NO. 184: A BOOK REVIEW

No. 184

“Of making many books there is no end”—Ecc. 12:12. It seems that the Wise Man had become vexed and wearied with so much reading matter, because he then concludes, “Much reading is a weariness of the flesh.... God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.” Here is a terse warning that every book – especially on Biblical subjects – would be subjected to a critical eye by those in agreement and by those of contrary views. And if this were true three thousand years ago, how much more would it be so today. Thus, those of us who resort to the printing press should logically – and agreeably – expect close anal­ysis of the things written.

On this premise we now review the latest book by the Jehovah’s Witnesses – “Then Is Finished The Mystery Of God,” copyrighted in 1969, first edition two million copies. Writers are motivated by various standards – some from pride or pelf, some from real altruism, duty, and a “love of the truth.” We shall not attempt to catalog the Wit­nesses in their writing of many books; we shall record their methods, then allow our readers to form their own conclusions. If we are properly informed by the Witnesses themselves, Headquarters simply sends them a number of copies of each new issue, tell­ing them the price, and “PLEASE REMIT.” Considering that their “dedicated” help at headquarters is substantially slave labor (board, room and slight expense allowance), no union interference, and all participants very willing cooperators, we may readily conclude that the cost of such productions as the one we now consider would be a small percentage of a like production that must comply with the competitive rules of the fi­nancial world. The system of the Witnesses thus approaches the ideal: A quick sale without any cost of advertising, with pressure placed upon the “faithful” in the field to dispose of their supply with no undue delay.

In 1917 this same organization – then the International Bible Students Assn –produced The Finished Mystery, an attempted interpretation of the books of Revelation and Ezekiel. This present “Mystery” deals only with Revelation; and is often in sharp disagreement with the book they published in 1917. Many of those former state­ments are now reversed, or completely set aside. When the 1917 volume appeared, it caused a great revolt among the members, with headquarters insisting that it be accep­ted with blank credulity; critical questions were anathema. Many who disagreed there­upon severed their association with the organization, were disfellowshiped, and casti­gated with such names as “That Evil Servant” class, second-deathers, causers of divi­sions among the faithful, etc. But it was only a matter of a very few years that Headquarters itself recognized many of the blatant blunders of The Finished Mystery, and not only no longer insisted upon its acceptance, but actually threatened disfellow­ship of those who would dare to read it. Its printing was discontinued.. But no sense of shame was manifested over the unchristian treatment that had been meted out to their erstwhile brethren who dared question it in 1917. Indeed, Man’s inhumanity to man makes countless thousands mourn!

Coming now to this 1969 “Mystery,” it seems to us to have as many – or more –errors, ridiculous charges, false interpretations, etc., as did the one in 1917. And it is to some of these that we now direct our attention: On page 67 there is quite some elaboration on Rev. 6:11 – “White robes were given to every one of them.” Their interpretation states this took place in 1918, when the sleeping saints were raised. They say, “It would hardly be fitting for those slaughtered souls to receive these white robes while still remaining under the altar.... How could long flowing robes be kept white down there?” The shallow thinking here will become readily appar­ent when we consider Rev. 19:8; “The fine linen is the righteousness of saints” ­the righteousness that every one of them earned through perfecting himself in a Christ like character. Their condition “under the altar” was exactly the same as was the con­dition of Jesus, when He exclaimed, “Into Thy hands do I commend my spirit.” When our Lord was in the death state, after His crucifixion, His righteousness did not die; it was simply deposited into the hands of the Father until His resurrection. And the same with the sleeping saints – the mere fact that Jesus was dead only parts of three days would not alter in any way the condition of those who may have been dead – under exactly the same conditions – for a number of years. And let us not forget here that the Witnesses’ so-called “Founder” – Brother Russell – showed very clearly from the parallel dispensations that the first sleeping saints were raised in 1878, and not in 1918, as now claimed by the organization.

ERRORS ON THE CHRONOLOGY

On page 94 the book says “the creation of man almost six thousand years ago.” Here again they have cast away the clear calculations of their founder, who gave log­ical proof from the Scriptures that the six thousand years of Adam’s creation had ex­pired in 1872. We take a step forward in the book here to page 137, where it is stated, “When the manna was put into the Ark of the Covenant by Moses to King Solomon’s dedica­tion of the completed temple was 485 years.” How they could arrive at this erroneous conclusion we do not know, as it is clearly disputed by clear Bible statements. In Acts 13:20 St. Paul says that God “gave them (the children of Israel) judges about the space of four hundred and fifty years, until Samuel the Prophet.” It is recorded that the Jews wandered in the Wilderness of Sin, after leaving Egypt, for forty years; then it took them six years to divide the land by lot after they crossed Jordan into Canaan, making then 496 years. Saul, the first King after Samuel, reigned as King for forty years, as did also David who followed Saul on “the throne of the Lord in Israel.” Then came Solomon, who “began to build the House of the Lord” in the fourth year of his reign. Adding all these figures, we have exactly 580 years from Sinai to the time Solomon began to build the Temple.

In 1 Kgs. 6:1 it is stated “it came to pass in the four hundred and eightieth year after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt” Solomon began to build the Temple. The discrepancy of 100 years in these two statements is well explained in the footnote of the Diaglott:

“A difficulty occurs here which has very much puzzled Bibli­cal chronologists. The date given here is at variance with the statement in 1 Kings 6:1. There have been many solutions offered, but only one which seems entirely satisfactory, i.e., that the text in 1 Kings 6:1 has been corrupted, by substituting the Hebrew character daleth (4) for hay (5), which is very similar in form. This would make 580 years (instead of 480) from the exode to the building of the Temple, and exactly agree with Paul’s chronology.”

This is the explanation that was approved and accepted by Pastor Russell; and for a few years after his death the Witnesses themselves approved of his conclusion, and vigorously defended it against the attempts of some other errorists to set his chronology aside (although the errorists attempted only a 19-year change in his figures –against approximately 100 years which the Witnesses now try to inject into them). But, even if we accept their present figure of 1 Kgs. 6:1, they are still six years off, because 1 Kings 6:38 tells us, “In the eleventh year, in the month Bul, which is the eighth month, was the house finished throughout all the parts thereof... So he was seven years in building it” – or ten years and eight months after he began his reign, mak­ing at least 491 years from Sinai – if we accept the faulty statement of 1 Kings 6:1 as correct. However, let us note that they say “almost” or “about” when stating dates now, so it would seem they are not at all certain of their own figures. And this should not surprise us when we consider the confusion of many of their statements.

THAT SERVANT

When the Witnesses produced The Finished Mystery in 1917, they were emphatic that Pastor Russell was “that servant” of Matt. 24:45-47; and they falsely insisted that the book was his posthumous work. Indeed, they did include copious quotations from his writings, which statements contained the Truth; and it was the “seventh vial” of Rev. 16:17, although the errors the writers intermingled with the truths of Pastor Russell gave that “vial” a vile appearance in many parts of it. But attacks made upon so many of their errors were so incisive that they were shortly forced to reverse themselves, sub­sequently claiming that “that servant” was a class of people, and not an individual ­the ‘class’ being themselves, of course. And in the book now under discussion they follow the same line with the “seven angels” of the seven churches described in Reve­lation chapters two and three. These “seven angels” they now also describe as a class, again including themselves in that class.

There are a number of reasons why their twist in both instances is fundamentally wrong, because the Scripture itself—Matt. 24:45-47, and its companion text Luke 12: 42-46, clearly refutes their claim. “That Servant” is clearly distinguished from the church in general because he is spoken of as being made “ruler over His (the Lord’s) household; hence he cannot be the household – or we are faced with the ridiculous statement that he is made ruler over himself – an unsound statement on its very face. Also, he is said to “give them (the Church) meat in due season,” a statement which clearly sets him apart from the general Church. And, when he is called the “steward” here is clear proof that all the household cannot be meant, for a steward is the spec­ial representative of the householder, having in charge the owner’s goods during his employment, as well as the supervision of all the other servants in that particular house. In our Lord’s day individuals, not classes, were stewards. Moreover, he is expressly distinguished in Luke 12:45 from all the other servants, in that he is for­bidden “to beat the menservants and maidens,” i.e., all the other servants of the Church. Would there be any sense whatever in warning the steward not to beat himself? Hence, the expression “That Servant” cannot mean the servants of the Church as a class, because in this passage he is clearly distinguished from them. Therefore, in view of the fact that these two Scriptures distinguish him from the Church as a whole and from all the other servants of the Truth, we should conclude that he must be an individual.

Furthermore, the facts of the harvest history (all of which is now seemingly de­nied by the Witnesses in their juggled chronology) prove that an individual, Brother Russell, is meant by that expression. For the Harvest, understood as the reaping and gleaning period, is past – that is, for those of us who still retain the true chronol­ogy and apply the parallel dispensations. During that Harvest time not a class, i.e., neither the Church, nor all servants of the Truth however we may classify them, had the entire storehouse in their charge, nor gave the meat in due season, nor ruled the Harvest work; but “That Servant” alone did these things. Hence he alone fulfilled the prophecy. Those of us conversant with the situation know he was “monarch of all he surveyed – his right there was none to dispute.” He appointed and dismissed pilgrims at his will; he determined what should go into the Watch Tower; supervised the vol­unteer work and indirectly the colporteurs; decided who should be employed at Bethel, and what particular position each one there should occupy. We are told that he him­self realized the absolute position he occupied; did not want any of his survivors to have the great power that was his; thus arranged in his will that the work in general, and the writing of the Watch Tower in particular, should be done by a group of brethren – rather than by any one of them. He was thus the antitypical Eleazar of the Gospel Age Harvest, having complete charge of the antitypical Tabernacle – in exact duplication of the plenipotentiary powers conferred by the Lord upon the Twelve Apostles, excepting only he did not speak by inspiration, nor was he infallible.

And because of the very nature of the work to be done, could it reasonably have been otherwise? How could the entire Church have had the entire Storehouse in its charge? Or have given itself the meat in due season? Or have ruled the work? That would have been a duplication of some brethren during the Philadelphia period who decided that each one of their number “spoke as he was moved by the Holy Spirit,” to determine what was right and what was wrong, which often resulted in about as many dif­ferent opinions on any one subject as there were members in the congregation, with the result being a spiritual bedlam. Thus we recognize the absurdity in the claim that “That Servant” was just another name for the entire Church. In fact, we inquire, Why should the Lord offer such a confusion in the use of an uncalled-for name? Why did He not offer the simple statement that the Church would do the things specified – if that was His intention?

And the results confirm this. It was Brother Russell who saw most of the advanc­ing Truth during his stay with us. And what others did see, they first had to submit it to him for approval and for presentation to the general Church. Certainly all familiar with the facts know this to be the truth. And this being the truth, it log­ically follows that “That Servant” had to be an individual. It is stated of him that he was “faithful and wise.” While it is properly stated that the general Church is blessed with “the wisdom from above,” it is also properly stated that many of them did very unwise and downright foolish things. Not only so, but many of them eventually proved to be unfaithful – either as crown-losers, or as second-death sifters during the Parousia. This also is common knowledge.

But, having concluded That Servant to be a class, they are logically forced to further error: They must determine that all “the angels to the seven churches” must also be the entire Church. It would be quite illogical to single out one individual during the entire Gospel Age for any particular time, then say that all the others were a group – the general Church. Note now Rev. 1:20, Dia.: “The seven stars are messen­gers (angels) of the seven congregations, and the seven Lampstands are seven congrega­tions.” Here is a very clear and indisputable line of demarcation between the “angels” and the congregations themselves. No, That Servant cannot be defined as the general Church, if we apply “the spirit of a sound mind.”

Further, if we consider the “angel” to the Church at Ephesus, we find that the twelve Apostles (angels, messengers, ones sent forth) were decidedly superior to the general Church: “If the sins of any one you may forgive, they are forgiven them; if those of any you may retain, they have been retained.” (John 20:13, Dia.) There is certainly no difficulty here in separating the “angel to the Church at Ephesus” from the Church itself.

FORCED INTERPRETATIONS

As may logically be expected from such minds as now control the Witnesses, all their thinking will manifest a similar bent; so they now attempt to place literal interpretation upon parts of The Revelation. When The Finished Mystery was first published in 1917, it placed great stress upon the first verse of Revelation: “Jesus Christ .... sent and signified it by His angel unto His servant John.” ‘Signified’ means the Lord told it by signs – sign-i-fied it. One of the keys to a proper under­standing of The Revelation is that practically all the nouns – except the proper names such as God, Jesus Christ, John, etc. – are symbolic (they mean something different than the surface would indicate), while all the numerals are literal.

On page 146 – and pages following of the book under discussion – the attempt is made to give a literal meaning to “that woman Jezebel,” although Brother Russell properly applied the meaning to the apostate church of Rome, and her illicit union with the empires of earth. He came to this proper conclusion from the type in first and second Kings, where she, as Queen in Israel, was joined with King Ahab in a God-forbidden union with the kingdoms of this world, a thing the Church had been specially warned not to do.

SECTARIANISM

From pages 107 and onward much stress is placed by the Witnesses on their resolve not to be recognized as a “sect”; and one of the methods they have chosen to avoid this is to give themselves a name. True, a different name than any other sect in Chris­tendom, but a name just the same. On July 26, 1931 at Columbus, Ohio, they chose “to be identified and distinguished from Christendom” by adopting the name Jehovah’s Witnes­ses. It seems they reason that just a name in itself is sufficient to eradicate the evil of sectarianism from the character of those who accept it. But, as we have said on previous occasion concerning the Lord’s people, it is not the building that sancti­fies them; rather, it is they who sanctify the building in which they gather. And the same with sectarianism: It is not the name that frees any one from this evil; it is rather the person who must free himself from it. During Pastor Russell’s lifetime his movement became designated ‘Russellites’; but that in itself did not make a sectarian of any one who associated with him. The advice he gave operated to free his adherents from this evil. Repeatedly he insisted, Don’t accept anything just because I say it; PROVE IT FOR YOURSELF! In this he was but following the course of St. Peter (1 Peter 3:15): “Sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you.” To this end he always counseled his followers not to distribute anything he wrote without first reading it themselves, and convincing them­selves that it was the truth.

Consider now the Witnesses: We have met quite a few of their former supporters who were disfellowshiped by them simply because they insisted upon asking questions on statements in their Watch Tower that seemed to carry a view contrary to the one printed there. That surely is sectarianism in the extreme degree; it is just the opposite of St. Paul’s counsel: “Prove all things, and hold fast that which is good.” To para­phrase the statement of another uninspired writer: Sectarianism is a great sin; for it does not act from devotion to the Truth (as advised by Peter, Paul and Pastor Russell) but from devotion to partisanship. The Truth, its arrangements and its spirit are by it neglected or antagonized whenever this is in the interests of the sect. Their actual, though perhaps not verbal motto is: My party, my religious organization – I stand for it, right or wrong. Thus, such people support their sect and their leaders regardless of how wrong they are. And the Witnesses, being the little twin of the Roman Church in Little Babylon, have been excellent mimics of their ‘Big Brother’ in heaping anathema upon any who dare question their teachings. Over the centuries the shibboleth of the Roman Church has been: Reading (literature other than ours) is doubt; doubt is here­sy; and heresy is Hell!

Such a spirit finds no company with St. Paul’s words: “Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.” (Gal. 5:1) The opposite of this is SECTARIANISM, which not only depraves him who succumbs to It, but it also encourages power-grasping leaders to wax worse and worse. This is in keeping with St. Paul’s prediction: “In the last days perilous times shall come (we are now in those days).... evil men, and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.” (2 Tim. 3:1, 13) And the very people who have fanned the sectarian spirit to fever pitch over the past fifty years now have the colossal gall to offer this statement on page 112 of their book:

“The tendency toward the formation of a sect (back In 1917) among his faithful fol­lowers was displeasing to the one ‘who holds the seven stars in his right hand.’ Under his guidance this tendency toward the founding of a religious sect like the sects of Christendom out of which they had come was fought against by those who hate unchristian sectarianism. Those who chose to follow a dead man (Pastor Russell) left the ranks. Those who believed that the light of Bible Truth did not stop advancing with the death of the first president of the Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society held to God’s visible organization and continued searching the Holy Scriptures in the advancing light.”

In former years it was taught, and inculcated in their members, to be faithful to their sect in Big Babylon – whether Baptist, Methodist, Lutheran, etc. Today the gen­eral advice and teaching of Big Babylon is to “join the church of your choice” whatever that may be. But the Jehovah’s Witnesses are more adamant than any of these sects in Big Babylon in their pronounced teaching that they must be faithful to their organiza­tion – God’s channel for the Truth. It doesn’t matter who runs the organization, it is God’s ‘earthly’ visible channel.

The “advancing light” which came from those who seized control of the Society after Brother Russell’s death set aside almost all of the advancing light he had brought forth from the storehouse during his lifetime; and we have here an exact duplicate of the action of the Roman Church after the death of the Apostles, who proceeded to counterfeit, or set aside completely, every important teaching that the Apostles gave when they were yet alive. Clearly enough, Brother Russell and the leaders of the Society since 1917 cannot both be right; one or the other must be a colossal fraud – just as either the Apostles or the Roman Church must be a colossal fraud. And St. Paul warns that as pun­ishment for such fraud “God will send to them an energy of delusion” (2 Thes. 2:11, Dia.) – such as Millions Now Living Will Never Die, the Kingdom to be established by 1925, etc. It is a sound appraisal that he who successfully fools others must first fool himself. It is decidedly an unjust twist by the writers of this Mystery of God book when they declare that those back in 1917 who opposed the management then were at­tempting to “follow a dead man.” While the dissenters had great respect for that “dead man,” it was the Harvest and general truths given by the Lord through him that they were adamant in retaining and defending. To these present writers we would offer the Scrip­ture, “What doth the Lord require of thee but to do justly.”

In this connection, let us recall that J. F. Rutherford in 1918 placed great stress upon Eph. 4:13, insisting that it was at that date that “all attained the unity of the Faith” – the “all” in this text being his dedicated sectarian supporters, of course. But “the unity of the faith” that the Witnesses attained in 1918 has now been so changed that it is no longer recognizable; so they must now self-evidently be in jumbled dis unity of the faith. In fact, within ten years after 1918 the Vice-president of the So­ciety, C. A. Wise, said from the platform during one of their Conventions that he no longer knew himself anymore – that what he believed last year he didn’t believe this year, and probably wouldn’t be believing next year what he did that year. Thus, the Witnes­ses’ “unity of the faith” has been clear as mud for the past fifty years!

THE DAILY HEAVENLY MANNA

On pages 145, 146 is offered some detailed comment about the Manna book, saying it “was published by a Christian woman.” If that be true, all of us know full well that the comments themselves are by Brother Russell; and the citation is given in the perti­nent Watch Tower for every day’s item. Then why bring a woman into the discussion? The lame excuse is presented that the woman wanted to bring the book up to date in 1926, which “offer was refused in the light of 1 Tim. 2:12.” We know not the details surrounding that decision, but we observe that it furnished another excuse to the lead­ers to replace the Manna with a book of their own – The Year Book – with “Daily Texts and Comments” – to be published every year. Truly, “Of making many books there is no end!”

However, the hypocrisy of this move is also clearly revealed when we consider that just a few years after Pastor Russell’s death the various Ecclesias were advised to form “Sunday Schools,” in which the children of the members could be instructed by women teachers. It seems they had then temporarily forgotten 1 Tim. 2:12. But many of the members had not forgotten it; and the reaction was a positive NO by many of the sisters, causing some to leave the organization completely. In this also the objectors were following a “dead man” – in fact, “dead men” when we include the Apostle Paul – be­cause Pastor Russell himself was quite definitely opposed to such performance. Here’s what he said about it in Vol. 6, pp. 544-46:

“If it be considered in the light of a children’s social club, which draws them together once a week and directs their minds out of the ordinary work-day channels and in a general social and religious direction, it might be esteemed that the Sunday School has accomplished considerable in the world – especially for the lower classes of society. As for the effect of Sunday Schools upon the children of believers, we regard it as in­jurious.”

Then he offers some considerable detail for his reasons in thus stating, to which we refer our readers at their leisure. However, in this matter also the leaders in 1917 were determined not to follow a “dead man,” regardless of how sound and Scriptural his conclusions may have been.

FALSE PERSECUTIONS?

On page 119, and pages following, there is recited the experiences of many of the Witnesses in durance vile for their supposed adherence to Christian principles. Among these is listed the seven leaders of the organization, who were prosecuted by the United States Government for obstructing the conduct of the War in 1918 because of cer­tain statements made in The Finished Mystery; and they relate this:

“All seven having been sentenced on June 21, 1918, on false charges of political sedition, and obstruction of the American Military draft.... were denied the right to bail and were finally committed to the Federal penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia.”

Just for the record, and the information of our readers, we offer now a quotation from that 1917 book:

“The three fundamental truths of history are man’s Fall, Redemp­tion, and Restoration. Stated in other language, these three truths are the mortal nature of man, the Christ of God and His Millennial Kingdom. Standing opposite to these Satan has placed three great untruths, human immortality, the Antichrist and a certain delusion which is best described by the word Patriotism, but which is in reality murder, the spirit of the very Devil. It is this last and crowning feature of Satan’s work that is mentioned first. The other two errors are the direct cause of this one. The wars of the Old Testament were all intended to illus­trate the battlings of the new creature against the weaknesses of the flesh, and are not in any sense of the word justification for the human butchery which has turned the earth into a slaughter house. Nowhere in the New Testament is Patriotism (a narrow-minded hatred of other peoples) encouraged. Everywhere and always murder in its every form is forbidden; and yet, under the guise of Patriotism the civil governments of earth demand of peace-loving men the sacrifice of themselves and their loved ones and the butchery of their fellows, and hail it as a duty demanded by the laws of heaven.”

There are some four or five pages more of the same, but we believe the above will be sufficient for our readers to determine for themselves whether these statements would indeed “obstruct the conduct of the war and the American Military draft.” And our readers may also determine for themselves whether such statements on the part of “peace-loving” Christians would come from “the spirit of a sound mind” when all ele­ments of Society in the United States were aroused to a consuming frenzy over prose­cution of the war.

THE “GREAT CROWD”

On page 194, and following, there is given some considerable detail concerning the ‘great multitude’ of Rev. 7:9-17. Brother Russell went into some great elabora­tion in defining and describing this class: they are the “many” who are called, but not “chosen.” He presented many Scriptures, and explained numerous types concerning this class, whom he said would eventually have a spiritual birth – a part of “the church of the firstborn, which are written in Heaven.” A summary of such Scriptures is to be found on page 315 of the 1907 Watch Tower; and much was written and spoken concerning this class during the final years of Brother Russell’s life – by himself and by many other brethren. So far as we know, all the present leaders of the Witnesses, includ­ing J. F. Rutherford (now deceased), who were in the Movement prior to 1916, were in wholehearted agreement with the interpretation given at that time.

But, Behold! Here is just one more piece of what was “advancing Truth” ­“unity of the faith” - prior to 1918 that became disdainful error when J. F. Ruther­ford “discovered” early in 1935 that this class was not spiritual at all; it would be an earthly, flesh-and-blood class - one time styled Jonadabs, but now the “great crowd” of this Revelation Scripture. It was this same J. F. Rutherford who also “discovered” almost all the other errors that replaced the accepted truths of the Har­vest period prior to 1916; so any unbiased mind is now forced to admit that either Brother Russell or J. F. Rutherford must repose in the history books as a rank error­ist; in fact, a gross fraud. And notice that it took almost twenty years to “discov­er” this very important truth here in the end of the Age. But with It all, it would be very interesting to learn what the Witnesses now do with those Scriptures listed in the 1907 Tower, and how they explain the “unprofitable servant” of Matt. 25:30. It will be noted that it is written of this servant that “there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” Then compare the statement concerning this ‘great crowd’ in Rev. 7:17: “God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.”

Some of us recall that it was Brother Russell’s prediction that the majority of those in his organization toward the end of his life would be of this ‘weeping’ class; so we ponder the question, Can it be that the present leaders have concluded that the best way to free themselves from membership in this class is simply to deny in toto that there is such a class? In “due time” the truth on this matter will prevail – especially after Armageddon. For some years now the leaders have been telling this ‘great crowd’ that they will go right through Armageddon and live forever, if faithful to that organization. But so many of their number have already died that it has shaken the faith of quite a few others; and we offer the prediction now that when Armageddon fails completely to confirm present predictions, the great majority of those remaining will indeed experience “weeping and gnashing of teeth.”

Perhaps we shall have more to say about this book in a future paper, but for now we would offer the counsel of St. Paul (2 Tim. 3:14,15--Dia.): “But do thou continue in the things which thou didst learn, and wast convinced of (from 1874 to 1916), know­ing by whom thou hast been instructed.... those holy Scriptures, which are able to make thee wise for salvation, through that faith which is in Jesus Christ.”

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

----------------------------------------------------------------------

ANNOUNCEMENT OF GENERAL INTEREST

In harmony with the arrangements the Epiphany Messenger made for the Epiphany, we suggest Sunday, October 18 through Sunday, November 15, for our Fall Special Effort in antitypical Gideon’s Second Battle in the “good fight” against the two King Errors, ­Eternal Torment and Consciousness of the Dead, antitypical Zebah and Zalmunna. Please see Epiphany Vol. 5, pp. 236-245. Our tracts Where Are The Dead? What Is The Soul? and The Resurrection of The Dead are especially adapted for this service. Also the books, The Divine Plan of the Ages and Life-Death-Hereafter may be used for this work. All who wish to join with us in this service, please order the pertinent literature in time. Our tracts are free, postage paid.

As we seek to “bear witness” to these timely Truths, we honor the Lord, as we also honor those whom He honors (1 Sam. 2:30), His faithful Mouthpieces who faith­fully pursued antitypical Zebah and Zalmunna all during their ministry; therefore, we invite all of like mind to join with us in this Special Effort – and also to join with us in the prayer, God bless their memory! (1 Tim. 5:17)

NO. 183: ANTITYPICAL JANNES AND JAMBRES

No. 183

The May-June Present Truth contains some excellent articles. The one on p. 34 – “The Christian’s Warfare” – is by Brother Russell, so we should logically expect it to be superb. Then another article on p. 42 – “Reason – Its Import and Proper Func­tion” – likewise by Brother Russell; as is also one on p. 44 – “Secret and Beneficial Societies.” All three of these articles are commendable and profitable reading. Then there is one on p. 39 – “Antitypical Jannes and Jambres” – which is basically by Brother Johnson, although RGJ injects some of his pet errors into it; so it is with this part of the Present Truth that we shall now concern ourselves.

The names Jannes and Jambres occur only once in the entire Bible – 2 Tim. 3:8 in which text St. Paul says they “withstood Moses” before Pharaoh. There is no indi­cation whatever as to where the Apostle learned these names – which are Hebrew in their construction; he either spoke by inspiration, or he had learned of them through some writing or tradition that had come down to his day. But this information is rela­tively unimportant, as we are concerned mainly with the evils ascribed to these rene­gades, as shown in the meanings of their respective names. Jannes means “he deceives”; and Jambres means “he rebels,” or revolutionizes. The article under review properly ascribes the Jannes clique to the Parousia sifters from 1874 to 1916; and the Jambres group to the Epiphany sifters from 1916 onward to the present, and yet continuing.

TREATMENT OF DISFELLOWSHIPED PERSONS

On p. 41, col. 2, RGJ presents “procedure for Loyal Believers” in their treatment of those that have been excommunicated, part of which we now quote:

“How should faithful believers act toward false brethren in their midst? Should they take them by the hand, as formerly, and bid them Godspeed? Should they recognize them as brethren?.... Should we indeed walk with them and expect to be counted guilt­less?”

While RGJ is here dealing in generalities, he was much more specific in his ver­bal comments from Convention platforms in the past, at one time indicating unmistakably that he was referring to JJH and wife, when he asked the question, “Would you shake hands with the Devil?” Well, we note now his “double mind” – because in Jamaica in January 1957 RGJ came well out of his way, without any encouragement from us, to shake hands with the both of us – almost a year after he himself had personally disfellow­shiped us. Indeed a doubleminded man is “unstable in all his ways”! (Jas. 1:8) We graciously received and returned his greetings, although we were well alerted to Psalms 55:21: “The words of his mouth were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart.” This was later confirmed by his conduct at that Jamaica Convention where he shouted from the platform to the brethren assembled there, NOT TO GREET US, NOT TO SHAKE HANDS WITH US, AS WE WERE DEVILS – or the Devil’s emissaries. So vicious and vituperative was his diatribe that beloved Sister Condell wrote us subsequently, “If it had been possible, he would have burned you at the stake.” In consequence, she refused to en­gage in the Love Feast with him.

However, the statement we have offered from p. 41 is certainly correct as it stands, even though his own course since Brother Johnson’s demise is far from harmony with that teaching. Thus RGJ has come a long way since his experiences with the Soci­etyites as described in his letter in the June l924 Present Truth, p. 104. At that time his conduct and attitude toward the errorists were the same as ours today, while today his conduct and attitude are the same as the Societyites were then – and the same as the Jehovah’s Witnesses are today. He now joins hands with them in revolutionism against Parousia Truth on treatment of disfellowshiped brethren.

Neither Brother Russell nor Brother Johnson counseled that we should greet disfel­lowshiped brethren “as formerly”; but they both did advise that we extend to them the common courtesies of every-day life. We offer here a comment by Brother Johnson con­cerning the Mushite-Merarites:

“The history of Standfastism is full of cruel disfellowship proceedings, which are instituted on trivial charges. On flimsy evidence disfellowshipment is decreed, and is enforced by refusal of even the common amenities of life, such as an ordinary greeting, or a friendly look, or handshake. Along this line they are copying the Society poli­cies – ‘avoid them.’ ‘The instruments of cruelty are in their habitation.’ Another un­scriptural procedure of Standfastism is the use of Matt. 18:15-18 by Conventions. Matt. 18:15-18 applies to individuals within an ecclesia and to individual ecclesias, but not to sins that affect the entire church. The old Catholic error that what applies to an individual applies to the General Church has crept in among Truth people, and is mani­fest in the actions of both branches of the antitypical Gershonites and both branches of the antitypical Merarites.”

Thus, RGJ is now placing himself in a most pitiable condition as he follows in the footsteps of the Societyites and with the Mushites, and departs from the faithful teach­ings of the Star Members on the Scriptural conduct toward disfellowshiped brethren. And be it noted, too, that he also brought disfellowshipment proceedings against us in a Philadelphia General Convention a few years back in direct violation of the foregoing, and in direct contradiction to his own teachings of the matter in previous Present Truths – when the truth on the subject served his then present purposes. And we may note well here that in the June 1, 1970 Watch Tower, p. 351, the Societyites have this to say:

“The basic position of a faithful Christian toward a disfellowshiped one – have no fellowship at all with him, not even speaking with him.”

Compare now the truth teaching by the “wise and faithful” ‘founder’ of the Witnesses’ organization concerning a disfellowshiped person: “He should not be passed by on the street unnoticed by the brethren, but be treated courteously. The exclusion should be merely from the privileges of the assembly and from any special brotherly associa­tions, etc., peculiar to the faithful; This is implied also in our Lord’s words, ‘Let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.’ Our Lord did not mean that we should do injury to a heathen man, nor treat either in any manner unkindly; but merely that we should not fellowship such as brethren, nor seek-their confidences, nor as New Creatures give them ours.” (Studies 6, p. 303) What a contrast between the two atti­tudes!

In this very Present Truth we are discussing, RGJ says the Tower Editors are a part of the Epiphany Jambres. Thus, when he now joins hands with them in error – revo­lutionizing against clear Parousia Truth – he offers abundant proof that he himself is still a member in “good standing” of the Epiphany Club of the Jambres Order. He is now revolutionizing against both Parousia and Epiphany Truth on this matter.

In this connection, we would instruct our readers that it would be our duty to tender aid to disfellowshiped brethren if we saw them in dire difficulty. This is in keeping with St. Paul’s counsel: “As we have opportunity, let us do good unto all men.” Note here the gracious Berean Comment on Gal. 6:10: “Unto all men – Temporally and spiritually, including our enemies, including those who have been disfellowshiped by the Church.” Of course, when we consider the record of RGJ, as given by the Epiphany Messenger, it may be generous for us to grant that such conduct is just a little be­yond his understand­ing and capacity – especially in his present condition. Note here just some of the record:

“An incident illustrative of unfair and unkind criticisms of J. occurred in connec­tion with J.’s advocating the ecclesias giving financial help to an aged Youthful Worthy widow who was both sick and penniless. Certain ones not pleased with her (although she had not then been disfellowshiped—JJH) carried on a whispering campaign against her and against J. for advocating her being helped by the ecclesia, resulting in such a feeling being aroused as almost made a division in the ecclesia; and R. G. Jolly again was J.’s main opponent before the church on the subject. Actually the sister by a combination of starving and cancer died; and the hospital blamed the ecclesia to J.’s face therefor.” (E-10:585) In this episode we have a clear example in RGJ’s conduct of a member of the Epiphany Jambres, as he “withstood Moses” (the Lord’s Mouthpiece).

And this same member of the Epiphany Jambres is now advising his sectarian devotees to avoid disfellowshiped brethren as we would avoid the Devil. “You wouldn’t shake hands with the Devil, would you?” is the way he put it from the Convention platform in Phila­delphia. “Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. But whoso hath this world’s good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?”

It is well to note here the difference in attitude of Brother Russell and Brother Johnson from that of RGJ. The two Messengers were in the Truth, while the sifters were in error, so they had nothing to fear from the errorists; whereas RGJ himself is in error, and he well knows that any of his adherents that may speak to us may attempt to discuss same of his errors with us – and that could result disastrously for him. His present teaching is in exact accord with many of the preachers in Big Babylon, who also counseled their deluded supporters concerning those hated Russellites, “I wouldn’t even give one of them the time of day.”

On p. 42 RGJ sets out very well the qualities of a true Truth leader, which comments are commendable and easily accepted by all well-instructed Truth brethren; and it would seem RGJ includes himself in the category of a Truth teacher; whereas, he himself has proven himself to be a member of the Epiphany Jambres, applying in some instances the cunning of the Parousia Jannes (He deceives), as we shall presently prove. His technique here is identical with that of the Popes over the centuries, and the Little Pope here in the Epiphany, who applied the complimentary terms of the Scriptures to themselves, as they applied the criticisms to the real Truth teachers who opposed their errors. This “sleight-of-hand” can readily lead astray “the unstable and the unlearned.”

While the real sifters of the Parousia did leave the Harvest Truth movement, as they also did in the Jewish Harvest, but just the reverse was true throughout the Interim and during the Epiphany. It was the Popes during the Gospel Age – and JFR especially during this Epiphany – who were the real sifters, even as they shrieked to high Heaven that it was the ‘sifters’ who were the troublemakers – those who left the Popes on account of their sins of teaching and practice. Unless this is kept clearly in mind, one may easily become confused over present conditions. RGJ himself admits that he was a part of the Epiphany Jambres during the 1938 debacle – when he was manifested to the entire Church as a revolutionistic crown-loser. The whole record is to be found in Volume 10; and we can but assume that RGJ approves of that record, because he still offers that book for sale to all as the truth; often quotes from it when it suits his purposes. Of course, he never quotes the record of his revolutionism.

AN EXAMPLE OF THE BELIEVERS

In 1 Tim. 4:12 St. Paul appeals to Timothy to be “an example of the believers,” with the Diaglott stating it this way: “Become a pattern of the believers.” At the time of Paul’s writing Timothy almost certainly was one of the Very Elect, working as an Evangelist. Thus, his good pattern of life and teaching would the more readily win Jews and Gentiles into the Christian unity during the Jewish Harvest. As most of our readers know, RGJ has been applying to himself and to his followers many of the titles that Brother Russell and Brother Johnson applied only to the Little Flock; so it should not surprise us to note in this same Present Truth that he publishes a statement regarding one of his kinsmen, “What an example of the believers!” Therefore, it would now seem in order to quote some expressions from Brother Johnson concerning this class:

“Their failing to gain the prize has not been due to the Lord’s not loving and helping them sufficiently; but it has been due to the fact-that they forgot their ‘first love’ by which they for awhile kept the Lord’s word. (John 14:15; Rev. 2:4) The Lord sent them, as well as the Faithful, abundant instructions, encouragements, exhortations, warnings, rebukes, disciplines and corrections to deter them from a wrong course (Heb. 12:5-13; Rev. 3:19); and their taking the wrong course was entirely due to their fail­ing to watch, to pray and keep themselves in the love of God sufficiently to carry out their consecration. There have been such measurably unfaithful brethren throughout the entire Gospel Age.

“Their course toward the Lord, the Truth and the remainder of the Lord’s people has not been a praiseworthy one (has not been an “example of the believers”—JJH). But not all of them have been equally guilty of wrong-doing. Some of them have been nearly faithful enough to be of the Bride; and some of them have been nearly unfaithful enough to be of the second-death class (Jude 22, 23). Between these two extremes of character in these brethren there have been and are now all sorts of variations of double-minded­ness. With some of these bound brethren of God the trouble has not been so much a turning to sin as a failure to sacrifice unto death, through fear of the sacrificial death (Heb. 2:15). Unlike the Master, they do not endure the cross and despise the shame. Others of them, in addition to failing to sacrifice self and the world, give themselves up to various sins, and serve the adversary through spreading errors of doctrine and prac­tice in religious matters (such as those we now examine at the door of RGJ—JJH), there­by spotting their garments. Altogether as a class they are more or less wayward and self-willed. Thus they fall with respect to their justification and consecration privi­leges and duties.

“This condition, of course, unfits them for the position of Kings and Priests, their characters not being of so good a quality as that required for Kings and Priests. How could God give the Divine nature to those who rebel and support rebels against His ways! (Psa. 107:10,11) How could He make them of the Bride of His Son when they defile the bridal garments of holy characters? How could He proclaim them ‘more than conquer­ors’ (examples of the believers—JJH) when they compromise with the enemy through fear of the sacrificial death? How could He make them of the Christ-Body, from which the rivers of living waters will flow, in view of the fact that through false teachings they corrupted the wells of Truth? The Faithful are guided by His eye, i.e., they are directed in their life by His Word of Wisdom, the Truth; while the measurably Faithful must be repeatedly chastised, and finally have their fleshly mind entirely destroyed by punishments received at Satan’s hands.

“In our times there are more such people than ever before. They must pass through ‘the great tribulation,’ amid which they will cleanse their robes and make them white in the blood of the Lamb. (Rev. 7:14)”

At no place in the Bible are such people described as “examples of the believers”; nor are they so described anywhere in the Parousia or Epiphany writings. It remains for RGJ to present this ‘advancing Truth.’ Note the Parousia Messenger’s comment about it in Reprints 5232:

“All these circumstances (such as outlined above by Brother Johnson—JJH) attest that this great company before the throne and with palm branches are a wholly different company from the elect, the bride.... For this reason, they cannot be accepted by the Lord as copies (“examples of the believers”—JJH) of His dear Son.... They have built improperly with wood, hay and stubble, and the fire of that day (in the Epiphany day in which we are now living—JJH) shall completely destroy all such structures . “

The outstanding typical example of such crown-losers is King Saul of Israel, who types their leaders from shortly after the Jewish Harvest up to Armageddon. And, since Jambres types their leaders during the Epiphany, we emphasize that for Epiphany purposes antitypical Saul and antitypical Jambres are synonymous. We cannot have one without the other. This is strikingly revealed in 1 Sam. 15:23: “Rebellion (revolutionism) is the sin of witchcraft.” The meaning of Jambres is “He rebels”; and the specific charge against Saul for his disobedience is also the sin of rebellion – wording very closely related. The sin of witchcraft is especially deceptive false teachings; and more of such false deceptions have appeared during this Epiphany period in one year than what appeared in a whole century during the Gospel Age. Most of the Book of 1 Samuel is concerned with a detail of Saul’s dismal and willful failures; at no place is he set forth as an example for the Lord’s people to follow. Rather, the recitation of his “re­bellion and stubbornness” is a warning to all not to do likewise if we would not come to the same end he did – ignominious defeat and death at the hands of the wretched Phili­stines. Here is an excellent summation of this matter in E-13:251: “Let us learn the lesson inculcated by Samuel and Saul, i.e., that by God’s grace we stand, as we abide faithful, taught by antitypical Samuel’s life, and that, despite God’s grace, we fall, as we prove unfaithful, taught us by antitypical Saul’s life.”

AN INSTANCE OF SPIRITUAL WITCHCRAFT

At the bottom of p. 40, col. 2, of this same Present Truth, is this statement:

“The word days in 2 Tim. 3:1 refers to the Parousia day and the Epiphany, or Apocalypse, day, the two days or period with which the Gospel Age ends. In the narrow, or restricted, sense, the first day was from 1874 to 1914, and the second from 1914 to 1954 respective­ly... But in wider sense the lapping of the Parousia and Epiphany period into one another continued and continues after Oct. 31, 1916 (see, e. g., E-4, p. 18). Likewise in wider senses the lapping of the Epiphany and Basileia periods into one another continues since 1956.”

In making such a statement RGJ demonstrates that he either has a very hazy concept of the subject, or he is attempting spiritual witchcraft (especially deceptive false teachings) upon his readers; and it may be a little of both. We make this charitable appraisal because we know only too well that the errors presented by the Epiphany Jambres leaders must necessarily tend to color their thinking – they must bend the Truth at every turn to give some plausibility to their revolutionistic perversions, as one error usually begets other errors. Let us analyze this present topic:

There is a large Parousia Day and a small Parousia Day, the small day being a part of the large one, starting at the same time in 1874, and continuing concurrently with it until its end. That end came October 31, 1916; and nowhere in the Epiphany writings do we find the slightest hint that it continued one day after that. Of course, the large Parousia day did continue, and will do so until 2874. Much the same analysis may be given for the Epiphany as the last special period of the Gospel Age. It began in September 1914, and will continue unto the complete end of the Time of Trouble, being lapped upon, and running concurrently with the large Parousia Day; but in no sense of the word having any identity with the small Parousia Day after October 31, 1916. This is well established throughout the Epiphany writings – especially in the very citation he gives in E-4:18 to prove his point. As Brother Johnson has said, Why do these crown-­losers cite references that directly contradict their contentions? The Epiphany as the last special period of the Gospel Age also will not continue for one day after the Time of Trouble is fully ended.

RGJ says there was a similarity in the ending of the small Parousia Day on Oct. 31, 1916, and his ‘restricted’ ending of the Epiphany Day in October 1956. Let him tell us what the ‘similarity’ is. In no place in the Epiphany writings is the Epiphany given a ‘restricted’ ending in 1956. We all know there was an event at October 31, 1916, which all of the Truth people then recognized. Can RGJ point to any event at all – even an infinitesimal dot of any kind on the time table – that points out October 1956? If he cannot, then we repeat that he is simply practicing spiritual witchcraft here in a very lame effort to bolster temporally his “house built upon the sand.” And once again he reveals that he is still a member ‘in good standing’ in the Epiphany Club of the Jambres Order – with a little of the Parousia Jannes added.

And his contention finds direct contradiction in the words of Jesus in Luke 17: 22, Dia.: “You will desire to see one of the days of the Son of Man, and you will not see it.” The “day to be desired is the small Parousia Day; and, if it continued after October 31, 1916, we should be able to see it. But Jesus said we won’t be able to see it, although RGJ can now see it – by his hallucinating witchcraft only. And in this very connection, we have again the words of Jesus: “They will say to you ‘Behold there!... follow not.” That is, ‘follow not’ unless you wish to be entrapped by the es­pecially deceptive false teachings of the Epiphany Jambres.

Some may think that we stress this matter too much, but we remind our readers that RGJ is an old hand in the art of Jambresian witchcraft, as note the record Brother Johnson left us about him in E-10:645: “R. G. Jolly, a pilgrim.... tried to put through a bus­iness meeting of the Philadelphia Ecclesia a motion that was a revolutionism (Jambres means He rebels – revolts—JJH) against proper methods of voting against candidates for elders and deacons. This led to J’s exposing them as attempting to gain control of J., the Lord’s mouthpiece. Not a few in the ecclesia sympathized with them; and had not J. been present and vigorously opposed their resolution, so Azazelianly constructed (a real piece of spiritual witchcraft—JJH) as, if possible, to have deceived the very Elec­t would doubtless have passed.” Of course, Brother Johnson is not here to oppose him now in the LHMM; thus, he attempts one piece of spiritual witchcraft after another since his abandonment to Azazel (Azazel means Perverter as the teacher of the Epiphany Jambres) in October 1950.

All who are well informed in Harvest Truth will readily realize that this presenta­tion is chiefly from Present Truth writings, with appropriate Scripture in corrobora­tion. Certainly it is not our wish to be unduly harsh, but exposure of error and un­christian conduct is always interpreted as vicious by “the sinner in his path of error” (Jas. 5:20, Dia.) – prototype of the Scribes and Pharisees. The Truth voiced by Jesus in Matthew 23 hurt the errorists so badly that they resorted to murder – the cross – to rid themselves of it. Because he attacked the sins of teaching and practice of the “gentlemen of the cloth,” Brother Russell became “the most hated man on earth.” But un­pleasant duties are not to be avoided if they require us to “earnestly contend for the faith that was once delivered unto the saints.” (Jude 3) “It is required in stewards that a man be found faithful” – faithful to the Lord, the Truth and the brethren – re­gardless of whom it may please or displease. Using the words of St. Paul, we can whole­heartedly say of ourselves: “They which preach the gospel should live of the gospel. But I have used none of these things... necessity is laid upon me... I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all.” (1 Cor. 9:14-19) “He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.”

“Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy throne: mercy and truth shall go before thy face. Blessed is the people that know the joyful sound: they shall walk, 0 Lord, in the light of thy countenance.” (Psa. 89:14,15)

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle, pilgrim

----------------------------------------------------------

QUESTION OF GENERAL INTEREST

QUESTION: – What is the difference between the death of the “dead in Christ” and those who experience the constrained death?

ANSWER: – The “dead in Christ” are those mentioned in Psa. 50:5 – “Those that have made a covenant with Me by sacrifice”; and who have kept that covenant to the end in “a good and honest heart.” They are the “good and faithful servants” of Matt. 25:21-23 – the 144,000 of Rev. 7:4-8 – the “blessed which die in the Lord from henceforth... Yea, saith the Spirit, they may rest from their labors; for their works follow after them” of Rev. 14:13, Dia. These are “the dead in Christ that shall rise first” (1 Thes. 4:16) – “The first resurrection, over these the second death has no authority.” (Rev. 20:6, Dia.) As with Jesus, these also “have poured out their souls unto death” (Isa. 53:12) for the “joy that was set before them” (Heb. 12:2) – have “suf­fered the loss of all things, and consider them to be vile refuse... to know Him, and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death” (Phil. 3:8-10, Dia.) Thus, the “dead in Christ” are those who have been fully faithful in “dying daily,” even as He died daily from Jordan to Calvary. Theirs is the “sacrificial death.”

There has been another Class during this Age who have agreed to do all the forego­ing, but who forgot their first love – they are “the seed that was sown among thorns... in whom the cares of the Age and the deceptiveness of riches choke the word, and render it unproductive.” (Matt. 13:22, Dia.) Thus, they are forced – constrained – to do what the first class did voluntarily; they are those whose works are “burned” (1 Cor. 3:15 – See Berean Comment) instead of their “works following after them.” (Rev. 14:13) They suffer the loss of all things, escaping only with their lives, as typified by Lot’s flight from burning Sodom. It will be recalled that Lot “sat in the gate of Sodom” – the place of prominence – and the “deceptiveness of riches” in his case was much the same as influenced the “chief rulers” of John 12:42,43, Dia.: “Who believed into Him, but did not confess Him... For they loved the glory of men more than the glory of God.” Much of what they have done was “to be seen of men” – and “they have their reward”; and such a course could not possibly win for them the “first resurrection.” They are the goat “for Azazel” (Lev. 16:8, margin), which is eventually delivered unto a fit man, sent into the wilderness “for the destruction of the flesh (fleshly mind), that the spir­it may be saved in the day of the Lord” (I Cor. 5:5, Dia.) – death by constraint. They fail faithfully to sacrifice – “die daily” – and after “great tribulation” they die the “constrained death” and are privileged to be “before the throne.” (Rev. 7:14,15)

---------------------------------------------------------

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Bro. John J. Hoefle: Greetings in our Master’s name!

I have had an urge to write to you for some time. I have been receiving some of your literature, and I find the articles quite interesting. I notice that you must have had some experience with the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ activities and their literature – not that you are one of its members, but I gather that you are a firm supporter of Brother Russell’s views and his Six Volumes of Scripture Studies. I am happy to know that you are a firm believer in the things that he wrote. I have been a subscriber to the Watch Tower since about 1903, I believe. About 1942 I refused to accept it any more – although I was not in harmony with its teachings for five or six years before.

Much water has passed over the dam since I first started reading the Tower and the Six Volumes of Studies in the Scriptures. I have learned that the Six Volumes have been the means of keeping me on the right road. I don’t think that there is anything better or more satisfying; at least, that is my thought. I have been at my present address since 1966 among strangers, and it is not too pleasant I can assure you. There are quite a few JW’s here, and they have been trying to interest me, but I don’t see anything in it that will induce me to change my course. I have kept most of the literature that you sent me, and after reading some over again today I am more convinced than ever that what I learned under Brother Russell is the Truth, which I gather that you also believe. The JW’s teaching is not a bit convincing to me in the least. They indulge in writing many books with a different title, but as far as giving one the fundamental principles of the truth they are lacking a great deal. It is as you have stated, they do not recognize the Tabernacle Shadows, and also they teach the Church is under the New Cov­enant. I have been taught that the Church is under a Covenant by sacrifice, which was the thought of Brother Russell – and also the teaching of the Bible.

From what I gather they do not manifest the love of God. Why I say so is that they have hardly any hope for those that will die during the final trouble that shall engulf the world. I cannot agree with that. They seem to have quite a following, but that doesn’t prove that they have the Truth. From all indication of the signs of the times we are very close to the establishment of the Kingdom, and that means that we can ex­pect a “time of trouble” such as the earth has never known; and it appears that all will soon be in readiness for its final fulfillment. Yes, the storm clouds are gather­ing at a rapid speed, and how thankful mankind will be when sin, sickness and sorrow will be forever a thing of the past, and death being abolished forever! I am sure that there will be great rejoicing when the people will awaken to that fact – when all will be restored to perfection – and every one loving their neighbor as themselves.

I had the privilege of meeting Brother Russell in Appleton, Wis., in 1907. He gave a talk at the Park on “To Hell and Back” to a nice crowd. And after the talk he went to a Brother’s home who was his first Colporteur, and that is where I had the opportunity to shake hands with him. He said, Now brother, don’t look down on us – and, of course, everybody had a good laugh. I am a bit taller than the average person. In the evening he gave a talk on the first four verses of John 14. This was at Brother ........ home – his first Colporteur. So you see I have many, pleasant memories. I have never had a desire to change to another teaching – because the sound of the Truth is absent no matter what one picks up to read, it seems. I will soon be 88 years of age, and quite able to be about – although I would like very much to be back among my old friends in Wisconsin, and its surrounding country. I am hoping that the Lord may open the way for me so as to be with those of like faith.

Well, dear Brother, I have written more than I thought I would. Please excuse me for taking up so much of your time. May the Lord bless and keep you in His loving care!

Your brother by His kind favor, ------- (CANADA)

....................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace be multiplied!

Your good letter received and as always we were glad to hear from you – and also pleased that you liked the photo........ It was truly wonderful how Sister ------- was so self-sufficient almost to the very end. What a good age!. We are very glad to hear that she was truly a good friend and a dear Sister. Truly you will miss her very much!

We also want to be especially remembered to Sister Dunnagan – and tell her we do petition our dear Heavenly Father to continue to bless her ....... We trust that you and dear Sr. Hoefle are well, and we know you are rejoicing in the Lord and His rich bless­ing to us all. We deeply appreciate your labor of love for the brethren......

Warm Christian love to all –

Your brother and sister, ------- (NEW  JERSEY)

....................................................................

Dear Sir:

Please send me the following pamphlets: Where Are The Dead? What Is the Soul? The Resurrection of the Dead, The Three Babylons, Two Distinct Salva­tions, God’s Great Sabbath Day, The Great Reformer, Permission of Evil. Thanks so much for your trouble!

Sincerely yours ------- (VIRGINIA)

....................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle:

Will you please send me some more of the tracts. I am about out of The Resurrec­tion of the Dead. Still in the Master’s service,

Your Sister ------- (CONNECTICUT)

NO. 182: JESUS THE CHRIST

No.  182

My dear Brethren: Grace and peace through our Beloved Master!

It is rather a sad commentary that many earnest and sincere Church Members do not know the clear meaning of the name Jesus Christ, the One they desire to worship. This is not only true of lay members, but is also true of quite a few of their ministers who are attempting to “preach Christ and Him crucified.” “Thou shalt call His name Jesus,” was the command of the angel to Joseph, His stepfather. Jesus is the equiva­lent of the Hebrew Jeshua, or Joshua, and means Savior – “for He will save His people from their sins,” said the angel. Jesus continued with only the given name Jesus all during His boyhood, and was known by this name by His family or neighbors. However, when He presented Himself to John at Jordan for Baptism, the Holy Spirit descended upon Him from on High; and from that time onward He was known as Jesus Christ. The word Christ means anointed; and the clear indication is that from Jordan on, from the time the Holy Spirit was poured out upon Him, He was then known as Jesus the Christ – or the Anointed Savior. Thus, the name Jesus Christ and Anointed Savior mean exactly the same thing.

In a broad sense there are four offices He would hold in the saving process for the human family – that of Prophet, Priest, King and Judge. Be it noted there are also four attributes of the Divine character – Wisdom, Love, Power and Justice; and each one of these attributes finds its full application individually in the four offices just named. The work of a prophet is to teach the people the truth; “I will send you Elijah the Prophet... and he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers.” (Mal, 4:5,6) And such a ministry is founded upon the attribute of Wisdom. Next, the purpose of a Priest is to forgive and bless. “We have not an High Priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities... Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy (forgiveness), and find grace (favor, blessing) to help in time of need.” (Heb. 4:15, 16) Surely, such forgiveness and blessing are primarily a work of the attribute of Love. As King (Ruler), Jesus will use particularly the attribute of Power.  “At the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and of things in earth, and things  under the earth.... that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ (the Anointed Savior) is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” (Phil. 2:10, 11). It needs no argument that such rulership, regal authority, is the direct result of the attribute of Power. And as a Judge He will use specifically the attribute of Justice. “God hath appointed a day, in the which He will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom He hath ordained (the Anointed Savior); whereof He hath given assurance unto all men, in that He hath raised Him from the Dead.” (Acts 17:31) As Judge, the risen Lord will use specifically the attribute of Justice – strict, impartial  and perfect Justice. “The spirit of the Lord shall rest upon Him... shall make Him of quick understanding... He shall not judge after the sight of His eyes, neither reprove after the hearing of His ears (as must now be done in our courts, thus often resulting in the conviction of the innocent, and more often resulting in the freeing of the guilty)... With righteousness shall He judge the poor, and reprove with equity for the meek of the earth... Righteousness shall be the girdle of His loins, and faithfulness the girdle of His reins.” (Isa. 11:2-5)

A MORE DETAILED ANALYSIS

While the foregoing gives an overall summary of the Anointed Savior and His work toward men, there are various details of each of these that may be itemized under 17 subheadings; and some of these we shall now consider:

(1) OUR RANSOMER – “The Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give His life a ransom for many” (Matt. 20:28); And this is further emphasized and clarified in 1 Tim. 2:4-6: “Will have all men to be saved... The man Christ Jesus (the Anointed Savior) Who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.” In this latter text the word ransom is from the Greek antilutron, and means a corresponding price – an exact equivalent. This word ransom finds a fairly good illustration in our present-day kidnapping crimes, where a ransom is demanded for the release of the victim. When the demands are met, the victim is released; and it is much the same in the case of Jesus as Ransomer, one great difference being that Jesus Himself provides the ransom price. In 1 Cor. 7:23 it is stated: “Ye are bought with a price”; and we are further informed in Rom. 6:12: “By one man (Adam) sin entered into the world, and death by sin: so death passed upon all men.” From the fall in Eden the great enemy has held the human race as in a gigantic vice, from which none could escape. “None can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him.” (Psa. 49:7)

But Christ Jesus (the Anointed Savior) was well able to  provide  the  ransom  price; and He did this by “pouring out His soul unto death,” giving His human life and life rights as the exact equivalent of the man Adam in Eden. “Behold, the Lion of the Tribe of Judah, the root of David, hath prevailed to open the book... thou wast slain, and hast redeemed (ransomed) us to God by Thy blood... Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honor, and glory, and blessing.” (Rev. 5:5-12) As such He substituted His perfect human body for the perfect human body that Adam lost in Eden; His perfect life rights for those lost by Adam in Eden. “The Son of Man is come to save that which was lost.” (Matt. 18:11) Thus, the question properly arises, What was lost? We answer, Four things were lost. First, Adam lost in Eden his peaceful fellow­ship with God; second, he lost his perfect home in Eden; third, he lost his dominion over the brute creation; fourth, he lost his right to life. The Dying process lasted 930 years, at which time Adam returned to the dust whence he was originally taken.

The doctrine of the Ransom is the foundation stone of all Biblical teachings; it is the touchstone by which we may gauge the truth or error of every other attempted Scrip­tural interpretation. If such teachings impinge in any way against this touchstone, we may be sure there is something wrong with that teaching. Thus, a proper understanding of the Ransom immediately annihilates the idea that man is a dual being; that is, that he has a soul and body separate and distinct from each other.  “In the day thou eatest there­of, thou shalt surely die,” was the clear edict to the man Adam (Gen. 2:17). There are those that contend that Adam died spiritually on that day. But, if he died physically 930 years later, he must then have been both spiritually and physically dead; so just what else would be left of him? However, the record is clear enough, “Man became a living soul” (Gen. 2:7). Thus, when Christ Jesus (the Anointed Savior) “poured out His soul unto death,” He provided an exact equivalent for what the man Adam lost in Eden – ­He became the Ransom, the corresponding price, by which He could “redeem them from death; ransom them from the power of the grave” (Hosea 13:14).

(2) MEDIATOR – In Heb. 12:24 it is stated “Jesus the mediator of the New Covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.” In the verses immediately preceding, there is minutely detailed the Covenant with the nation of Israel at Sinai, with Moses as Mediator, and compared with Jesus as the proposed Mediator of the New Covenant; so it is in order first of all to define the meaning of a mediator. He is a go-between for two parties, much the same as a broker in the stock market. When we buy stock on the New York Stock Exchange, the broker who transacts the action not only represents the buyer, but he represents the seller also, and he is le­gally and ethically bound to give to each a fair and impartial representation. While money is the medium of exchange in a stock deal, the buyer paying and the seller receiv­ing the amount involved, Jesus as Mediator of the New Covenant provides not money, but His blood, His human life and human life rights, to bring the opposing parties into ac­cord. It should be noted also that the parties to a stock transaction need not be ene­mies – they may actually be good friends; but the mediation of Jesus will be between two parties actually at variance with each other. The Jews at Sinai were also out of accord with God – because of inherited and acquired sin; thus, in no position to have any di­rect dealings with God. But, with Moses as the go-between, the Law Covenant was com­pleted, through the sprinkling of animals’ blood. So also with the New Covenant, the Christ Anointed Savior – shall ‘‘make His soul an offering for sin” (Isa. 53:10), as He mediates the New Covenant.

That this New Covenant is not yet in operation should be readily apparent. If it were, man would be unable to continue in his sinful course as he has been doing for the past six thousand years.  There is now no command to the Gentile world to forsake sin and follow righteousness. Rather, there has been a call (“Many are called, but few are chosen”) to such as would hear, a call to “follow in His steps.” But, as stated in the opening paragraphs, when the New Covenant and the Mediator (better than Moses) are es­tablished, then it will be a command for “every knee to bow, and every tongue to confess that Christ is Lord.” Certainly, all will agree that this condition does not prevail at this time.

The purpose of the New Covenant is to give life to all who will accept it under the terms of that Covenant. “God will have all men to be saved” from the various evils that now afflict the human race; but, once that salvation is accomplished, then it will be a matter of each individual’s choice whether or not he wishes to avail himself of the further benefits that will then be available. That will be the “resurrection of judg­ment” (John 5:29, Dia.), the word ‘judgment’ here being from the Greek word krisis, which actually means a trial time – a trial time with sufficient knowledge available to permit those tried to make an intelligent choice between good and evil.

(3) FATHER – In Isa. 9:6 we have the prophecy, “unto us a son is given... His name shall be called Wonderful .... The everlasting father.” St. Paul states, “As by Adam all die, so by the Anointed (Savior) also, will all be restored to life.” (1 Cor. 15: 22, Dia.) The first Adam did not give us life; he gave us a sentence of death, which is slowly executed upon each individual until he is finally placed in the tomb. It is a common expression for men to say, I am living in New York, St. Louis, Los Angeles, etc.; but the fact is that they are all dying in those places, of which every funeral procession gives mute evidence.

But the life that will come from the second Adam (the Anointed Savior) will be just the reverse; it will bring to the race life in perfection – “God will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and death will be no more, nor mourning nor crying; neither will there be any more pain.... These words are faithful and true.” (Rev. 21:4,5) Instead of the aging process we now see on all hands, there will be just the reverse at the hand of the “Everlasting Father”: “Man’s flesh shall be fresher than a child’s: he shall re­turn to the days of his youth.” (Job 33:25) At present we see men going from youth to old age and faltering steps; under the Mediator, the Anointed Savior, the Everlasting Father, just the reverse will occur – man shall return to the days of his youth.

(4) LAW-GIVER – “The Government shall be upon His shoulder.” (Isa. 9:6) And, since all God’s works are perfect, we may expect a perfect Government when the Anointed Savior takes unto Himself His great power to reign. Under present unfavorable conditions all governments are far from perfect; in fact, most of them have been miserably imperfect ­due to the vicious, corrupt and selfish men who have been at the heads of the various governments. “To the intent that the living may know that the Most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever He will, and setteth up over it the basest of men.” (Dan. 4:17) Even with the few noble rulers of history, their efforts were much impeded and negated by corrupt and ambitious underlings. As the perfect Law­giver, the Anointed Savior will have no selfish motives. “With righteousness shall he judge the poor, and reprove with equity for the meek of the earth” (Isa. 11:4) – class distinctions will not enter into the administration of justice under the Perfect Law-Giver,

(5) THE GREAT PHYSICIAN – That the human race is in dire need of better doctors to cure their diseases is apparent on every hand. It is our conviction that many of our better physicians are men and women of high ideals, who work conscientiously and altruis­tically to ease the ills of the human race; yet they are forced to admit their limita­tions against the ailments that afflict the race.  Not long back a very good and person­al friend of ours dropped dead of a heart attack in just a few minutes. He had been a brilliant physician, with a very lucrative practice. We were discussing his sudden de­mise with perhaps ten fellow members of the Medical Association, when one of them sadly remarked that in instances such as that one they were forced to admit their limitations in their treatment of bodily ills.

The human afflictions are not only physical, they are also mental, artistic, moral and religious.  “When I would do good, evil is present with me,” is the open confession of the Great Apostle (Rom. 7:21); and it needs no argument that that noble “example of the believers” exerted all his indomitable will to combat the weaknesses which had come to him through heredity. Said the Prophet Isaiah (1:5,6): “The whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. From the sole of the foot even unto the head there is no soundness in it; but wounds, and bruises, and putrefying sores: they have not been closed, neither bound up, neither mollified with ointment.” Further on the subject by David (Psa. 51:2-5): “Wash me thoroughly from mine iniquity... Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.” Doctors have listed about 2,000 diseases that afflict humanity – many times more than can be found in any of the brute creation. “I am fearfully and wonderfully made,” is a further statement by David (Psa. 139:14); but man’s great physique and sensitive nervous system have also subjected him to more numer­ous and more intricate bodily disorders than can be found in any of the lower animals.

And for all of this the Great Physician (the Anointed Savior) will in due time produce the remedies that will effect a complete and permanent cure. “The Sun of right­eousness shall arise with healing in His wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves in the stall.” (Mal. 4:2) “Bless the Lord, 0 my soul, and forget not all His benefits: Who forgiveth all thine iniquities (through the work of the Great High Priest); Who healeth all thy diseases (by the hand of the Great Physician)—Psa. 103:2.  This healing has been partially extended to the faith class during the Gospel Age, and will be given fully and completely to all the non-elect during the Kingdom reign who will avail themselves of it.

(6)  THE GREAT AND JUST JUDGE – Previously we touched lightly the Anointed Savior’s office of Judge, but we now offer some elaboration because of the confused and extensive misunderstanding that prevails on the subject throughout Christendom. In previous centuries the belief was general throughout Christendom that the Great Judge would eventually put in an appearance in a 24-hour day, sentence all the sinners to eternal torment, and take His faithful with Him into the heavenly abode. It is a tribute to the great increase in knowledge (Dan. 12:4) here in the end of the Age that many Christian believers no longer accept such an erroneous view; but many of them still have only a hazy conception of any different view on the subject. However, if we consider the Judges in Israel, after the entrance into Canaan, we find their most important work was to deliver their fellow Israelites from their enemies; and in this they were but a type of the Anointed Savior who will deliver mankind in general from their enemies of heart and mind – namely, sin, error and selfishness. “The Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son” (the Anointed Savior)—John 5:22.

Such judgment to be successful will involve several things: First, the human race will be put under providential conditions conducive to accepting the harsh, yet merci­ful, conditions applicable to such judgment. Such conditions do not now prevail, because all will agree that it now is as easy for man to sin as for the smoke and sparks to fly skyward. Even with the faith class, who have resolutely attempted a better way, a cer­tain margin of failure has accompanied their efforts to keep the perfect law of God. Secondly, it will be necessary to teach the unbelief class just what the law actually is – what is required of them – before they can even make the attempt to keep the law. All will agree that the conflicting teachings of the numerous sects today must carry with them a considerable amount of error. It has been well stated that behind every argument lies some one’s ignorance. And this has been especially true of religious arguments. But the promise is sure to all, “I will instruct thee, and teach thee in the way which thou shalt go.” (Psa. 32:8) And, “When thy judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness” (Isa. 26:9). The people will first be told clearly and certainly what they must do before they will be judged for what they do. It is estab­lished law in the courts of our land that “Ignorance of the law excuses no one”; and this may continue measurably true during the reign of the Anointed Savior. But the ignorance will surely and completely first be eliminated before judgment will be meted out. Then, “the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea.” (Isa. 11:9)

Such a situation would require, thirdly, that the necessary help be given for the success of the willing, and suitable punishments for willful violations – punishments not too severe, nor yet too lenient for each individual case. Then, finally, the judgment must be pronounced – innocence for the innocent, and guilt for the guilty. “Then will the King say to those at His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed one of My Father, inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the formation of the world’.... He will then also say to those at His left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed ones, into that aionian fire (annihi­lation), which is prepared for the Adversary and his messengers.’”—Matt. 25:34-41, Dia.

From the foregoing it should be clear that the judgment process and the salvation process are companion accomplishments. As the one occurs, so does the other. Thus, instead of the judgment being a fearful thing, the world is admonished to “sing unto the Lord, all the earth... show forth His salvation from day to day – Declare His glory among the heathen.” (Psa. 96:1-3) He will “judge the world in righteousness”; and none will be asked to perform more than he is able to do. Such a situation today is impossible ­even though the judge may have the most noble intentions. We still are faced with the in­disputable truth, “Man looketh on the outward appearance,” and must judge accordingly; but in the judgment process of the Anointed Savior all will know that “The Lord looketh on the heart.”

(7) THE GOOD PROVIDER – Despite man’s best intentions to improve his condition, the result has been mostly dismal failure. Since the great increase of knowledge in the time of the end – from 1799 onward – almost all the great inventions have been produced, re­sulting in great freedom from the burdens of the curse. But, “A morning cometh, and a night also.” In the more advanced countries today we find much the same evils as were charged to Sodom: “Pride, fullness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her...... they were haughty, and committed abomination before Me; therefore, I took them away as I saw good.” (Ezek. 16:49, 50) Jesus compared the world in His first Advent to sheep that have lost their way – without a shepherd; but St. Paul writes of The Anointed Savior as “That great shepherd of the sheep, who will make you perfect in every good work.” (Heb. 13:20, 21) “Our God shall supply all your needs through Christ Jesus, our Lord.” This He has done for the faith class during this Age, and will perform it for all mankind in the Age just ahead, supplying the things needful for them to gain the salvation then avail­able.

At the outset we stated that there are 21 offices, or titles which apply to the Anointed Savior; but we have offered detail on only about a dozen of them. Some of those we have not discussed, and which have Biblical labels are the Advocate, the bride­groom, the Deliverer, the Captain (of our Salvation), the Head (of all things), the Prince of Peace, the Revealer, the Purifier and Refiner. Some of these operate only dur­ing this Age, while others operate now, and will also operate in the next Age. The 21 evils that are rampant among men all find their cure through the person, offices and work of the Anointed Savior; nor are they to be found elsewhere. Once this is clearly discerned, we may join heartily and with increased fervor in offering the prayer, “Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth.” That alone will produce “the desire of all nations”; and, as we consider those things already accomplished in that direction, we may have increased confidence in the performance of the remainder, for “He is faithful that promised.”

All of the foregoing may be summarized in the words of St. Peter (Acts 3:19-23) ­“The restitution of all things.” The general premise, and the ultimate consummation are also contained in these texts: “A prophet (the Anointed Savior) shall the Lord your God raise up unto you... Him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever He shall say unto you. And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people.” We are told further that when That Prophet occupies His office of Teacher of the people that Satan will be bound – “that he should deceive the nations no more.” (Rev. 20:3) But after that he will be “loosed for a Little Season.” That “Little Season” will be the Time of Trouble at the end of the Millennial Age, just as the present Time of Trouble now marks the end of this Age. “Every man’s work shall be made manifest, for the day shall declare it.” (1 Cor. 3:13)

However, when the trial time of the Little Season shall arrive – in the eventual sep­aration of the Sheep and the Goats – most of the 21 evils mentioned herein will have been eliminated; thus, there will be no more any need for their corrective offices to be oper­ative. But there are several of them that will find their real prominence during that Little Season. The Anointed Savior will then act in delivering the Sheep (as Deliverer), even as He destroys the Goats; He will still be their King, because man will not obtain “restitution” of his kingly domain that was lost in Eden until after the full end of the Little Season, when the Lord’s words will apply, “Come, ye blessed of My Father, inherit the Kingdom.” Also, at the end of that Little Season the Judge will pronounce His final judgment upon “the just and the unjust” – after which “cometh the end, when He shall have delivered up the Kingdom to God, even the Father, when He shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. For He must reign till He hath put all enemies under His feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.” (1 Cor. 15:24-26) This “last enemy” cannot possibly mean the tomb, as we understand it today; because, once the resurrection from the death state occurs, in that instant the bonds of the grave are broken, and the healing, instructing, and reviving processes begin to work – all of which must be completed by the beginning of the Little Season.

Both the sheep and the goats will have been perfected physically by the time the Little Season begins; and to all outward appearances they will all be the same. But it will require the trial time – the graduating process – of the Little Season to deter­mine which of them are also perfected mentally, morally and religiously. These may be classed as the concealed vestiges of the dying process – the evils they willfully refused to forsake – even though they were outwardly obedient during the Mediatorial Kingdom. All who enter that Little Season will be perfect physical specimens; most of the 21 offices of the Anointed Savior will have accomplished their full purpose, and will have passed forever out of existence as such. But a few of these titles and their works will carry right on through the Little Season to its full end. “Then cometh the end,” when all of the 21 offices will cease to operate, as the sheep “inherit the Kingdom” – have had all restored to then that was lost in Father Adam.

Briefly we would recap the 21 offices of the Anointed Savior as described by the Epiphany Messenger: (1) The Ransomer, (2) the Advocate, (3) our Righteousness, (4)       Bridegroom, (5) High Priest, (6) Teacher, (7) Deliverer, (8) Captain, (9) Head, (10) Mediator, (11) Father, (12) Perfect Lawgiver, (13) Prince of Peace, (14) King, (15) Revealer, (16) Executive for God, (17 Physician, (18) Lord, (19) Judge, (20) Purifier and Refiner, (21) Provider. Some of these offices are operative now for the Faith Classes – for the “called” or elect classes, and many of them will continue to operate for all mankind during the Kingdom proper. Also, quite a few of these offices will terminate at the beginning of the Little Season – such as Medi­ator, Ransomer, Physician, etc. But all who have received Present Truth must know that the Christ will continue all through the Little Season until the end in the offices of King, Judge, Revealer, Deliverer and Provider of the Sheep – until the “end” of the Little Sea­son when He shall have “delivered up the kingdom to God” (1 Cor. 15:24) by transferring kingship to the Sheep, to those who entered the Little Season with perfect characters.  Those who enter the Little Season with unholy heart condition, who have failed to perfect moral and religious qualities – who have failed to rid themselves of Adamic defilements (the dying process) – will be destroyed in the Second Death at the end of the Little Sea­son. Then the Restitution work will be finished, and Acts 3:19-23 be fulfilled – also He will have “put all enemies under his feet,” and 1 Cor. 15:24-26 will be fulfilled. “He that is able to receive it, let him receive it,”

The above is well summarized in E-15:211: “What, then, are these enemies? from v. 26, where the last one of these – the Adamic death – is named, we see that they are not persons, but things.  And this one being a work of Satan, and the purpose of our Lord’s two advents being the destruction of all Satan’s works (1 John 3:8), we understand the expression, ‘all rule and all authority and power,’ to mean every expression of Satan’ usurpation. This includes everything that he has accomplished and the means used to that end. Hence Christ’s reign will abolish every feature of Satan’s empire and the evils that he has effected through introducing sin into the world and usurping the rulership of the world. This includes the Adamic sentence and its effects: physical, mental, moral and religious imperfection. Adamic sin, the Adamic death process (this is the last enemy of v. 26), the Adamic death state (hades, destroyed by the awakening the Adamically dead), Adamic tears, sorrow, crying, pain, etc., in a word, all the effects of the curse (Rev. 21:3-5; 22:1-3; 20:13, 14; Is. 25:6-9). Thus the Millennial reign of Christ is to annihilate everything that Satan and Adam brought upon the race.” (The Goats of the Little Season will have failed to rid themselves of their moral and religious imperfec­tions by the beginning of the Little Season, and were, therefore, unable to stand the crucial tests of that trial time—JJH)

“Oh that men would praise the Lord for His goodness, and for His wonderful works to the children of men... the righteous shall see it, and rejoice, and all iniquity shall stop her mouth, Whoso is wise, and will observe these things, even they shall understand the loving kindness of the Lord” – through the ministration of the Anointed Savior. (Psa. 107:31-43)

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

----------------------------------------------------------

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Gentlemen:

I have an exciting book borrowed from a friend, entitled The Divine Plan of the Ages. I would like one for myself and one to send my sister. Also would like to pur­chase a copy each of Volumes 2, 3 and 4. the address in the book is yours, so am send­ing to inquire if the prices are as advertised..... Will send a check as soon as I hear from you,

Sincerely, ------- (CALIFORNIA)

...........................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace!

It has been quite awhile since I’ve heard from you. I’m enclosing a few names. You will be glad to hear that the papers are coming through better now. I received the July paper on June 10, and the June paper May 18. Also many thanks for sending me by first-class mail the June issue, which I believe I received around May 20. I think the mail service is a little better than it was.

You can rest assured your June and July articles were wonderful! That July issue surely was a masterful production.

We are getting some warm and humid weather here now.... Garden is growing...

Our Christian love to all there ------- (MICHIGAN)

...........................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle:

Enclosed is $ ------ which is my free will offering toward the wonderful work of the Association. I realize that this work must have financial support, and I would like to contribute as I am able.

I have received the book The Divine Plan of the Ages. I have read it through – and now to read it through again and study it page by page and prove its contents by the Bible. It is very informative and I will tell you that I have never studied anything like it.

Mrs. ------- husband and family are old friends of mine. She sent for the liter­ature from you because I told her to. We have attended the same Church for many years – ­in fact, I used to be her Sunday school teacher. I will help her and her family in any Christian way that I can.

May  the  Lord  be  with   you!  --------  (NEW JERSEY)

...........................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace be multiplied!

We received your letter and thank you for sending the books. We truly appreciate your faithfulness in keeping up the war against errors and in defense of the Truth amidst much persecution. I don’t have the words to give thanks to God for you, and for keeping my Mother alive until I was able to see for myself – for I could have been killed by errors.

Warm Christian love for you and all the dear ones that give you a helping hand. God bless you all!

Yours through grace ------- (JAMAICA)

...........................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace be with you!

Brother ------- joined with us in celebrating the Memorial of our Lord’s death. Sisters, et al, memorialized together. Brother ------- took our tracts, so we now ask that you send us a supply.

Brother and Sister ------- also Sister ------- called to see us yesterday. They are well. Brother had a talk with a Jehovah’s Witness. He was shocked to hear that the JW believed Adam a ‘murderer,’ – dying the Second Death. Brother defended the Truth, that Jesus died for Adam, a corresponding price.

In closing Sister joins me in warm Christian love, and the assurance of our prayers for you all.

...........................................................................

Dear Sirs:

Kindly send copies of What Is The Soul?  Where Are The Dead?  and The Three Babylons to Mrs --------- Thank    you! ------- (CONNECTICUT)

NO. 181: A MISCELLANY

No. 181

“Is it proper to apply antitypically the ‘water of separation,’ described in Num­bers 19, to the cleansing of God’s people in the Gospel Age or in the Millennial Age, or in both?”

The above question is to be found on p. 29 of the March-April Present Truth, where RGJ ridicules the analysis contained in our Addenda to the February paper No. 176; and in this he confirms once more Brother Johnson’s description of him in E-10:591: “Loquacious, repetitious, false-accusing Epiphany crown-loser, foolish effusions, false criticisms.” Our Epiphany-enlightened brethren know that Brother Johnson himself was the recipient of much of the same “false criticisms” from the same kind of people from whom we now receive it. (See Epiphany Vol. 10, pp. 584 through 594.) RGJ goes into con­siderable detail about Brother Russell and Brother Johnson making limited application of the type to the Gospel Age, just as though we disagreed with that; whereas, we stated very clearly in our No. 176 our complete agreement with them on it.

However, we stressed Brother Russell’s basic conclusion in the Nov. 15, 1895 WT (incorrectly given as 1897 by RGJ in this March-April 1970 PT) to this effect:

“Had the red heifer and its ashes been connected with the Gospel Age cleansings, the Apostle surely would have shown the fact here (Heb. 9:13); for he did not shun to declare the whole counsel of God then ‘meat in due season;’“

We now offer a few more sentences from that same article: “The Apostle Paul, in Heb. 9:13, speaking of the typical cleansing, mentions the blood of both the bulls and goats (the Atonement Day sacrifices) and the sprinkling of the ashes of the red heifer with water, etc.; but, when applying the antitype, he stops with the blood of Christ, and makes no mention of the antitype of the ashes of the red heifer, – because (empha­sis by Brother Russell) it had nothing to do with our cleansing, but relates to the world’s cleansing in the Millennium; as we have shown.”

The foregoing was written sixteen years after Tabernacle Shadows – at a time when That Servant was at the pinnacle of his sanctified reasoning powers – yet RGJ insists on going back to the earlier writings for his ‘proof.’ WHY? Usually, when our positions seem to be reversed, he makes loud ado about the latest expressions by Brother Russell ­just as he did on 1 Cor. 15:24. However, when we quoted from his “latest teachings” on that text – which RGJ boasted could not be found – his “foolish effusions” were again exposed.

When writing our February paper we agreed with the above statement – and we still agree with it; although RGJ rails “sifting errorist” at us for quoting this statement at him in his confusion on this subject. Brother Russell’s emphatic teaching in 1895 should certainly take precedence over his statement 16 years earlier in Tabernacle Shad­ows. “In due time” Brother Russell also corrected others of his statements in that book, as we have previously stated. As we agreed in our previous paper, the noble example of the Ancient Worthies should goad us to better things – and it surely does; but we need not confine this exclusively to their deeds. The noble and inspiring acts of any world­ly person may work in similar manner for us. But we believe there is sound Scripture for claiming that the ashes of the red heifer – as a type – is strictly Millennial.

First, there are many Ancient Worthies of whom we know absolutely nothing – not even their names. Thus, their ashes (memories) can affect us now in no way whatever. But when they are established as ‘princes’ in Jerusalem, all mankind will then be bene­fited by the record of what they did. Second, the ashes of that heifer were for sprink­ling the “unclean.” None of the fully faithful of this Gospel Age are to be considered as “unclean.” “You are already clean (even before the Holy Spirit had been given) through the word which I have spoken to you.” (John 15:3) “Ye are washed, ye are sanctified, ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.” (1 Cor. 6:11) The only “unclean” new creatures during this Age have been the leprous Levites ­the Great Company – of which RGJ himself is admittedly one – which are so ably described in Epiphany Volume 4, pp. 243-302.

Third, RGJ’s Campers Consecrated (if we should grant such a class may exist now) are no more “unclean” through contact with the dead than any of God’s elect people during this Age. Let us keep ever in mind that justification in this Age comes only through faith – a justifying faith that counts all of the fully faithful elect as clean; where­as, in the next Age imperfect men will never be reckoned clean – they will be definitely “unclean” with Adamic defilements (process) until they reach perfection.

RGJ attempts to confuse this matter by injecting Brother Johnson’s explanation of Numbers 31 into it. And in this attempt he demonstrates once more that his understand­ing of types is just as confused now – if not more so – as it was sixty years ago, when he then admitted his confusion. (See his letter of Nov. 15, 1910 WT) As instance, he says this at the bottom of col. 1, p. 30:

“Though themselves (the warriors of Numbers 31) members of the Camp of Israel, they were to do this cleansing, not in the Court at the Laver, but outside the Camp.”

One would naturally conclude from this that, had those warriors not became “un­clean,” they could have availed themselves of the water in the Laver. Will he tell us if this is his thought? And if this is his thought, Is it now impossible for uncleansed Levites to avail themselves of the Laver in the Court?

But we inform our readers now that the Laver in the Court was exclusively for the priests and levites; therefore, had nothing whatever to do with the “water of separa­tion” in the red heifer type. And it will be noted that those warriors had to purify themselves Outside the Camp – where the ashes of the red heifer were deposited; they were not allowed to do this cleansing in the Camp, with the other Israelites. However, to clarify this matter, in this picture the warriors type the Little Flock – and not a one of them died in battle; but the cleansing of themselves and their instruments typed they “have this treasure in earthen vessels” – that is, Adamic defilements (con­tact with the dead – the Adamic death process) are still present with them – even though reckoned “clean” – perfect – through the merit of Christ. As the Apostle Paul says, “I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.” (Rom. 7:21) And to those who have not lost the “spirit of understanding,” this picture is very clear that the “waters of separation” here are not a substitute for the Laver in the Court ­of which all the consecrated must use if they would be faithful. And in all of this we now secure our information from the antitypical laver – THE BIBLE – even though others may secure theirs from other sources. RGJ has no antitypical laver in his camp, so none of this would properly be available for his Campers Consecrated – even for him, if – as he contends – that the Great Company and Youthful Worthies are on the same “narrow way” (in the Camp) with his Consecrated Campers.

Furthermore, RGJ stresses that those ashes “were available for all the people”; and with this we agree. But, did they have to go to the place where the ashes were – outside the Camp – or were those ashes brought in to them? Those warriors and their instruments were cleansed where the ashes were deposited – outside the Camp; so he again offers rank confusion when he tries to bring that type in and connect it with his Campers Consecrated, whom he contends are in the Camp. In fact, his reasoning here is on a par with his contention that those people who die under the Kingdom reign will be dying the Adamic death if they are still contaminated with any Adamic defilements.

Of course, in all this RGJ is simply treading the steps of his kinsmen of the past, those Levites who built Big Babylon in their efforts to cleanse the world; and for which the Bible offers severe condemnation: “The Levites that are gone far from me, when Israel went astray.... they shall bear their iniquity.... because they ministered to the people before their idols (moral uplift, social reform, convert all to Christianity before the “due time,” etc.), and caused the house of Israel to fall into iniquity.” (Eze. 44:10-12) “Bungling is the usual and natural activity of the Great Company.”

CONCERNING 1 COR. 15:24

It had been our intention to refrain from further comment on “the end” of this text; but there is a statement by RGJ on p. 21, col. 2, that forces us to further elab­oration:

“Many defiled ones have been Truth-enlightened teachers, who themselves became roots of bitterness; thus they defile many, speaking ‘perverse things’ (Acts 20:30), such as:.... The ‘end’ of 1 Cor. 15:24 does not come until at the end of the Little Season.”

For this statement he offers no proof, or refutation of our previous presentations (the reason being because he has none!); and in this he is simply following the steps of That Evil Servant (“walking in the counsel of the ungodly”), who, in his sneering at the crushing refutations of his errors by Brother Johnson, acted on the same principle as do the Jesuits (who also had Azazel for their teacher) – “do not attempt to prove your statements; for the effort to prove arouses suspicion in the minds of the hearers. Repeat, repeat, repeat, and the repetition will gradually be accepted as proof by most people.” (Epiphany Volume 6, p. 611, top)

Let us take a further look at 1 Cor. 15:24, with the Berean Comments as follows: “Then.... Having finished the work of redeeming the race, of bringing many sons to glory, of destroying the reprobate, and of filling the earth with perfect human beings... The End .... the end of the restitution work.” Also the Berean Comments on Matt. 25:34: “Blessed of my Father Inherit the Kingdom... When Christ delivers up the dominion of earth to the Father, he will do so by delivering it up to mankind, the Father’s repre­sentatives, who were designed from the first to have this honor... Prepared for you... From the foundation... For the restitution classes... Not ‘before the foundation,’ as in the case of the Church.”

Is RGJ now telling us “the end of the restitution work” will occur at the begin­ning of the Little Season – before the dominion of the earth is delivered to them? We have raised this question before, with nothing but silence from RGJ. WHY? Simply because he has no answer; therefore, he repeats, repeats, repeats such expressions as “sifting errorist, roots of bitterness,” etc. And we now suggest that Acts 3:19-23 will be accomplished at the end of the Little Season, just as 1 Cor. 15:24. Such tactics as used by RGJ are the last resort of cheap psychologists to fool “the unstable and the unlearned”; but they will have a reverse enlightening effect upon all those who are “of the Truth.”

Once more we refer to the type of Exodus 14 and 15. There the fleeing Israelites do not come to the complete end of their Egyptian bondage until Pharaoh and his pursu­ing hosts had been swallowed up in the Red Sea – the same being a clear type of the “Lake of fire,” into which Satan and his spiritual and human followers will be cast at the end of the Little Season. This Exodus account is one of the grandest types in the entire Old Testament; and we offer now a few of the comments on it as they are found in Epiphany Vol. 11, pp. 245-296 (which RGJ apparently has never read – and apparently does not want to read, because even he might feel some sense of shame in his present Jesuitical course of repeat, repeat, repeat):

“All the factors connected with the final trial (at the end of the Little Season—­JJH) are pictured in Israel’s surroundings at the Red Sea. Israelites camping in such a position types the faithful restitutionists (the sheep—JJH) being tried with the Second Death, as the threat before them, flanked by wicked angels and men, as their opposers to capture them, and guarded in the rear by the Christ, as their strong tower. Certainly such will be the conditions of the final trial (at end of the Little Season—JJH).”

Continuing: “The perfection (shown by the 600 chariots of Pharaoh—JJH), of course, would not be that of character, but that of faculty, because neither Satan, the fallen angels nor apostate restitutionists will be perfect in character, but they will be per­fect in faculty.”

Thus, the “goats” will have all the outward appearance of “sheep” – physical per­fection – with only a bad heart condition as their condemning quality. This latter is the clear result of their willful choice of sin as they enter the Little Season; and is the certain evidence of the Adamic death process still with them. They keep their evils because they are in heart-harmony with them. We have made similar comment in previous papers; and RGJ responded by saying that if this were true, then the Goats would be dying the Adamic death – and not the second death. Those who have even a smattering of Present Truth will readily recognize that That Evil Servant never offered a more ludicrous piece of nonsense to his gullible readers. And yet this same RGJ now has the colossal gall to rail “sifting errorist” at us because we make bold to expose this arrant nonsense.

More from the same book: “It is true that the promise will be given to the Mil­lennial overcomers that at the end of the thousand years they will inherit the king­dom of the earth (Matt. 25:34) – (which is a part of restitution – Acts 3:19-23—JJH). But Satan will use this doctrine deceptively, by ignoring the fact that the thousand years will end lappingly just as they began lappingly, in various stages – 1874, 1878, 1881 and 1914, and by reiterating in his tempting suggestions that it ended in 2874. Hence as days, weeks, months and years pass by he will with increasing emphasis suggest something like the following to the hearts of the people: ‘The thousand years ended in 2874, but you see that the Ancient and Youthful Worthies are not giving over the kingdom to you, but are keeping it for themselves (not giving you restitution – what Father Adam had—JJH). They are usurping the power that is yours in order to Lord it over you. They are power-graspers, and as lords over God’s heritage are seeking to deprive you of your rights for their own aggrandizement. This cannot be the Lord’s will, who has promised you the kingdom (as Adam had—JJH) by the end of the Millennium, i.e., 2874. You must have faith in His pertinent promise and request them to deliver to you the kingdom in harmony with God’s promise.’ Such seems to be that deception.”

And then – the same as now in this Epiphany – those who are not in heart-harmony with the Truth and its Spirit, will be susceptible to the deceptions of the Devil (otherwise known as Azazel) – “deceiving and being deceived.” They had received the Truth all during the Mediatorial Kingdom, but they received the truth not “in the love of it” (2 Thes. 2:10, 11). They, too, will receive “strong delusion” – although those ‘goats’ of the Little Season will not cleanse themselves, as do those crown-losers who are cleansed in the “great tribulation” here in the Epiphany. Any who enter the Little Season with an unholy heart condition will not be able to stand the crucial tests ­and will be “destroyed from among the people” (Acts 3:23) – just as second-death new creatures will all be annihilated during the Epiphany.

Let us note particularly that in the Red Sea experience Moses types Christ as the Deliverer, the Leader of the Sheep. Therefore, He self-evidently will be their Teacher, their Judge, their Ruler, their Protector during the entire Little Season, the same as He was during the Mediatorial Reign – to bring them safely through the antitypical Red Sea, the “Lake of Fire,” and save them from the Second Death. This final trial will be the last stand that Satan, sin and error and all in sympathy with them will ever make. The final trial and its outcome will leave a universe forever free from sin, error and their effects. This will be the end of the restitution work – “the end” of the Little Season. Then – and only then – will “the kings of the earth” (the Sheep, the faith­ful restitutionists) bring their glory into the heavenly city or kingdom. (Rev. 21: 24-26)

Consider further, 1 Cor. 15:24: “Then the end.... when He shall have put down all rule and all authority and power” – “when He shall have abrogated all Government and all authority and power” (Dia.). In a limited sense this will be accomplished as soon as the Kingdom reign is universally established in all the earth; but all during the Kingdom reign there will be a certain defiance by those “sinners a hundred years old that shall be accursed.” But even this defiance will have disappeared by the begin­ning of the Little Season, after which it will reappear when Satan is “loosed for a Little Season”; and it will seem to gain a certain upperhand as the Goats do violence to the “camp of the saints, and the beloved city” – until, eventually, “fire came down out of Heaven from God, and consumed them.” (Rev. 20:9) Clearly enough, this also must be at the end of the Little Season!

“That Kingdom will be an absolute monarchy; hence its government will not be of the people nor by the people, but will most emphatically be for the people.... The ar­rangement that they will establish for mankind will be conducive to Truth and Right­eousness and inconducive to error and sin.... Instead of sin and error prevailing, right­eousness and truth will prevail. Instead of false religions, oppressive governments and predatory aristocracies holding sway, the true religion of God, teaching perfect truth and righteousness, the fostering Government of Christ Jesus and the Church, bless­ing everybody, and the faithful servants of Jehovah as a benevolent aristocracy effect­ing the prosperity of all, will hold sway. Instead of losses, disappointments, sorrows, tears, crying, sickness, weakness, dying, and death, there will be prosperity, hope, joy, pleasures, laughter, convalescence, strength, health and life, abundantly avail­able for all.” (E-17 – The Millennium – published in 1956)

Also, in this same book, p. 15, there are Seven Main Objects of our Lord’s Return: “(1) To gather together and deliver the Little Flock from the earth; (2) to cleanse and deliver the Great Company; (3) to develop the Youthful Worthies; (4) to overthrow Satan’s Empire; (5) to establish God’s Kingdom; (6) to bless with opportunities of Restitution the whole human race, both the living and the dead; and (7) to test and reward each member of the human race.” This seventh item will be completed at the end of the Little Season.

“Restitution means a return to an original estate. The original estate of the human family was the image and likeness of God, as these were exemplified in Father Adam and Mother Eve in Eden before the transgression. By the image of God we under­stand the perfection of being, the condition of being very good, to be meant (Gen. 1: 26, 27, 31; Heb. 2:6-8; Col. 3:10; Eph. 4:23, 24); and by the likeness of God we understand man’s rulership over the earth, even as God is Ruler over the Universe, to be meant (Gen. 1:26, 28, 29; Matt. 25:34). The image of God implies perfection in the physical, mental, moral and religious faculties.... The likeness of God implies a perfect earth with perfect rulers in charge.” (p. 21, and top of p. 22)

More from p. 23 and top of p. 24: “Acts 3:19-21 testifies: ‘Times of refresh­ing (this word is used to denote the re-enkindling of life and the promotion of growth effected by rain falling upon mown and burnt grass, to which the fallen human family is compared (Isa. 40:5-8), and which is expressly stated to be the effect of Christ’s Reign upon our race, mown down by the curse, and burnt by the fierce rays of sin).... but during the Millennium as this passage indicates, He will turn His face toward man, beaming with grace, mercy and truth for man’s restoration.... and He shall send Jesus Christ, which (who) before (during the Gospel Age) was preached unto you, whom (Christ) the heaven must receive (retain; – how long?) UNTIL THE TIMES OF RESTITUTION OF ALL THINGS (every feature of the image and likeness of God is to be restored to the willing and obedient in the Millennium) which (things) God hath spoken (promised) by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began.’ This passage expressly teaches us that Christ does not return until the Times of Restitution, the Times of Refreshing; therefore He returns to restore to, and to refresh the race with, its original condition. St. Peter tells us that this is the testimony of all the holy prophets, as also quotations above given prove.”

One of Christ’s offices is that of Deliverer, and the faithful restitutionists will not be delivered until the end of the Little Season: “As God in the ways de­scribed in vs. 19-29 delivered His fleshly Israel out of the power (hand) of the Egyp­tians, so God will by the ministry of the Christ and the Truth, by the authority and power of the Christ in the exercise of God’s power, through the obedience of the faith­ful restitutionists and the threats and protection of Second Death dangers, amid the capturing efforts of the post-Millennial wicked spirits and men, by the Lord’s troub­ling the antitypical Egyptians, by making their organizational efforts miscarry, sup­porting the faithful against them, and by sinking the antitypical Egyptians, all their appurtenances and leaders, into eternal annihilation, effectually and completely de­liver the faithful restitutionists during, and at the end of the Little Season.” (E-11, pp. 275, 276 – Published in 1948)

All authority will be vested in The Christ during the Mediatorial reign; and during this reign sin will be quickly obliterated – that is, outwardly. So, even then, during this Mediatorial reign, all authority and rule are vested in The Christ – some­thing like marshal law will exist then. But the “all authority” mentioned in 1 Cor. 15:24 is similar to the conditions now. Our Lord will not permit any “rule or author­ity” to prevail against His elect, such as Satan and his ledlings endeavor to enlist. All those who are “of the Truth” will come off victorious – the residue of the elect will be delivered during this Epiphany. And the same condition will exist in the Little Season for Restitutionists: Satan, his angels and the goats, who try to exert “authority and power” over the Sheep will not succeed. But Satan will succeed with the Millennial goats of the Little Season, just as he will with the second-deathers dur­ing this Epiphany period. We can indeed praise the Lord for His Goodness, Mercy and Deliverance of the fully faithful, as well as of the measur­ably faithful when they are cleansed.

We know that RGJ won’t attempt to answer any of this, because he can’t. But, true to his “higher class,” he will almost certainly continue his garrulous pernicious name-calling. For those of us well acquainted with Epiphany Truth, we know the basic concept of the article on p. 20 of this March-April Present Truth, “Moses’ Third Fare­well Address,” is by Brother Johnson; but we know, too, from sad experience, that RGJ is certain to inject his perversions into that splendid presentation (Azazel means Perverter). Also, by the same considerations, we know he will eliminate such truth as exposes the evils of the “unprofitable servant” (Matt. 25:30, Berean Comment) – the Great Company, of which he admittedly is one. Thus, if we had available the original notes of Brother Johnson, we would almost certainly find he described that “Great Com­pany” (the unprofitable servant) in his comments on p. 22, regarding the “Restoration of Penitent Ones.” And in all of this RGJ will fool “the unstable and the unlearned,” as he has been doing since he was abandoned to Azazel in 1950; but we know – with pity for him – that “he that being often reproved, hardeneth his neck (in willful per­versions of the Truth) shall be destroyed, and that without remedy.” (Prov. 29:1)

The controversy on such subjects with erstwhile brethren certainly affords us no pleasure, except the pleasure of serving the Lord in sincerity and in Truth. We could readily find other more winsome and pleasant ways to spend our time and money. Our sentiments here are the same as those Brother Johnson wrote concerning himself:

“He abhors controversy with brethren, and at first had, by the Lord, to be pushed into it, greatly against his inclinations. But as he more and more came to see the Adversary’s purpose in these attacks, and he came more and more to see that it was un­holy ambition to get and keep a following (Acts 20:30) that was animating these repudi­ators and attackers of the Truth, he more and more ceased to shrink back from entering such conflicts, though it is always painful for him to have to do it. Just as after the Apostles fell asleep, Satan used crown-losing leaders who hungered for a follow­ing to pervert the Apostolic Truth, until it was lost from the earth through their efforts, culminating in the papacy; so after that Servant passed beyond the veil, Satan began to raise up crown-lost leaders to take away from the Church the Truth that the Lord gave by him, seeking by them to destroy it entirely.” (Epiphany Vol. 5, p. 499)

“The Faithful build upon Christ in wisdom as the Rock by subjecting every thought that is presented to them for acceptance to the acid test of these seven axioms and only then accepting it, if it stands this acid test (1 Thes. 5:21; 1 John 4-4; Ps. 45:1; Is. 8:20; Matt. 4:3-10; John 17:17).... Accordingly, they do His sayings as to their taking Him to be their Teacher in wisdom.... But crown-losers fail to do His sayings as to their taking Him as their Teacher and that in two respects. They fail to seek His teachings in the right way and frequently take as His teaching things that He does not teach. The Lord guarantees to give the meek (Ps. 25:8,9), the hungry (Matt. 5:6), the humble (Matt. 11:25), the honest and good (Luke 8:15) His Truth; but He will not give it to others.... Those who do not do these sayings of His on teaching lack one or more of the five qualities just mentioned as prerequisites of obtaining the Truth. Hence the Lord allows them to imbibe more or less of error. Their unhappy heart condition has a blinding effect on their minds, so they are often prone to accept error for Truth. Some of them go to the extreme of receiving with blank and unquestioning minds whatever a real or fictitious channel of the Lord presents to them. It is even required of them in the Catholic wards of Great and Little Babylon to shut their eyes, open their mouths and swallow whatever is presented to them on the ground that it’s not their but God’s business to keep the channel clean..” (Epiphany Vol. 5, pp. 478, 479)

“Draw me not away with the wicked, and with the workers of iniquity, which speak peace to their neighbors, but mischief is in their hearts. Save thy people, and bless thine inheritance: feed them also, and lift them up forever.” (Psa. 28:3, 9)

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle , Pilgrim

---------------------------------------------------------

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Sir:

Please send me your free Bible student material. I am very much interested in starting a course. Sincerely ------- (NEW JERSEY)

....................................................................

Dear Friends:

Thank you for the extra copies of No. 175. I have presented some of them to close friends of mine. Very thoughtfully written, and tells the truth as it is to­day. The No. 176 is here, and I am reading it now.... absolute accuracy as to Roman Empire, etc., and especially very educational. May I please have a copy of No. 7?

God bless you for your Blessings through your splendid magazine!

Cordially and respectfully, ------- (CALIFORNIA)

....................................................................

Dear Brother: Greetings in Christ!

Please change my address from ------- to the address below. Your bulletins are very helpful. Do you have bitterness toward Brother Jolly?

Yours in Christ ------- (KANSAS)

....................................................................

Gentlemen:

Please send me the following booklets, Numbers 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 10 and 121. I want to thank you for the gift of booklets numbers 1 and 2. They have been of great help to me during the period following the death of my wife.

Do you publish a magazine? If so, please send me a sample.

Thank you! ------- (NEW JERSEY)

....................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Greetings in our dear Redeemer’s name!

Your letter was received with great pleasure...... We answered your last two letters of the 5th and 16th – and let us say how we received a rich blessing as we celebrated our Lord’s last Supper..... As you have said in your letter to Mr. ------- that you hope he finds the truth, and the truth will make him free. Yes, dear Brother, and as the Apostle says, Free indeed!

As we have said before, dear Brother, your letters to us contain so much, and how uplifting they are! And we can assure you we are deeply grateful to you for them. God bless you both! Thank you again for the copy of letter sent to -------

God bless and keep you all in His loving care–

Brother & Sister ------- (NEW JERSEY)

....................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and Peace!

Would like to report that Sister and I took the Memorial on March 20 after 6:00 p.m. Sister is not well. She does not get out very much unless someone takes her out for groceries etc. She will be 85 in August. She has asked me to write and tell you so you will understand why she has not written herself. They still live in a section of town that is not safe to visit. So I keep in touch with her by phone.

Thank you for the Epiphany papers. They are wonderful.

Much Christian love, Sister ------- (OHIO)

....................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Greetings in the Master’s Precious Name!

In reply to yours of the 19th, I am most grateful for your directive. I am, dear Brother, 100 percent in agreement with your statement of my tackling a subject which very few think of in terms of the factual – still one feels good to be reas­sured that he contends for the Truth.

In F 470:2, mention is made of the Apostles and their immediate followers hav­ing fallen asleep – somewhere about the third century. Please enlighten me somewhat here..... I heartily appreciate your invitation to write again if and when your guid­ance is sought on matters that tend to confuse me.........

Sister has received notice of the arrival of tracts, so I believe that she must be in possession of them now....... Please accept here an humble expression of appre­ciation for No. 176. Trusting the Lord’s gracious blessings will forever be the lot of you and yours. May I here pass on the warm Christian love expressed by all here, coupled with that of Sister and myself – to you, Sister Hoefle and the friends on your side.

Sincerely your brother ------- (TRINIDAD)

....................................................................

Our dear Friends:

Many thanks for your letter. It will be difficult to make Mother understand....... We believe she knows and understands, but get­ting words to come forth is an effort.... when she does talk, such as “Thank you for the kiss,” etc., it is only a few words at a time. She knows us apart and probably understands more than we realize.....

Enclosed is a check for furtherance of your good work. How interesting to see world affairs shaping up exactly as we were taught many years ago. Sister ------- brought the Truth to our Mother. We had a letter from her last week. She is now 92 years of age, but able to be up and about.

Our family is as usual and thankful for that, but most thankful that our mother loved the Truth and told us about it. She would send her love to you all if she could.

Sincerely, ------- (Ohio)

NO. 180: THE EPIPHANY - IN RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT

No. 180

The Bible clearly designates a number of periods of time for the end of this Age, among them The Time of the End, the Time of Trouble, the Harvest, and the Epiphany. All of these periods have different beginnings; but all of them have substantially the same ending. The Time of the End had its beginning in 1799, and will conclude at the full end of the Age. Thus, it must include the Time of Trouble, the Harvest and the Epiphany. The Time of Trouble – in the wide sense began at 1874, as did also the Harvest; and both of these will continue to the full end of the Age. The Epiphany as a period of time had its beginning in 1914 as did also the Time of Trouble in the narrow sense; and both of these periods will continue also to the full end of the Age, at which time the Time of Trouble will end in its narrow sense, as well as in its wide sense. All of these periods will have substantial ending with the end of Jacob’s Trouble; but we cannot now be certain of that exact date, although we assume it will be sometime between now and 1994, a date which will also mark the end of “the third watch.” (Luke 12:38)

Aside from incidental mention of the first three periods above mentioned, we shall concern ourselves herein with the Epiphany as a period of time, the same being the last special period of the Gospel Age. In Epiphany Vol. 4, pages 7 through 72, this subject is given exhaustive Scriptural analysis – both from the standpoint of an act and as a period of time. On page 45 of that book there is an approved quota­tion from Brother Russell:

“Parousia is used in respect to the earliest stage of the Second Advent, while apokalypsis relates to the same advent later: – not that apokalypsis and epiphaneia relate to another or a third advent, but merely to a later feature (not features, since these two words both as an act and as a period are synonymous).... The Scrip­tures clearly indicate that after the Lord has done certain things during His pres­ence (Parousia) and unknown to the world, He will later make a manifestation of His presence; a manifestation which will be discerned by all mankind; and the outward manifestation is designated His ‘epiphaneia.’”

This quotation is from the booklet “Our Lord’s Return,” and was written more than ninety years ago. Having been now some 56 years into the Epiphaneia, we see with the eye of faith, as well as with our physical eyesight, the great progress this Epiphaneia, this manifestation, has made; and this gives us a firm foundation for belief in further manifestations in the years immediately ahead.

It should be noted in the foregoing it is stated that Apokalypsis and epiphan­eia are synonymous “as an act and as a period of time”; and there is good reason for this limitation, because the two words are not synonymous in the strict and all-in­clusive sense of the term. Apokalypsis means uncovering or revelation; whereas, epiphaneia means bright shining, or brilliant illumination. As an act this latter is clearly designated in Matt. 4:16,17, Dia.: “People dwelling in darkness saw a great light (through the brilliant illumination that came from Jesus’ teachings)..... the royal majesty of the Heavens has approached.” But the word apokalypsis is lim­ited more to an uncovering, a revelation. The last book of the Bible is commonly called The Revelation; but the Diaglott translation simply heads it The Apokalypse. It was indeed a revelation at the time it was written by the Apostle John, but it could not be understood in any of its parts without the help of the Holy Spirit and time itself. Therefore, we state it is impossible to have a revelation without an epiphaneia, because it is the bright shining that accomplishes the uncovering.

To illustrate: A dollar bill may be lying on the floor of a dark room, with a person standing directly over it, but he cannot see it because of the darkness. But once the electric light is turned on, that bright shining reveals it. Even so, it would yet be revealed only to the one standing in that particular room, and awake. “Blessed are your eyes, for they see.” Since 1914 this bright shining has increased to such an extent that even some of those in the world not understanding the perform­ance, yet can see some of its effects – hazy and blurred though their vision may be. One outstanding financial expert has stated it this way: We are now in the 56th year of monetary disorder (since 1914).

“The day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night (under cover of darkness)... but ye, brethren, are not in darkness (because of the bright shining which has come to you) that that day should overtake you as a thief.” (1 Thes. 5:2-4) And the same Apostle tells us further that the very purpose of that bright shining is this: “The Lord come, Who (by His coming and the bright shining) will bring to light the secrets of darkness, and will make manifest the purposes of the hearts.” (1 Cor. 4:5, Dia.) And the very purpose of this revelation is that we may speak the things thus revealed to us. “The secrets of darkness” are error; and exposing error always brings at­tempts at retaliation, and often the vicious ill will of those whose errors are exposed. This was often emphasized by brethren during the Parousia through the illustration of a rotten board, under which would be hiding bugs and vermin of various sorts. When the board is overturned, the corrupt life underneath it scurries in all directions, breath­ing resentment at the one who thus disturbed them. “Let your moderation be known unto all men,” says the Apostle in Phil. 4:5. The Diaglott expresses it in better manner: “Let your gentleness be known to all men.” But most of us have learned from sad ex­perience that we may manifest extreme gentleness in exposing error, but it will be given quite the contrary definition by those whose errors are revealed, often elicit­ing slanderous falsehood from them in retaliation.

SOME EXAMPLES

J. W. Krewson: A one-time believer in Epiphany Truth, and an Evangelist in the Epiphany Movement. Although he was closely associated with the Epiphany Messenger for many years – having personal relationship with him over the years – Brother Johnson never saw in him the qualification for a Pilgrim. He was very grateful to him for his many services to him and the brethren – which we know from our own knowledge. Had the Epiphany Messenger seen in him these qualifications, he would have happily bestowed this honor upon him. But it is not to JWK’s discredit as a brother that the Epiphany Messenger did not appoint him as a pilgrim: It was only because of his lack of the necessary qualifications – otherwise JWK would have received an appoint­ment to this office.

But once the Epiphany Messenger was removed from us, JWK began to cast away im­portant teachings he had formerly believed – or accepted with lip service – and we felt constrained to refute his errors. In retaliation, he declared we were parading under false exaltation when we signed our papers with the title “Pilgrim” after our name; said we had no authority from the Epiphany Messenger for such a title, and could produce nothing in writing to prove we had such a title. In answer we quoted the first paragraph of a letter to us dated October 11, 1942, as follows: “I am en­closing a certificate of your appointment as a Pilgrim of the Epiphany Bible House of the Laymen’s Home Missionary Movement, signed by myself and sealed with the seal of the Movement.” We also then quoted from Epiphany Volume 10, page 249: “J. was Commissioned finally, according to the Divine wisdom given into his care, to appoint for the Epiphany – not for Parousia – purposes auxiliary pilgrims and pilgrims, to assist the Lord’s people in teaching ways.”

Not only did he charge us publicly with fraudulently claiming a title as Pilgrim, but he also wrote various brethren to this effect, asking them to demand of us such a proof in writing from the Epiphany Messenger – some of which we now have in our files. He charged that we could not produce our appointment in writing as he could his Evan­gelist appointment – because we would-have done so had we had this evidence. And from these statements it is self-evident that JWK’s contention was simply a fabricated false­hood, a malicious and fraudulent falsehood; yet he has gone right on with his defama­tion, while styling himself the Pastor and Teacher, the Lord’s mouthpiece at this time the “channel” for advancing Truth, and for Present Truth. This is in keeping with the Witnesses claim of being the “channel” for present Truth and ‘advancing’ Truth, while setting aside many basic Parousia Truths – just as JWK has done with both Parousia and Epiphany Truth.

And in keeping with the foregoing, he also has the effrontery to accuse JJH of “paralleling” the Gershonite Levites early in the Epiphany. Therefore, we now call upon him – and upon all those who support him in his falsehood – to show where the Epiphany Messenger ever resorted to open falsehood in his altercations with the Ger­shonites same forty years ago. And we would offer, too, the Epiphany Messenger’s clear and convincing definition of a parallel: “In Bible parallels the two sets or chains of parallel events are Always an equal number of years and days apart.” If we accept this definition of a parallel, then it is quite clear that JWK does not even know the meaning of the word. Our comments here are prompted by his attempted paral­lel on page 211 of his Nov-Dec. 1969 paper No. 89.

ANOTHER FALSEHOOD: In this same connection, JWK then makes the statement, “Much has been written against JJH’s errors which likewise have not been disproved.” The “errors” (?) of which he here speaks center around the date 1954; and the errors (?) we espouse for that date are the exact teaching of Brother Johnson. We quote two of them below:

“The Epiphany Camp in the finished picture is the condition of truly repentant and believing, but not consecrated Jews and Gentiles.” (E-10:209)

And further from the same book, p. 672:

“There will be a large work: (1) whereby our non-Truth Great Company and Youthful Worthy brethren, and new ones not yet consecrated, are to be won for the Truth, some of whom will be won before Babylon is destroyed and others of them afterward.”

We “continue in” these Epiphany Truths and accept them just as stated above; whereas, JWK now rejects them for ideas of his own respecting 1954, just as his “cous­in” RGJ has done. So here is another clear instance where he resorts to falsehood to sustain himself. Of course, this has been the chief method of the great and small systems of error all during the Gospel Age, all of whom have “made lies their refuge, and under falsehood have they hid themselves.” (Isa. 28:15)

And respecting his date of 1950 for the death of the last saint, he tried to es­tablish this from the Pyramid immediately after Brother Johnson’s death – when he and his “cousin” were partners; but Brother Johnson himself was emphatic in his teaching, as was That Servant, that the Pyramid is not to be considered a source of Truth; it is only “for a sign and for a witness” – to substantiate Truth already found in the Bible. The “signs of the Times,” the parallel dispensations, and the chronology do not support 1950 – nor does the Bible give us such a date through any of these, or in plain statement. This statement we have also previously published – with no further comment by JWK. Silence is the best refuge for such people when they can’t meet the Truths presented against their errors. Why doesn’t he show us where 1950 is shown in the Bible? He claims our ‘errors’ (?) have been disproved; let him cite the pages where he has disproved them. Of him we would quote the same words Brother Johnson quoted against the oily blandishments of JFR: “The words of his mouth were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart: his words were softer than oil, yet they were drawn swords.” (Psa. 55:21)

It is in order to mention an odd coincidence here in the end of the Age: JFR, JWK and RGJ have all invented consecrated classes of restitutionists during this Epi­phany. They have done this despite the clear Scriptural demarcation between the Faith classes and the world of mankind. The “due time” for Restitutionists is still future when the Highway of Holiness is opened for them. JFR called his the Great Multitude, JWK calls his Quasi-elect Consecrated, and RGJ calls his Consecrated Epiphany Campers; but the only difference in the three of them is the name they give their ‘consecrated’ Restitutionists. And let us not overlook the fact that JFR was the first one to see this ‘advancing truth’; he saw it many years before JWK and RGJ came forth with their special brand of non-existent classes. We wish to emphasize the fact that none of the three produced such “strange fire” (false doctrine) until after God had removed the restraining hand of His faithful Mouthpieces from them: That Servant was removed from our midst before JFR went on his rampage – and the Epiphany Messenger was removed be­fore RGJ and JWK went on their rampage.

Brother Johnson told us that JFR was rapidly going blind on the Truth – “his right eye shall be utterly darkened” (Zech. 11:17). Self-evidently the “cousins” don’t ac­cept this teaching in toto now, since they, too, have produced similar Restitution classes. And they do this despite the teaching of That Servant that those consecrating between the Ages – after the High Calling had closed and “until Restitution sets in” ­would be the Millennial Associates of the Ancient Worthies in reward and service. And they do this despite the Epiphany Messenger’s repeated reaffirmation of this Truth ­especially in refuting JFR on similar errors. We repeat, if consecrated Restitutionists are now the order of the Epiphany period – the last special period of the Gospel Age ­then JFR was certainly the FIRST to see that “advancing truth” – and clearly enough, he would be the one to receive the chief honor.

On p. 211 JWK has this to say: “much has been written against JJH’s errors.” We have on numerous occasions cited 2 Thes. 2:8, Dia.: “Then will be revealed the law­less one, whom the Lord Jesus will annihilate with the appearing of His presence” ­with the epiphaneia of the Second Advent; therefore, the conclusion logically follows that the epiphaneia must also still be with us, and will continue to be with us at least until the Man of Sin is no more. This premise we have also often presented; but we have seen nothing from JWK or RGJ to disprove this Scripture. Will they now tell us how they can dispose of this clear Scripture?

Furthermore, if we have left the Epiphany and are now in the Apokalypsis, then there should be an Apokalypsis Tabernacle. JWK has now had sixteen years in which to present one. If he has done so, we haven’t seen one, nor have we heard about one. Will he please give the reference? As soon as the Epiphany and its fundamentals of advancing Truth became clear to Brother Johnson, he proceeded at once to present the Epiphany Tabernacle.

THE APOKALYPSIS JOSHUA

Again on p. 211 of this same paper JWK presents himself with the above title, so we now quote Josh. 1:5: “There shall not any man be able to stand before thee all the days of thy life: as I was with Moses, so I will be with thee.” And this promise was literally fulfilled with the typical Joshua; there is no record that he ever lost a battle. And the same could be said for the true Epiphany Joshua; there is no record that he ever lost a battle. But what do we find regarding the self-styled Apokalypsis Joshua? He has experienced one crushing defeat after another – not only in his doc­trinal errors, but also on his false charges against us regarding our Pilgrim appoint­ment. Some of our readers know about the crushing defeat he received from his compan­ion in error – RGJ – in the lawsuit over the use of the name Present Truth. RGJ also gave him defeats on those Truth subjects where he still retained the Parousia and Epi­phany Truth in the contro­versy.

It is little wonder that JWK has decided to avoid almost all controversy – even though this is just the reverse of the typical Joshua, who was engaged in warfare all of his life. And let JWK show one instance where the true Epiphany Joshua ever avoided controversy when the welfare of the Household was jeopardized. In fact, JWK’s present position is the exact duplicate of the decision of the Gershonite Levites some forty years ago. Once they were persuaded that they had come up against the razor’s edge, they most lovingly (?) and meekly (?) said, No more controversy; we shall confine our­selves to “love and good works.” And yet it is JWK who is now telling his readers that it is JJH who is ‘paralleling’ those Gershonites!

Of course, give such teachers enough yarn, and they will entangle themselves in a web of their own weaving. Consider 1954: JWK is telling us that the destiny of all crown-losers was unalterably fixed at that date. Now consider what he says on p. 194 of this same paper No. 89: “Almost all of the Lord’s people, in both Babylons, in varying degrees, are complacent in error and the erroneous teachings such produce. They are in serious danger of losing their standing before the Lord (with the Great Company this could eventuate in the second death).”

If the Great Company was FIXED at 1954, then how could they possibly lose their resurrection reward “before the throne” – and how could they be in any more danger of going into the second death now than they will be after their change to spirit nature? Do we find one instance where the Epiphany Messenger ever said the saints were in danger of the Second Death, or of losing their standing before God, after 1914? Such “profu­sion of words to no purpose” simply reveals the confused condition of JWK’s mind – and also manifests that he is indeed a close relative of RGJ, who tells us that if the goats of the Little Season still had the Adamic death process they would be dying the Adamic death then. Note, however, RGJ doesn’t say all those who still have the Adamic death process in them during the Mediatorial reign – and die after 100 years – would also be dying the Adamic death!

It is well to bear in mind here that during the Parousia day it was THE TRUTH that did the separating work among the Household of Faith; but in this Epiphany Day it has been the error that has done the separating. “Come out of her, My people” was the shibboleth of every Parousia warrior. “In His hand a sharp sickle (Present Truth for the Harvest work – “more cutting than any two-edged sword.... and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart,” Heb. 4:12, Dia,).... Thrust in thy sickle, and reap.” (Rev. 14:14, 15) That ‘sharp sickle’ did two kinds of reaping work – gathered the tares into bundles for the burning, and gathered the wheat into the Lord’s barn. But it was just as true then as it was at the first Advent – “Every one that is of the Truth heareth My voice.” (John 18:37)

But in the Epiphany just the reverse occurred. Hardly had That Servant been en­tombed before the leaders in the Society began sweeping changes in the Harvest Truth –with the same continuing unto this day. Any of us with a clear knowledge of Harvest Truth knows that were That Servant to return now he would be unable to recognize the organization that was his at the time of his death in 1916. But, just as in the Pa­rousia the majority was wrong, with the minority right, so here in the Epiphany we see the same situation prevailing. Those who left the Society some fifty years ago were very much in the minority – as much in the minority as were the Protestants who left the Roman Church during the Reformation period. It fell to the lot of the Epiphany Messenger to defend almost every major truth that had been generally accepted by the reapers during Brother Russell’s lifetime. This brought upon him the ill will of many erstwhile brethren – a duplicate of the Parousia Harvest performance. But the contro­versy over those errors did indeed “make manifest the counsels of hearts” – exactly as had been prophesied for this Epiphany period.

In the Vol. 4 cited on page 1 it is stated that the Epiphany and the Time of Trouble are identical – “it is the day of the Lord’s vengeance, and the year of recompenses for the controversy of Zion.” (Isa. 34:8) The “Lord’s vengeance” is the Time of Trouble, which is to occur during the Epiphany as an act and as a period of time here in the end of the Age – the last special period of the Gospel Age; and we may expect it to con­tinue to a completion – the “sharp sickle” will continue to separate the fully faith­ful, the measurably faithful and the complete renegades. “The Lord Jesus will annihi­late the Man of Sin by the Epiphaneia of His Parousia.” “And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.” (Luke 21:28)

R. G. JOLLY: Our refutations of RGJ have been more elaborate than against any other person or group of persons. This is in keeping with the Epiphany Messenger’s concentration mainly upon JFR and the Society leaders in error. Because of being the leaders in the organization founded by That Servant, they were in a position to deceive the brethren more than the others. And so it is with RGJ, due to his position in the movement founded by the Epiphany Messenger, he is able to deceive the Epiphany brethren more than any one else.

When the Epiphany Messenger brought forth advancing truth, it was based on Parousia Truth – an elaboration of the basic Truths brought out by That Servant. Many Truth people thought he was presenting advancing error when he was simply defending the Truths already expounded by That Servant – a reassertion of Parousia Truth. Of course, these brethren were not “rooted and grounded” in the Truth. Some of the fully faithful, too; failed and refused to investigate the writings of the Epiphany Messenger due to their temporary association with the perverters after the demise of That Servant – just as was true of some of the fully faithful after the Apostles fell asleep. They were told Brother Johnson was a second-deather, and became so inoculated with that false report that they continued to believe he was even after they came to see the errors, and the true state of affairs in the Society. Brother Johnson was sadly cognizant of this fact, but rested in the full assurance of faith that they would some day know better, if not in this life they would know when they would “Awake in Thy Likeness.”

And much the same is true of the LHMM: RGJ’s “advancing truth” is actually “advanc­ing error,” because it is not based on Parousia or Epiphany Truth. Some of our Parousia­ enlightened brethren, even though not acquainted with Epiphany Truth, surely know that Moses leading the children of Israel from Egypt is a type of Jesus delivering the faithful. (See Parousia Vol. 6, Chapter 11) We expect, D.v., to elaborate on this type in a future paper. Brother Johnson has elaborated in great detail on this type and antitype – all in complete harmony with That Servant’s teaching – and the Truth on this type will surely “make manifest” the many errors prevalent in our day – especially of those who have con­cocted a consecrated restitution class here in the last period of the Gospel Age.

In our April paper No. 178 we thoroughly refuted the errors and “foolish effusions” of this “false-accusing Epiphany crown-loser” (See E-10:591) on 1 Cor. 15:24 – so much so that we doubt he will attempt to answer – although we may expect him to make mention of it as a “sifting” error by one of the “sifters.” But we stress here once more his irresponsible contention that the Goats at the end of the Little Season would be dying the Adamic death were they then still infected with the Adamic death process. We have discussed this matter in detail on p. 8 of our April paper; but we would emphasize how ridiculous is his contention here – as though any one who still continued in his charac­ter faults until the Little Season would not be willfully so doing! It would seem that a mere babe in the Truth should know better. We are told by St. Paul that the Truth will give us the “spirit of a sound mind”; and the reverse is true of error: Error will give the spirit of an UNSOUND mind – and RGJ’s effort to refute the Truth here is just one more proof that he has received an ‘unsound mind’ (2 Thes. 2:10, 11). He is indeed in the clutches of Azazel! We say this without rancor or malice; in fact, we feel a deep pity for him – just as did David for King Saul, even as he was painfully moved to exclaim, “Ye daughters of Israel, weep over Saul, who clothed you in scarlet, with other delights, who put on ornaments of gold upon your apparel.... How are the mighty fallen, and the weapons of war perished.” (2 Sam. 1:24-27)

This conflict between truth and error will continue to a completion – until this Epiphany period has made fully manifest the counsels of hearts – until the Time of Trouble culminates in Jacob’s Trouble – when the nations “as the vessels of a potter shall be broken to shivers.” (Rev. 2:26, 27) We are in the day of sweeping portent ­in the world and in God’s Household – great changes in quick succession. As example, the financial world: One financial service estimates that when the Dow-Jones stock averages go down 100 points it whittles the values of the stocks listed on the New York Exchange by 85 billion dollars. Consider now, that since last Spring those averages have dropped more than 200 points, or more than 170 billions of dollars from ‘paper’ wealth of the owners clipped off in a matter of months. “I will cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant.... I will sweep it with the besom (broom) of destruction, saith the Lord of Hosts.” (Isa. 14:22, 23) And such action we may anticipate as further Epiphany work – until it has accomplished all its purposes to a completion.

It is clear enough that many of our brethren don’t like controversy – nor do we; we would much prefer peace and the winsome Truths. But we do so only because “neces­sity is laid upon us” if we would be “faithful to the Lord, the Truth and the Brethren.” His testimony is that none will be acceptable to Him whose faithfulness will not draw upon them the world’s disfavor. His words are, “Whosoever will live godly shall suffer persecution.” As That Servant has faithfully recorded: “If our Lord had not rebuked some of these things that their leaders did, the people would not have known but that those Pharisees had the Lord’s endorsement. There they were going about with sancti­monious faces and saying so many prayers, etc. Were they really holy people? Jesus was there as a representative of God and an exponent of His views.... He merely did His duty. So we believe that we have a perfect right to call attention to the flagrant errors of today.” And this he faithfully did, even though it brought much persecution and revilings upon him – especially from the Clergy. And the Epiphany Messenger re­ceived some of the same treatment, especially from the leaders in the Society, etc., when he exposed their errors. It brought upon him much suffering, persecution and re­vilings.

“Who shall abide in thy Tabernacle, Lord? Who shall dwell in Thy holy hill? He that walketh uprightly, and worketh righteousness, and speaketh the Truth in his heart... He that sweareth to his own hurt, and changeth not.... He that doeth these things shall never be moved.” (Psa. 15)

Sincerely your brother,

John J. Hoefle, Pilgrim

-----------------------------------------------------------

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Mr. Hoefle:

I thank you for the literature which you sent me. It impressed me as no other ever had. You asked about my background. I am a Protestant, having a life-long interest in religion. I have always maintained that were Jesus to return to earth today He would not recognize what is being preached in His name.... I usually read from the Bible every day, and make an attempt to make it the guiding theme of my life. I must confess that many times I fall short of my goal.

Yes, please, please place me on your mailing list. Do you have a Church or represent­ative in my area?

Thank you! ------- (NEW JERSEY)

....................................................................

Gentlemen:

Would you send me copies of your pamphlets Numbers 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 to the address given above.

Sincerely yours ------- (KANSAS)

....................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: The Lord be with you!

I have your letter of the 30th before me as I write. I see by one of your papers No. 177, which came, I believe, after your letter, that you differ from Brother Jolly on two important points: (1) You believe that there are still Saints on earth; (2) Also you believe that Youthful Worthies can still come into the Truth! I believe you are right on these two important points. I have believed for many years that the spirit-begotten class and the Youthful Worthies are “marching” along side by side ­through observation and searching of the Scriptures. I think you will agree that I have the right thought here. Because of this I would like you to continue sending me your publications from time to time.

Your brother In the Interest of all Truth ------- (CANADA)

....................................................................

Dear Dr. John Hoefle:

I would like very much to receive your free booklets – Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. I shall anxiously await their arrival. Thank you! ------- (CALIFORNIA)

....................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Grace and peace!

Your most welcome letter of the 27th is received..... I sure enjoyed the Memorial article – and also your letter to the Brother in answer to the errors of the Truth people.

I am sending you some names for your mailing list....

With much Christian love – Your Brother in Him, ------- (MICHIGAN)

....................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle:

Just to let you know I’m still trusting in the Lord, and in you. May God bless you in your labour of love, and keep you walking in His footsteps. I am seeking to please Him.

Christian love ------- (CONNECTICUT)

....................................................................

Dear Brother Hoefle: Loving greetings through our Beloved Redeemer!

Your letter of the 3rd is much appreciated, and I am sorry I have not replied earlier.

Yes, Sr. ------- is the sister from Oldham, who is on your list. She is not with the LHMM, and does appreciate your monthly papers. She comes and stays with us once a year, and we have good fellowship. You also send to her natural sister.... also from Oldham. Sister ------- has been here, too, but last year she was not well enough to travel.

Do hope Sister Dunnagan is having a better time with her new glasses. It is good to hear Sister Moynelo is doing well...... Brother and I are keeping fairly well, and we seem to be getting more opportunities to talk on Truth lines to people whom we meet. Quite a few return the tracts, and we hope they have read them. We had a nice talk with our Doctor. He has read Where are the Dead.... and then I gave him one of The Resurrection of the Dead. He is not happy with the dogmas of the Church of England. He appreciated the comma being placed in the right order when Jesus said Today, I’m saying.......

Brother is visiting a gentleman now who is ill – and almost blind. He likes some of the thoughts Brother has pointed out to him. It seems a pity he cannot read for himself. His wife is a practicing Roman Catholic – nevertheless, she could agree on Spiritism should be avoided, as being of the Devil and fallen angels.

The Pope has just spoken out against the Dutch priests being free to marry. Now he says the priests must vow every year to be celibate and obedient. Certainly, 2 Pet. 3:10 is in course of fulfillment – the elements melting with fervent heat. Nevertheless. we according to His promise look for new heavens and a new earth wherein dwelleth right­eousness. All join in love and prayers. Your loving sister ------- (ENGLAND)