for you as my disciples. The apostles believed that the death of Jesus was for their sins, and that it constituted the basis of their acceptance with the heavenly Father. They realized that only as they appropriated the life of Christ would they be truly recipients of all these blessings.

THE SEALING OF THE NEW COVENANT

Jesus spoke of the cup, the fruit of the vine, as representing the blood of the New Covenant. The Law Covenant was the Old Covenant, which failed to bring the blessings to the Jews, because they could not keep it. Hence, also, they were not qualified to bless the other nations of the earth. But God promised a New Covenant, a better one, which would be introduced by a new and higher, or superior, Mediator than Moses. That New Covenant, God declares, will accomplish what the old Law Covenant failed to accomplish; for the New Law Covenant will be inaugurated by Messiah, its Mediator, at His Second Advent. His Kingdom, established in power and great glory, will rule, bless and instruct mankind, and will “take away the stony heart and will give a heart of flesh” to all who will respond to those blessed opportunities.

Jesus’ death constituted the blood which seals, or makes efficacious, that New Covenant. But mark further: The Church is not to be blessed under that New Covenant of the Millennial Age, which will be inaugurated at the second coming of Jesus, at the establishment of His Kingdom. The Church is to be blessed in advance of that New Covenant. Indeed, their consecrated lives (blood), accepted by our Lord, are counted in as a part of His own sacrifice, which seals the New Covenant. Hence the New Covenant cannot be fully sealed until the entire Body of Christ, which is the Church, shall have shared with Him in the drinking of His cup – in the sacrifice of earthly rights, privileges, life itself.

THE COVENANT OF SACRIFICE

Meantime, we see that Jesus and the Church receive their reward neither under the Law Covenant nor under the New Covenant, but under a special covenant, called a Covenant of Sacrifice. Reference is made to this covenant of Christ and the Church in the Psalms, where the Lord is represented as saying, “Gather my saints together unto me, those who have made a covenant with me by sacrifice.” (Psa. 50:5) The gathering of those who enter into this special Covenant of Sacrifice with the Lord has been in progress for now over eighteen hundred years. We have every reason to believe that the sacrifice is nearly completed, and that soon all the sacrificers, members of the Body of Christ, will be glorified, changed by the power of the First Resurrection and will enter into the joys of their Lord, according to His promise: “To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne.” (Rev. 3:21)

As from the intelligent appreciation of the fact symbolized by the Memorial Supper a great blessing comes, and a joy proportionate to the participator’s faith and obedience, so also a condemnation attaches to an unworthy, improper participation in the Memorial. None are to participate except those who have come into relationship with the Lord by consecration of their hearts – their all – to Him and His service.

But let none think that they should remain away from the Memorial because of imperfections of the flesh. This is a great stumbling-block to many. So long as we are in the flesh, imperfection of word, deed and thought are possible – yea, unavoidable. St. Paul says that we cannot do the things that we would. It is because we need Divine grace to forgive our daily unintentional, unwilling trespasses that all whose sins have been forgiven and who have been accepted into fellowship with Christ are encouraged to come to the throne of heavenly grace in prayer. The Apostle says, “Let us come with courage to the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy and find grace to help in time of need.” (Heb. 4:16) It was because of our needs that God opened up the way and made this arrangement for us.

THE SERVICE

As there was but one Passover in type, so there is but one “Lamb of God” in antitype; and by taking notice of that antitype each year, we merely do so “in remembrance” just as the Jews to this day keep their Passover “in remembrance.” And the service for the occasion is unique; there is no other service like it in Christian ritual throughout the earth. When our Lord gave command that we observe it, He did so in simplicity of speech and with few words. “He took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: This do in remembrance of me. Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the New Testament in my blood, which is shed for you.” (Luke 22:19,20) Yet, upon these two forthright and uncomplicated sentences great rituals have been erected by the various sects of Christendom – some more, some less. Fundamentally, no more would be required of us in our observance than our Lord’s statement; although it is certainly in keeping with decorum and orderly procedure that a preparatory foundation be laid for partaking of the bread and the wine by reading and explaining the various elements involved where more than one person “keeps the feast.” However, it is equally good decorum and orderly procedure that we avoid the pompous play upon words and “stage” performance, which is to be found in some quarters.

The solemnity of the occasion should be stressed, however, that all be done “decently and in order” – not shabbily, nonchalantly, as of some “common thing.” It is commendable that the Christian world over­emphasize the “feast” with impressive service and sedate and select speech, rather than by the other extreme of no propriety at all. The Roman system requires each participant to attend “confession” – usually the previous afternoon or evening – before acceptance of the emblems; and, until recently, nothing was to be eaten or drunk the morning of the service. While this in itself stresses the great regard that the system attempts to display for the service, it also overawes those present in a manner never intended by Jesus when He instituted it. Here we need not discuss the errors that have been superimposed over the centuries by such nicety of display and demand. Blessed are we if we may arrive at that balance of mind and heart that does not overdo or underdo the service – greatness in simplicity, inspiration in solemnity, uplift and virtue in a “good and honest” participation.

All Christians should keep their accounts squared with the Lord. If they come short, they should lose no time in getting the account squared, in obtaining forgiveness through the merit of the Savior’s sacrifice. Such accounts with the Lord should be settled promptly at the time of their occurrence, or no later than the day of their occurrence. They should not be allowed to accumulate; for they will rise as a wall between the soul and the heavenly Father. But whatever has been the condition in the past, the Memorial season, above all others, is the time for making sure that no cloud remains between the Lord and us, to hide us from His eyes.

We trust that the celebration of the Memorial this year may be a very deeply impressive one, and occasion of rich blessing to all of the Lord’s consecrated people everywhere. “For even Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us; therefore let us keep the feast.” (1 Cor. 5:7,8)

THE PLACE TO MEMORIALIZE

The tendency of this our day is for larger and more costly edifices in which to observe this “remembrance of Me.” But in many of these “the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee” (Rev. 18:22); therefore, may the fact impress us that it is the occupants who sanctify the building; the building does not sanctify the occupants. Thus, St. Paul addresses one of his most human and endearing letters “unto Philemon our dearly beloved, and fellow laborer...and to the church in thy house.” Therefore may each participant in this year’s “remembrance of Me” rest in the strong assurance that where “two or three are gathered together in my Name, there am I in the midst of them” (Matt. 18:20), regardless of the edifice we may occupy. In fact, the institution of this “remembrance” by Jesus Himself was in an “upper room” of a private residence.

TEMPTED IN ALL POINTS

St. Paul tells us in Hebrews 4:15, Diaglott, that Jesus was tried “in all respects like ourselves, apart from sin”; also, that He was “holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners.” (Heb. 7:26) To many these statements are an enigma. How can anyone be tempted, except to sin, they ask. And, if Jesus was not tempted to sin, how could He possibly be tempted “as we are” – we who are prone to sin, “none righteous, no not one”? This becomes clear when it is understood that there are four classes of temptation that beset God’s people: Sin, Error, Selfishness and Worldliness. Before we analyze these in our Lord’s experiences, let us first of all make clear that He was never tempted to the sins that beset the fallen human race – murder, thievery, immorality, falsehood – on every occasion He always said and did exactly the right thing, in the right way, at the right time, always “apart from sin”; whereas, all of the Lord’s followers – some more, some less – have had such temptation to sin. St. Paul makes this clear in 1 Cor. 6:9-11 (Dia): “Be not deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminates, nor Sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous persons, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the Kingdom of God. And such characters were some of you.” Yet in all these things Jesus was “apart from sin” – they bothered Him not in the least. His human body was ever the noble and altruistic servant of His New Creature. Let us look then at those features wherein He was tempted, the same being related in Matthew 4, “Then Jesus was conducted by the Spirit into the desert, to be tempted by the enemy,” the first of which was:

SELFISHNESS: “After fasting forty days and forty nights he was hungry. Then the Tempter approaching him, said, If thou be a son of God, command that these stones become loaves.” Here we have temptation in the form of Selfishness in the very strongest degree. Self-preservation is the first law of nature, the desire for food and drink being the prime factors therein. Thus, a good and honorable man, faint with hunger, might put forth his hand to purloin food belonging to another, even though he had fasted but two or three days, instead of forty days, as was true of Jesus. But in this temptation Jesus was more than conqueror, as He answered, “Man shall not live by bread only, but by every word proceeding from the mouth of God.” Thus, He who later turned water into excellent wine, could just as easily have used His power to provide food for Himself, but He victoriously resisted the temptation to sate His selfish propensities to satisfy His bodily needs.

And this continued to be His course throughout His earthly ministry. Not once do we read that He derived personal material gain from the great power that was His. Some of the miracles He performed in healing wealthy people – such as raising the daughter of Jairus from the dead (Luke 8:41-56) – could certainly have brought Him substantial “fees”; but in this one instance we here mention He not only sought no pecuniary reward, but even avoided popular applause. “He charged them that they should tell no man what was done.” (Luke 8:56) And in this He surely gave us sound cause to “do this – with the bread and the cup – in remembrance” of Him. “Buy the Truth, and sell it not.” (Prov. 23:23) And, following His “example” in resisting temptation towards selfishness, we may also have this same blessed experience: “Then the enemy leaves him; and behold! Angels came and ministered to him.” (Matt. 4:11)

ERROR: “Then the Enemy conducts him into the Holy City, and places him on the battlement of the temple, and says to him, If thou be a Son of God, cast thyself down; for it is written, He will give his angels charge of thee; they shall uphold thee on their hands, lest thou strike thy foot against a stone.” (Matt. 4:5,6) God’s people should never court or encourage sensationalism, or even ribald flippancy, or “slight-of-hand,” if they would be true and fully useful “able ministers of the New Testament.” (2 Cor. 3:6) Such a “stunt” would certainly have brought Jesus wide acclaim – would have attracted to Him the attention of the people in pronounced manner. Here was a most subtle ruse to stumble our Lord. Be it remembered that temptation is an appealing suggestion. Without appeal, there can be no temptation. Thus, we cannot tempt a fellow with a cigar if he detests tobacco; whereas, it might be a very strong appeal to another who had been an habitual smoker and had with great difficulty forsaken the vice. And by the same token, at least some of God’s people have had the urge to “show off” with the power of the Truth that has come to them – to use it for personal prestige, and perhaps even more, when “the praise of men” might be involved. But to the erroneous twist by Satan our Lord gave the perfect answer, “Again it is written, Thou shall not try the Lord thy God.” (v.7) Here again He “left us an example” that we indulge not in outward show as we “do this in remembrance.”

WORLDLINESS: “Again the Enemy takes him to a very high mountain, and shows him all the Kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; and says to him, All these will I give thee, if prostrating thou wilt worship me.” (vs. 8,9) Some may argue that these were not Satan’s to give; but we are told he is “the God of this world (2 Cor. 4:4), and there is little doubt but that he could have kept his promise to that extent. (Here also is indisputable proof that Satan was about this earth when our Lord was here – in contrast to the mistaken belief held by some that he was in Heaven until 1914 or 1918, at which date, they say, he was first cast out.) With the perfect mind and vigorous body that were His, our Lord would have had little difficulty in securing quick domination of the financial and political elements in a world where all about Him were in every respect His inferiors, especially, if He experienced no opposition from Satan. Here, also, He “was tempted like as we are”; and once more we have His perfect answer, “Get thee behind me, Adversary; for it is written, Thou shall worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.” (v. 10) And at this time we are well advised to keep His answer well in mind, as we “do this in remembrance.” His human body was always the noble servant, in full subjection to His New Creature.

At this Satan left Jesus, and we hear no more about his temptations. While we have classified them as selfishness, error and worldliness, they may also be defined under the headings of faith, obedience and loyalty, respectively. We could also describe them as Capitalistic Power (prompted by selfishness to use His power for personal gain), Religious Power (temptation to gain a following – to “do great works, win great numbers, gain great favor” as many have done who have built upon “Christ as sand”), and Governmental Power (using superior intellect to dominate weaker men). Many would do well to “examine themselves” from these standpoints as we “do this in remembrance.”

OUR PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

“The Apostle’s argument is that we should hold fast the faith which began our Christian life and which is also to be the finisher of our Christian life. The Lord is able to carry us through and He will do it, if we do our part. But the terms on which the Lord has received us are that we purpose to abide faithful. Hence everything depends on our holding fast to the faith which we have professed, without wavering, without harboring any doubts and fears; and the basis of our faith in our ultimate triumph is the assurance that ‘He is faithful that promised.’ (Heb.10:23) We know that in the Bible there are ‘exceeding great and precious promises’ for us. While the Lord tells us that there is nothing in ourselves that we can depend on, He assures us that His Grace is sufficient, that His strength is made perfect in our weakness. We have only to lay hold upon it. If therefore we hold fast to our faith, we may obtain all that God has promised us. He will be faithful; He will not disregard His promises; He will do all that He has said.

“If we hesitate and waver we are either losing our faith or losing the spirit of obedience and love. If, therefore, we realize that either of these conditions exists, we should go at once to the Word of God and to prayer, that our faith, love and zeal may be renewed. We should scrutinize our hearts day by day to make sure that we are still loyal to the Lord, to see whether we are seeking to lay down our lives according to our covenant, to see whether we are developing the fruits and graces of the Holy Spirit. Thus we shall fulfill our vows, and there shall be ‘an abundant entrance’ administered unto us into the ‘everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.’“ (Tower Reprint 5698)

This year we shall observe the Memorial at 7:30 p.m., Sunday, March 31, at 2501 Morningside Drive, Mount Dora, Florida, and we extend cordial welcome to all of like mind who may be in the vicinity to join with us. And with this comes the prayer that all our readers receive the Lord’s blessing in their preparation for, and participation in “this remembrance.” “Let us keep the festival, not with old leaven, nor with leaven of vice and wickedness, but with the unleavened principles of sincerity and truth.” (1 Cor. 5:8, Dia.)

========================

WITH GOD’S HELP, ISRAEL WILL PREVAIL

Reprinted from the Middle East Intelligence Digest, November 1995

Benjamin Netanyahu, (Bibi) Leader of the Likud Party in Israel and candidate for Prime Minister in the 1996 elections, was invited to address 4,500 Christians who gathered in Jerusalem during the Feast of Tabernacles (Succot, 1995). The following are excerpts from his speech.

Generations of Jews and non-Jews waited for the realization of the great prophecies of Jeremiah, Isaiah, Ezekiel and the others, who said that Zion would be rebuilt and the fallen Tabernacle of David would be raised up. This simply would not have happened without the support and the unrelenting efforts during the last Century – and this Century – of Christian Zionists. It is this partnership that made the State of Israel, and a united Jerusalem possible.

Zionism was always in the hearts of the Jewish people, in our prayers, our dreams. But it did not become a real force until late in the 19th Century, with the arrival of men like Theodor Herzl and Max Nordau. And it was 50 years before these great men that other great men, men of the Christian faith, visited Palestine, saw the land of Israel, and imagined in their mind’s eye the return of the Jewish people, who alone, they said, “could bring this barren land back to life”

These Christians and Jews believed that the great prophecies were something to be acted upon. Their faith was seized upon by clergymen, then by statesmen, whose translation of our common belief propelled Zionism forward in the hearts and minds of the movers and shakers of the world. It was because of this that there was a universal understanding among the great statesmen and writers of the world 100 years ago, 80 years ago, that: There is one land for one people, and that land is the Land of Israel for the people of Israel. They must be allowed to return. They must be supported in their return, in the rebuilding of the land, and rebuilding of their common destiny.

And now, after we achieved all our triumphs, established our state against overwhelming odds, rolled back armies a hundred times our size, and after we watered the desert, built up this wasteland, built cities and schools and universities and theater and industry, and the Hebrew language – after we made this unparalleled revolution in human affairs, guided by faith, there are those now from among us who say: “It’s all a mistake. Zionism is a mistake. Zionism is passe.”

Part of the reason this is happening is the absence of faith. But part of the reason is also the absence of knowledge. Our adversaries understood that the way to erode our faith was to erode our knowledge. If you possess the facts, you can defend against lies. But if you have no facts and no truth in your hands, you are completely defenseless against all the distortions that perverse human ingenuity can create. This perversion of truth is our greatest enemy.

At the time of the Balfour Declaration in 1917, and at the time of the collapse of the last great empire that held this land, there was universal agreement that this land belongs to us, and that we must come back to it. How is it, that in the short span of 70 years the situation seems to have completely reversed? Now, the seats of government around the world, and the media which influence men’s minds and hearts, say that we are the usurpers; the interlopers; that we came and stole this land from its ancient residents – the Palestinians, who were here from before the time of Jesus.

And to those who do not know, this message becomes, by dint of constant repetition and elaboration, the self-evident truth. Unless we pierce this falsehood, unless we come up with a weapon of truth, no amount of guns or money, no amount of human material, can defend against this slander.

I heard the speech of Yasser Arafat at the UN, when he said that the great Zionist invasion began in 1881. At the time, he said, Palestine was a verdant land, teeming with a peaceful people quietly cultivating their fields.

You know that in the 19th Century, as in the 18th, 17th and 16th Centuries, but in a growing flood, hundreds of visitors, including nationals from every civilized country of the time, documented their visits to the Holy Land. They described, as did the French Poet, LaMartin, the 19th Century geographer, Arthur Penrun Stanley, and the great American writer, Mark Twain, the craven state of the land, the barrenness, the silence of death.

This is the truth. This land was barren. It was waiting precisely as the great Christian preachers taught: it was waiting for the one people who could bring it back to life. We came back, and we brought it back to life. And as we rebuilt the land, there was business, and hospitals, and jobs and immigration: immigration of Jews and immigration of Arabs. These “age-old” Palestinians came here in the last 70, 60, 50 years, in response to the Jewish immigration. All who were born here saw it. We welcomed the Arabs. They were our neighbors.

A war was forced on us when the time came to establish the Jewish state and ingather the remnants of European Jewry that had been destroyed in the Great Fire. We said to the Arabs, “Be our friends.” But they succumbed to the call of the Arab countries around us and sought to extinguish our state.

They thought they could overpower us, they did not know the power of our faith. Some were driven out in the course of the fighting. But it is not true that Israel created the refugee problem. What Israel’s enemies did after the establishment of the State was to employ the trick they use again and again: They turned the result of the conflict into its cause.

When you asked the Arab world in the 1950s and 1960s, “Why are you fighting Israel?” They said: “Because of the refugees.” “But,” people said, “there wasn’t a single refugee in the Middle East when you chose to attack the infant Jewish State.”

They tried another war in 1967. That same faith produced a greater miracle – the redemption of the heart of our homeland, of Judaea, of Samaria, of the unity of Jerusalem – all the places that resonate in our history. And for the last quarter of a century, when you asked the Arab world, “Why are you fighting Israel?” They say: “Because of the territories.” But there wasn’t a single Israeli soldier in Judaea and Samaria before 1967. Again, they turned the consequence of their aggression into its cause.

If we were to cede Judaea and Samaria to the Arabs, the conflict would go on. And if you were to ask, “Why is it going on?” They would say: “Because of Jerusalem.” And if you were to cede half of Jerusalem, they would say: “But we still have here the right of refugees to return to Jaffa, and Haifa, and Akko, and every part of truncated Israel.”

This process, which is based on falsehood, on a complete reversal of cause and effect, a wiping out of basic historical facts, and replacing them with fiction – this is the greatest threat to our common dream.

All these campaigns of slander will not work. We are part of a much, much larger scheme. The return of the Jewish people is not just a passing episode that will be wiped out by the force of ignorance and stupidity. The life-force within the Jewish people is enormous. The life-force of the friends of the Jewish people around the world, especially the Christian world, is enormous. And this partnership will safeguard the Jewish land, will safeguard Zion, will safeguard our Eternal City.

It is something I believe should be treasured as the most precious element of our faith, without which, knowledge is empty. I have a deep faith, and it resonates amongst most of the people of Israel, that the promise that God gave to Abraham, and to Isaac, and to Jacob, this Birth [Covenant] is the most powerful force we have. It has guided us through millennia of struggle and strife and exile and pogrom and degradation and Holocaust. It has brought us back from the ashes of the dead. It has brought back this country to life, and I believe that, with your help, and with God’s help, we will prevail.

(Jerusalem Digest, December, 1995 – submitted by David Horowitz)

=======


NO. 472B: RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT - PART TWO

by Epiphany Bible Students


No. 472B

THE JEWS

Israel: “World Mourns Death Of Rabin” is the headline of The Jewish Press of November 10, 1995. “Our view on The Assassination. We share the shock and anguish of our people over the death of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Our Torah condemns the wanton taking of life and reverences the sanctity of life.

“Unfortunately, despite the fact that we are still in the throes of our grief over the death of the Prime Minister, accusations have filled the airwaves blaming certain Rightist elements for creating a hateful atmosphere that inspired the obviously deranged young man who took Mr. Rabin’s life. For the sake of the welfare of our people it is important to set the record straight. In truth, this charge is reminiscent of the oxymoron of a boy who kills his parents and then pleads for mercy because he is an orphan.

“Because of the effort to hasten the implementation of the Oslo Accords prior to the next election, and in order to weaken the opposition, Israel was turned into a virtual police state. Peaceful demonstrations were banned, freedom of speech was sharply curtailed, police brutality against men, women and children was rampant and dissidents were targeted for harassment and worse. In the name of Peace, many deaths of Israelis and hundreds of incidents of Arab brutality against the Jews were simply ignored.

“There seemed to be a calculated effort to create a feeling of hatred for the 150,000 settlers in Judea and Shomron, characterizing them as enemies of the true interests of Israel. Concurrently, a process was undertaken to give away our Holy Places such as Kiryat Arba, Kever Rochel (Rachel’s Tomb), Meoras Hamachpelah (Cave of the Patriarchs), the Temple Mount, and nearly half of the land of Israel – all against the advice of the Israel Defense Forces and only the help of the 5 Arab votes in the Knesset. Although Israelis were promised that they would be able to vote on these matters in a referendum, that promise was never kept.

“Jews in America who protested against what was happening were told, in effect, send your money, but keep your opinions to yourselves.

“Perhaps worst of all, a terrorist and murderer of Jews was given virtually every-thing he sought – land, hundreds of millions of dollars, power, etc., although he did not fulfil the promises he made or offer anything real in return. In fact, he continues as the biggest ‘con-artist’ of the century as he openly preaches ‘Jihad.’

“But most of all, the Peace Process violates the commandments of our Holy Torah. G-d promised our ancestors that the entire land of Biblical Israel was to be an inheritance for the Children of Israel in perpetuity. When confronted by the Rabbis of today, the Peace Process proponents answered as did Pharaoh of ancient Egypt: ‘Who is your G-d that I should listen to him!’

“Why was G-d angry with the ‘Meraglim’ (spies)? He said, ‘I performed so many miracles for them in Egypt, at the crossing of the Yam Suf, at Mt. Sinai, and I gave them food from Heaven and water from an arid land in the desert, and the Heavenly clouds protected from the extreme heat and cold of the desert and many more miracles in their daily lives. And yet when they saw ‘giants’ in the land of Canaan they feared these humans more then they feared Me.’

“In our time, too, G-d heard our pleas. After the 1967 war, He instilled fear in all the Arabs who then ran away from Jerusalem. G-d then gave them the entire City of Jerusalem including the Temple Mount and in effect, so to speak, said: ‘Now plan to build the Holy Temple and I will help you.’

“Instead, Moshe Dayan, the commanding General, refused this offer and invited back all the Arabs, much to our chagrin today. In effect, he, so to speak, banished G-d from Jerusalem.

“One thing is certain. If we follow the principles of the Torah, G-d will surely help us as He did our ancestors.

“Again, we deplore this wanton act of murder, but those who seek to silence opposition by blaming the Peace process opponents serve no useful purpose. In any democratic society, legitimate debate on such fundamental issues should not be stifled. “

(By Rabbi Sholom Klass, The Jewish Press, November 10, 1995, pp. 1 and 3)

“As The World Mourns Yitzhak Rabin: Some years ago Yitzhak Rabin was a columnist for THE JEWISH PRESS. He was an outspoken young man and even though we may not have agreed with everything he wrote, we felt it was our duty to have a variety of opinion in THE JEWISH PRESS.

“Yitzhak Rabin felt the route he was taking with the PLO was proper and he may have been right, but we and others disagreed. We join the millions who are mourning Yitzhak Rabin, a man who felt that his dream for peace was in the best interests of Israel. Despite differing opinions, he forged ahead for what he felt was right. We extend our heartfelt condolences to Mrs. Rabin and entire family. “

(The Jewish Press, November 10, 1995, p. 2)

ISRAEL: “The Tragic Truth About Yitzhak Rabin: Without condoning the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, critics of his so-called peace policy will now be subjected to further repression, to a more vicious denial of their civil rights. And this will only render the political climate of Israel more precarious, more inflammatory, more susceptible to civil war.

“With profound sorrow for the bereaved, truth and justice and concern for my own loved ones in Israel, compel me even now to clarify the political context of Yitzhak Rabin’s tragic death. Even in this period of grief and mourning, innocent and law-abiding Jews in Israel are in danger of repression by a desperate government, a government that parades in the name of democracy but is democracy’s enemy.

“It is not easy for me to say, but it must be said even now, that Yitzhak Rabin and his cohorts created the emotional and political climate that led to his assassination. Only by facing this tragic fact honestly and courageously and with magnanimity will the people of Israel be able to avoid such tragedies in the future.

“I know of no leader of any nation that publicly denigrated the heritage of his own people. Yet Mr. Rabin called religious critics of his so-called peace policy ‘degener­ates.’ He also called soldiers who fought and bled for Israel ‘cry babies’ because they opposed his policy of surrendering Jewish land to Arab despots... He also vilified Benjamin Netanyahu and the Likud Party as ‘allies of Hamas’ – of brutal murderers... Finally, it should not be forgotten that Mr. Rabin released thousands of Arab terrorists and murderers, some of whom subsequently murdered more Jews. In fact, more Jews have been murdered by Arabs since September 13, 1993, when Mr. Rabin first shook the blood-stained hands of Yasir Arafat, than the number of Jews murdered by Arabs during the previous six years of the intifada. Mr. Rabin called these Jews ‘sacrifices for peace.’ Could anything be better calculated to arouse agony and resentment among the Jewish people of Israel, especially among the families and friends of the Jewish victims of Rabin’s policy?

“Let us nonetheless end on a positive note. The assassination of Yitzhak Rabin goes beyond personalities, Left and Right, secular and religious. Israel’s political system is basically flawed. Israel lacks a written Constitution. There are no institutional checks and balances... The electronic media are government controlled. There is no outlet for legitimate and effective dissent, and the opposition parties are fragmented and impotent. Israel needs a new system of Government. “

(Excerpts by Prof. Paul Eidelberg, The Jewish Press, November 10, 1995, p. 10)

Israel: “NEW YORK – Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres made an impassioned plea for Jewish unity Sunday at a New York memorial rally for Yitzhak Rabin, assassinated by a religious Jew opposed to his peace policies.

“Rabin was the ‘consummate man of Israel,’ Vice President Al Gore told more than 15,000 people who attended the rally at Madison Square Garden. ‘He will always be remembered as a man of grace, courage and quiet dignity ... who always put substance before style, action before acclaim and ideals before ideologue.’ Gore said.

“Rabin’s widow, Leah, spoke of his gift to those he left behind: ‘From his death, he bequested to us peace, he bequested to us solidarity, he bequested to us Jewish unity.’

“Peres meets President Clinton today in Washington to discuss ways to restart negotiations with Syria over the future of the Golan Heights, which Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast War.

“Although officials closed off 4,000 of the Garden’s 18,000 seats for security reasons, 16 metal detectors proved barely adequate to handle the crowd. Many people stood in the 16-degree cold for up to two hours before they were allowed in.” (Excerpts from The Orlando Sentinel, December 11, 1995)

Israel: “Besides, all Israel’s leaders have to do to my mute protest is: (1) Have the PLO cancel their covenant of death (a promise made at Oslo and not kept). (2) Allow Women in Green and other peaceful Israelis to protest within the law without police interference. (3) Invite some of the many learned and articulate opponents of the peace talks to air their views in the government-controlled electronic media. (4) Spell out these secret agreements being made with Arafat, Assad and others and invite the Israeli public to make up its own mind. (5) Since both Labor and Likud deceived the pioneers in Judea and Samaria in telling them to build their homes in what would be ‘forever a part of Israel,’ stop treating them with mockery and disrespect in calling them ‘crybabies’ and telling them they can ‘spin like propellers.’

“For years, I was rather popular in Israel and American Jewish circles. But I note that each time I merely share my apprehension at the Israeli rush to peace without firm reliance on the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, my ‘likeability rating’ dips. Well and good. Not to speak up would have me opt for the praises of men more than the praises of God. This I will not do!

“For when ‘peace’ must be purchased through illegal and brutal force, it will turn out to be as elusive as Jeremiah’s lament: ‘Peace, peace, when there is no peace.’ (Jer. 6:14) And when covenants of ‘peace’ are cut with a murderer of Jews, who in turn, refuses to cancel his own PLO covenant of war, Israel must yet taste the bitter truth that theirs is ‘a covenant with death’ and that ‘with hell we are in agreement.’ (Isa. 28:15) “ (By Dr. Frank Eiklor, Shalom International, Volume 17, Number 9)

Israel: “Clinton Optimistic On Middle East Peace: Greeting Israel’s new prime minister, Shimon Peres, the president said chances of peace between Israel and Syria have improved.

“WASHINGTON – Little more than a month after the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, President Clinton Monday warmly welcomed the new Israeli prime minister, Shimon Peres, and again pledged support for the perilous Middle East peace process.

“‘The United States stands ready to help bring the parties together and to work with them in the negotiations,’ Clinton said during a White House press conference with Peres. ‘Peace is our mission, and the prime minister and I are determined that nothing, nothing will deter us from this task in the weeks and the months ahead.’

“Clinton said he thinks the atmosphere is better for peace between Israel and Syria now than before. The Syrian-Israeli dispute, as well as the one between Israel and Lebanon, are the major remaining obstacles to securing peace in the bloody region.

“‘As sad as it is to say, I think the Syrian leader and the Syrian people now see the exceptional price that former Prime Minster Rabin and Prime Minister Peres have been willing to pay ... for peace,’ Clinton said. ‘I think that is the fundamental new reality here.’

“Clinton also spoke with Syrian President Hafez al-Assad Monday by telephone for 20 minutes and received assurances that he was committed to moving the Syrian-Israeli peace process forward.

“Secretary of State Warren Christopher will travel to the region next week to meet with Assad to try to jump-start peace talks.

“Clinton praised Peres, who was Rabin’s political rival but also his peace partner. ‘Mr. Prime Minister, as Israel continues to take risks for a lasting and comprehensive peace, the United States will stand with you to minimize those risks and to ensure your success,’ Clinton said. ‘And I pledge to you personally, Shimon, that I will be your partner in peace.’

“Clinton and Peres said the next steps in the peace process are proceeding: Palestinian elections will go forward, and control of some 450 villages in the West Bank and all major cities, including Gaza and Jericho, will be turned over to the Palestinians before Christmas. Peres also said he intends to fulfill the promise to release another thousand Palestinian prisoners before the elections.”

(The Orlando Sentinel, December 12, 1995)

Palestinians Celebrate As Israeli Army Withdraws: NABLUS, West Bank – Thousands of Palestinians streamed into the streets Monday night, shooting firecrackers and burning an Israeli flag as Israeli troops ended 28 years of occupation by withdrawing from Nablus a day ahead of schedule. ‘They are gone! They are gone!’ residents chanted outside Israel’s former military headquarters in the West Bank’s largest city. They let out a huge roar of approval and fired gunshots into the air as a flag ripped from the balcony was set aflame. The withdrawal, which had been expected to begin today or early Wednesday, caught the city by surprise. It apparently was moved up to prevent opponents of the peace process, Israeli or Palestinian, from organizing protest. “ (The Orlando Sentinel, December 12, 1995)

“Archaeologists: Burial Cave In Israel Confirms Ancient Clan: Maccabim, Israel – Archaeologists think they have uncovered a 2,000-year-old burial cave of the Maccabees, a clan of Jewish warriors who led a revolt against a Syrian king that is still celebrated today with the feast of Hanukkah.

“The find appears to confirm ancient Jewish accounts of the clan, also known as the Hasmoneans, a spokeswoman for the Antiquities Authority said Thursday. ‘This is the first proof that the Hasmoneans lived and were buried at this site,’ said Efrat Orbach.

“The burial cave, 19 miles north of Jerusalem, was uncovered Monday when a tractor leveled ground for a highway. The cave – made up of three small rooms and a courtyard entrance – held 24 ossuaries, or containers for bones of the dead, archaeologist Yossi Levy said.

“The ossuaries are inscribed in Hebrew with Jewish manes, Orbach said. One ossuary carried an inscription that is missing several letters, but most probably reads ‘Hasmonean,’ she said.

“‘This is the first time the word ‘Hasmonean’ has been found on archaeological evidence,’ said archaeologist Shimon Riklin.

“The house of the Maccabees, known as the Hasmoneans after their ancestor, Hashmon, lived in what is now central Israel. They rebelled in the second century BC against the Syrian King Antiochus IV, who had stripped the Temple in Jerusalem and began a religious persecution. Having occupied Jerusalem, they reconsecrated the Temple in 165 BC, a feat celebrated by the Jewish feast of Hanukkah.

“At least one ossuary carries the name Shimon, the head of the Maccabean state, which was said to have lasted about 100 years. Archaeologists do not know whether they had uncovered his remains.

“So far, evidence of their existence is confined to writings in the Talmud, a collection of Jewish legal commentary, and in accounts by the Jewish writer and historian Josephus who lived in the first century. “ (The Orlando Sentinel, November 17, 1995)

Wiesenthal, Speaking For Austria, Urges UN Organize A World Confab Against Hate

“Unbelievable, but true – the world’s most renowned Jewish Nazi hunter, Simon Wiesenthal – who in his life-time had apprehended scores of German-Austrian Nazis – appeared here at the UN General Assembly on November 20 as the official spokesman of the Austrian Government proposing that the World Organization ‘organize a global conference aimed at reducing hate.’

“The occasion of his appearance – an unusual event arousing deep interest – was a special commemorative meeting ‘to mark the UN Year for Tolerance’ – a subject which struck a positive chord with Wiesenthal who, a little more than a decade ago, had confirmed the work of this writer in exposing two Nazis who had found haven in America – the Hungarian, Ference Koreh and the Rumanian, B. Trifa, the latter, long ago, deported and former, after being confronted by your correspondent’s attorney Paul O’Dwyer, was recently finally judged guilty of war crimes by a New Jersey judge.

“And here at the UN we have been confronted with the unusual sensational scene in witnessing this world-admired personality speaking on behalf of a nation, Austria, birthplace of Hitler and haven of Kurt Waldheim and once a full partner with Nazi Germany in perpetrating the worst crimes of the century.

“‘It is a great honor for me to be allowed to speak to this audience at the end of the Year of Tolerance as the Representative of Austria,’ Wiesenthal declared in his opening statement: ‘In four years,’ he added, ‘we will be standing at the end of this century which has been rightly termed a century of crimes.’ Thus there is the need to speak about tolerance and also to act on this principle.’

And act he did. He made this direct proposal to the UN: ‘Let us try to organize a worldwide conference aimed at reducing hate. Technology without hate can be so very beneficial for mankind, but in conjunction with hatred it leads to disaster. The most important participants in such a conference – which should of course be held under the patronage of the United Nations – would be representatives of the monotheistic and other religions.

“‘Through religious networks, the greater part of mankind could be reached. The representatives of the various religions – in keeping with their moral duties – will work for mutual respect and support among men and against hatred. By spreading positive messages in churches, temples and synagogues, they can reach more people than all political parties put together. If religious representatives can agree to make the gradual elimination of hatred a major common concern, they will also find ways of informing and influencing their believers throughout the world.’

“Speaking of a ‘new Austria,’ Mr. Wiesenthal recommended Vienna as the site for the conference: ‘Being an Austrian, I could imagine that such an international conference take place in our small country located at the center of Europe. In the course of its history, Austria was frequently the scene of hate; today, however, it lives in perfect amity with all of its neighbors, unstrained by any claims on lands outside of its existing borders. Our country is an obvious international meeting place having often been the site of international events in the past. Moreover, all steps to strengthen tolerance and reduce hate would be actively supported by Austria’s government and its population. In this connection, I would like to point out that in the past 50 years the small republic of Austria, in contrast to other, significantly larger countries, has achieved great things where humanitarian aid for refugees – the most unfortunate victims of hate – is concerned.’

“Continuing to hold his UN audience deeply interested in his unique presentation, he began to explain his own personal struggle for justice: ‘As a survivor of the Nazi period – my wife and I lost 89 family members in the Holocaust – I have dedicated my life to the struggle for justice. The title of one of my last books is Justice, Not Vengeance, because my work was never motivated by hate or revenge. I would therefore feel very honored if many people of good will and with the firm intention to conquer the hate in this world were to come to Vienna to take part in a conference having this aim.

“‘In this century I have myself seen Communism become a form of government under Stalin and, thankfully, I have seen its downfall. I have seen the rise of National Socialism under Hitler – and I lived to see its downfall as well. Both of these regimes set measures that cost millions of lives. In the Soviet Union the victims were mainly Soviet citizens; the exact numbers are still unknown, as all figures named so far have been estimates. The Nazi regime was also responsible for the deaths of millions of foreign nations: altogether about 50 million people, including six million Jewish victims, were killed as a result of the war and there were innumerable crimes committed in the countries occupied by Nazi Germany. Together, these two dictatorships extinguished about 100 million human lives during this century. Underlying both Stalinism and National Socialism were two fundamentals: hatred and technology.’

“That the goodly, Jewish, Simon Wiesenthal should have come here at this time as representative of Austria to speak against hate and intolerance proves something. It proves that we are indeed in the Messianic Age – the Chevlei d’Meshichah. And we must connect this with the score of other nissim since the nes of the birth of Israel. “ (By David Horowitz, The Jewish Press, December 8, 1995)

“Israel’s Resistance Slams Talks, Golan Deal. JERUSALEM – Israel’s opposition assailed the resumption of peace talks with Syria, vowing Sunday to do all it could to stop Prime Minister Shimon Peres from ceding the Golan Heights.

“U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher flew home from the Middle East on Sunday, having accomplished his mission in two days, half the time he had planned, by reviving negotiations severed six months ago.

“‘We will certainly do all we can to prevent the government from carrying out its intention to hand over the Golan,’ Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of the main hard-line Likud opposition party, told Israel Radio.

“Israeli and Syrian negotiators plan to meet for three days December 27 near Washington. A second three-day round is planned in January.

“Israel has yet to say it will meet Damascus’ demand to return all of the heights captured in the 1967 Middle East war, insisting on a promise of normal relations first from Syria.

“Riding a wave of popular support following the assassination last month of his predecessor Yitzhak Rabin, Peres said last week he was willing to pay the full price for full peace.

“Ten months ahead of scheduled elections, Netanyahu trails Peres badly in opinion polls but he has been trying to tap popular opposition to a Golan deal among war-hardened Israelis who view the heights as a strategic necessity and Syrian President Hafez al-Assad as insincere about wanting peace.

“A poll by Israel’s largest newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth last week showed 55 percent opposed to a full withdrawal and 42 percent for it. “ (The Orlando Sentinel, December 18, 1995)

========================

Many thanks and much appreciation for the beautiful Christmas cards received, with special thanks for the love and prayers expressed – which we heartily reciprocate. We wish all our readers a prosperous and Blessed New Year.

ANNOUNCEMENT: The date of our Memorial is March 31, 1996 after six p.m.

=======