NO. 642 RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT - PART TWO

by Epiphany Bible Students


JEWS

“For the people shall dwell in Zion at Jerusalem: thou shalt weep no more: he will be very gracious unto thee at the voice of thy cry; when he shall hear it, he will answer thee.”  (Isa 30:19)

IT IS NOT A TERRITORIAL STRUGGLE

Harvard University Professor Ruth Wisse (Yiddish, comparative literature) is the author of “Jews and Anti-Jews,” published in the Wall Street Journal. Excerpts: “...The attacks of Sept. 11 brought home to [Pres. Bush] similarities between [the U.S. and Israel]... If America is duty-bound to strike the bases of those who threaten its security, no matter how far they are from its shores, then Israel, too, which consti­tutes the fighting front line in the war against terror, must root out the terrorists within and along its borders.

“Yet the White House still cannot bring itself to admit the true nature of the aggression against Israel. It still tends to treat the regional crisis as ‘a conflict of two people over one land’ that can be resolved by the creation of a Pal­estinian state. According to this view, since Jews and Arabs both lay claim to the same territory of Israel-Palestine, some division of the territory between them will bring about a peaceful resolution...

“Unfortunately, the Arab war against Israel is no more a territorial conflict than was Al Qaeda’s strike against America, and it can no more be resolved by a ‘road map’ than anti-Americanism could be appeased by ceding part of the U.S. to an Islamist enclave.

“From the moment in 1947 when Jewish leaders accepted and Arab rulers rejected the UN partition plan of Palestine, the Arab-Israeli conflict bore no fur­ther likeness to more conventional territorial struggles... Arab rulers did not object to Israel because it rendered the Pal­estinians homeless. Rather, they ensured that the Palestinians should remain homeless so that they could organize their politics around opposition to Israel... “[In Arab nations] the Arab obsession with Israel grew in­creasingly destructive not only of its Jewish targets but also of [their own] regimes.

“Attacking Jews consumed energy that should have been directed at alleviating the misery of Arab subjects. Blaming the Jews postponed democrat­ization, which begins with people taking respon­sibility for them... Anti-Semitism morphed into anti-Ameri­canism, not because Amer­ica supported Israel but because America represented the same challenges of an open, democratic, competitive society... America did not so much fight on the side of the Jews as find itself forced to tackle the anti-Jews...

“[U]ntil Arab leaders give up the crutch of anti-Semitism, they can make no real progress toward responsible self-government, and it is futile to pretend that obsession with Israel is compatible with Palestinian independence. (Samir) Rantisi greeted the ‘road map’ by organizing major attacks against Israel, which he calls ‘our land, not the land of the Jews.’

“America can’t hope to win its war against terror while ignoring some of its major perpetrators and propagan­dists.”

ANTI-ZIONISM THE NEW ANTI-SEMI­TISM

 “Anti-Semitism – or Jew-hatred – has been des­cribed by Irwin Cotler, former attorney general of Canada, as ‘the discrimination against, denial of or assault upon the rights of Jews to live as equal members of whatever host society they inhabit.’ Jewish authors Dennis Prager and Joseph Telushkin start their classic study Why the Jews? With the statement, ‘Hatred of the Jew has been humanity’s greatest hatred. While hatred of other groups has always existed, no hatred has been as universal, as deep, or as permanent as anti-Semitism.

“This deep-rooted hatred of Jewish people – what has been called by many ‘the longest hatred’ – has now morphed into a ‘new anti-Semitism’ that was perhaps not expected after the Second World War. It was widely thought – and hoped – that after the Holocaust, impor­tant lessons had been learned. Following the revelation of the horrors of Nazism, it was hardly appropriate to talk about hating Jewish people. As Rabbi Benjamin Blech puts it succinctly, ‘It’s no longer ‘in’ to attack Jews as Jews or to revile any other religion.’ But tragically nothing really changed.” (Bridges of Peace, November 2010)

ANTI-SEMITISM: DISTURBING TREND

“The result of a recently released report by the Jewish Agency finds that in 2009, there were more reports of anti-Semitism than in any single year since World War II. Furthermore it was revealed that 42 percent of West Europeans believe that ‘Jews exploit the past to extort money’ – a statement that was most widely held in Spain and Poland.

“In France, estimated to have 600,000 Jews and a Muslim population of six million, anti-Semitic outbursts are reportedly rampant. Fueled by Israel’s military campaign in Gaza last year, anti-Semitic acts were said to have directly resulted in eight deaths worldwide in 2009, two of which were in the U.S.: a guard at Washington’s Holocaust Memorial and a female college student in Connecticut were murdered. According to the report, anti-Semitism is a phenomenon of both the political right and the left.” (World Jewry, April 2010)

FOURTH TRY AT A TWO STATE SOLUTION

“Right now there are two Palestinian Muslim mini-states within Israel. That makes it hard to implement a Two State Solution with Three States. Every time there’s trouble in Gaza, it is once again a reminder that it is ruled by Hamas, and the West Bank is ruled by Fatah, two terrorist groups that don’t get along with each other. Naturally every politician who talks about the importance of a Two State Solution completely ignores this minor problem, even though they created it. Or perhaps because they created it…

“Each time the assumption is that if Israel sits down at the table and negotiates with Fatah leader Abbas, and makes enough concessions, there will be a Two State Solution, and the problem will be solved. Which seems easily enough done, when you ignore the fact that Gaza is not only run by Hamas, but that the only reason Hamas isn’t running the West Bank is because the U.S. is propping up Abbas with weapons, and Israel has cut off Gaza from the West Bank. Yet the same people who call for a Two State Solution also demand that Israel stop blockading Gaza ─ when Fatah and their Two State Solution wouldn’t last two weeks if Hamas militias showed up in force in Ramallah.

“As we can see then, there are only one or two or three things standing in the way of a Two State Solution.

1. The fact that it's been repeatedly tried and failed.

2. The fact that there are two Palestinian states already in place and fighting among themselves (not counting Jordan, which was the original Palestinian state, and will join the fight if the Muslim Brotherhood succeeds in taking it over).

3. The fact that Abbas does not want to negotiate.

“Naturally none of this discourages politicians from chanting ‘Two State Solution’ over and over again, or media pundits from suggesting that Israel needs to implement it right now – when the only conceivable way Israel could make that happen is to close the border, throw the keys across the fence, and let anyone who wants to make a Palestinian state fight for it. “But the prospect of turning Hamas and Fatah into part of a state with Israel is about as likely to lead to a united democratic state with protection for anyone’s rights as throwing a hand grenade near a bunch of pots, one of which has a chicken in it, is likely to lead to a chicken in every pot. If the Palestinian Arab Muslims couldn’t form a single united government of their own that respected the rights of even their own Christian minority, or even each other – how exactly would they form one with Israel? Rather than answer the question, proponents will instead blame Israel for that too – which is their answer for absolutely every­thing. And I do mean absolutely everything.

“Which puts us right back where we started, with an unworkable dilemma for which Israel gets all the blame, because it can’t create peace by waving a magic wand and implementing a Two State Solution, a plan that is about as workable as any decent 99 cent magic wand?” (Excerpts by Daniel Greenfield, Out­post, September 2010)  

NO LOVE BOAT

“Hamas is smuggling thousands of Iranian rockets, missiles, and other weaponry – smuggling it into Gaza in order to fire on Israel’s cities… Under international law, and under common sense and common decency, Israel has every right to interdict this weaponry and to inspect the ships that might be transporting them.

“‘This is not a theoretical challenge or a theoretical threat. We have already interdicted vessels bound for Hezbollah, and for Hamas from Iran, containing hundreds of tons of weapons… Israel simply cannot permit the free flow of weapons and war materials to Hamas from the sea. I will go further than that. Israel cannot permit Iran to establish a Medi­terranean port a few dozen kilometers from Tel Aviv and from Jerusalem. And I would go beyond that too. I say to the responsible leaders of all the nations: The international community cannot afford an Iranian port in the Mediterranean…

“‘Today I warn of this impending willingness to enable Iran to establish a naval port right next to Israel, right next to Europe. The same countries that are criticizing us today should know that they will be targeted tomorrow. For this and for many other reasons, we have a right to inspect cargo heading into Gaza. And here’s our policy. It’s very simple: Humanitarian and other goods can go in and weapons and war material cannot. “‘…It is very clear to us that the attackers had prepared their violent action in advance. They were members of an extremist group that has supported international terrorist organizations and today support the terrorist organization called Hamas. They brought with them in advance knives, steel rods, [and] other weapons. They chanted battle cries against the Jews. You can hear this on the tapes that have been released.

“‘This was not a love boat. This was a hate boat. These weren’t pacifists. These weren’t peace activists. These were violent supporters of terrorism… Israel regrets the loss of life, but we will never apologize for defending ourselves. Israel has every right to prevent deadly weapons from entering into hostile territory, and Israeli soldiers have every right to defend their lives and their country.’” (By Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Dispatch From Jerusalem, August 2010)

ISRAEL PLEDGES UNDIVIDED JERUSALEM

Israel’s prime minister pledged to keep Jerusalem undivided despite Palestinian claims to its eastern half, as Israelis celebrated the 43rd anniver­sary Wednesday of the city’s reunification in the 1967 Mideast War.

“The Jewish section of Jerusalem took on a festive mood Wednesday with parades and speeches by political leaders, touching only lightly on the political explosiveness of the hotly contested city.

“Hundreds of youths, many carrying Israeli flags, marched in the annual Jerusalem Day parade from a main square in Jewish west Jerusalem toward the Old City. Earlier, an extremist Israeli group called the Temple Mount Faithful toted flags and banners through the Old City, demanding that Israel take full control of the hotly disputed holy site where the Al-Aqsa mosque compound sits atop the ruins of the biblical Jewish temples.” (Orlando Sentinel, May 13, 2010)

CRIMINAL ZIONIST REGIME DOOMED?

“The ‘criminal’ state of Israel is doomed, According to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahma­dinejad said as he met with senior Palestinian terror figures in Damascus. During his meeting with senior Hamas and Islamic Jihad members ─ including Hamas Politburo Chief Khaled Mashaal and Islamic Jihad Secretary General Ramadan Shallah ─Ahmadinejad warned that any Israeli attack will be met with stiff resistance. ‘If the Zionists want to repeat their mistake again, they must be uprooted from the source.’ he said. ‘This criminal regime is doomed, and the grand victory is imminent.’

“He promised the terror leaders that Iran would remain by their side and support their armed struggle against Israel. The Iranian president also belittled Israel’s power, likening it to an airplane about to crash. ‘The Zionist regime’s plane engine and arrogant rule have been ruined, and there is no force that can propel this plane forward or upward,’ he said.” (Excerpts of an article by Dudi Cohen, Ynetnews, June 2010)

IF ISRAEL GOES DOWN WE ALL GO DOWN

 For far too long now it has been unfashionable in Europe to speak up for Israel. In the wake of the recent incident on board a ship full of anti-Israeli activists in the Mediterranean, it is hard to think of a more un­popular cause to champion.

“In an ideal world, the assault by Israeli com­mandos on the Mavi Marmara would not have ended up with nine dead and a score wounded... In an ideal world, no state, let alone a recent ally of Israel such as Turkey, would have sponsored and organized a flotilla whose sole purpose was to create an impossible situation for Israel: making it choose between giving up its security policy and the naval blockade, and risking the wrath of the world.

“In our dealings with Israel, we must blow away the red mists of anger that too often cloud our judgment. A reasonable and balanced approach should encapsulate the following realities: first, the state of Israel was created by a decision of the UN. Its legitimacy, therefore, should not be in question. Israel is a nation with deeply rooted democratic institutions. It is a dynamic and open society that has repeatedly excelled in culture, science and technology.

“Second, owing to its roots, history, and values, Israel is a fully fledged Western nation. Indeed, it is a normal Western nation, but one confronted by abnormal circumstances.

“Uniquely in the West, it is the only democracy whose very existence has been questioned since its inception. First it was attacked by its neighbors using the conventional weapons of war. Then it faced terrorism culminating in wave after wave of suicide attacks. Now, at the behest of radical Islamists and their sympathizers, it faces a campaign of delegit­imisation through international law and diplomacy.

“Sixty-two years after its creation, Israel is still fighting for its very survival. Punished with missiles raining from north and south, threatened with des­truction by an Iran aiming to acquire nuclear weapons and pressed upon by friend and foe, Israel, it seems, is never to have a moment’s peace.

“For years, the focus of Western attention has understandably been on the peace process between Israelis and Palestinians...The real threats to regional stability, however, are to be found in the rise of a radical Islamism which sees Israel’s destruction as the fulfillment of its religious destiny and, simul­taneously in the case of Iran, as an expression of its ambitions for regional hegemony. Both phenomena are threats that affect not only Israel, but also the wider West and the world at large. The core of the problem lies in the ambiguous and often erroneous manner in which too many Western countries are now reacting to this situation. It is easy to blame Israel for all the evils in the Middle East. Some even act and talk as if a new understanding with the Muslim world could be achieved if only we were prepared to sacrifice the Jewish state on the altar. This would be folly.

“Israel is our first line of defense in a turbulent region that is constantly at risk of descending into chaos; a region vital to our energy security owing to our overdependence on Middle Eastern oil; a region that forms the front line in the fight against extremism. If Israel goes down, we all go down. To defend Israel’s right to exist in peace, within secure borders, requires a degree of moral and strategic clarity that too often seems to have disappeared in Europe. The United States shows worrying signs of heading in the same direction.

“The West is going through a period of confusion over the shape of the world’s future. To a great extent, this confusion is caused by a kind of masochistic self-doubt over our own identity; by the rule of political correctness; by a multiculturalism that forces us to our knees before others; and by a secularism which, irony of ironies blinds us even when we are confronted by jihadis promoting the most fanatical incarnation of their faith. To abandon Israel to its fate, at this moment of all moments, would merely serve to illustrate how far we have sunk and how inexorable our decline now appears.

“This cannot be allowed to happen. Motivated by the need to rebuild our own Western values, expressing deep concern about the wave of aggression against Israel, and mindful that Israel’s strength is our strength and Israel’s weakness is our weakness, I have decided to promote a new Friends of Israel initiative with the help of some prominent people, including David Trimble, Andrew Roberts, John Bolton, Alejandro Toledo (the former President of Peru), Marcello Pera (philosopher and former President of the Italian Senate), Fiamma Nirenstein (the Italian author and politician), the financier Robert Agostinelli and the Catholic intellectual George Weigel.

“What binds us...is our unyielding support for Israel’s right to exist and to defend. For Western countries to side with those who question Israel’s legitimacy, for them to play games in international bodies with Israel’s vital security issues, for them to appease those who oppose Western values rather than robustly to stand up in defense of those values, is not only a grave moral mistake, but a strategic error of the first magnitude.

“Israel is a fundamental part of the West. The West is what it is thanks to its Judeo-Christian roots. If the Jewish element of those roots is upturned and Israel is lost, then we are lost too. Whether we like it or not, our fate is inextricably intertwined.” (Jose M. Aznar was prime minister of Spain. This is slightly edited from his article in the (London) Times of June 17, 2010)

MODERN-DAY ISRAEL

“Is one of the most compelling proofs that God is still active in human history today: His actions is bringing the Jewish people home to Israel in fulfillment of many prophetic Scriptures are a powerful testimony to His character. He is proving over and over again that He is a faithful, covenant-keeping God, remembering His promises to a thou­sand generations (which in Hebraic thought is like saying forever). A famous story is told of King Louis XIV of France asking Blaise Pascal, the French philosopher, to give him proof of the of the existence of God. Pascal’s response was, ‘Why, the Jews, your Majesty ─ the Jews.’” (Bridges for Peace, September 1, 2010)

KINNERET DROP HAS EXPERTS ALARMED

Experts say the level of water in the Sea of Galilee began to decline this year on May 11, and that it has already dropped some 10.5 cm. This compares with a drop of 7 cm. in the corresponding period of 2009. The lake raised a total of 1.71 m. during the last rainy season.

“The volume of available water in the Kinneret this month was set at around 8 million cubit mil­limeters, and the volume of water flowing into the lake over the last three months was lower than the supply during the same quarter last year.

“One expert described the situation as ‘a shortage catastrophe.’ Meanwhile, the level of water in the Dead Sea declined by 8 cm. in May, following a drop of 12 cm. in the previous month.” (Jerusalem Post, June 18, 2010)

MILITARY OFFICER DEFENDS IDF

 “‘Dark force’ that unfairly criticize the Israeli military and want to harm Israel are often driven by anti-Semitism; so says retired British Army Colonel Richard Kemp. The former senior officer who recently addressed a dinner of the Zionist Federation in London says the international media unfairly single out Israel.

“Noting for example that UK armed forces do not face the same degree of criticism lodged against the IDF, Kemp says that non-governmental organ­izations and international groups such as the United Nations should know better than to level utter condemnation of Israel. The former commander of forces in Afghanistan praised the Israeli army’s restraint and expertise in providing him with invaluable information on thwarting suicide bombers.” (World Jewry, May 2010)

UNICEF SUPPORTS PALESTINIAN HATE AD

 “Donor organizations to the Palestin­ian auth­ority have been challenged for years to prevent their well-intentioned contributions from being directed towards hate promotion by the PA, its institutions, and it’s Non-Government Organizations (NGO).

“An ad by the Palestinian Youth Association for Leadership and Rights Activation [PYALARA], which is funded by UNICEF, shows an axe destroying a Star of David. The UNICEF logo is right on the ad – another example of the misuses of UN funding. The large Star of David that has been destroyed has on it pictures of stars and stripes, presumably representing the USA and an additional smaller Star of David.

“PYALARA has been funded by UNICEF since the year 2000. ‘PYALARA has been chosen by UNICEF as a major strategic partner in Palestine,’ states the PYALARA Web site. On the axe that destroys the Star of David is the word ‘Boycott!’ in the imperative tense. Youth are invited to watch the PA TV program calling for a boycott of Israel.

“The host acknowledges that they are aware that the boycott is illegal, but they have chosen to ignore this. ‘We know that the Palestinian Authority is tied to a number of agreements that prohibit it from completely boycotting Israel...We call upon all the youth, to all the residents, to all businesses and stores, to completely boycott the Israeli goods in their stores.’

The following is information about PYALARA from its Web site: ‘Since December 2000, PYALARA has produced, with the support of UNICEF and the cooperation of Palestine TV, a weekly two-hour TV program called Speak Up. An average of 300,000 Palestinian children and teenagers watch every episode.’” (By Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik, Palestinian Media Watch)

HARDLY HUMANITARIANS

It’s baffling to hear such foolishness from academicians (‘Israel attacked ship to stop aid to Gaza.’) Throughout universities across America, there are so-called humanitarians, demanding that Israel end its blockade of Gaza, be held accountable for the deaths of innocent lives and enter into peace negotiations.

“Fact: The Israeli-Egyptian blockade of Gaza has one purpose: preventing the Hamas terrorist regime from acquiring additional weapons from Iran to continue its war against Israeli civilians. For more than five years, Hamas fired about 7,000 rockets into southern Israel, aimed at kindergartens, old-age homes and hospitals.

“Every country has the moral and legal obligation to protect its citizens. Those who call for an end of the blockade know that without it, Hamas would have the military supplies to continue such attacks. Apparently, when it comes to the deaths of innocent Israelis, such humanitarians are not so humanitarian.

“Fact: Israel has long sought peace with the Palestinians. Yet, Hamas has no interest in negotiations. Its goal is to destroy the Jewish state. What is there to negotiate when your adversary wants nothing but your annihilation?

“Fact: Should the blockade be lifted, Iran ─ the world’s greatest exporter of terrorism ─ would have a port in the Mediterranean Sea. Hamas forces in Gaza would then be armed similar to Hezbollah troops in southern Lebanon, where some estimate that 60,000 rockets are now aimed at Israel. Who in their right mind would welcome such a development?

“Fact: Hundreds of thousands of tons of humanitarian supplies enter Gaza through Israel. The provisions aboard the recent flotilla also could have reached Gaza without any violence, had its organizers allowed Israel to search its cargo ensuring the absence of weapons.

“In fact, after the Israeli inspection, Hamas refused to even accept that aid. So who is really denying aid to the Palestinians? Who is indifferent to the sufferings of the residents of Gaza?

“The same people who use their own people as human shields when they launch rockets from civilians’ homes, hospitals and mosques. The same monsters who send teenage children strapped with suicide bombs to carry out terrorist attacks and, then, celebrate their deaths, so long as they managed to kill some Jews alongside themselves.

“People, regardless of their academic credentials, who support measures that would enable a regime to continue such bloodthirsty deeds are no humanitarians. Neither are they supporters of peace. They are just very foolish.” (Rabbi Aaron D. Rublinger, Orlando Sentinel, June 13, 2010)

AHMADINEJAD GETS HERO’S WELCOME

“Beirut Lebanon: Iranian and Lebanese officials tried hard Wednesday to depict the visit of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a run-of-the-mill diplomatic affair.

“But in Beirut, Ahmadinejad is no typical president. Iran’s ties to Lebanon are hardly ordinary. And Iran’s relationship with the Shiite militia and political organization Hezbollah, which Tehran finances and arms, drowned out the platitudes.

“Officials from the two countries signed trade agreements, praised one other and ate lunch at the palace of Lebanese   President Michel Suleiman.

“‘Our message is one of unity and cooperation,’ Ahmadinejad said during a joint news conference with Suleiman.

“During an evening appearance in southern Beirut, he said: ‘Lebanon is a green garden with many flowers from many faiths and religions.’

“But the choreography of Ahmadinejad’s trip overshadowed his carefully chosen words. Emphasis was on Iran’s relationship with Hezbollah, which operates as a state within a state and sometimes eclipses the power of the Lebanese government.

“Upon arrival, the Iranian president declined to take an official helicopter from the airport to the presidential palace. Instead he opted for a convoy of SUVs that waded through huge crowds of roaring spectators who gathered to greet him in Beirut’s mostly Shiite southern suburbs, a Hezbollah stronghold.

“After lunch, Ahmadinejad broke from his of­ficial entourage and basked in the adulation of crowds in southern Beirut.

“Referring to Israel, with which Hezbollah fought a war in 2006, he said: ‘The illegitimate Zionist regime is a permanent threat to the region and all the world governments.’

“On Thursday he plans to travel south and give a speech within several miles of the Israeli border. This is a move Israeli officials have denounced as provocative.

“Though Lebanese political leaders of all stripes attended the luncheon in Ahmadinejad’s honor, others not constrained by protocol have described the visit as infringement on Lebanese sovereignty that could aggravate sectarian tensions.” (By Borzou Daragahi and Alexandra Sandels, Tribune Newspapers, October 14, 2010)

SAUDI MONEY

In the past three decades, Saudi   Arabia has spent over U.S, $70 billion on ‘international aid,’ two-thirds of which has financed the infiltration of Western institutions with a message that is inherently anti-Western and anti-Israeli. In addition to building religious schools and funding other Islamic social and cultural infrastructure in non-Muslin countries, a large portion ended up in the coffers of educational institutions to fund Middle Eastern Studies departments and endow chairs across America and around the world. Author Wahlid Phares suggests that these Saudi dollars have made it possible for Middle East studies to be dominated by anti-Western ideology and endowed chairs to be filled by academics known for pro-Palestinian activism rather than scholarship.”

(By Cheryl Hauer, Dispatch From Jerusalem, October 2010)

RECORD TOURISTS, SHEKELS

“Israel’s Tourism Ministry says that in the first six months of 2010, an estimated 1.6 million travelers visited the Jewish state. Figures for January through June of this year show a 39 percent increase over figures for the same period in 2009. This year’s tourist numbers translate to an equivalent U.S. $1.55 billion going into Israel’s economy.

“According to the Ministry, the record numbers are a reflection of a ‘massive investment in marketing activities around the world with significant budgets, especially against the background of the public diplomacy challenges that Israel is facing.’”

(World Jewry, October 2010)

ISRAEL IS THE WEST’S BEST ALLY

“A European statesman, Jose Maria Aznar, is reminding his fellow continentals that ‘if Israel goes down, we all go down.’ Aznar, the former prime minister of Spain (1996 ─ 2004), opining recently in The London Times, says that Israel should not have to be fighting for its very existence, since it is the Middle East’s only reliable ally to be counted on for regional stability – yet it seems destined never to have ‘a moment’s peace.’

“Forming a coalition of European intellectuals and opinion makers called ‘Friends of Israel,’ Aznar says the new group will be dedicated to emphasizing Israel’s legitimacy, it’s right to exist and defend its sovereignty. He reminds Europeans that radical Islam is still a potent threat, that we must never forget our shared Judeo-Christian roots, adding that the fate of Israel is our (the West’s) fate.” (World Jewry, September 2010)

UNITED NATIONS EVICTS BAYEFSKY

“Anne Bayefsky, indomitable critic of the UN's obsessive hunting down of Israel, was ejected by guards from the UN after she used a microphone outside the General Assembly Hall to offer the only pro-Israel commentary on the resolution then being passed by the Assembly endorsing the infamous Goldstone report accusing Israel of “war crimes.” She called the UN a “laughingstock” for singling out Israel and ignoring human rights violations by Hamas. Bayefsky reports that four guards confis­cated two UN passes issued to her as director of Touro Law Center’s Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust.

“She is now in what she describes as a Kafkaesque situation with the UN having confiscated her credentials while denying to reporters that her access has been blocked. Her 25 years of monitoring the UN is in jeopardy – in the hands of the Committee on NGOs chaired by the genocidal regime in Sudan.” (By Rael Jean Isaac, Outpost, December 2010)

ISRAEL HATED FOR EXISTING

“Zionism is accepted by Jews worldwide as an integral part of Judaism. According to the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs: ‘The establishment of the State of Israel [in 1948] marked the realization of the Zionist goal of attaining an internationally recognized, legally secured home for the Jewish people in its historic homeland, where Jews would be free from persecution and able to develop their own lives and identity.’ As a movement founded in 1887 by a secular Jew from Vienna, Theodore Herzl, Zionism is essentially, and simply, about the return of the Jewish people to their homeland.

“Natan Kellermann, a clinical psychologist from Israel, wrote in 2005: ‘Now we are hated, not despite the fact that we have a homeland, but because we have it and because of what we do in order to live in it and defend it...This hate of Israel is profoundly anti-Semitic’ [emphasis added]. This hatred is accurately described as anti-Zionism ─ the denial of Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state. Cotler quotes Per Ahlmark, Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden, who said, ‘In the past, the most dangerous anti-Semites were those who wanted to make the world Judenrein, ‘free of Jews.’ Today, the most dangerous anti-Semites might be those who want to make the world Judenstaatrein, ‘free of a Jewish state.’ Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state is affirmed consistently by Israel’s leaders in the light of relentless denials of that right by its enemies. There are some who argue that anti-Zionism does not amount to anti-Semitism, stating that because Jews are neither a nation nor a people, they have no right to the land of Israel. Anti-Zionists who hold this view claim that they are not motivated by hatred of the Jews. Dennis Prager and Joseph Telushkin respond by stating that ‘the conse­quences of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism for the Jewish people are the same.’

“It is abundantly clear that anti-Zionism, in advocating the elimination of the state of Israel, is inherently anti-Semitic. Pierre-Andre Taguieff wrote in Rising from tile Muck. ‘Much of what purports to be criticism of Israel and Zionism is demonization, and has led to an international resurgence of attacks on Jew and Jewish symbols and an increased acceptance of anti-Semitic beliefs in public discourse.’” (By Keith Buxton, Bridges for Peace, November 21, 2010

The Divine Promise to Abraham’s Seed

As the very foundation of Israel’s every hope, the mainspring of that people’s courage, the motive power of their energy, their perseverance and their pride, has been the Divine promise made to Abraham, their illustrious ancestor, “the friend of God.” To Abraham, after certain tests of character – obedience, loyalty, and faith – God made a Promise, which constitutes the hope, both of Israel and the rest of mankind. It reads, “In thy Seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.” (Gen. 22:18) Abraham’s son Isaac was indicated by the Lord to be the channel through which this blessing should proceed. Later on, Isaac’s son, Jacob, was indicated as a further channel.

His name was changed to Israel, which signifies a prince influential with God – in Divine favor. This name Israel indicative of so much of honor and Divine favor was subsequently applied to the whole nation of Jacob’s descendants, who became known as Israelites, or Children of Israel. At Jacob’s death the Divine blessing passed, by Divine direction, not to a single one of his posterity, but to them all as a whole nation.

It is fitting that the citizens of the modern nation of Israel are known as “Israelis.” The designation “Israelites” indeed, has an entirely different con­notation.


NO. 641 RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT - PART ONE

by Epiphany Bible Students


Contretemps abound worldwide in every aspect of life and are growing in “shock and awe.” No nation of the world is exempt and troubles shall continue to grow and grow until all mankind is hopelessly in extremity. At this time the Messiah will take a hand. “For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. —1 Cor 15:25-26

“For his anger endureth but a moment; in his favour is life; weeping may endure for a night, but joy cometh in the morning.” —Psa 30:5

WORLD EVENTS — Natural disasters

Haiti Earthquake

On January 12, 2010 at 4:53 pm local time, a magnitude 7.0 earthquake, the country’s most severe earthquake in over 200 years, struck Haiti. The epi­center of the quake was just outside the Haitian capital Port-au-Prince. On February 10, the Haitian government gave a confirmed death toll of 230,000. Widespread damage resulted from the quake. The capital city was devastated. “Even in good times Haiti is an economic wreck, balancing precariously on the razor’s edge of calamity,” said one Journalist. As of September 2010, there were over one million refugees living in tents. By all economic mea­sures, Haiti is an impoverished country, one of the world’s poorest and least developed. Haiti now ranks 149th of 182 countries in the United Nations Human Devel­opment Index (2006). About 80% of the population was estimated to be living in poverty in 2003. Most Haitians live on $2 or less per day. Haiti has 50% illiteracy, and over 80% of college graduates from Haiti have immigrated, mostly to the United States. Cité Soleil considered as one of the worst slums in the Americas; most of its 500,000 residents live in extreme poverty. Poverty has forced at least 225,000 Haitian children to work as restavecs (unpaid household servants); the United Nations considers this a modern-day form of slavery.

About 66% of all Haitians work in agriculture, which consists mainly of small-scale subsistence farming, but this activity makes up only 30% of the GDP. The country has experienced little formal job-creation over the past decade, although the informal economy is growing. Mangoes and coffee are two of Haiti's most important exports.

Mining and economic geology: Natural resources of Haiti include bauxite, copper, calcium carbonate.

Cholera Reported in Haiti

To add insult to injury, a cholera outbreak in rural areas of Haiti has killed more than 150 people, and hospitals are overwhelmed with thousands of sick, the World Health Organization said on October 15th, increasing long-held fears of an epidemic that could spread to the encampments of the hundreds of thou­sands of Haitians displaced by the January earthquake.

Relief agencies had long feared a major outbreak of diarrheal diseases, particularly among people living in crowded, unsanitary tent cities and, as in the case in Artibonite, drinking from rivers.

However, the appearance of cholera – which dehydrates and kills victims more rapidly than other diarrheas – was a surprise. Haiti and the rest of the Caribbean have not seen the vibrio cholerae bacteria, which lives in human intestines, for at least 50 years.

Television images showed hospital corridors, hallways and even parking lots there filled with victims lying down, getting intravenous fluids as crowds of screaming relatives were kept outside. (Excerpted from New York Times column by Donald G. McNeil, Jr.)

2010 Pakistan Floods

Began in July 2010 following heavy monsoon rains in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh, Punjab and Balochistan regions of Pakistan. Present estimates indicate that over two thousand people have died and over a million homes destroyed since the flooding began. The United Nations estimates that more than 21 million people are injured or homeless as a result of the flooding, exceeding the combined total of individuals affected by the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, the 2005 Kashmir earthquake and the 2010 Haiti earthquake. At one point, approximately one-fifth of Pakistan’s total land area was underwater due to the flooding.

The disaster has inflicted billions of dollars of damage to homes, infrastructure and the vital agri­cultural sector and stirred anger against the US-backed government, which has struggled to cope.

A month after the disaster began; the United Nations warned that tens of thousands of children risked death from malnutrition.

This is Pakistan’s worst natural disaster in terms of the amount of damage, estimated to date at about $9,500 billion.

Indonesians evacuated

After 400 years, the volcano Mount Sinabung erupted. Approxi­mately 29,000 people evac­uated from their homes around the mountains as a precautionary measure to prevent widespread panic.

“The situation is not life threaten­ing, although the ash and smoke can cause illnesses,” said Surono, the head of the Indonesian Volcanology and Geological Disaster Miti­ga­tion Agency.

“Thousands of people were treated for smoke inhalation and other health problems related to the volcano. The Indonesian Red Cross and the Health Ministry sent doctors and medicines to the region. The National Disaster Management Agency has provided thousands of facemasks and food to assist the evacuees.”

Officials said they had not been monitoring the mountain because it had been inactive for so long.

Indonesia sits along the “Pacific Ring of Fire,” one of the most geologically active re­gions in the world. The country frequently experiences earth­quakes – two in 2009 caused hundreds of deaths. It also has the most active volcanoes in the world, with more than 70. (Excerpts from News.Com.)

Death Rate Doubles in Moscow

Heat wave blamed for 700 daily fatalities in Moscow. According to Moscow health authorities the number of deaths per day in the Russian capital had nearly doubled as the city and most of central Russia entered the seventh week of a heat wave.

The high temperatures, hovering around 100 degrees, destroyed 30 percent of the nation’s grain crops and triggered widespread peat bog and forest fires that have killed more than 50 people.

Andrei Seltsovsky, chief of Moscow’s health department, said the city’s morgues filled almost to their capacity, with 1,300 of the 1,500 slots occupied. He suggested that residents deviate from a Russian Orthodox tradition of holding burials on the third day after death, burying loved ones on the first or second day instead.

Fires Threaten Nuclear Arms Site

“Russian troops dug a 5-mile-long canal to keep fires caused by a record heat wave from a nuclear arms site, local media said Saturday, as air pollution from the crisis rose to more than six times above normal.

“Forest and peat fires have killed at least 52 people, made more than 4,000 homeless, diverted many flights and forced Muscovites to wear surgical masks to filter out foul air.” (The Orlando Sentinel, August 8, 2010)

Man or Nature? China Debates

 “Beijing: The images are heartrending, farmers kneeling over the cracked earth that looks to be straight out of a post-apocalyptic movie, the dust swirling in the wind.

“But what underlies China’s worst drought in nearly a century is a matter of great debate. Is it Mother Nature or human failure? Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam are claiming that China’s river dams and increased smoke and smog from the expanded Chinese industrial activity

“Beyond the official explanation of ‘abnormal weather,’ Chinese environmentalists are pointing to deforestation, pollution, dams, overbuilding and other man-made factors. Scientists are searching for clues about why rain has not come in some parts of the country.

“The Chinese army and paramilitary have been deployed in some hard-hit areas to deliver water, while residents of some mountainous villages inaccessible by motor vehicle have had to hike hours downhill and climb up again lugging plastic jugs of water in bamboo backpacks.

“An unusually long dry season – which has stretched from September. 2009 to the present ─ is at least part of the problem, but the underlying reasons are less clear. Some Chinese scientists believe that abnor­mally cold, wet weather in the north of the country is linked to the drought in the southwest.

“‘The Earth is reacting to climate change,’ said Kuang Yaoqiu, a professor with the Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, who predicted the drought last year; ‘China’s mainstream meteorologists haven’t accepted these theories. It will take time.’

“The drought-related losses are both economic and highly personal. For all the tea in China, this year’s crop is expected to be a fraction of what it was in previous years.

“‘There are huge cracks in the ground. The leaves on the trees are so dry they looked like they were set on fire,’ said Wu Liuzhi, manager of a tea processing plant in Guangxi province.

“‘At home, it is just as miserable. ‘People cannot brush their teeth every day. If there is a little water you want to wash your face,’ Wu said.

“According to government statistics, the drought has: • left parched more than 16 million acres of farmland in more than four provinces • threatened the livelihood of more than 50 million farmers • left up to 20 million people without drinking water.” (By Barbara Demick, Tribune Newspapers, May 2, 2010)

Comment: We are seeing many natural disasters as predicted in Matt. 24:7: “For Nation shall rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines and pestilences, and earthquakes in divers places.” Then in Matt. 14:21 we have this: “For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.” We understand that the Time of Trouble is necessary for God to Establish His Kingdom on earth.

IN FINANCE

Economist predicted the economy will get better in 2011. We do not see that with unemployment around 9.5 to 10 percent. The people sent a message to Congress that they do not like what is going on. Democrats worked more on the Health Plan than the economy.

2011 will be a so-so year. There will not be a cost of living increase for Social Security benefits and the wage base will stay the same as in 2009 and 2010.

The stock market should be good in 2011. Companies have a lot of cash waiting to see what the new laws will be. Unemployment will be high. The new Health Insurance is still law. The law that goes in effect in 2014 requires people to get health insurance by 2014 or pay a fine. It is predicted that issue will end up in the Supreme Court.

    We must continue to “watch and pray” (Mark 13:33) in this Time of Trouble so that we will not be caught “unaware.” (Luke 21:34)

IN RELIGION

 “SPREADING THE GLO: Can digital Bible win young believers over? For a generation growing up with digital media, the written word printed on paper has little appeal even if it’s the word of God.

“It’s for them that an Orlando company came up with the multimedia digital Glo Bible. ‘You have entire generations of people that don’t engage paper very well,’ said Nelson Saba, founder of Immersion Digital. ‘If you look at Bible literacy among younger gener­ations, it’s dismal. This is designed to be a digital alternative to the paper Bible.’

“A Gallup poll in 2000 found that about a quarter of young people ages 18 to 29 read the Bible weekly ─ about half the rate of those 65 or older. Part of that, Saba contends is the younger generation’s aversion to the printed word. ‘There is nothing wrong with paper. I have lots of paper Bibles, but it’s just not the media they engage,’ Saba said.

“‘The Glo, released in October, recently won the Bible of the Year award from the Evangelical Christian Publishers Association. It’s the first digital Bible to receive the distinction in the 32 years of the awards. The company is working on an application that will allow Glo to go mobile. ‘The biggest advantage of Glo is you can access the Bible through whatever device you have in your hands,’ Saba said.

“Glo will be going mobile; Glo is for personal computers and laptops, but the intent from its inception was that it would be applicable to mobile devices, Saba said.

“The Glo has 7,000 articles, 2,000 high-definition images and more than 500 virtual tours. ‘I think the appeal is, in this Internet society, people need to see things visually,’ said Skip Brown, customer-service representative for Long’s Christian Book and Outlet store in Altamonte Springs. ‘You can get a feeling for what it was like in Christ’s time, what Jerusalem looked like, what the streets looked like.’

“‘We need to take the Bible to where these generations are and try to communicate in a way they find fascinating,’ Saba said. ‘The idea was to explore what interactive digital media can do to communicate the Bible in a very new and powerful way.’” (Excerpts from Jeff Kunerth, Orlando Sentinel, May 22, 2010)

“RICE HAS GOOD REASONS TO QUIT CHRISTIANITY: ‘Today, I quit being a Christian.’  With those words last week on Facebook, Anne Rice delivered a wake-up call for organized religion. The question is whether it will be recognized as such.

“‘I remain committed to Christ as always,’ she wrote, ‘but not to being ‘Christian’ or to being part of Christianity. It’s simply impossible for me to ‘belong’ to this quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group. For 10 years, I’ve tried. I’ve failed. I’m an outsider. My conscience will allow nothing else.’

“You will recall that the author, famed for her vampire novels, made a much-publicized return to the Catholicism of her youth after years of calling herself an atheist. Now, years later, she says she hasn’t lost her faith, but she’s had it up to here with organized religion. ‘In the name of Christ,’ she wrote, ‘I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life.’

“lf that was not nearly enough for atheist observers, one of whom berated her online for refusing to completely give up her ‘superstitious delusions,’ it was surely plenty for people of faith.

“But Rice is hardly the only one who feels as she does. According to a 2008 study by Trinity College, religiosity is trending down sharply in this country. The American Religious Identification Survey, which polled more than 54,000 American adults, found that the percentage who call themselves Christian has fallen by 10 since 1990 (from 86.2 percent to 76 percent) while the percentage of those who claim no religious affiliation has almost doubled (from 8.2 percent to 15 percent) in the same span.

“Small wonder atheist manifestos are doing brisk business at bookstores and Bill Maher’s skeptical Religulous finds an appreciative audience in theaters.

“Organized religion, Christianity in particular, is on the decline, and it has no one to blame but itself: It traded moral authority for political power. To put that another way: The Christian Bible contains numerous exhortations to serve those who are wretched and poor, to anger slowly and forgive promptly, to walk through this life in humility and faith.

“The word ‘Republican’ does not appear in the book. Not once. Yet somehow in the past 30 years, people of faith were hustled and hoodwinked into regarding the GOP platform as a lost gospel. Somehow, low taxes for the wealthy and deregulation of industry became the very message of Christ.

“Somehow, hostility to science, gays, Muslims and immigrants became the very meaning of faith. And somehow Christianity became ─ or at least, came to seem ─ a wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican Party.

“Consider that, after the election of 2004, a church in North Carolina made news for kicking out nine congregants because they committed the un-Christian act of... voting for Democrat John Kerry. Who can blame people for saying, ‘If that’s faith, count me out!’

“Has atheism ever had a better salesman than Jerry Falwell, blaming the Sept. 11 attacks on the ACLU or Pat Robertson laying Haiti’s earthquake off on an ancient curse? But what of those who are not atheists? What of those who feel the blessed assurance that there is more to this existence than what we can see or empirically prove?

“What of those who seek a magnificent faith that commits and compels, and find churches offering only a shriveled faith that marginalizes and demeans? Its response to those people, those ‘seekers,’ will deter­mine the future of organized religion. And it might behoove keepers of the faith to keep in mind the distinction Anne Rice drew in her farewell: Christ didn’t fail-her, she said. Christianity did.” (By Leonard Pitts, Tribune Media Services, August 6, 2010)

Comment: Because of Satan’s deceptions the moral perception is obscured, the con­science is dis­torted, and policy runs nearly the whole ecclesias­tical machinery of the nom­inal churches. Thus a popularized religion ─ which costs nothing and is worth nothing ─ is readily accepted, while the old religion of the cross is utterly discarded. The consequence is that there is religion enough, and Churchianity enough, but a great famine for real Chris­tianity.

STUDY: AMERICANS PICK FROM RELI­GIOUS BUFFET: Many combine tra­di­tion, New Age belief, report says. When it comes to religion, many Americans like the mix-and-match, build-your own approach. “Large numbers attend services of traditions other than their own and blend Christianity with Eastern and New Age beliefs, a survey finds. The report Wednesday from the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life also shows tremendous growth over the last three decade in the number of Americans who say they have had a religious or mystical experience. Though the U.S. is overwhelmingly Christian, significant minorities say they hold beliefs of the sort found at Buddhist temple or New Age bookstores. Twenty-four percent of those surveyed and 22 percent of Christians say they believe in reincarnation, the idea that people will be reborn in this world again and again,

“As for the significant numbers who visit more than one place of worship, it’s not just an occasional visit while on vacation or for special events such as weddings and funerals.

“One-third of Americans say they regularly or occasionally attend religious service at more than one place. One-quarter say they sometimes attend services of a faith different from their own.

“‘It is as much now the norm as it is the exception for Americans to blend multiple religious beliefs and practices,’ said Alan Cooperman, associate director for research at the Pew Forum.

“Among the report’s other findings: • About 16 percent of Americans believe in the ‘evil eye’ ─ that certain people can cast curses or spells. More than 1 in 10 white evangelicals who attend church weekly and 3 in 10 black Protestants believe in the phenomenon, which can be found in Islam, Judaism and traditional African beliefs. • Nearly half of Americans say they have had a religious or mystical experience, or a ‘moment of sudden religious insight or awakening,’ the survey found. That is more than double the result since a Gallup survey asked in 1962.

“D. Michael Lindsay, a Rice University socio­logist with a specialty in religion, said the results what he calls the ‘playlist effect’ in contemporary American religious practice. ‘The ways we illustrate personalize our iPhones, we also personalize our religious lives,’ he said.

“The build-your-own-religion findings show that ‘culture and pop culture and the Internet are probably more powerful teachers than Sunday school teachers,’ said Scott Thumma, a sociologist at the Hartford Institute of Religion Research.

“The survey of more than 4,000 adults was conducted by phone in August; the total sample size has a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.

“Supernatural experiences and beliefs – Per­centage who has: Been in touch with the dead, 29%; Had ghostly experience, 18%; Consulted psychic, 15%. Percentage who believe in: Spiritual energy in trees, etc., 26%; Astrology, 25%; Reincarnation, 24%; Yoga as spiritual practice, 23%; Evil eye (casting of curses), 16%.” (By Eric Gorski, AP, December 12, 2009) 

“BELIEVE IT: ATHEISTS KNOW GOD: If you want to learn about God, you might want to talk to an atheist. A survey that measured Americans’ knowledge of religion found that atheists and agnostics knew more, on average, than followers of most major faiths.

“A majority of Protestants couldn’t identify Martin Luther as the driving force behind the Protestant Reformation, according to the survey, released Tuesday by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. Four in 10 Catholics misunderstood the meaning of their church’s central ritual, incorrectly saying that the bread and wine used in Holy Communion are intended to merely symbolize the body and blood of Christ, not actually become them.

“Atheists and agnostics were more likely to answer the survey’s questions correctly. Jews and Mormons ranked just below them in the survey’s measurement of religious knowledge ─ so close as to be statistically tied.

“American atheists and agnostics tend to be people who grew up in a religious tradition and consciously gave it up, often after a great deal of reflection and study, said Alan Cooperman, associate director of the Pew Forum.

“Atheists and agnostics also tend to be relatively well-educated, the survey found, not surprisingly, that the most knowledgeable people were also the best-educated. But the survey also found that atheists and agnostics outperformed believers who had a similar level of education.” (By Mitchell Landsberg, Tribune Newspapers, September 28, 2010)

“CATHOLIC PRELATE: “JEWS EXPLOIT HOLOCAUST”: Retired polish Bishop Tadeusz Pieronek accuses the Jews of appropriating the Holocaust, which he says ignores the loss of many Poles, Gypsies, Italians and Catholics who were concentration camp victims. Interviewed recently on an Italian Catholic website, Pieronek alleged that, for Jews, the Shoah was ‘used as a propaganda weapon and to obtain advantages that are often unjustified.’

“Calling the Holocaust ‘such a Jewish invention,’ the Bishop claims that the Jews have exhibited a ‘kind of arrogance’ he finds intolerable. The 75-year old Pieronek, who reportedly served as secretary-general of Poland’s Bishops Conference from 1993 to 1998, also characterized anti-Semitism in Poland as a ‘joke.’” (World Jewry, April 2010)

“VATICAN: Legionaries’ founder Maciel led immoral life. Pope to order ‘puri­fi­cation’ of order whose leader fathered child, abused boys. MEXICO CITY─ The Vatican Saturday ordered the over­­haul of one of the Catholic Church’s largest and most influential organizations after an investigation into decades of sexual abuse by the group’s founder and systematic efforts to cover it up.

“Mexican-born Father Marcial Maciel engaged in ‘very serious and objectively immoral behavior,’ the Vatican said ─ including fathering at least one child and sexually molesting boys and seminarians. The abuse dates to the 1950s and continued into the 1990s, years in which Maciel led a double life, protected by silence and obedience and sidelining his accusers.

“Maciel, who died in 2008 at the age of 87, founded the ultraconservative Legionaries of Christ order in Mexico in 1941. In this country, the group controls a network of schools and universities that preach traditional Catholic values.

“The Vatican said Saturday that Pope Benedict XVI will appoint a special envoy and a commission to oversee the ‘purification’ of the order and the ‘redefinition’ of its secretive, militaristic culture.

“Saturday’s announcement follows an investi­gation in which a team of bishops fanned out across the globe on Benedict’s command. They reported to the Holy See on Friday and Saturday, with Benedict sitting in on one of the briefings.

“How the Vatican handled the Legion case has been watched closely as sexual abuse scandals erupt across Europe and other parts of the world. Benedict and other church leaders have been accused of failing to act with enough vigor to stop abuse and punish offending clergy.

“Allegations had dogged Maciel for decades. But he was able to deflect them, branding his accusers as slandering liars and receiving unflagging support from the church hierarchy.

“Maciel ‘skillfully managed to build up an alibi to gain the trust, confidence an surrounding silence, and strengthen his role as charismatic founder,’ the Vatican said. Living ‘a life devoid of scruples an of genuine religious feeling,’ the statement continued, Maciel ‘created around himself a defense mechanism that made him untouchable for a long time.’

“Benedict’s decision is far short of disbanding the organization, as some critics had demanded.

“A statement on the Legionaries’ Website Satur­day said they ‘thank the Holy Father and embrace his provisions with faith and obedience.’” (By Tracy Wilkinson, Tribune Newspapers, May 2, 2010)

“WHY DOES SAVING A LIFE MERIT EXCOMMUNICATION? After all, priests merely get suspended or defrocked for sex­ual­ly abusing children.  We finally have a case where the Roman Catholic Church hier­archy is responding forcefully and speedily to allegations of wrongdoing.

“But the target isn't a pedophile priest. Rather, it’s a nun who helped save a woman’s, life. Doctors describe her as saintly. The excommunication of Sister Margaret McBride in Phoenix underscores all that to me feels morally obtuse about the church hierarchy. I hope that a public outcry can rectify this travesty.

“McBride was a senior administrator of St. Joseph’s Hospital in Phoenix. A 27-year-old mother of four arrived late last year, in her third month of pregnancy. According to local news reports and accounts from the hospital and some of its staff members, the mother suffered from a serious complication called pulmonary hypertension. That created a high probability that the strain of continuing pregnancy would kill her.

“‘In this tragic case, the treatment necessary to save the mother’s life required the termination of an ll-week pregnancy,’ the hospital said in a statement. ‘This decision was made after consultation with the patient, her family, her physicians, and in consultation with the Ethics Committee.’

“McBride was a member of that committee. She declined to discuss the episode with me, but the bishop of Phoenix, Thomas Olmsted, ruled that McBride was ‘auto­matically excommunicated’ because she assented to an abortion. ‘The mother’s life cannot be preferred over the child’s,’ the bishop’s communication office elaborated in a statement.

“Let us just note that the Roman Catholic hierarchy suspended priests who abused children and in some cases defrocked them but did not normally excommunicate them, so they remained able to take the sacrament.

“McBride has left her post as vice president. The hospital told me that she had resigned ‘at the bishop’s request’ but is still working elsewhere at the hospital.

“I heard about McBride from an acquaintance at the hospital. After what happened to McBride, he doesn’t dare be named, but he sent an e-mail to friends lamenting the excommunication of ‘a saintly nun’: ‘She is a kind, soft-spoken, humble, caring, spiritual woman whose spot in Heaven was reserved years ago,’ he wrote. ‘The idea that she could be excommunicated after decades of service to the Church and humanity literally makes me nauseated.

“A statement from the bishop’s office did not dispute that the mother’s life was in danger ─ although it did note that no doctor’s prediction is 100 percent certain. The episode reinforces perceptions of church leaders as rigid, dogmatic, out of touch ─ and very suspicious of independent-minded American nuns.

“McBride made a difficult judgment in an emergency, saved a life and then was punished and humiliated by a bishop who spent 16 years in Rome and devoted far less time to serving the downtrodden than McBride.

“‘Everyone I know considers Sister Margaret to be the moral conscience of the hospital,’ Dr. John Garvie, chief of gastroenterology at St.   Joseph’s Hospital, wrote to the editor to The Arizona Republic. ‘She works tirelessly and selflessly as the living example and champion of compassionate, appropriate care for the sick and dying.’

“Garvie later told me in an e-mail message that ‘saintly’ was the right word for McBride and added: ‘Sister was the ‘living embodiment of God’ in our building. She always made sure we understood that we’re here to help the less fortunate. We really have no one to take her place.’

“When hierarchies of mostly aging men pounce on and excommunicate a revered nun who was merely trying to save a mother’s life, the church seems to me almost as out of touch as it was in the cruel and debauched days of the Borgias in the Renaissance.” (By Nicholas Kristof, The New York Times, June 1, 2010)

“REPORT: BRITAIN, CHURCH, HID PRIEST’S ROLE IN BOMBS: LONDON ─ The British government and the Roman Catholic Church conspired to cover up the suspected involvement of a priest in a triple bombing in Northern Ireland in 1972 that killed nine people, a new investigation into the attack found Tuesday. “Despite strong evidence that the priest, James Chesney, had a hand in the explosions that ripped through the village of Claudy in July 1972, police decided not to go after the priest but instead asked officials in London to work with church leaders in removing him from the area. Chesney moved across the border and was later assigned to a parish in Ireland. “No one was ever charged in connection with the attack near Londonderry, one of the most notorious incidents of terrorist violence during Northern Ireland’s ‘Troubles.’ Chesney died 30 years ago. In 2002, Northern Ireland’s police ombudsman agreed to reopen an investigation, whose results were released Tuesday.” (Orlando Sentinel, August 8, 2010)  

“VATICAN REJECTS RESIGNA­TIONS: Irish bishops had offered to quit after abuse report. BELFAST, NORTHERN IRELANDPope Benedict XVI has rejected the resignations of two Irish bishops who came under heavy pressure to step down in the wake of a damning report on clerical sex abuse in Dublin, Irish media reports said Wednesday.

“Auxiliary Bishops Raymond Field and Eamonn Walsh tendered their resignations in December after a government backed investigation found evidence of widespread cover-ups involving cases of priestly abuse in the Dublin Archdiocese from the 1970s through the 1990s. The report caused uproar in Ireland and deepened public disillusion with the once-dominant Roman Catholic Church.

“But in a letter to fellow clerics, according to Irish news media, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin informed them that the Vatican had decided not to accept the two bishops’ offers to step down. Instead, the pair would be ‘assigned revised responsibilities within the diocese,’ the letter said, without specifying what those new duties would be.

“The Vatican’s decision was swiftly denounced by victims’ groups. ‘By this move, the pope has done irreparable damage to the already deeply damaged image of a selfish church hierarchy,’ Barbara Blaine, president of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, said in a statement.

“The report released in November; which drew on thousands of previously secret church documents, concluded that bishops in Dublin failed to inform the police about dozens of priests suspected of pedophilia and that the church systematically hushed up the alleged abuse of hundreds of children.

“Field and Walsh, who were bishops during the period covered by the investigation, initially resisted calls to step aside but eventually relented, saying they were sorry for their actions and expressing hope that their resignations would bring ‘peace and reconci­liation’ to victims.” (By Henry Chu, Tribune Newspapers, August 12, 2010)

“IRISH CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS LOST ITS CREDIBILITY, ANGLICAN SAYS: LONDON:  The Roman Catholic Church in Ireland has lost all credibility because of its mishandling of abuse by priests, the leader of the Anglican church said in remarks released Saturday. A leading Catholic arch­bishop said he was ‘stunned’ by the comments.

“The remarks marked the first time Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams has spoken publicly on the crisis engulfing the Catholic Church. The comments come ahead of a visit to England and Scotland by Pope Benedict XVI later this year.

“‘I was speaking to an Irish friend recently who was saying that it’s quite difficult in some parts of Ireland to go down the street wearing a clerical collar now,’ Williams told the BBC. ‘And an institution so deeply bound into the life of a society, suddenly becoming, suddenly losing all credibility ─ that’s not just a problem for the church, it is a problem for everybody in Ireland, I think.’

“Dublin Archbishop Diarmuid Martin said he had ‘rarely felt personally so discouraged’ as when he heard Williams’ comments. ‘I have been more than forthright in addressing the failures of the Catholic Church in Ireland. I still shudder when I think of the harm that was caused to abused children. I recognize that their church failed them,’ a statement, posted on the archdiocese’s Website, said. ‘Those working for renewal in the Catholic Church in Ireland did not need this comment on this Easter weekend and do not deserve it.’ Martin later said Williams had called him to express regret for the ‘difficulties which may have been created’ by the interview. “Williams’ criticisms are likely to strain already testy relations between the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion ─ which estimate 1.1 billion and 80 million adherents respectively. Although the pope and the archbishop of Canterbury have stressed the importance of healing the Reformation-era rift that split the churches in the 16th century, relations hit a low point last year when the Vatican invited conservative Anglicans to join the Catholic Church.” (By Raphael G. Satter, AP, April 4, 1010) 

SOUTHERN BAPTISTS SHIFT GEARSSouthern Baptists on Tuesday approved shifting resources away from their strongholds in the South to concentrate on parts of the U.S. and the world where they can gain more members. The 10,000 Baptists attending the annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention at the Orange County Convention Center in Orlando voted to divert more money and manpower overseas and to Northern states. ‘What it will do is help us to be more focused on meeting the needs around the world rather than spending it on ourselves,’ said the Rev. David Uth, pastor of First Baptist Church of Orlando. The decision to restructure was not without debate and division. Retiring President Morris H. Chapman urged rejection of the recommendations, which he said would drastically change the way churches give to the boards, missions and agencies within the Southern Baptist Convention. Chapman said too much emphasis was placed on money and organization and not enough on spiritual renewal. ‘The recommendations are about moving the chairs on the deck of the Titanic as the ship goes down into an icy, watery grave,’ Chapman said. Supporters of recommendations made by the Great Commission Resurgence Task Force said that changes were needed to bolster membership and baptisms. Membership has leveled off at about 16 million members since 2000, and the number of baptisms in 2009 was about the same as in 1989. One recommendation, intended to expand the denomination’s reach beyond the South, narrows the focus of the North American Mission Board to creating Southern Baptist churches in cities where none now exist, such as Seattle, Chicago and Boston. Another recommendation broadens the reach of the International Mission Board, which has been restricted to evangelism in foreign countries. The international mission­aries can now proselytize to ethnic groups and nationalities within the United States, such as foreign born Hispanics and Haitians in Florida. The increased emphasis on the Inter­national Mission Board, supporters contended, returns the denomination to its origins in 1845, when foreign missionary work was a primary goal of Southern Baptists. It also allows Southern Baptists to respond faster and more efficiently to disasters worldwide as a way of introducing their religion to non-Christians, Uth said. ‘It helps us to take the hope of the gospel to ends of the earth, literally.’” (By Jeff Kunerth, Orlando Sentinel, June 16, 2010)

“FIVE ANGLICAN BISHOPS CONVERT: LONDONFive Church of England Bishops opposed to women being ordained as bishops will take up an offer by Pope Benedict XVI and convert to Roman Catholicism.  The bishops will enter full communion with Rome through an ordinariate, a body proposed by the pope last year to let traditionalists convert while keeping some Anglican traditions, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales announced.  The ordinariate will let married clerics become Catholic priests, in an exception to the Vatican's celibacy rule, but not bishops. Married Angli­can bishops who convert may be granted a special status almost equivalent to their former rank.” (By news services, November 9, 1010)  

“Only 40 percent of U.S. Presbyterians believe Jesus is the only way to heaven, with only 35 percent of the denomination’s pastors believing this. More than half agreed that ‘all the world’s religions are equally good ways of helping a person find ultimate truth.’” (Religion Today, January 18, 2010)

____________________________________________________________________

Our heartfelt thanks and appreciation for the many beautiful Christmas cards received expressing love and prayers. Be assured that our warm Christian love and prayers are ever with you. We wish for all our readers that they will grow in Grace and Knowledge of the Lord for a blessed New Year as "The path of the just is as the shining light, that shineth more and unto the perfect day," (Proverbs. 4:18)

____________________________________________________________________

ANNOUNCEMENT: The date of our Memorial is April 15, 2011, after six p.m.


NO. 640 "THE PRINCE OF PEACE"

by Epiphany Bible Students


Even though Christmas day is not the real anniversary of our Lord’s birth, but more properly an annunciation day or date of His human begetting (Luke 1:28), nevertheless, since the celebration of our Lord’s birth is not a matter of Divine appointment or injunction, but merely a tribute of respect to Him, it is not necessary for us to quibble particularly about the date. We can join with the civilized world in celebrating the grand event on the day which the majority celebrates “Christmas Day.” The lesson for the occasion is a most happy choice, fitting well to the series of lessons it follows.

THE PRINCE OF PEACE

“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, and The Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end.” (Isa. 9:6,7)

The standpoint of the Prophet in Isaiah 9:2-7 is the dawn of the Millennial Age, and in v. 2, “The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light.” The reference here is to the world of mankind, all of whom will at that time recognize the presence of the Lord and His Kingdom established; for it is written that “every eye shall see him.” (Rev. 1:7) The world that has walked in the darkness of ignorance and superstition for six thousand years will then begin to see the glorious light of truth and righteousness, and in the earthly phase of the Kingdom they will see the grand illustrations and rewards of righteousness.

Though they dwell in the land of the shadow of death (i.e., fleshly Israel under the condemnation of their Law Covenant), “a light shineth brightly over them.” Yes, the light will shine with special brilliancy upon fleshly Israel: then their blindness will be turned away and the favors of the new dispensation will again be “of the Jew first and also [afterward] of the Gentile” (Rom. 2:10); and through the secondary instrumentality of the fleshly seed of Abraham shall all the nations of the world be blessed. The Ancient Worthies of that nation will be the visible rulers of the world, and their new work will begin at Jerusalem, bringing order out of confusion, peace out of discord and making Jerusalem a praise in the whole world. It was with reference to this that the Prophet wrote again, saying: “Arise, give light, for thy light is come, and the glory of the Lord is shining forth over thee. For behold, the darkness shall cover the earth and gross darkness the people; but over thee the Lord will shine forth, and his glory will be seen over thee. And nations shall walk by thy light, and kings by the brightness of thy shining... And the sons of the stranger shall build up thy walls, and their kings shall minister unto thee.” (Isa. 60:1-3, 10)

“Thou hast multiplied the nation [Israel – a reference to their gathering together again as a nation after the long dispersion of nearly two thousand years as fugitives among all the nations: and also to their reinforcement by the resurrection of their Ancient Worthies and heroes], made great their joy: they rejoice before thee as with joy in harvest, as men are glad when they divide the spoil.” (Isa. 9:3) Such, indeed, will be the joy of Israel when the blessings of their restoration to Divine favor begin to be realized.

“For thou hast broken the yoke of his burden, and the staff of his shoulder, the rod of his oppressor [the heavy burdens of oppression imposed upon them and the persecutions inflicted by their Gentile enemies during the long period of their blindness and exile], as in the day of Midian” (Isa. 9:4) ─ when a great victory was won for them by Gideon’s little band of 300 under the Lord’s direction, without bloodshed and without strife. (Judges 7:1-23) Even so shall it be when the Lord shall again fight for Israel; it will not be by their own power that the victory of the final battle will be secured. (See Ezek. 38:11, 15, 23 – also compare verse 4 with Ezek. 39:8-15)

Isaiah 9:6: Why is all this return of Divine favor to Israel? Is it because of worthiness in them? Surely not; for to this day they are a stiff-necked people, and their blindness and hardness of heart continue, although we are within only a few more years of the time all these things shall be fulfilled. The reason for it is that the Lord hath remembered His Covenant with their fathers (Lev. 26:42, 45; Jer. 31:34), and that in fulfilment of that Covenant a child has been born unto them who was destined to be a light to lighten the Gentiles and the glory of Israel; and now (at the time indicated in the prophecy) “the government is placed upon his shoulders.” Dimly this light of the world shone upon Israel at the First Advent of Messiah; but when “the light shineth in darkness, the darkness comprehended it not.”(John 1:5) “He came unto his own, but his own received him not.” (John 1:11) It is only at the Second Advent that they recognize Him as the promised seed of Abraham and their long-looked for Messiah. “They shall look upon Him whom they have pierced, and shall mourn for Him.” (Zech. 12:10)

“And his name is called Wonderful [What a wonder indeed to Israel specially, that the despised Nazarene, the man of sorrows and acquainted with grief, whom they hated and crucified and reviled, even to this day, was indeed their Messiah, and they knew Him not. What a wonder, too, to them specially, will be the forgiving love that so meekly bore their reproaches and sacrificed even unto death to redeem them from the curse of the Law, and that now returns to restore and bless them! What wonderful, wonderful love, wonderful condescend-sion and grace, and wonderful exaltation and glory and power!], Counsellor [not counsellor of the mighty God, as some translators rendered it; for Paul significantly inquires concerning Jehovah, “Who hath been his counsellor?” (Rom. 11:34) He needed no counsellor, but poor fallen humanity does need such a wise counsellor, and He will teach them and they shall walk in His ways. (Isa. 2:3)] The mighty God [“a Savior and a great one” (Isa. 19:20)], The Everlasting Father [the new life-giver to our dead race – the second Adam (1 Cor. 15:45)], The Prince of Peace [whose glorious reign shall be one of righteousness, bringing with it all the blessed fruits of righteousness – peace and joy and satisfaction and everlasting rest].” (Isa 9:6)

And in verse 7 of Isaiah, Chapter 9: His dominion shall increase until all things are subdued under Him. It shall extend, not only to the ends of the earth, but eventually all things in heaven and in earth are to be united under His headship as the representative of Jehovah, who would have all men honor the Son, even as they honor the Father. (Psa. 72:7; Eph. 1:10; John 5:23)

“The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this.” (Isa. 37:32) Such is Jehovah’s purpose, and thus He declares that it shall be accomplished; and our hearts leap for joy as we realize, not only the glorious import of this prophecy, but also the fact that the time is at hand, and that a score or so of years future will see the kingdom established and its blessings beginning.

The common interpretation of this prophecy regards it as fulfilled upon Israel at the First Advent, and the Kingdom of God as established then in the Gospel Church; and the great increase in the numbers and powers of the nominal church of all denom­inations, Papal and Protestant, as the predicted increase of Christ’s government. (v.7)

Such a fulfillment would not be worthy of the record. Christ does not reign in Christendom; its general character is anti-Christian. The only sense in which Christ’s Kingdom was begun at the First Advent was in its embryo condition; and this, the only true Kingdom of Christ in the world, has, like the Lord, been unrecognized in the world, except, like Him, to be despised and forsaken and to suffer violence. Its numbers have always been small and its circumstances humble; for not many rich and great, etc., are called. (1 Cor. 1:26-29; James 2:5)

Nor did the nation of Israel at the First Advent see or comprehend the light of Christ, nor did He at that time break their yoke or deliver them from the rod of their oppressor; for in consequence of their failure to recognize the light when it began to shine upon them, they were blinded, the rod of the oppressor came upon them with increased force and they have never yet been relieved, nor will they be until their Messiah is recognized as having come again, a Second Time; this time without a sin-offering unto salvation. (Heb. 9:28)

Let us rejoice for them and for all mankind that the blessed day is nigh, even at the door. Rightly viewed, this prophecy is full of rapturous inspiration.

JACOB’S RESCUE NEAR

But evidently the Prophet’s vision, while it glanced upon the preaching of our Lord and the apostles in Galilee, and glanced down through the Gospel Age and noted how this light glinted here and there as a wonderful “lamp,” nevertheless rested not until it reached the very end of this Age. There in prophetic vision Isaiah seems to see the end of Jacob’s trouble – Israel’s deliverance from the blind­ness that has been upon her, her acceptance of the Lord as the Messiah the time mentioned by another prophet, when the Lord would pour upon them the spirit of prayer and supplication and they should look upon Him whom they had pierced and mourn for Him ─ at the time mentioned by the Apostle Paul, when the fullness of the Gentiles having come in (the full number of the Gentiles to complete the elect number of the Church), Divine mercy shall go forth from the Church to bless the world and shall first of all rest upon Israel according to the flesh, “They shall obtain mercy through your mercy.” (Rom. 11:31)

The third and fourth verses of Isaiah, Chapter 9, we believe, are near fulfillment. In the Revised Version it reads, “Thou hast multiplied the nation, thou hast increased her joy: they joy before thee according to the joy in harvest, and as men rejoice when they divide the spoil. For the yoke of his burden and the staff of his shoulder, the rod of his oppressor, thou hast broken in the day of Midian.” The nation of Israel is very much increased today, but their joy is not yet accomplished because this great deliverance here mentioned has not yet been accomplished. It is to be accomplished in the “Day of Trouble” which began in 1914, and is now recognized by many.

The fifth verse of Isaiah, Chapter 9, seems to be more intelligently rendered in the revised version: “For all the armor of the armed man in the tumult, and the garments rolled in blood, shall even be for burning, for fuel of fire.” The thought seems to be that at that time there will come the end of warfare, as the Scriptures have declared. The Time of Trouble with which the Millennium will be introduced is the means by which the Lord will overthrow all the powers of evil, as it is written, “He shall cause wars to cease unto the ends of the earth.” Under the righteous reign which will then follow, men will learn war no more, but will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. At the present time the reverse of all this is in operation, nor can we hope for a change such as the Lord’s Word here and elsewhere predicts by any other power than from above. Hence our prayer as our Lord instructed and in harmony with our hopes, “Thy kingdom come; thy will be done on earth as it is done in heaven.”

THE GOVERNMENT UPON HIS SHOULDERS

As the verses through five indicate the coming joys and blessings and cessation of war, verse six points out how this would be accomplished. This is shown by its introduction with the word “for.” This verse goes back of the promised blessings to point out how they will be introduced. (1) A child will be born ─ a son will be given ─ a gift from God. (2) Passing over his earthly ministry and faithfulness, whereby the Lord Jesus was tested and proven worthy of the favors here prophetically assured Him as the overcomer, we have the declaration that the government will be upon His shoulders. This is an old-style figurative way of declaring that the authority and honor will be laid upon the Lord Jesus. The same thought is still carried out in the armies of the world, whose generals have upon their shoulders epaulets in which the dignity of their rank is noted, is indicated. So upon our Lord Jesus the heavenly Father has placed the dignity and responsibility of being the great King who in due time, as the Father’s representative, as the great glorified Mediator, shall reign for a thousand years to restore order in the world, to put down all insubordination, to destroy every enemy of righteousness and truth and to exalt everyone who is the friend of these Divine principles.

It is worthy to note that this authority or government is conferred upon our Lord before He assumes the various offices subsequently made: remarkably few recognize the authority of this great Captain of our Salvation whom God has set forth. Only comparatively few recognize Him truly and render Him obedience and refuse not Him who speaketh from heaven. These few have the eyes of their understanding opened and see what the others do not see: and the ears of their understanding opened that they hear and comprehend what others do not comprehend. To them the Master is the Father’s representative and all in all even now ─ even before the time has come for Him to take His great power and reign, even before He has established truth and righteousness in the world. By the eye of faith they see Him, worship, adore, obey and follow Him.

KNOWLEDGE OF HIS GLORY WORLDWIDE

But it implies much more than such an acknowledgment of our Lord Jesus by the Church. It implies a world-wide knowledge, as it is written, “Unto him every knee shall bow, and every tongue confess, to the glory of God the Father.” (Phil. 2:9-11) The govern­ment or authority is not laid upon His shoulders in vain, and the fact that He has not exercised this authority in now nearly two thousand years’ triumph and ascension up on high is merely in accord with the Scriptural declaration that the Father has a “due time” (1 Tim. 2:3-6) set at which the Son shall take unto Himself His great power and reign, and in association with Himself the Church, the Little Flock, gathered out from the world during this Gospel Age.

The time when the Lord shall manifest to the world His government, His authority, His rule, is represented in Daniel 12:1, 2, by the words, “stand up.” “At that time shall Michael [another name for our glorious Lord] will stand up, and there shall be a time of trouble such as was not since there was a nation; and at that time thy people shall be delivered, everyone found written in the book.” Our Lord will not only have the authority He will use it, and one of the first works, we are assured, will be the suppression of evil ─ not only the suppression of Satan, the prince of this world, who now worketh in the hearts of the children of disobedience, and who, we are assured, will be bound at the beginning of that Millennial reign, but additionally all the works of the devil, all institutions of evil, moral, social, financial, that are now injuring the world of mankind and cooperating in effecting the groaning and travailing of the whole creation. All these will be suppressed as soon as the proper time shall come, and He upon whose shoulders the power and authority have been placed shall take unto Himself His great power and shall begin to reign. No longer, we may be sure, will any evil be licensed; no longer will the making of spirituous liquors be permitted, authorized and licensed, nor the sale of these nor any other harmful thing be allowed to do injury in God’s Holy Kingdom. (Isa. 11:9)

It will be then, at that time, that the whole world shall begin to recognize the great King whom God will thus set in the throne of the world’s dominion to rule it, to order it, to subdue it, to lift it up out of sin and degradation and to bring it into harmony again with God as it was before sin entered.

“COUNSELLOR,” MIGHTY-ONE, FATHER

The great Mediator, the Christ, “Prophet, Priest and King,” Judge, the Seed of Abraham in whom all the families of the earth shall be blessed, shall have various names; His character and work shall be recognized from various standpoints. He will be the Wonderful One that in Himself He will manifest more than others the Father's character and likeness and nature. He will be Counsellor, Teacher, Instructor, Helper, Guide, for the whole world of mankind. He will be the Mighty God ─ the One with all power and authority to deal with mankind throughout the Millennial Age.

There will be no appeal from His righteous laws, regulations and decisions, because the Father hath committed all judgment unto the Son: the whole matter will be left in His hands. From another standpoint He will be the “Everlasting Father.” Having purchased the life of Adam and His race with the sacrifice of His own Human life, our Lord having been granted a new life in His resurrection, will have at His disposal the life which He bought in the sacrificing of His own in such measure as will be sufficient to apply to every member of Adam’s race. Each member of our race as he shall respond to the knowledge that shall then be filling the whole earth, may receive life more and more abundantly from the glorified Christ – everlasting life, the life that was lost in Adam’s disobedience and that was redeemed by Christ’s sacrifice of Himself.

The one from whom all life for the world must precede is fitly called the father of the world, since the word father signifies life-giver; and since this father gives life everlasting, it is eminently proper that He should be called the father of everlasting life or the everlasting father. Prince of Peace is another of His titles, but this one evidently will not be appropriate to Him until, toward the close of the Millennial Age, He shall have accomplished the putting down of everything obnoxious to Divine righteousness, the subjugation of all things to Himself ─ until He shall have finished the use of the iron rod in smiting the nations, in dashing them to pieces as a potter’s vessel. Then it will be seen that the motive beyond all this activity against unrighteousness was the bringing in of everlasting righteousness, the bringing in of everlasting peace, and it will be seen that the title well fits our great King, Prince of Peace.

THE LAW OF RETRIBUTION OPERATIVE

But, some inquire, what about the sins of the world? Will there be no chastisement, no punishment, for these? We answer that it will be equally as just for God to forgive the sins of the world for Christ’s sake as it has been just for Him to forgive the sins of the Church for Christ’s sake. If the one is just, so will be the other; for “God is no respecter of persons” (Acts 10:34), and is equally willing to forgive the sins of the world as the sins of the Church (the Little Flock), when to forgive the sins of the world, repenting of sin will turn from it, accepting Christ as their Redeemer.

This does not mean, however, that justice is to be ignored. In the case of the Church, note how the sins of youth may leave their scar and sting to the end of life. And so we may reasonably assume that certain stripes, or punishments, will be permitted to follow the world in just the same manner. It will be from these weaknesses and frailties that they will be gradually raised up to perfection during those blessed thousand years of Christ’s Kingdom, when Satan will be bound and not be permitted to deceive any during that period. But what about the heart condition? If conformity to the Divine Law in an outward way will bring blessings to all, will there not still be a difference between the people – some coming heartily into accord with the Father, and others merely outwardly into harmony, because this outward harmony will be the way to restitution, perfection?

Undoubtedly this is correct reasoning. It is along this line that the parable of the Sheep and the Goats (Matt. 25:31-46) teaches; namely, that outwardly the “sheep” and “goats” will have much the same appearance and demeanor, except to the Judge, the King, who will read the heart and ultimately will manifest to all that there has been a real heart-difference between the two classes, all of whom will have been on trial for a thousand years, receiving blessings from the kingdom.

BASIS OF THE JUDGMENT

All the while each individual will be making character. This character will be fully appreciated by the great Judge, and the individual will be rated either as a “sheep” or as a “goat.” Not until the conclusion of the Millennium will the decision of the Judge be manifested. To the “sheep” at His right hand He will say, “Come ye blessed of my Father [the kind that my Father is pleased to bless and to grant everlasting 1ifel], inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.” (Matt: 25:34)

Then the other class, the goats of the parable will be sentenced: “Depart, ye ac­cursed ones [doomed ones] into everlasting punishment.” (Matt. 25:41)

Some think that those who live unrighteous lives, and are very wicked, should not receive a resurrection. But our Lord tells us there will be a resurrection of the good and the evil ─ the evil to a resurrection of judgment (mistranslated damnation) – John 5:28,29; and He is faithful that promised! (Heb. 10:23) “Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow. If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land.” (Isa. 1:18, 19) “When the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness that he has committed, he shall surely live, he shall not die... For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord God; wherefore turn yourselves, and live ye.” (Ezek. 18:27, 32)

Just as the Millennial Age is for the world, the Gospel Age is for those who consecrate and are seeking to “walk in His steps” during the time when sin is in ascendancy. They are being judged daily, and if some apparently are breaking their vows in their daily walk, but have not denied the Ransom, we are not to judge them as unfit for the Kingdom, even though we know what is right and what is wrong. “We shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ.” (Rom. 14:10) So we should be content to await the unerring and righteous judgment of Christ. Let us “Put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof.” (Rom. 13:14) “For if we would judge [examine] ourselves, we shall not be judged [condemned – corrected and punished of the Lord]” (1 Cor. 11:31)

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SHEEP CLASS

With the establishment of the Kingdom all who come into harmony with it will have the great privilege of doing something to help others. While the Mi1lennial blessings will be showered upon those who accept the Lord’s terms, there will be others who will need assistance. Those who have the spirit of God, the spirit of love, will be glad to carry the heavenly message of reconciliation to all humanity, glad to apply the eye-salve to the blind, glad to unstop the ears of the deaf, glad to help the sin-sick back into harmony with God.

All who will take pleasure in this work will thus be manifesting that they have God’s spirit and are co-laborers with Him. All these will be the sheep. On the other hand, those who will be careless in respect to their vow, and merely enjoy the Millennia1 blessings themselves, will be of the goat-class and will thus be marking themselves as “goat,” and correspondingly will be out of favor with the great King of kings, their Judge, the Lord of Glory.

NO END OF RIGHTEOUS GOVERNMENT

The seventh verse of our lesson gives another precious assurance, and that is that this Kingdom once being attained by our Lord will never be surrendered to another, never pass into other hands. Of His government and of His peace which He will establish there will be no end (Luke 1:33). Not only Israel, but all mankind will have been witnesses that the best of kings as well as the worst of kings have at times surrendered their dominion, and that the best of kings might be followed by the worst. How appropriate then the suggestion that when the kingdom of this great King of kings and Lord of lords shall have conquered the world and have subdued all things into harmony with the Divine will, it shall never again be overturned by evil.

The expression “upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom to establish it and to uphold it with judgment and righteousness from henceforth even forever; the zeal of the Lord shall perform this,” signifies that this great Kingdom which our Lord Jesus at His Second Advent will establish – His Church as members of His body, members of His Kingdom class, His bride associated with Him – will be the outcome, the antitype of that which was typically presented to Israel in the kingdom, the government of David. As previously seen, the name David signifies “Beloved,” and the David who was the first king on Israel’s throne, and of whom it was said that he sat upon the throne of the Lord, was merely a type, a figure of the greater David, the Anointed, the Messiah. Jesus Christ, the first Lord of all, and the Church His body associated with him, constitutes the antitypical David, the antitypical Beloved of the Lord, who’s Kingdom shall be an everlasting Kingdom, “henceforth even forever­more.”

UNENDING KINGDOM TRANSFERRED

The Apostle points out (1 Cor. 15:28) that, at the close of His thousand-year reign, our Lord (His Church associated with Him) will abdicate the throne of earth. Having accomplished the work which the Father has set apart to be accomplished by the Anointed in this Millennial reign, at its close the entire authority, with the world in complete sub­jection to the Divine law and fully restored to the Divine likeness and all willful transgressors cut off, will be surrendered to the Father’s hands, and in accordance with His prearrangement will be redeliv­ered to mankind, that the perfect human family, in the image and likeness of God, may rule the world in harmony with the Divine regulations. But the government will never cease, because the govern­ment with Christ will be even more particularly associated with the Father in His throne in the general government of the universe, it will be in that particular sense under the supervision of the glorified Christ.

The zeal of the Lord shall perform this. It will not be the arm of man nor the zeal of man, however good or well meaning, which could bring to pass such wonderful changes as those which the Lord has pointed out. The Lord Himself will accomplish it, He will put all things into subjection to the Son ─ all things, the Apostle explains, except Himself, for He is excepted who thus puts all things under the Son (1 Cor. 15:27).

From this standpoint, looking back over the history of the world, we get a grand view of the Divine Power and Wisdom, Justice and Love. We see how God has been continually overruling in respect to the efforts of man, to the intent that ultimately without interfering with the free moral agency of any, every man of the whole race of Adam shall be fully and thoroughly tested and proven respecting his loyalty to the Lord, and thus respecting his worthiness of life eternal. How glorious is the Divine Plan! What wonder is there that with its accomplishment every voice in heaven and in earth shall be heard expressing praise and thankfulness, glory, honor, dominion and might to Him that sitteth upon the throne and to the Lamb!

It is our hope and prayer that what is given herein will increase the love and appreciation of our great Redeemer and will give us pleasure in the contemplation of the prayer, Thy Kingdom come; Thy will be done on earth as it is done in heaven. Hallelujah, what a Savior! He is mighty to save! Our best wishes to all our readers for a peaceful and blessed Holiday Season.

(Brother John J. Hoefle, Reprint 450, December 1993)

____________________________________________________________________

LETTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Sister Marjorie: Loving greetings through our beloved Redeemer!

     I was indeed saddened to learn of Sister Delta’s passing, but we are very comforted with the knowledge that she is “asleep in Jesus’ awaiting God’s great Resurrection Day. As we understand more clearly the meaning of the Resurrection, it makes us even more joyful. This enables us not to mourn as others do who have no faith.

    Warm Christian love from your sister by His grace, Ruth Roach (TRINIDAD, WEST INDIES)

………………………………….

Dear Marjorie and all the Brethren there, and especially Sister Delta’s family,

     So sad to hear you lost dear Delta on July 11, 2010. She had a long fight. I know you will all miss her very much. It is so wonderful to know that in the coming Resurrection we will all be together again and without these frail bodies with their pain and sorrow. Please convey my thoughts and sympathy to her family as well.

    Thank you for the sympathy for my Sister. She was 86 so near Delta’s age as well. No matter the age we miss our dear ones.

                                            May the Lord comfort your hearts. Love, Hava Bausch   (ISRAEL)

____________________________________________________________________

THY KINGDOM COME

Oh, Lord, how long ‘til the morning

           When Thy Sun of Righteousness shall arise

                                         To brighten the troublous cloudy skies?

                                         How long ‘til that wonderful day

                                         For which we so earnestly pray?

                                         How long ‘til there shall reappear

                                         The faces of those whom we hold dear?

                                         How long ‘till we joyfully meet

                                         Our loved ones at Thy feet?

                                         The Times and Seasons are in Thy hand

                                         As ordered in Thy Plan so grand,

                                         But Lord we do feverently yearn

                                         For our dear ones speedy return.

                                         We pray for Thy woe to be swiftly past,

                                         And that Glorious Age ushered in at last!

                                                                                   By Delta Clinard


NO. 639 "THINK IT NOT STRANGE"

by Epiphany Bible Students


“Beloved, think it not strange concern­ing the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you,” is the counsel of the Apostle Peter in 1 Peter 4:12; and in verse 16 he appeals further, “If any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.” It is often most helpful to the proper under­standing of any text to discern its back­ground, the basis which prompted its expres­sion; and such is definitely true in the present instance. It will be noted in verse 1, chapter 1, that the Apostle is addressing his letter to “the strangers” of the Black Sea Provinces. The Diaglott expresses it much clearer: “Peter, an Apostle of Jesus Christ, to the sojourners of the dispersion.” Who were these “sojourners of the dispersion”? Apparently, they were such Jews as had been exiled from or about Jerusalem, or those who had left because conditions there were more or less unbearable for them. It would seem these are the same ones mentioned in John 7:35, when the Jews who were hearing Jesus, “said among themselves, whither will he go, that we shall not find him? Will he go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles?”

Among such dispersed ones, those who had suffered afflictions for some cause or other there would certainly be found some who were ready listeners to the message that Jesus was indeed the Christ, their Messiah; and it would seem St. Peter had been among them, had convinced some, and was striving to “es­tablish them in the Present Truth.” Of a certainty, those Jews had never seen Jesus personally; therefore, their acceptance of Him had been prompted by the testimonies of St. Peter or others (1 Peter 1:8). The prophecy (Isa. 8:14) that “He shall be for a stone of stumbling, and for a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel” was not without purpose. Those Jews who received Him gladly did so from the heart; but those Jews who rejected Him likewise hated Him from the heart – hated also their former brethren who then accepted Him. To some He was the savor of life unto life; to some the savor of death unto death; and the latter snarled the opprobrious name “Christian” at their former fellows, as they spat upon the ground in the same breath, the worst of all insults they could express toward the new converts. Thus, St. Peter was telling such who had become His disciples that if they suffered under the offensive name “Christian” to be not ashamed, but to “Glorify God in this name.”

The expression “fiery trial” in our text is from the Greek purosis, meaning literally “a burning,” being the same word found also in Rev. 18:9 and 18:18 (the word occurs but three times in the Bible), where the “burning” of that Great City which is called spiritually Sodom is described. This may be regarded as a fitting sarcasm in contrast that the same word should be used to describe the “sweet-smelling savor unto the Lord” which comes from the “burning,” the sharp and faith-developing trials, of the true Christians on the one hand, and the “burning,” the utter destruction, of the “vine of the earth” on the other hand. And all of this is emphasized further by St. Peter in verse 17 of chapter 4, Dia.: “Because the season is coming for the judgment to begin from the house of God; and if it begin first from us, what the end of those who are disobedient to the glad tidings of God?”

Today the name Christian is often spoken with respect, even by many Jews in the more enlightened countries; the name itself is no longer “a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense.” Now Christians in name only must find other insulting terms for “Christians indeed [“Israelites indeed" ─ John 1:47].” Too many who received “Present Truth” under That Servant, to be a “Russe11ite” was the most insulting term to apply to those “Christians indeed.” To some, who believed Brother Johnson and his ardent adherents were in the Second Death, the epithet “Johnson-ite” would bear similar meaning to their fellows as did the name “Christian” in apostolic times. Thus, we might substitute the words, “If any man suffer as a Johnson-ite, let him not be ashamed" ─ that is, if he suffers such epithets as a faithful footstep follower of Jesus Christ. Let us keep in mind that if we “suffer as a Christian,” because of the Truth, we need never be ashamed ─ whether it be labeled Russe11ism, Hoef1eism, or whatever oppro­brium erstwhile brethren may use in contempt the same as did the Jewish brethren of Jesus in contemptuous use of the name “Christian.” “As He was in this world, so are we.”

“THAT OLD SERPENT THE DEVIL”

All of the “burning” ─ fiery trials ─ of God’s people under the reign of evil have been instigated by “the God of this world,” the evil one; and this has been markedly true of the difficulties of all New Creatures during this Gospel Age. This is apparent at the very outset of the Age, when “the Apostle and High Priest of our Profession, Christ Jesus” (Heb. 3:1) was “led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the Devil.” (Matt. 4:1) The word here translated “Devil” is from the Greek diabolos, and is a specific name for the individual Satan ─ the Devil. It is the same word as found in Rev. 20:2: “He laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the devil, and Satan.”

We believe the words dragon, serpent, Devil and Satan portray the four unholy attributes of Azaze1 – the personification of evil in completeness – just as Power, Wisdom, Justice and Love describe the four character traits of Jehovah – the personification of Goodness and true Holiness in perfection.

As the “dragon,” the Evil One has attempted to devour the Gospel-Age saints by the unholy use of power, just as he through Pagan Rome did actually “devour the child.” (Rev. 12:4) Honest opponents are devoured and crushed by the unholy use of power, just as that great apostate “woman – Jezebel” used unholy power to become “drunken with the blood of the saints.” (Rev. 17:6) But in all of this seeming victory, God's holy use of power has preserved the fully faithful, has “laid up for them a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will give them in that day... to all those who love His appearing.” (2 Tim. 4:8)

As the “serpent,” the evil one has been the deceiver, the beguiling tempter, of the Age in a perverted use of wisdom – Azaze1 means perverter. “Now the serpent was more crafty than any living thing” (Gen. 3:1, Rotherham); and “the woman was deceived.” (1 Tim. 2:14) But the “pure wisdom which is from above” has kept the fully faithful during the Age from being “hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.” (Heb. 3:13)

As the “devil,” the Evil One has been the false accuser, the calumniator (so the Greek) of God’s people, especially so in the Parousia-Epiphany in the persons of antitypical Jannes and Jambres, the slanderous false-accusing sifters described by St. Paul in 2 Tim. 3:1-9. And slander, lying, false statements, misrepresentations, bad conscience manifested toward the fully faithful, are they not all an abuse of justice, i.e. “in”-justice? But here again, the “justice that is laid to the line” has spoken, or will eventually speak, in vindication of all those “whose righteousness is of me, saith the Lord.” Then, finally as “Satan,” the Evil One is the adversary, or opposer of God’s fully faithful people. He often uses the measurably faithful, the “buckwheat” class, to oppose the fully faith­ful, causing them to meddle in the affairs of the wheat class in attempts to usurp their office powers. They frequently use the Truth given by God through His faithful mouthpieces to their own advantage, often palming it off as their own. They are all motivated through a lack of love and are those persons “who received not the Truth in the love of it,” and who have been given “energy of delusion” in return. “Thou hast given them blood [error] to drink”! (Rev. 16:6) But the true love, coming from the One “altogether lovely” provokes to good works (Heb. 10:24) just as the lack of it opposes such good works, and attempts to promote evil works. Thus, there is clearly depicted the “High and Lofty One, who inhabiteth eternity, whose Name is Holy” (Isa. 57:15), as contrasted with the Evil One who will be “bound a thousand years, cast into the bottomless pit, that he should deceive the nations no more" (Rev. 20:2,3), and eventually annihilated.

THE PATTERN OF TEMPTATIONS WELL DEFINED

If we “consider Him,” it becomes clear enough that Jesus had His most severe trials at the very outset, and then at the end of His walk on the “narrow way.” After His anointing “with the spirit without measure” at Jordan, He was possessed of a consuming zeal, which so engrossed Him He did not even stop to eat for forty days. It would seem reasonable to believe that, knowing the great import of His mission on earth, and that “the King’s business required haste,” He memorized the entire Old Testament in those forty days, as well as to “rightly divide the word of Truth” on the various Tabernacle types, etc., of which He Himself would be the central figure in the antitype. According to His own words a little later, He had instructed those who have followed Him during the Age that every Tabernacle type had to continue until its antitype appeared – “Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” (Matt. 5:18; Luke 16:17) Then, at the extreme end of His earthly ministry came the most severe trial of all – Gethsemane and the Cross; and this pattern is also clearly marked in the experiences of the Apostles – much persecution immediately after Pentecost, with greater climax toward the end of their lives. James was killed with the sword (Acts 12:2), Peter crucified head downward, John thrown into a vat of boiling oil, Paul having his head chopped off, etc. – with all of them having their most severe testings at the beginning and at the end of their narrow-way experiences.

And Satan, master of psychology, makes his boldest and strongest attempts when his intended victims are weakest. This he did in the case of Jesus, when He was weakened from His fast and arduous concentration at the end of the forty days. And this Satan did by evidencing real concern for His physical welfare. “You are hungry and weak,” he had implied, “but you have received the Holy Spirit without measure; you have power to provide your every need; command that these stones be made bread.” This would not only try out the new power He had received, but would provide His temporal necessities at the same time. It might even decide Satan to repent and be converted, to join hands with Him in the work He was about to undertake.

Inasmuch as “He was tempted in all points like as we are, yet without sin,” we may be certain His followers all during the Age would be similarly tried ─ tempted to use the power of the Truth to their own present ad­vantage; yet accomplish just as readily the work given them to do. Numerous are the ex­amples along this line: Balaam, who suc­cumbed to the temptation (Num. 22); St. Peter was “offered money” for the power he had, but emphatically responded that “the gift of God is not to be purchased with money” (Acts 8:18-20); the Gospel-Age builders of Great Babylon becoming “rich, and increased of good, and in need of nothing” (Rev. 3:17) foolishly deter­mined to bring to earth the Kingdom of God before “due time” – “my Lord delayeth.” “Money is power,” says Solomon; but it does not bring the power that maketh wise unto salvation; yet it has deceived many into believing they could be the “rich man” in this world, and “Lazarus” in the next. Just a cursory look at our Lord’s course should convince them of their fallacious reasoning.

TEMPTATION TO USE UNLAWFUL METHODS

At Jesus’ prompt rejection of Satan’s first bit of sophistry, he took up a second mode of attack: “If thou be the son of God, cast thyself down” from the pinnacle of the temple. (Matt. 4:6) This task of redeeming, uplifting mankind from the mire of sin, from relieving the poverty and human frailty, so apparent on every hand, just could not be done without some sensational methods; and this has been the thinking of the minds of worldly men throughout the Age. One outstanding weakness of the “great multi­tude” all during the Age has been this very mistake; thus, they become “double minded” ─ a mind to serve the Lord while using Satan’s methods. They would do great works, win great numbers, gain great favor with their fellows, yet bask in the smile of Heaven at the same time – a combination never parried by the fully faithful, but readily grasped by those befuddled by Azazel, attempting to juggle the “pearl of great price” (Matt. 13:46) with one hand, as they juggle “the pleasures of sin for a season” (Heb. 11:25) with the other hand. “They that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare.” (1 Tim. 6:9) “The Kingdom of Heaven cometh not with outward show,” said Jesus, and He set us the example of being “meek and lowly of heart.” There can be no argument with the statement, “The entrance of thy word giveth light,” and the great “quickening” that comes upon entrance of the Truth into the human mind has caused the large majority to “think more highly of themselves than they ought to think.” But the jester spoke a great truth when he declared, “O, if you would only know how much you have to know that you don't know nuthin.”

It is a common fallacy of professional men – doctors, lawyers, preachers, tech­nicians – to consider others stupid because the general knowledge of their particular vocation is so limited in the general mind. This is a mistake, of course, because many uneducated people could have made excellent doctors, lawyers, etc., had they been given the opportunity. It is a sage observation that the big difference between the professors and the students is that the professors read the books first. Therefore, it is sound counsel to all, and especially to the leaders in the church, to consider St. Paul’s words: “Who maketh thee to differ from another? And what hast thou that thou didst not receive? Now, if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?” (1 Cor. 4: 7)

TEMPTATION TO COMPROMISE

With Jesus’ positive rejection of Satan’s suggestion, there came immediately the third temptation, the temptation of Combinationism, which has overcome vast multitudes through­out the Age, and especially so here in the end of the Age. Satan would have Jesus to join with Him to accomplish His mission. Could not the two of them do it better than one of them alone? Would not two heads be better than one? Satan made it clear, of course, that he himself would be chief of the two heads: “All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.” This temptation of Combinationism to God’s people has been among the most alluring all during the Age ─ not stated in exactly the same words, of course, but with the same underlying principle. “Money is power,” says Solomon; and this influence is stronger today than at any time in history, because there is so much more of it in the hands of so many more people of differing ideals and desires. The person today, who contributes, say, $10,000 per year to his particular church, will not be lightly considered when he states his wishes to the preacher. One great source of strength with the last two Principal Men was their decision, SEATS FREE ─ NO COLLECTIONS. Since they asked no one for money, they could afford to tell them the truth; there was no need to compromise. This revives the story of an Admiral from the U.S. Navy: Deciding to go to church one Sunday morning as he returned from the sea, he walked to a pew near the front, occupied by one lone old man. As he joined the party, he was given reproachful glances, which, however, he ignored. The old man, not to be thus disregarded, took one of his personal cards from his pocket, wrote on it, “I paid $1,000 for this seat.” The Admiral turned the card to the other side, handed it back to its owner with the answer, “You paid too much.” And certainly Jesus would have “paid too much” had He succumbed to the tricky deceit of Satan.

TRUTH STRANGER THAN FICTION

It is a sound observation that truth is stranger than fiction; and this is illustrated all about us today. Who wishes to hear the Truth? Even some among former brethren ─ those who once claimed to love the Truth more than life itself ─ there is very little of the “hearing ear” any more. And this situation is very evident in Churchianity everywhere; they are willing to listen to and receive almost any kind of hocus-pocus just as long as it isn’t the Truth. Thus, to the vast majority, the Truth is indeed a “stranger,” which emphasizes the truth of Jesus’ inquiry: “When the Son of Man cometh, will He find the faith on the earth?” And the Berean Comment is most fitting: “The question implies that at that time the true faith (the Truth) would be almost extinct.” (Luke 18:8, Berean Comment) But for those who do have the faith, the Present Truth, there is the comforting assurance of Psa. 89:15: “Blessed are the people that know the joyful sound [that have an ear for the Truth]; they walk, O Lord, in the light of thy countenance.” Such have meat to eat that others know not of; to such the Aaronic blessing is sure: “The Lord lift up His countenance upon thee, and give thee peace”, the peace of God, which passeth under­standing.

All of the three temptations of Jesus, which He met and rejected without wavering, have come in principle to all of His followers during the Age, added to which they have also been tempted to sin. It is well to bear in mind that temptation is an appealing suggestion. Without appeal, there can be no temptation. Thus, the statement, “God cannot be tempted of evil” (James 1:13) ─ evil is distasteful to every pore of His Being; just the reverse of Satan, whose characterization as The Evil One is indicative of the full corruption of evil that pervades every pore of his being. Nor is it any sin to be tempted; sin enters only when we are “overcome of evil.” Therefore, “be not over­come of evil, but overcome evil with good.” (Rom. 12:21) In all of their temptations, the fully faithful eventuate as “more than con­querors” – they gain the “crown of righteousness” which wins for them a throne. “He that overcometh shall sit with me in my throne, even as I overcame, and am set down with My Father in His throne” (Rev. 3:21), is the sure promise of the fully faithful New Creatures.

But the Scriptures are very clear that the New Creatures who were measurably faithful, a “great multitude,” are not such overcomers; they will never gain a throne. At best, they will serve “before the throne” ─ the throne be­ing the heritage of their fully faithful brethren. After they have “washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb” (Rev. 7:14) it will also be their privilege to become a kind of police force in the spiritual realm. And we believe it is sound and just obser­vation that every one of the Great Multitude leaders failed in at least two, and probably in all three, of those temptations which came especially upon Jesus ─ selfishness, error, worldliness ─ with the additional charge against some of them that they also fall under the fourth temptation, Sin. As the Epiphany Mes­senger has taught, Sectarianism is a great sin. During the Gospel Age Great Company leaders built the sects in Big Babylon, and perverted the Star Members’ teachings they embraced for their sects. The Great Company is one of the elect classes, but as a class they are not counted as overcomers of sectarianism and clericalism, even though they all must overcome their sins of teaching and practice as individuals if they receive the “palms” of victory (Rev. 7:9). Thus, we offer St. Paul’s counsel: “Exhort each other every day, while it is called today, so that no one among you may be hardened by a delusion of sin.” (Heb. 3:13, Dia.)

Another class of faithful overcomers are those who consecrate between the Ages, after the “door is shut” to the High Calling and before the full opening of the Millennium, that is, before the New Covenant is inaugurated, and opportunity to consecrate for restitution purposes is available. That Servant taught there would be such a class in the end of the Age when no more crowns would be available ─ a class that would be similar to the Ancient Worthies, and would receive a “better Resurrection” (Heb. 11:35) and be rewarded in partnership with the Ancient Worthies. He also saw in later years that they would be rewarded with spirit nature at the end of the Kingdom reign. The following respecting “Those Con­secrating between the Ages” is from That Servant’s writings in the Sept. 1, 1915 Watch Tower, Reprint 5761:

“It is our thought that with the closing of the ‘door’ of this Gospel Age there will be no more begetting of the Holy Spirit to the spirit nature. Any afterward coming to God through consecration, before the inauguration of the restitution work, will be accepted by Him, not to the spirit plane of being, but to the earthly plane. Such would come in under the same conditions as the Ancient Worthies who were accepted of God. The Ancient Worthies came in, no call being opened to them ─ the High Calling not being yet open. But they freely gave themselves up to God without knowing what blessings their consecration would bring, except that they had the intimation that they would, in the future life, have a ‘better resurrection’ than would the remainder of the world.

“Our thought is that whoever under such conditions as these [during the time when sin and evil are in the ascendancy, such as in this our day] will make a full consecration to the Lord, to leave all to follow in His ways, and will live up faithfully, loyally, to that consecration, may be privileged to be counted as a similar class to those who preceded this Gospel Age. We know of no reason why the Lord would refuse to receive those who make a consecration after the close of the Gospel Age High Calling and before the full opening of the Millennium."

And it is reasonable to expect a God of Love, Justice, Wisdom and Power to reward such consecrators above restitutionists ─ those who are faithful and obedient and walk a narrow way when sin and evil are in the ascendancy. The Epiphany Messenger accepted That Servant’s teaching, and was privileged to bring out additional light and much convincing Scriptural support for such a class; and we also “continue in what we have learned and been assured of,” and heartily believe that such consecrators between the Ages, after the “door is shut” and before opportunity for consecration for the non-elect, will, if faithful, be rewarded with the Ancient Worthies with a “better resurrection” and become “princes in all the earth.” (Psa. 45:16)

Like the Ancient Worthies, the Youthful Worthies are on trial for faith and obedience, and not for life, but they will be tested and proved worthy if they achieve their goal, the visible rulers of the Kingdom, under the invisible Kings and Priests of God (Rev. 20:6). “Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power, for he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.” (1 Cor. 15:24-26)

J. F. Rutherford taught in harmony with That Servant at the outset of his career, but later reversed himself. He later produced a class of his own imagination, calling them Jonadabs, which later became the “great Multitude.”

We believe that all the Lord’s people would be greatly benefited if they would take heed to That Servant’s admonitions and warning in the February 15, 1912 Watch Tower, Reprint 4970:

“The Lord’s followers are to note how these same temptations are the very ones by which the adversary assails them: (1) He would be their friend and helper and would thereby induce them to violate their covenant of sacrifice by requests for physical healing, physical blessings, which they have agreed to sacrifice. (2) He would suggest to them some wild, foolish way of capturing the world for God by some great exploits or prayer tests. (3) He would have them compromise with the world and its spirit and its methods of church federation and otherwise. We are to resist the adversary courageously that he may leave us permanently, seeing no hope of winning us.”

“Wherefore take unto you the whole armor of God that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness. Grace be with all them that love our Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity.” (Eph. 6:13, 14, 24)

(Brother John J. Hoefle, Reprint No. 449, November 1993)

____________________________________________________________________

TURNED INTO HELL

“The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.” —Psalms 9:17)

   This statement of the Lord recorded by the Psalmist, we find without any qualification whatever, and we must accept it as a positive fact.  If the claims of “Orthodoxy” were true this would be indeed a fearful thought.  Hell, to them, means a place of unmitigated woe, where untold millions of human beings writhe in anguish, tortured by literal fire or the gnawing of conscience, which, say some, is even worse.  Under this fearful sentence they see the vast majority of mankind hastening, as they believe, to their dreadful doom; yet feeble indeed are the efforts put forth to rescue them.  Babylon still has plenty of time for social enjoyment and festivity, which according to their belief should be spent in an almost frenzied endeavor to save the perishing.  And she still has plenty of money to spend in gratifying the pride of life and the lust of the eye which might be applied to the same purpose; but instead, witness her costly temples of fashion, her grand organs, her costly apparel, her contempt of the poor, her greed of gain and strife for worldly honors.

   But let us look at the true meaning of the word hell, into which God says, He will turn the wicked and forgetful nations.  We find that it is the translation of the Hebrew word Sheol, which simply means the state or condition of death.  There is not in it the remotest idea of either life or torment; and no scholar can by any manner of twisting or turning make it to mean anything else.  Suffering of any kind would be impos­sible where there is no consciousness, no life.  The Psalmist says, “In death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave [Sheol] who shall give thee thanks?” (6:5)  And again it is written: “Whatever thy hand  findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom in the grave [Sheol] whither thou goest.” (Eccl. 9:10)  The corr­esponding Greek word is Hades, which also means the state or condition of death, and no other can properly be attached to either. 

Every minister, unless he be very ignorant indeed, knows that this is true; and ignorance on this subject is in no wise excusable in these days when books are so plentiful and so cheap.  But still they go on preaching this false idea of hell, which is nothing short of a slander against the character of God, as though they were still enveloped in the ignorance of the dark ages.  This very text which we are now considering, is quoted and preached from over and over again by men who ought to know, and many of whom do know the true meaning of the Hebrew word sheol, and who nevertheless in their attempt to uphold the frightful doctrine of eternal torture, knowingly pervert this Scripture.

   Well, you inquire, how, then, did this idea first originate, and then obtain such universal acceptance?  We answer, that it originated with Papacy, and was a part of her scheme for raising money from her ignorant and deluded subjects.  Papacy taught that this place of torment was prepared for all who did not seek the protection of THE (Papal) Church.  All heretics were sure to go there; while those in THE Church not counted worthy of heaven, were permitted to tarry in purgatory, there to suffer reformatory punishment, which might be shortened and relieved by the liberality of their friends in securing the prayers of the priests.

   No other doctrine of the Romish Church ever did so much towards holding her captives in the bondage of fear, and increasing her revenues.  The Protestant Church in emerging from Romanism, rejected the doctrine of purgatory, but retained the worse doctrine of eternal torture in hell.  Though false, yet like Papacy, finding it to be such a powerful agent in binding her subjects, and exacting her revenues, she is loathe to part with it; and since reasoning and enlightened minds are beginning to question this dogma, her policy now is, to put the brakes on reason, and to hurl her anathemas against investigation.  If this bondage of fear were once broken, and God’s children relied entirely on His Word, these great systems of Babylon would soon dissolve.

   If we substitute the true meaning of the word Sheol, our text will read: “The wicked shall be turned into the condition of death, and all the nations that forget God.”  This we believe; but who are the wicked?  In one sense all men are wicked, in that all are violators of God’s law, but in its fullest sense the wicked are those who, with full knowledge of the exceeding sinfulness of sin and the remedy provided for their recovery, willfully persist in sin, and refuse the remedy.

   As yet few, only consecrated believers, have come to knowledge of God; the world knows Him not and the nations cannot forget God until they are first brought to knowledge of Him.  The consecrated have been enlightened, led of the Spirit through faith, to understand the deep and hidden things of God, which, though expressed in His Word, appear only as an idle tale and foolishness to the world, but which to the consecrated believer reveal the glory of God’s character.

   But, as we have hitherto seen, it will not be so in the age to come, for then “The earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea.” (Isa. 11:9)  Much that we now receive by faith will then be demonstrated to the world by sight.  When He who has ran­somed man from the power of the grave (Hos. 13:14) begins to gather His purchased possession back from the prison-house of death (Isa. 61:1); when the sleepers are awakened under the genial rays of the Sun of Righteousness, they will not be slow to realize the truth of the hitherto seemingly idle tale, that “Jesus Christ, by the grace of God, tasted death for every man.”

   We have also seen by previous investigation, that the gradual ascent of the King’s Highway of Holiness in that age will be easy and possible to all, when all the stones - stumbling blocks shall have been gathered out and straight paths made for their feet.  It is in that Age that this text applies.  Those who ignore the favoring circumstances of that Age, and will not be obedient to the righteous Judge or Ruler - Christ - will truly be the wicked.  And every loyal subject of the Kingdom of God will approve the righteous judgment which turns such a one again into Sheol - the condition of death.  Such a one would be unworthy of life, and were he permitted to live; his life would be a curse to himself and to the rest of mankind, and a blemish on the work of God.

   This will be the SECOND DEATH, from which there shall be no resurrection. After having been ransomed from the first or the Adamic death (Sheol) by the sacrifice of Christ, and then they die again on account of their own sin, “there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins.” (Heb. 10:26)  “Christ dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.” (Rom. 6:9)  This second death should be dreaded and shunned by all, since it is to be the final end of existence to all those deemed unworthy of life.  But in it there can be no suffering.  Like the first death, it is the extinction of life: in fact it would not be called a second, if it were not like the first.  The work of Christ is to destroy the Adamic death.     

    It is because mankind had, through sin, become subject to death (Sheol, Hades) that Christ Jesus came to deliver us and save us from death.  For this purpose Christ was manifested, that he might destroy death. (1 John 3:8; Heb. 2:14)  Death is a cessation of existence, the absence of LIFE. There is no difference between the condition in the first and second deaths, but there is hope of a release from the first, while from the second there will be no release, no return to life.  The first death sentence passed upon all on account of Adam’s sin, while the second death can be incurred only by willful individual sin, and can come only upon those who have first been released from the first death, either reckonedly or actually released.

   That this last proposition is true is evident, since a man cannot lose his life (die) twice, without having it restored once in the interim.  The world will in the next age have ex­is­­tence actually restored to them by resurrection, then, unless obedient to the favorable arrange­ments of that time, will merit and receive the second death, or death a second time.  (Compare Ezek. 18:2-4 and Jer. 31:29, 30)  During this Age only those can be liable to the second death, which first by faith in Christ have been justified and reckoned as free from the Adamic death.  These can become liable to the second death by sinning willfully, counting the blood of the covenant wherewith they were sanctified a common thing.

   But the application of our text belongs to the coming Age, when all shall be set free from Sheol or Hades, for saints and sinners all go into Sheol now, and this scripture indicates that, in the time when it applies, only the wicked shall go there.  And the nations that forget God must be nations that have known him, else they could not forget him; and never yet have the nations been brought to that knowledge, nor will they until the coming time, when the knowledge of the Lord shall fill the whole earth, and none shall need to say unto his neighbor, “Know thou the Lord,” for all shall know him from the least to the greatest of them. (Isa. 11:9; Jer. 31:34) Again, we find that the Hebrew word shub, which in our text is translated turned, signifies turned back, as to a place or condition where they once were.  They once were in Sheol, and were redeemed by the precious blood of Christ, and will be brought out of Sheol; but if then they are wicked, they, and all who forget God, shall be turned back to Sheol.

(Pastor Russell, Reprint 552, 553, November 1883)

____________________________________________________________________

LETTER OF GENERAL INTEREST

Dear Marjorie and all there in the Lord,

Warm greetings from the Sea of Galilee! And it is warm here with many of our days already hitting 100 degrees. So we had to say “Goodbye” to our lovely, long and green spring this year. Due to some good rains the Sea of Galilee did come up some, but not to a good level and now it has started to drop – sadly. So our summer is here! I pray you will all be protected in the hurricane season there.

Wow! This has been such a busy spring in Israel for tourists. I have been very busy until this last week. In May there were only two nights that I did not have guests for the Bed/Breakfast rooms. So I am now grateful for a couple of slow weeks before July guests come. I have had a lot of interesting and intense visitors from many countries. So it is nice to be able to share God’s plans for Israel with them in a world that becomes more anti-Israel all the time,

Well, there is a lot of talk of possible war here this summer, and many preparations as well. We seem to get more “unfriendly” neighbors (example Turkey now) all the time. So we have to trust the Lord Day by day! He has the best plans, and controls it all.

I am so thankful I was able to visit my sister in December last year as she died the last week of March. I am so thankful the Lord gave us one last good visit. We never know what is next.

Hope all is well with you and those there. Please give my greetings from Israel to all!

                                                                                            In His Love, Hava Bausch (ISRAEL)


NO. 638 THAT SERVANT - MATTHEW 24:45-47

by Epiphany Bible Students


Those of the Truth groups who came into the Truth during Brother Russell’s life were substantially of one mind before 1916 - and most emphatically so, that he alone was “That Servant” of Matt. 24:45-47; and this belief was so firmly entrenched among the various ecclesias that it is doubtful if any one of them would have elected an elder to his office who openly declared his disbelief on the matter. After his death a few ─ a very few (we know personally of only two) ─ said they never did believe he was That Servant; but they concealed their opinion so well that it closely approached hypocrisy. One outstanding example of such was Frederick H. Robison, one of the Tower Editors after the Fall of 1916. He then openly declared that he never did believe that Brother Russell or the Society could be “that Servant.” Yet, during the last years of Brother Russell’s life he was a regular resident at the Bible House and devoted his entire time to the Truth work. How long, think you, could he have remained there had he revealed himself then as he did after Brother Russell’s death? And how much reliance should any of us place in a character like that? Surely, we must regard him as a rank hypocrite, harsh though the word may seem.

But in the years that have followed all sorts of views have “sprouted” among Truth people ─ from one extreme to the other. Some hold he was That Servant in such an extreme degree that he gave all the Truth due here in the end of the Age, and that he was also the last saint to be on earth. Others, such as FHR mentioned above, deny he was That Servant in any sense of the word. And in between these two views we find many variations. However, our purpose here is mainly to consider those among us who do believe he was That Servant, but whose views on some important Bible subjects directly rule him out as such. In other words, if he was That Servant, then he self-evidently was “ruler over this household,” as he was also “ruler over all His goods.” These statements would mean that he dictated the policies without accepting supervision or curtailment from any other individual, or from any group of individuals; and that his teachings were in the overall sense the “due Truth” then. And, if those things were “due Truth” then, they would still be Truth now ─ making allowance, of course, for some minor discrepancies, some of which he himself corrected later in life.

Our established readers know of our firm belief that Brother Russell was “That Servant” in the exact words of the text; and believing such, it logically follows that we adhere closely to the general Truth structure which he gave the Household when he was with us. Of course, we realize there is some dispute about what he actually taught on a few items ─ such as tentative justification, the Epiphany and the Time of Trouble being identical, etc.; but those points we shall ignore in this presentation. Brother Russell himself taught that “the path of the just is as the shining light, that shineth more and more unto the perfect day” (Prov. 4:18); and he applied this to the individual life of each sincere believer, as well as to the entire Household. Even assuming there are no more saints on earth, it would still be logical to expect more “light,” as Rotherham’s translation of the text clearly reveals: “The path of the righteous is as the light of dawn, going on and brightening, unto meridian day.” Notice now the footnote: “the stable part of the day, when the sun seems motionless in mid-heaven.” “The Sun of Righteousness shall arise with healing in His wings.” (Mal. 4:2) From Rotherham’s translation and footnote, it is apparent that the rising of “The Sun of righteousness” is in exact proportion to the celestial sun in its rising and progress to high noon. Thus, early risers would see the sun’s rising first, while, others who might sleep to nine or ten in the morning would only see it when they arise, howbeit it would then be much brighter than at early dawn. All of us know that this has been the exact course of the Truth Movement, which forces us to accept one of two views: Either the Truth reached its full splendor in October 1916, when Brother Russell died, or it has continued to rise higher and higher, and will continue to do so until the “meridian day” ─ at high noon. And this will come only when “the knowledge of the Lord shall cover the earth, as the waters cover the sea.” Here is the Berean Comment on Isa. 11:9: “Earth shall be full ─ At the close of the Millennium. This is not true in the present time.” The “seventh trumpet” began to sound in 1874, and will continue to sound until the goats have all been destroyed at the full end of the Little Season.

From the foregoing, it should be clear enough not only that other enlightened teachers would follow after That Servant, but they will continue to appear unto the “meridian day” ─ at the close of the Millennium, as That Servant himself taught. However, we would say of him that he held the exclusive position of “the steward” here in the end of the Age ─ a position not occupied by any other individual since the days of the Apostles. But even in this last statement there must be some qualification, lest we be misunderstood. The “ruler over the household” (the twelve Apostles) at the beginning of the Gospel Age wrote by inspiration, and those writings were infallible; but this was definitely not the case with the “ruler over the household” here in the end of the Age.

All of us know that Brother Russell made some mistakes ─ permitted by the Lord, of course, for “the trial of your faith”; but those mistakes were few indeed when we consider the intricate and massive Truth structure he placed upon the table as the “meat in due season.” However, to offer some allowance for his mistakes, we would say that even the Apostles ─ at least one of them ─ also made serious mistakes, outstanding among them being St. Peter himself to whom the Lord had delivered “the keys of the Kingdom.” (Matt. 16:19) “When Cephas [Peter] came to Antioch, I [Paul] opposed him face to face, because he was blamable. For before certain persons came from James, he ate together with the Gentiles; but when they came he withdrew and separated himself, being afraid of those belonging to the circumcision... even Barnabas was led astray by their hypocrisy. (Gal. 2:11-13, Dia.) In this statement St. Paul openly accuses the one to whom had been committed “the keys of the kingdom” of temporary hypocrisy ─ a very serious charge indeed, and revealing a fault that was not chargeable to Brother Russell all during his ministry so far as we know.

Many of our readers are probably in full agreement with all of the foregoing, but there are also probably some of our readers who believe there was no special illumination during that portion of the Age that lies between the Apostles and That Servant. This likewise is an extreme position. It was Moses who led Israel from Egypt (type of the world in sin) to goodly Canaan land (type of the Heavenly garner); and in this he was certainly a type of those outstanding individuals during the Age who led spiritual Israel from antitypical Egypt to the Heavenly Canaan. Those brethren also held a high position in the Household; and St. Paul makes this quite clear in Eph. 4:11,12: “He gave some, apostles [the twelve]; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists [such as Timothy]; and some, pastors and teachers [local elders]... for the work of the ministry.” The “prophets” in this text are the same ones mentioned by St. Paul in 1 Cor. 12:28: “God hath set some in the Church, first apostles, secondarily prophets.”

In Eph. 2:20 the Apostle declares that the Church is “built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets.” And who are the “prophets” in this text? They are the same as mentioned in the two other texts ─ those who labored in word and doctrine in “the work of the ministry” to build the Church which is His Body. Being the very foundation stones, they must necessarily be a part of the building, which was not true of the Old Testament prophets. These latter have indeed taught the Gospel-Age Church through their writings; but none of them received the “better thing” which has been reserved exclusively for the Church of this Age. The Gospel-Age “prophets,” the foundations stones of the Temple, are the same as the “seven stars in His right hand” (Rev. 1:16), who were the special messengers (the Gospel-Age antitype of Moses) who were given the special messages to the seven churches of Revelation 2 and 3 ─ of which “stars” Brother Russell was but one ─ as he also was one of the “eight principal men” of the “seven shepherds” of Micah 5:5. The “seven shepherds” in this text are the same as the “seven stars” of Revelation, and are the same as the “prophets” mentioned by St. Paul in his writings quoted foregoing.

EZEKIEL NINE

During Brother Russell’s life those brethren that regarded him exclusively as That Servant also regarded him as the only one included in the “man with the writer’s inkhorn” in Ezek. 9:2,11. There is a certain logic in all Bible presentations that provides a symmetry and harmony which should never be ignored. In Ezek. 9:1,2, six other men are mentioned, “every man with his destroying weapon in his hand”; but of the seven mentioned only one is said to be “clothed with linen”; and “fine linen is the righteousness of the saints.” (Rev. 19:8) The one “clothed with linen” was to “set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and cry in the city for all the abominations that be done in the midst thereof.” (Ezek 9:4) Surely, none of us would contend that Brother Russell alone did all of this work, although he did considerably more than any other individual. Nor were the men with the “slaughter weapons” in their hands individuals. These six were the Harvest sifters; and no individual monopolized the sifting errors of anyone of the six siftings that occurred after 1874. Thus, consistency would force us to conclude that the man “clothed with linen” was more than one individual. It is true that Brother Russell did put the ink into the horn; he provided the “sharp sickle” of Rev. 14:14,15 (Present Truth ─ see Berean Comment) that enabled all the reapers to do the Harvest work.

History is not too profuse about many of the “stars” that came after the Apostles, but a sentence or two here and there is sufficient to give us a foundation for the belief in their spiritual insight. As instance, Arius: the record says of him that he “was a man of clear intellect.” And this he well must have been, when we consider the pompous assembly of bishops that congregated at Nice in 325, with only two of that illustrious multitude aligned with him. Yet his arguments that there is but one God were so prevailing and unanswerable that Emperor Constantine concluded that the best way to silence that man was to banish him from the Roman Empire. But even that did not silence him, because he went over into North Africa, where he died after eleven years, leaving a thriving group of "Arians" as his testimonial to the Truth he had loved so well.

And similar conclusion may be made of many others; for instance, Polycarp, Marsiglio, Wessel, Luther, Zwingli, Servetus, Cranmer, Wesley, Miller, et al. Well did the text apply to them: “Sons of God, without rebuke... ye shine as lights in the world.” (Phil. 2:15) The Diaglott states it even more forcefully: “Irreproachable children of God, in the midst of a crooked and misguided generation, among whom you appear as luminaries in the world.” The footnote on this text says that the Greek phosteeres is the name given to the sun and the moon in the Septuagint; and this was certainly a fitting description of those “stars” that led spiritual Israel all during the Gospel Age. Thus, while Brother Russell outshone many of them, he was by no means the only “luminary” that gave a “good and faithful” account of his stewardship.

OBVIOUS CONCLUSIONS

As stated above, among those brethren that contend Brother Russell was That Servant, there are some ─ quite a few, in fact ─ that belie their own statements in that they reject so many prominent and essential truths he gave. For instance, some contend that the Second Advent of Jesus has not yet occurred. If that be true, then the Harvest is yet future, because the Chief Reaper is the one who would provide the “sharp sickle” with which to do the reaping work. And note the logical sequence in the pertinent Scripture: “From this time blessed are those dead who die in the Lord... they may rest from their labors; for their works follow after them [as they experience their part in the First Resurrection, and are joined in the Marriage to the Lamb]... And behold! a white cloud, and on the cloud one sitting like a Son of Man [this occurred after the First Resurrection had begun], having on His head a golden crown [authority to rule], and in His hand a sharp sickle... And another angel came forth out of the temple, crying with a loud voice ‘Send thy sickle and reap; because the hour to reap is come.” (Rev. 14:13-15, Dia.)

And Brother Russell applied this prophecy to his own activity from 1878 until he died in 1916. Thus, if he was That Servant, he instigated and supervised the reaping, put the ink into the inkhorn, and gave “the present Truth”; otherwise, we must catalog him as a rank fraud, with perhaps the most erroneous message ever presented in such a short time during the entire Age.

Also, he correctly predicted the outbreak of the World War in 1914, which began the desolation of Christendom ─ just as Jeremiah predicted the desolation of Israel during the Babylonian captivity. And in this he clearly antityped Jer. 1:5: “I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.” Those who remember conditions back in 1914 know the prediction of a world conflict seemed certain to fall in derision before all, because everything was serene and calm, exceptionally so ─ with just no indication whatever that in one short 24-hour day the roof would fall in on Christendom. The Archduke of Austria was driving peacefully along in a carriage in Sarajevo (now Bosnia-Herzegovina), when he and his wife were assassinated; and this precipitated the World War in a matter of hours thereafter. So violent was the disturbance that the New York Stock Exchange closed for many months, so that no one could buy or sell even here in America where we were not yet directly involved in the conflict. But that event brought admission from some of Brother Russell’s erstwhile critics that he was indeed “the prophet unto the nations.”

A PERTINENT STATEMENT

Lest we appear to stress this situation overly much, we now offer a quotation from Volume 2, p. 28, The Time is at Hand, the same having been first presented to the public in 1889 ─ 25 years before the world uproar began:

“It is a grave error into which many fall, to suppose a knowledge of God’s doings and plans is of little importance, the graces of Christian character are all God requires, and these are better conserved by ignorance. How differently the Scriptures present the matter! They counsel not only to cultivate the graces of the Christian character, but to preserve constantly the condition of heart that will enable us to discern the truth, especially the Truth of the Lord’s presence when due, and when dispensational changes take place. A knowledge of dispen­sational truth is as important in the end of this Age as in the end of the Jewish Age. Those who did not discern the truth then due did not receive the favors then due. So in the end of this Age: Those who cannot discern the truth now due, blinded by unbelief and worldliness, cannot receive special favors now due. They are not overcomers, and hence not fit to be the bride of Christ, and to enter into the glorious inheritance of the saints as joint-heirs with Him. Truth, in this Age, under adverse conditions for its reception, becomes a test of our faithfulness to God, and hence as a sickle separates the fit from the unfit, the wheat from the tares.

“Odium attaches to the study of prophetic time through past misapplications of it by the Second Adventists and others, and the con­sequent failures to realize the events expected to occur at set times. But we see that even this is a part of God’s plan to obscure the subject to all but the class for whom it was intended, by permitting contempt and ridicule to attach to it, hindering the worldly-wise and prudent from grasping it (Matt. 11:25). This, we doubt not, was as much a part of the Divine Plan as sending Jesus into Nazareth, a despised place “that He might be called a Nazarene” (Matt. 2:23), though He was born in the honorable town of Bethlehem. As the worldly-wise and prudent of that day said, Can any good thing come out of Nazareth? so today, when prophetic time or anything relating to Jesus’ advent is mentioned, many cry Adventist, as if to say, Can any good thing come out of Adventism? though they admit that many prophecies containing time are not yet fulfilled, and that the second coming of the Lord is the most prominent topic of Scripture.”

Recently we heard a brother offer an excellent oration on this subject, in which he stressed the Scripture, “It is contained in the Scripture, Behold, I place in Zion a foundation-corner stone, chosen, honorable: and he who confides in it shall not be ashamed. The honor therefore is for the believers: but to the dis­believing, this stone which the builders rejected, was made into the head of a corner ─ even a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense... to both the houses of Israel. (1 Pet. 2:6-8, Dia.: Isa 8:14) And what is the “stone of stumbling”? Is it not the recognition of the Messiah, and the time concerning His presence. Indeed, the accusation was flung at the Jews: “The days will come on thee, when thine enemies shall throw a rampart around thee... and lay thee level with the ground... because thou didst not know the season of thy visitation. (Luke 19:43,44, Dia.) Thus it was the presence of the Lord Jesus, and the accompanying works, that was “the stone of stumbling” for the Jews at that time.

Consequently, the sharp criticism of Jesus: “If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin ─ but now they have no excuse for their sin.” (John 15:22-24) And further in Luke 7:19-23, Dia.: “And summoning two of his disciples, John sent to the Lord, saying, ‘Art thou the coming one? or are we to expect another?’ And having come to Him, the men said, ‘John, the Immerser, sent us to thee, saying, ‘Art thou the coming one? or are we to expect another?’... And Jesus answering, said to them, ‘Go, tell John what you have seen and heard: the blind are made to see, the lame to walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, glad tidings are announced to the poor; and happy is he who shall not stumble at Me.’” But most of the Jews were “slow of heart”; their hearts had waxed fat; their eyes and ears they had closed ─ they did “stumble”; and they reaped the consequent destruction at the hands of the Roman army under Titus.

Much the same condition exists today with many who claim to have the faith of their fathers, blinded also at least partially to the mission and works of That Servant. He it was who clearly defined the ten cardinal doctrines of the Bible, and coordinated them with each other. This he did as no other man before him had ever done. Further, he examined the various stew­ardship doctrines of the “stars” who had preceded him, cleansed them of their flaws, polished them as no other man had ever before done. For example, the stewardship doctrine of Martin Luther was “Justification by faith”; but That Servant defined Justification in all its various details much more effectively and clearly than Martin Luther himself had done. This he did likewise with the doctrines of the Second Advent, of Baptism, of the Lord’s Supper, of the elective and restitution sal­vations, the condition of the dead, the true meaning of the soul, etc. All of these he made crystal clear, and harmonized them with each other. Thus, it could truly be said of him that he had done among us “the works which none other man did.” And he, too, became “a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense” to Big Babylon during the small Parousia Day: and he is now the same “stone of stumbling” to many.

“In the time of the end knowledge shall be increased.” (Dan. 12:4) The great increase of knowledge was first of all spiritual, having its beginning about 1870. And the Scripture clearly states that That Servant would be dispensing the “meat in due season” when “his Lord cometh. Therefore, when we would observe the offering of the “meat in due season,” it would give us absolute proof that the Lord had also come. It is as clear as the noonday sun. But, of those who cannot discern this evident truth, it is written of them, “Our lamps are gone out” ─ they have lost the spirit of understanding. Note the Berean Comment on Matt. 25:3.

Nor was it long after the appearance of the spiritual truth until secular truth began to come forth ─ in keeping with the prophecy, “Truth shall spring out of the earth [the present social order].” (Psa. 85:11) A little reflection will give ample substantiation: At the end of the Civil War in 1865 there wasn’t a telephone in the United States (or anywhere else in the world); no radio, no television, no automobiles, no typewriters. The United   States was then largely an agricultural country, and the people were forced to provide their own entertainment, such as it might be. A favorite mode of travel was horseback or carriage; with oil lamps to give light to all rural homes. The first practical typewriter came in 1874, with the electric light some years after that. It is stated by some that the electric light has been the most beneficial invention for mankind in all history, and we would certainly not quarrel with that. But it also came after the Lord had come ─ a sound secular evidence that the Lord had indeed come. After the Civil War the people were still harvesting their wheat, barley, etc., with sickles and scythes; it required a very good team of horses to plow and prepare two acres of land for planting in one day ─ a dawn-to-dusk day, not an eight-hour day. Today it is ordinary procedure for a large tractor to prepare and plant 75 acres in one day. “Knowledge shall be increased,” and only the spiritually blind cannot read the signs of the times in such things.

The desolation of Israel began in the fall of 607 B.C, and is paralleled by the beginning of the desolation of Christendom in 1914. Thus, we may logically look for parallel happenings in both “houses of Israel.” Today the youth are calling many of the turns in our social order; 18-year-olds are now given the vote. They are also intimidating their teachers in many parts of the country ─ so much so that the teachers are afraid to correct or discipline them for fear of the knife, the club, or the gas pipe after school. Note the charge against Jewry about 100 years before Jerusalem was leveled: “As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them.” (Isa. 3:12) All of us have recognized that there is always bedlam in any home where the children run riot without correction. All of these things and many more, are but the “signs” that point to the second presence of Jesus.

SITTING IN MOSES’ SEAT

Just before His death, Jesus said: “The Scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat.” (Matt. 23:2) The full significance of this is not discerned until we understand the custom in those days, which was just the reverse of what we have today. At that time the speaker, or teacher, sat, as the audience or pupils stood. This was so pronounced then that in the Talmud “to sit” is synonymous with “to teach.” This custom comes down to the present in the form of, “So and So occupies the History Chair at Harvard.”

An instance of this is Matt. 5:1: “When He was set, His disciples came unto Him. And He opened His mouth, and taught them.” Therefore, when Jesus said that those Jewish leaders sat in the seat of Moses, He meant that they occupied the teaching position in Israel. This is further confirmed in John 18:13,14: “They led Him away to Annas first, for he was father in law to Caiaphas, which was the high priest that same year. Now Caiaphas was he, which gave counsel to the Jews, that it was expedient that one man should die for the people.” Note now the Berean Comment on verse 13: "Was the high priest... And, therefore, until the rejection of the Jewish House, was to a certain extent God’s mouth­piece.”

That same condition would also apply here in the end of the Age. “Babylon hath been a golden cup [the golden cup being the Divine Truth] in the Lord’s hand.” (Jer. 51:7) But she was rejected from such position in 1881, until today there is no semblance of God’s mouth­piece at all in Big Babylon. Thus, we must look elsewhere for the counterpart of those Scribes and Pharisees of Jesus’ day; and it doesn't require much insight to find them in Little Babylon ─ the outstanding example being Jehovah’s Witnesses. Are they not telling the world that they are the only gate to salvation? And, in their attempt to construct a tower (gateway) to Heaven, have they not had their tongues sadly confused ─ a “Babel” of most repellent sort? Let us note once more that Moses was a type of the Star Members of this Age, of which That Servant was a most prominent one. But the Witnesses now claim succession to him as mouthpiece to Christendom ─ to take up where he left off; they claim the teaching position to Christendom. Therefore, they, by their own admission, do claim to sit in the seat of antitypical Moses.

During the Age the Roman Church soon learned that they could tell their adherents most any weird yarn, and they would believe it. In fact, if they did not believe it, they were not “good Catholics.” The Witnesses have followed in exact pattern: their adherents must also believe just what they teach. If anyone in their midst persists in asking questions that may appear to contradict what is published in their Watch Tower, it will not be long until he is disfellowshiped after which the “faithful” are instructed not even to speak to him if they see him on the street.

It thus becomes pertinent here to offer some more from Parousia Vol. 2, pp. 29-31:”We have great sympathy for the First Adventists, the Jews, and the Second Adventists, though only a few of either realized the truths they so nearly apprehended, yet failed to grasp, blinded by false expectations. Our Adventist friends have failed to recognize both the manner and the object of the Lord’s return as taught in the Scriptures; consequently, they have not been expecting to see Him as He is, but as He was. They consider the object of His coming one which will fill the hearts of all except the saints with dismay and terror; that His object is to gather the elect, destroy all others of mankind, and burn up the world. Having such ideas, they used time prophecy as a whip to scourge and drive the world to God [as the Witnesses are now also doing through the threat of destruction in Armageddon]... God provided time prophecies for no such purpose, nor will He attempt to convert the world in any such way; for He seeketh such to worship Him as worship in spirit and in truth (John 4:23), and not such as are frightened into His service. [Here is a direct contradiction to the technique of the Witnesses, as they claim to “sit in Moses’ seat” as successors to That Servant]. If He designs to terrorize men into obedience, He could have devised some more successful method than the proclamation of time, as our Adventist friends have proved.

“Prophetic time was given, not to alarm the world, nor for the world in any sense, but to strengthen, comfort, encourage and guide the Church in the troublous times in the end of the Age. Therefore, it is written, ‘None of the wicked [the world in general] shall understand, but the wise only [those who have accepted the Wisdom from above].’ (Dan. 12:10) To these this becomes meat in due season [the faithful and wise servant was to “give them meat in due season”], and it, with other meat, strengthens those who use it, so that they may be able to stand in the evil day [in which we now find ourselves], the day of trouble with which this Age closes. It will enable them to understand the events transpiring around them, so that they will not be consumed by fear and dread [by the threat of Hell Fire, or Armageddon blood bath], not swallowed up by the projects and false theories, science falsely so-called, with which this day abounds. And, withal, they may be in the devouring fire (trouble), witnesses for God and His plan, and teachers of the people ─ pointers to the outcome of Jehovah’s plan, lifting up a standard for the people (Isa. 62:10).”

In the above quotation from That Servant it is clearly discernible that he taught as long as sin and evil are in the ascendancy ─ and no one in sound mind will dispute that fact ─ the “call” is not for the world in general. Only the “elect” who make the promises their own are able to stand trial for life now, in faith and obedience. But the Witnesses set aside that logical teaching, and tell the world they MUST accept them and their present system of error, or die in Armageddon, with no hope of a resurrection. And why do they teach such? Because they have had their chance, they say. To those who cannot accept their teachings now in “this present evil world” they offer no hope for any kind of future life. Thus, they preach the Kingdom, but without the “glad tidings of great joy which shall be to all people. Not even their own “dedicated” devotees can have “fullness of joy” in this teaching, because many of their own dear friends and relatives are not joining with them, and will, they apparently believe, subsequently suffer annihilation.

Just a little reflection should reveal how ridiculous their present position is. They themselves admit their imperfections, their fallibility and monstrous mistakes of the past (such as Millions Now Living Will Never Die, the return of the Ancient Worthies by 1925, etc.). “When thy judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants of the world will learn right­eousness” (Isa. 26:9); and they will not learn it from fallible teachers who are not themselves certain of many of their teachings (such as the chronology, etc.), but they will learn it from perfect teachers, who will be “princes in all the earth.” “Out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.” (Isa. 2:3)

As That Servant has so well taught, the Truth is not for the world now, though there are many good and honorable people who have a measure of appreciation for the “good tidings” ─ the gospel, the good news ─ but do not accept it in the full sense. They are not of the “many that are called.” but are measurably blinded by “the god of this world.” (2 Cor. 4:4) And certainly a blind man cannot be faulted justly if he stubs his toe against a stone. “I desired mercy [not condemnation for those who cannot compre­hend], and not sacrifice [feverish efforts on street corners ─ a “zeal not according to knowledge”], and the knowledge of God [the true understanding of the great Plan of the Ages as it was explained by That Servant] more than burnt offerings.” (Hosea 6:6)

“There is none so blind as he who will not see” ─ but this does not apply to the fully faithful who “continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them.” (2 Tim. 3:14) They do this from a “good and honest heart” and can readily discern between Truth and Error, thereby continue to “grow in Grace and in the Knowledge” of our Beloved Lord. “Light [truth] is sown for the righteous [the consecrated], and gladness [the joys of the truth] for the upright in heart [for the fully faithful].” (Psa. 97:11)

(Brother John J. Hoefle, No. 504, April 1999)